Topic: Is it possible to do this? - page 5. (Read 1183 times)
I think it is a good idea. But it will not be possible on this year. Because the sec will take some steps to do this. But hoping it will be approve, because it can filter out scam ico and even scam people.
Dear forum participants, I think it's time to introduce restrictions on the ICO. The reason for my proposal was a huge number of fraudulent projects that are hiding with investors' finances, don't pay bounties compensation when the desired amount is reached, etc. I propose to create a verification system that will become an intermediary between the investor and the ICO.
This kind of verification system is tough to implement. Even if the eth platform is trying to have this in place, still there's more than meets the eye here.
If a regulatory system is introduced, my concern us that, will it be able to compel all projects to comply.
Also, this is a decentralized system, will regulation really work.
I think sometimes ago, ethereum network was trying to bring up a new development, where every ICO that uses its can be restricted from scamming the investors, by giving them the opportunity of being able to withdraw their money, peradventure scam is perceived.
Also, this is a decentralized system, will regulation really work.
I think sometimes ago, ethereum network was trying to bring up a new development, where every ICO that uses its can be restricted from scamming the investors, by giving them the opportunity of being able to withdraw their money, peradventure scam is perceived.
I think that is one way of beating these scammers, the opportunity to withdraw your money whenever there is a proof of heading them to be a crap one.
If a regulatory system is introduced, my concern us that, will it be able to compel all projects to comply.
Also, this is a decentralized system, will regulation really work.
I think sometimes ago, ethereum network was trying to bring up a new development, where every ICO that uses its can be restricted from scamming the investors, by giving them the opportunity of being able to withdraw their money, peradventure scam is perceived.
Also, this is a decentralized system, will regulation really work.
I think sometimes ago, ethereum network was trying to bring up a new development, where every ICO that uses its can be restricted from scamming the investors, by giving them the opportunity of being able to withdraw their money, peradventure scam is perceived.
It's possible to make such system. But no one project will use it so there is no sense to make it. I think we need to wait until official announcement from SEC that crypto is absolutely legit.
It seems to me that it is necessary to introduce not restrictions, but regulation of ICO, so that we can achieve great results!
I think full regulation can bring complete decentralization to the market that we don't need , but I think the creators of the ico should be responsible Dear forum participants, I think it's time to introduce restrictions on the ICO. The reason for my proposal was a huge number of fraudulent projects that are hiding with investors' finances, don't pay bounties compensation when the desired amount is reached, etc. I propose to create a verification system that will become an intermediary between the investor and the ICO.
I agree with you on these
But restricting icos to prevent fraud is not an individual task
It requires each government to take a legal step by requiring the details of deva before launched
But how do you intend to become the intermediary??
Your suggestion is fantastic but regulation in an open system has been a problem and will continue to be for a long time to come. But nothing real urgent need to be done to curb the fraudulent activities going on in the crypto-currency ecosystem
I think also that it is time. Because the investors and also the bounty hunters has already suffered enough. They participate on a worthless project that is also even a scam one.
I believe to make that kind of restriction fro crypto market, would need the country to take part in this cyrpto market.
But since these days there are still a little part of the country that already aware and understand about crypto market, then it could be a bit difficult to makes those kind of restrictions.
But since these days there are still a little part of the country that already aware and understand about crypto market, then it could be a bit difficult to makes those kind of restrictions.
that would be good, but I think it would be difficult, because all of us here don't know the exact procedure we have to do to report to the ico team that did the scam.
Dear forum participants, I think it's time to introduce restrictions on the ICO. The reason for my proposal was a huge number of fraudulent projects that are hiding with investors' finances, don't pay bounties compensation when the desired amount is reached, etc. I propose to create a verification system that will become an intermediary between the investor and the ICO.
You got a point in there. Scam projects and ICOs are turning up every now and then and it is unfortunate to be a victim of it. That is why I think that putting restrictions and at least regulating these ICOs would somehow minimize if not eliminate scam ICOs. It's time that these activities will be stopped.
It seems to me that it is necessary to introduce not restrictions, but regulation of ICO, so that we can achieve great results!
Dear forum participants, I think it's time to introduce restrictions on the ICO. The reason for my proposal was a huge number of fraudulent projects that are hiding with investors' finances, don't pay bounties compensation when the desired amount is reached, etc. I propose to create a verification system that will become an intermediary between the investor and the ICO.
i think there should be bounty smart contract or bounty distribution function in ico smart contract or something like that, this way icos can't cheat anyone, smart contract will payout automatically to bounty participants. people also should really start using platform like wings. I really like this idea
Dear forum participants, I think it's time to introduce restrictions on the ICO. The reason for my proposal was a huge number of fraudulent projects that are hiding with investors' finances, don't pay bounties compensation when the desired amount is reached, etc. I propose to create a verification system that will become an intermediary between the investor and the ICO.
intermediate means what? Going to act like an escrow for the funds then how you can be trusted it is also same like the banking centralized money system.
We definitely need a verification system preferably a global one and not an over complicated one which would kill the legit businesses.
Dear forum participants, I think it's time to introduce restrictions on the ICO. The reason for my proposal was a huge number of fraudulent projects that are hiding with investors' finances, don't pay bounties compensation when the desired amount is reached, etc. I propose to create a verification system that will become an intermediary between the investor and the ICO.
I totally agree with you. Today there are too many ICOs projects. And it seems impossible to know what is a good project and what is a scam project.
Scam projects are too many. Bounty hunters are exploited and become referrals it to everyone. This makes more and more people fooled. There must be something to protect investors and bounty hunters from this.
Dear forum participants, I think it's time to introduce restrictions on the ICO. The reason for my proposal was a huge number of fraudulent projects that are hiding with investors' finances, don't pay bounties compensation when the desired amount is reached, etc. I propose to create a verification system that will become an intermediary between the investor and the ICO.
Regulation is indeed needed to control the possibilities of any scam project who are just trying to steal the investors money and deceiving the bounty participant. But until today that kind of regulation is still not fully available to controll that.
between the investor and the ICO is indeed most do not have a connecting bridge. This is going to be quite important for the sake of the success and smooth running of a project. with the existence of a verification system will make the project into a narrow space of fraud in the ICO which is pretty much the case.
Dear forum participants, I think it's time to introduce restrictions on the ICO. The reason for my proposal was a huge number of fraudulent projects that are hiding with investors' finances, don't pay bounties compensation when the desired amount is reached, etc. I propose to create a verification system that will become an intermediary between the investor and the ICO.
Yes, but for the team. They have to be transparent because they want our money which we should invest. If they are not hiding anything and are required to be responsible for a scam they will care to avoid scam and be honest. If not they have to held responsible for fraud. Dear forum participants, I think it's time to introduce restrictions on the ICO. The reason for my proposal was a huge number of fraudulent projects that are hiding with investors' finances, don't pay bounties compensation when the desired amount is reached, etc. I propose to create a verification system that will become an intermediary between the investor and the ICO.
I am agree that too many scam ICOs this year. Many investor losing their money and there is no way back. I am thinking that government regulation needed to regulate new ICOs. Government should take an action to protect their people investment
Jump to: