Topic: Is rank of bounty manager is really matters? - page 14. (Read 1741 times)
I think the rank is not really matter it depends to the investors if they like the project of that ICO so it will success, but high rank and with trust points are advantage because they can easily gather members to join their campaign and it will successful ICOs.
i think not, he is not responsible to check out all info about the ICO, he is responsible for his job only, because it is based oh his reputation of his previous works
there is some of them, u can find the list, each of them his own style of the work
there is some of them, u can find the list, each of them his own style of the work
Some companies prefer to manage bounty’s or ANN thread by their own, and they create a new accounts for this purpose, if ICO is not a scam such bounty complains can turn in to mess, because people have a little experience in managing them, and they start to make some weird rules, or for example count stakes for signature campaign in the end of the bounty, which will take them for several month, and also if there is low rank manager and the ICO do not have any other activities except on bitcoin talk forum, the possibility that it is a scam increases dramatically.
Thank for your answers, guys! If summarize your thoughts,in general rank is important, but junior/newbie bounty manager not means possible scam. As member with hi rank can promote scam project, as junior/newbie can be just part of the project team and promote successful in future project.
I think the rank manager in bitcointalk is not the main judgment when looking at ICO.
ICO akaiito held by manager with JR rank, and success. but I prefer with more famous managers and more experience like amazix team, tokensuite team, hotachy manager, and newslike manager.
ICO akaiito held by manager with JR rank, and success. but I prefer with more famous managers and more experience like amazix team, tokensuite team, hotachy manager, and newslike manager.
What you see as the rank may be a new account he wants to use to manage the bounty. Rank does not have any effect on the performance of the bounty. The manager can use any rank to manage any bounty.
I think the limit will not affect the Bounty campaign they give, many ICO projects do not really care about ranking when posting a Bounty program on Bitcoin. They only focus on the content and optimization of the project.
I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
In some times, It is really matters. But if the manager works for a good marketing team (amazix, tokensuite,...), you can be assured. Ranking sometimes represent the reputation of the person. Between JR's campaign and member's campaign, I prefer member's campaign. "Bounty" is not free token. We have to work to get it, so we should choose trustworthy projects to work and ranking influences our choices.
I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
It will be affected to the participant who will follow the bounty campaign, usually bounty campaign which is managed by newbie or Jr. member will be less participant who will join, you can see that. Unlike the already-existing rank Hero Member-Legendary participant will follow more. This indicates that the owner who owns the ICO project will be more selective in choosing managers, and will make a success factor of the ICO project. Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
mostly higher rank managers are well experienced and trusted so bounty hunters tend to follow and join the campaign they managing. when i first joined in bounty i joined a campaign managing by a newbie and the end result the ICO is a scam.
I participated in some projects with such managers, more than half of the projects turned out to be a Scam
yes. for me it does very matters. im prefer doing bounty with higher rank manager rather than low ones. because i think the higher rank on manager, is more experienced them and more trustworthy.
yes, I think a rank managers in Bitcointalk should also be considered in choosing of nice ICO, but that is not priority assessment of ICO.
I do not know the example of a successful ICO held by a manager with Jr. rank, but the manager of ICO helbiz has a rank member, and his ICO is successful.
I do not know the example of a successful ICO held by a manager with Jr. rank, but the manager of ICO helbiz has a rank member, and his ICO is successful.
I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
I will still join the campaign. Firstly since the forum implement a new feature (merit point) to go beyond a newbie stage is a very diffcult thing to do, i am not sure how many percent of those able to award people with merit point really do that or just let it remain stagnant.
Secondly everyone should be given a chance low rank does not mean he is a scamer unless those that are tag with negative trust then you need to beware. All bounty managers start from no experience and only after doing it for the firstf time then they can start to gain experience in being one. If we does not give low rank members a chance on being bounty manager, after sometime the bounty managers market most probably will be manipulate by higer rank members.
I think the rank of bounty manager does not affect whether the project has the potential or not? So when choosing ICO projects to participate, you need to evaluate through factors, so the rating of the bounty manager is just a small factor. But if the ICOs are managed by reputable managers such as yahoo, atriz, deadley, aerys2, etc., then the potential rate of those ICOs will be very high.
of course I always prefer to participate in high ranked and trusted managers campaigns.
I think bounty manager's rank is do really matters because it will lose the credibility and reliability of the ICO project just because the manager is just a Junior Member rank. Although it may lead to a misjudgment because we don't even know if that manager is really a good one.
Generally, higher the rank of the bounty manager, higher trust we will put on the ICO bounty. However, it doesn't become the only one, we are better also to know the track record and experience of the bounty manager. Once more to note is that sometimes the developer uses their own bounty manager from the ICO project. So, sometimes the rank of the manager campaign is still Junior or Newbie with Copper Member, this term is the exception.
Yes, I think it's important. If you want to avoid fraud as much as possible, it's best to choose a high-level bounty manager to avoid the newly registered rookie. This is the best way.
I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
I can't give any example of junior member has a bounty manager, but the rank doesn't really affect at least they can manage well for the better development of the ICO projects. Rank doesn't matter as long as they can really handle the good development of the projects and all the members get satisfied at the end.
Jump to: