Pages:
Author

Topic: Is it possible to do this? (Read 1217 times)

member
Activity: 490
Merit: 10
April 03, 2019, 12:17:14 PM
You know that you are speaking about the third party that would control everybody here right? This could be a great way of how to protect investors from scam projects and ICOs from fraud participants, but the anonymity will get lost forever.
copper member
Activity: 349
Merit: 0
📱 CARTESI 📱 INFRASTRUCTURE FOR DAP
April 03, 2019, 11:02:11 AM
That would be a very good one as it will help to curb all this scam ICO and also save investors funds and save hunters the stress of working without payment
jr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 1
March 31, 2019, 05:33:43 PM
Dear forum participants, I think it's time to introduce restrictions on the ICO. The reason for my proposal was a huge number of fraudulent projects that are hiding with investors' finances, don't pay bounties compensation when the desired amount is reached, etc. I propose to create a verification system that will become an intermediary between the investor and the ICO.
Do you want it to be create or you want to create it yourself?
I think whoever want to do tat, should start from somewhere. Perhaps by identifying scam ICOs  and reporting them on this forum. That in a way, you can build some trusts in the heart of people, so that when your platform is created, it will not be a problem.
member
Activity: 712
Merit: 15
February 18, 2019, 05:49:20 AM
I really like your idea of an intermediary between investors and ICOs but I don't think it will be credible expect we have some regulations. The only way to get a credible intermediary is to get the government to create such an intermediary, because individuals can manipulate it but government will make a trustworthy agency for such. That's why I still feel we need a lot of regulations before cryptocurrency attains it full potential.
member
Activity: 378
Merit: 10
February 18, 2019, 03:57:00 AM
With the rules made, it certainly can make both parties mutually beneficial, so the existence of a legitimate project, the fraud project will disappear by itself. This can be a positive impact on further ICO development.
sr. member
Activity: 658
Merit: 250
February 18, 2019, 03:40:57 AM
Restriction is good for the future of cryptocurrency project. It will be able to act as a guaranty for any investors or bounty participant that the project is a legit one. People don't need to be worried anymore cause any new project already been legally registered as a legit project.
hero member
Activity: 2520
Merit: 952
February 17, 2019, 11:24:02 PM
Regulations are already coming for ICOs and for cryptocurrencies in general, although not all countries have started yet but surely progress is being made. So scammy ICO will fade away little by little.
full member
Activity: 448
Merit: 100
February 17, 2019, 10:29:12 PM
Dear forum participants, I think it's time to introduce restrictions on the ICO. The reason for my proposal was a huge number of fraudulent projects that are hiding with investors' finances, don't pay bounties compensation when the desired amount is reached, etc. I propose to create a verification system that will become an intermediary between the investor and the ICO.
This is necessary for investors, that is us, but who wants to take on such a burden? I think no one, which means everything will remain as it is, and the scammers are becoming more literate, gained experience and began to deceive us better
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1145
February 17, 2019, 06:21:47 PM
It has been done a long time ago, actually ICO is good through Escrow. but now there are too many ICOs that don't use escrow. so investors must accept the situation when their money is lost. now the ICO is bigger on scam. so that most investors have lost trust. so choosing a good ICO is difficult. even though data verification. it cannot guarantee that ICO is successful.
sr. member
Activity: 533
Merit: 250
February 17, 2019, 06:01:48 PM
It is quite a little bit same thoughts of STO. I think STO will be introduced more and people will only invest on STO coins only. ICO are these days no more trusted because of their fraudness. I personally didn't invest in any ICO since the last of 2017.

The current STO projects are not many, because most projects want a lot of conditions to be able to STO. Therefore ICO is still an option for most projects
full member
Activity: 588
Merit: 100
February 17, 2019, 02:50:18 AM
It is quite a little bit same thoughts of STO. I think STO will be introduced more and people will only invest on STO coins only. ICO are these days no more trusted because of their fraudness. I personally didn't invest in any ICO since the last of 2017.
i think investing in any ico now quite risky for us.its didnt profitable anymore, only less projects tat able to keep their price stable in market, and another project failed
sr. member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 322
February 17, 2019, 02:26:50 AM
It is quite a little bit same thoughts of STO. I think STO will be introduced more and people will only invest on STO coins only. ICO are these days no more trusted because of their fraudness. I personally didn't invest in any ICO since the last of 2017.
member
Activity: 630
Merit: 13
February 17, 2019, 02:05:13 AM
i think is a must, something must be made for controlling and regulated where is the real ico project and where is the fake one..
member
Activity: 462
Merit: 13
February 17, 2019, 01:13:39 AM
Yeah that will be nice but I think most of the victims of these fraudulent project are one way or the other responsible for their own actions. I sometimes even don't get it. They know nothing about  the project and they invest and most are also not willing to learn. Lets try to open our eyes and minds.
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
February 17, 2019, 01:01:18 AM
Responsibility of project developers is still too few and mostly, almost risk will belong to investors. This form will be also eliminated afterwards


I think all developers are responsible, it's just that there are some people who abuse their responsibilities, this makes the project difficult to succeed. Sometimes temptation is stronger than responsibility, so whatever it is we have to be able to understand and see the developer with its performance. For verification, I see that there have been many projects that have carried out verification, and this will be an important part of the ICO.
full member
Activity: 891
Merit: 100
Oikos.cash | Decentralized Finance on Tron
February 17, 2019, 12:44:43 AM
Responsibility of project developers is still too few and mostly, almost risk will belong to investors. This form will be also eliminated afterwards
Why do you think developer responsibility is low now? it all depends on what country the project is being done. if it is the United States then all the responsibility on the developers. And if they do not fulfill their promises to investors, then they can go to prison
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 14
Bcnex - The Ultimate Blockchain Trading Platform
February 17, 2019, 12:16:27 AM
Responsibility of project developers is still too few and mostly, almost risk will belong to investors. This form will be also eliminated afterwards
jr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 2
February 16, 2019, 07:11:21 PM
indeed, it's time for ico to start doing such restrictions in order to avoid fraud. or at least compensation for participants or investors when ico fails or does not meet the target. because all this time, ico will only disappear without responsibility.
jr. member
Activity: 169
Merit: 1
February 13, 2019, 05:27:40 PM
This has been the suggestion of many these days. Honestly, it should be looked into. Sometimes, I just wonder if all these ICO fall from the sky. The scam associated with it is much now.
member
Activity: 350
Merit: 10
February 13, 2019, 12:41:25 PM
A lot of such projects have been created but none of them has coped with the task. I really want to see such a project. Since there is a lot of scam on the ICO market.
Pages:
Jump to: