Topic: Is rank of bounty manager is really matters? - page 17. (Read 1741 times)
You shouldnt rely to the ranks here,because i know some legendary accounts that arent going to pay your efforts,because they are going to get your stakes giving you pennies at the end of the campaign.You should consider most of the things before deciding to participate,whitepaper,team,product,vision,online presence,hype ,partners,so on and so forth.
I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
Own analysis of the project is much more important than the rating of the manager's bounty. With respect to crypto currencies, it is better to trust only to yourself, no one else. Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
Of course it is very important, the higher the rank the higher their experience in this Crypto world, and it certainly affects the success of a project. it is difficult for us to know the project will be successful or not, but at least if the project manager is already famous then there is hope for us to the success of the project.
As long as i cam going to get paid,the manager's rank wont be a problem it doesnt matter because if the manager has high rank which would be a potential scam it would be worthless,i would choose newbie manager as long as we are going to get paid,that is my logic that is why i am finding quality campaigns regardless the rank of the manager,
this is a very important component of the bounty's company, the higher is the rank the better the chances that you will not be deceived and begin earn
I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
For me ,the rank wont matter if the campaign is legit because not every new campaign can have legendary accounts here as you can see the merit system fucked up the whole ranking system,rely to the credibility of the ICO thru researching,not thru the rank of the campaign manager because some of these high ranks arent going to pay your efforts,greedy people will always be greedy. Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
Doesnt matter for me,because i am doing my own researchng before joining these ICOs,so that i would know if the project might turn into scam or has potentials to scam investors,high rank managers sometimes arent going to pay your efforts which is why it doesnt guarantee your rewards,doesnt matter the rank as long as the account is from the legit team of the ICO.
Doesnt matter as long as these manager arent going to steal the hunter's rewards,having legendary accounts wont give you guarantee that you will receive your rewards because some of these high ranks arent going to pay you regardless the outcome of the ICO is,that is why we should be following good managers which doesnt have accusations or bad records so we can expect more!
I think the older the rank of Manager bounty runs the company, the longer he's involved, and that also means he has to be more experienced than the younger members. But I also think that sometimes they create new accounts to participate in bounty companies.
I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
I believe no. There are many bounties that are managed by newbies or junior members. These bounties commonly are managed by themselves or the project team itself. They do not hire any outside manager. I had experience witn this and turn out to be good project,
I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
The manager can be of low rank if the account is created by the developers of the project.
As a rule, bounty managers with a good reputation do not risk undertaking bounty campaigns of questionable projects. I try to participate only with trusted managers.
Nope,ranks doesnt matter if the maanager are corrupted and known from stealing people's stakes that is why i am doing my own research before joining th e bounty,or atleast joining a new manager because i dont want to waste my time and effort doing bounties from these scammers,we need to consider a lot of things so that we are going to get paid.
obviously Yes.at least for me it is incredibly important I always pay attention to it because I want to participate in the bounty of only a good project
I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
they may see from the profiles or recommendations of other seniors about the person's ability to be trusted to be a manager. manager I think only to divide the stake only and the most important is the team that is in it. it's a bit of a view from me. Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
certainly!after all, the bounty Manager is generally a person of the entire project rather that face the bounty project.I think it is always necessary to know who the Manager is
Doesnt matter for me because if the campaign is legit,i will still join regardless whom the manager is because i do believe legit people wont give a shit to the hunters,in my own experience only those scammers are going to hide their identity using newbie accounts which is why i prefered to do my own research for me to know if i am joining shit campaigns.
Not going to be a problem as long as the newbie or jr.member accounts are promoting/managing legit projects the ranks wont be matter because you are going to get paid as long as you have done your research before joining,these newbie accounts shouldnt be underrated,because threr will be less participants as most of the people wont join,it means that you are going to have more stakes.
I absolutely agree that we need to trust managers with a good reputation and high rank. But if the company is led by a user with a low rank, it can be a member of the project team.
Some ICOs use their own people to manage the bounty and because they are new here, they have a low rank. The other thing is that there are many people, who are new here and want to make money as bounty manager. It doesnt mean that they are bad manager.
You also have to understand that its not the bounty manager who paid you.
You also have to understand that its not the bounty manager who paid you.
For me it matters. My most favorite needmoney, olsaytu2005, mr Cryptos, Sylon, smauni. I try to choose companies with these managers only. I understand their rules. And I do not have problems being a bounty hunter in their campaigns.
Jump to: