Topic: Is rank of bounty manager is really matters? - page 19. (Read 1741 times)
Doesnt really matter if the campaigns are legit ones from the real people which arent hiding their faces,you will morelikely getting paid because these people wont steal your rewards just like what other high ranking managers are doing,getting big cut from the totl bounty allocation.You shouldnt be hesitating to join at lower ranking manager because the more your risk the bigger the rewards that you can get.
For me personaly rank is like reflecting how much trust and experience this particular person has, so Legendary BM certainly knows which bounties are better to take and lead.
I like to join bounty campaigns that are managed by the official team, they usually pay good rewards and on time also such campaigns are less hassle as there is no third party involved.
In my own experience sometimes it is better to join campaigns from the lower rank campaign managers because there will be less participants,but im sure if the campaign is legit you will get rewarded regardless the rank of the campaign manager! the risk of getting scammed will be lessen thru researching thus you will need to find redflags so that you wont lose your time and effort from these campaigns.
I think it does, which other way can we verify the experience of such person. I think rank, if not paid for is a good indication of experience in the crypto world.
So can you tell me , if there is a legendary and a senior member tell you the opposite sides about 1 thing.
Who you will listen to even you think the both ways are good ? I definitely you'll listen to the legendary one because he/she got a higher-rank and it mean he/she is more trusted than the senior one ( unless there are some special evaluations ).
Who you will listen to even you think the both ways are good ? I definitely you'll listen to the legendary one because he/she got a higher-rank and it mean he/she is more trusted than the senior one ( unless there are some special evaluations ).
Yes i think it's an important thing to look at . Because i think it's just like the participants, rank of bounty manager is high mean the owner of that project will have to pay more for him then lower ranks.
High rank means that bounty manager is more trusted than the lower one ( it's not true in all situation but it's correct with mostly.)
why do you think that high rank managers can receive higher salaries than low rank? try to see amazix team, there are some members of that team who become a manager but still have a low rank. but what is the result? almost all of their projects are successful. because the most important thing is their work, not the rank manager High rank means that bounty manager is more trusted than the lower one ( it's not true in all situation but it's correct with mostly.)
Nope,sometimes it is better to join those campaigns which are being managed by lower ranks because theres less participants which means bigger rewards for you,those good managers which has high ranking profiles sometimes will pay you less,or worst wont because they want to take all of the bounty allocation, you should be avoid such campaigns.
I think this really matters of bounty manager while they are working for managing bounty campaign. If they had the higher rank then the people of bounty participant would be more and also participants are more confident about the company that runs the ICO.
i think it's matter.
If the ICO team has a really good project and sure it will produce a lot of investors, the project team should rent an expensive and good bounty managers to handle the bounty campaign.
Ranks do matter as it is one of the main attractivenes and impact to bounty hunters like ourselves but as you can see joining in ICOs that their manager is a junior member that will make your shoulder down or you felt uneasy due to rank of their manager. There won't be a loss except your time and effort if you try joining their ICO but as i say their ICO may be successful or not depends on their progress once it started. If the ICO team has a really good project and sure it will produce a lot of investors, the project team should rent an expensive and good bounty managers to handle the bounty campaign.
High rank generally (not always) has more expirience in this world and they are seen in a better way BUT as bounty hunter I saw very good manager in lower rank, and very bad manager on high rank, so in the end high rank has more appeal but this mean nothing.
Yes i think it's an important thing to look at . Because i think it's just like the participants, rank of bounty manager is high mean the owner of that project will have to pay more for him then lower ranks.
High rank means that bounty manager is more trusted than the lower one ( it's not true in all situation but it's correct with mostly.)
High rank means that bounty manager is more trusted than the lower one ( it's not true in all situation but it's correct with mostly.)
for now many participants are choosing managers who rank high and have a good performance to avoid some scam projects but it does not mean rank jr member all the scam or not managed I see there are some projects that are handled by jr member but achieve success achievement one example Marriot manager bounty patron
thread bounty https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bountyico-closed-patron-japans-influencer-service-20m-over-3110799
website https://patron-ico.io/
thread bounty https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bountyico-closed-patron-japans-influencer-service-20m-over-3110799
website https://patron-ico.io/
It don't matter so much because many projects buy Hero or Legendary account just for announcement, bounty managing and sometimes to scam people.
In the other side, many new accounts managing bounties are related directly to the team and they are better than usual managers.
In the other side, many new accounts managing bounties are related directly to the team and they are better than usual managers.
Manager rank doesn't matter. Most likely this person is an acquaintance, friend, or fellow developers. Many managers with a high rank are very bad at leading companies, for this reason it does not matter. Example I can't remember unfortunately, but it was. 
It matters because they can easily say they are an "acquaintance, friend, or fellow developers". How can participants be sure that they will get paid? A third person is important in holding funds and scrutinizing the project itself and knowing the people behind it since they are the one who will deal with them (developers) directly. Unless that low rank manager already earned trust from high ranked members here. 
I think it is something that you need to pay attention to , not saying that every low ranked campaign manager is a scammer. But at least look at their history on the forum , where are they active etc.
I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
I have little trust in bounty campaigns, which is from a jr. account. I think I would not participate.
A hero or legendary account awakens more trust in me. I would always choose it.
I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
I think that the manager should be experienced. Then the campaign passes qualitatively. Steaks are counted in time, there is a normal feedback. Some projects try to carry out the campaign themselves and chaos begins in everything ... I pay attention only to managers with big experience.
It is one of the factors that can influence my choice. On the other hand, it is such a competitive space that young and hard-working managers that have entered cryptospace later are having real troubles to prove their qualities. And even high rank of the manager does not say anything about their approach to the people. But if I am in a serious team and I want to hire someone for our bounty, who would I choose? I think most of us would prefer managers that have proved their qualities.
The safest way is to choose one of the managers and if you were satisfied, you can follow their steps in the future. If you do not have any experience, well, you can hope for a good advice from users of the forum. You can follow successful managers as well or try your luck
. It is completely up to you.
The safest way is to choose one of the managers and if you were satisfied, you can follow their steps in the future. If you do not have any experience, well, you can hope for a good advice from users of the forum. You can follow successful managers as well or try your luck
. It is completely up to you.
I will say it's 50/50 but firstly the rank of bounty manager matter sometimes, the rank show how much there experience on bounty campaign, but sometimes it doesn't matter because some ico use one of there team member as bounty manager Who does not have bitcointalk account before...But that doesn't predict the success of the campaign
Jump to: