Topic: Is science a religion? - page 39. (Read 47434 times)

I am not a believer. In contrast to you, I understand the logic and can apply it properly to every day problems. I don't have no religion for nobody. You fool yourself with your religious myths.
 

So, you a believer in science can't find a logical answer, yet you condemn the logic. You have a great religion for yourself, there.

Blah blah blah. Tell your fairy tails to retard kids who have no brains and enter your totalitarian religions  cult.

Wrong!

In a formal religion, the God that science has proven to exist, makes promises to people. If the people want to believe Him, they must take Him on faith.

In science theory (which is part of science) some facts that are proven to exist, come together in a new way with a promise of something else that has not been proven yet. If scientists believe the theory to be fact, they do so on faith, because it hasn't been proven yet.

So, faith is the foundation in both religion and science, being only less firm than the foundation of facts of both religion and science.

From a point of view of ignorant religious obscurantists, may be so. In reality, there is nothing in common between science and religion. They are just two different worlds based on completely different principles.

The belief that science is not a religion, in the face of it being proven to be a religion, is a religion itself.

 

No. Science is anti-religion.

You can find many people who use math to design their art.

Science has many meanings. Some women call their range or their washer and dryer science.

Science in the pure sense is not religion.

Science in the theoretical sense can be religion if the scientists believe it as truth when they don't know that it is truth.

I agree -- the subjects are two completely different and unrelated  domains. We don't use maths to prove art, so why use science to prove god?

Religion and science are two different fields of study that occasionally come into conflict when either forgets itself.
Religion is a spiritual pursuit of Truth.
Science is an intellectual pursuit of truth.
Religion is strongest when it doesn't attempt to touch the facts of the universe and maintains its pursuit of the Divine.
Science looks at the universe through conjecture and refutation - theory and experiment. When it shows that the universe is several billion years old, it is true. When it shows that evolution produced life on Earth over the course of millions of years, it is true.

Yeah, scientists too have their own religion but the scientists who are atheist believe science as a religion.

I'm pretty sure science will never be a religion because people of science has their own point of views and they do not worship a "God" out there. Most of scientists are atheist too, so that would be really ironic if science is a religion.

No, it's not.

Science is not meant to be a religion. Yet the fact that scientists would accept as fact, much of science theory which has not been proven to be fact, starts to bring science into the realm of religion.

Scientists have built up all kinds of expressed structure about how things work, structure that is not known to be factual. They believe much of it. They attach it to the factual science. They have turned science into a religion, and made themselves the high priests of that religion.

The theoretical things are written up right along side of the factual things in books. They are taught in classrooms around the world as truth when they are not necessarily known to be truth.

For example. Two theories that are not known to be fact are Big Bang Theory and Black Hole Theory. Nobody knows that the Big Bang happened. Nobody knows what Black Holes really are.

Basically, there are three Big Bang theories. Basically there are 4 kinds of Black Holes expressed by the various Black Hole Theories. The amazing thing is that none of the Black Holes expressed by Black Hole Theory could fit withing any of the universes expressed by any of the Big Bang Theory. The theories are not compatible.

Yet, scientists just know in their hearts that the Big Bang really happened, and that Black Holes are what they say they are. And they believe it strongly, even though it all contradicts. Stand this up against the definition of "religion" to see that they have a religion going for themselves in their science.

No, it's not.

Cool to note that more and more scientists now actually try to intertwine concepts of science and religion. This sounds very DaVinci Code, but yea, there are religious who are actually involved with scientific researches and discoveries.

Science can't be a religion
Almost every scientist belongs to a religion if we don't count atheists. Anyway atheism is also a religion that against to religions

Science is not a religion and it is totally different from many religions of world.Science don't believe in the creator of world or GOD.According to science world is not made by any creator like in Big bang theory this planet earth is a part of sun which broken from sun billions of years ago.

If you don't have a link, it's politics.

God doesn't need math to hold the universe in place. Math is a virtual language man devised for his own understanding of things. It is man's understanding that is flawed, not God's.

^

Well it is mathematically possible to show you 1+1=1.

How is that intelligent design? Did god just failed there?