Topic: Is science a religion? - page 9. (Read 47459 times)
Science not religion. Science - is a magic. I think everyone already know abut theory of simulation of the world? Isnt it magic?
Science is the religion of atheist. I'm starting to become sarcastic though, well it is not a religion base on the majority of the people here. But religion does have beliefs and science does have "theories" = beliefs, so what's the difference about it?
People like you really need to brush up your basic understanding of the scientific method before making such ridiculous assertions. "Theory" in science doesn't mean "a guess" or "a belief", but instead an actual explanation to something, with lots of verified observation and experimentation supporting it.
Look who's talking..
Really? Theory is not a guess or belief? So do you believe in human evolution? Yeah we are all came from the semen of APE's and just turned suddenly into human. Oh yes, the solar system itself also came from dust and just blown up and explode and formed into different planets.
Within the realm of science, no, it is not. Why is it so hard for you to understand that the same term can have a different meaning depending on the context? You could start your investigation from a dictionary, although your utter ignorance of the subject and these ridiculous strawmen just show how you have no interest even trying to figure things out. Religious indoctrination at its best.
But two can play that game: so do you believe we all came from dust (except women, who came from bone dust), crafted by a being who ended up sacrificing himself to himself because while he's all-knowing and all-powerful, people eating a fruit and putting their dicks in asses are simply too much for his fragile ego to handle?
This is why I hate people who are not understanding the belief of others while it's clear that they are believing to the evolution of monkey to human being..
Science is obviously not a religion. Are you smoking something man or what? Cant you see that they have a very different perspective science is seeking for answers too anything that exist here in the universe
Science is the religion of atheist. I'm starting to become sarcastic though, well it is not a religion base on the majority of the people here. But religion does have beliefs and science does have "theories" = beliefs, so what's the difference about it?
People like you really need to brush up your basic understanding of the scientific method before making such ridiculous assertions. "Theory" in science doesn't mean "a guess" or "a belief", but instead an actual explanation to something, with lots of verified observation and experimentation supporting it.
Look who's talking..
Really? Theory is not a guess or belief? So do you believe in human evolution? Yeah we are all came from the semen of APE's and just turned suddenly into human. Oh yes, the solar system itself also came from dust and just blown up and explode and formed into different planets.
Within the realm of science, no, it is not. Why is it so hard for you to understand that the same term can have a different meaning depending on the context? You could start your investigation from a dictionary, although your utter ignorance of the subject and these ridiculous strawmen just show how you have no interest even trying to figure things out. Religious indoctrination at its best.
But two can play that game: so do you believe we all came from dust (except women, who came from bone dust), crafted by a being who ended up sacrificing himself to himself because while he's all-knowing and all-powerful, people eating a fruit and putting their dicks in asses are simply too much for his fragile ego to handle?
Science is a kind of knowledge of the research, it is about the invention and practice of knowledge, it is human exploration and study of the universe of all things change the law of knowledge, so science is not a religion.
Science is the religion of atheist. I'm starting to become sarcastic though, well it is not a religion base on the majority of the people here. But religion does have beliefs and science does have "theories" = beliefs, so what's the difference about it?
People like you really need to brush up your basic understanding of the scientific method before making such ridiculous assertions. "Theory" in science doesn't mean "a guess" or "a belief", but instead an actual explanation to something, with lots of verified observation and experimentation supporting it.
Look who's talking..
Really? Theory is not a guess or belief? So do you believe in human evolution? Yeah we are all came from the semen of APE's and just turned suddenly into human. Oh yes, the solar system itself also came from dust and just blown up and explode and formed into different planets.
You can turn anything into a religion, you just have to believe hard enough
No, they are ultimate enemies.
It could be a religion depending in the prospective 
many men have faith in science to evolve into our better selfs
many men have faith in science to evolve into our better selfs I can not compare religion and science. For me, these concepts are the opposite. Religion is built on legends and holy scriptures, and science only on facts and research.
It could be a religion depending in the prospective many men have faith in science to evolve into our better selfs
many men have faith in science to evolve into our better selfs I can not compare religion and science. For me, these concepts are the opposite. Religion is built on legends and holy scriptures, and science only on facts and research.
Science is not at all only facts and research. This is an example of pure belief. Science is done by people who make mistakes and wrong assumptions, receive false positive experiments results which are published and used by other scientists without verification. All of this goes to the corpus of scientific works which cannot be verified as a whole. All contemporary science is like building made from bricks each one of those produced by individual scientist. When one brick breaks it's not always lead to break of the whole building but science as a whole is accumulating this error over the time. And it's not too far fetched to expect that this will eventually collapse.
Same like Bible has something based on history and something based on fantasy, science has some solid knowledge and some completely erroneous and unsubstantial and we don't have a way to tell one from another.
It could be a religion depending in the prospective many men have faith in science to evolve into our better selfs
many men have faith in science to evolve into our better selfs I can not compare religion and science. For me, these concepts are the opposite. Religion is built on legends and holy scriptures, and science only on facts and research.
Science is the religion of atheist. I'm starting to become sarcastic though, well it is not a religion base on the majority of the people here. But religion does have beliefs and science does have "theories" = beliefs, so what's the difference about it?
People like you really need to brush up your basic understanding of the scientific method before making such ridiculous assertions. "Theory" in science doesn't mean "a guess" or "a belief", but instead an actual explanation to something, with lots of verified observation and experimentation supporting it.
It could be a religion depending in the prospective many men have faith in science to evolve into our better selfs
many men have faith in science to evolve into our better selfs
Science is the religion of atheist. I'm starting to become sarcastic though, well it is not a religion base on the majority of the people here. But religion does have beliefs and science does have "theories" = beliefs, so what's the difference about it?
Science itself is not religion but many people tend to use it as something that provides an ultimate truth or use erroneous incorrect understanding of scientific concepts. Correctly applied science is able to provide great benefit for what it was meant to. Same applies to religion.
Science is an evidence based method, not a belief system.
Well, science is not religion and it doesn't just come down to faith. Although it has many of religion's virtues, it has none of its vices. Science is based upon verifiable evidence. Religious faith not only lacks evidence, its independence from evidence is its pride and joy, shouted from the rooftops.
Science is the opposite of religion.Religion believe in God as the creator while science do not believe in God.Science believe more on proofs.
While many in main stream science claim to be atheist and believe in the Big Bang and the eventual Deep Freeze due to entropy. Is it not curious to consider that the very underpinnings of this belief is based on mathematics, was it too created in the big bang? if so how was it constructed? one digit at a time?
I think not it has always been there and will always remain its an eternal masterpiece that permeates every conceivable facet or reality yet in its self it is purely abstract. Without it nothing would exist, but it in itself it is nonexistent and existent at the same time. It is the language of the living universe. Its permutations are infinite, yet it did not grow, it has always been complete and eternal.
Science and religion always went alongside. Who - that until now believes exceptionally religions, and who - that is exceptional to science. It is possible to argue infinitely long that true, and that lie, then that it is much well-proven science is a fact. I think not it has always been there and will always remain its an eternal masterpiece that permeates every conceivable facet or reality yet in its self it is purely abstract. Without it nothing would exist, but it in itself it is nonexistent and existent at the same time. It is the language of the living universe. Its permutations are infinite, yet it did not grow, it has always been complete and eternal.
Science is a method into figuring out the way the physical universe works. Religion is set of values and beliefs that people live by. The closest that they get, to me, is that some people believe that science and god work hand-in-hand, while others believe that one completely disproves of the other. But, ultimately, these two subjects have two completely different concepts. I wouldn't say the scientific method is a "ritual".
Well, science is not religion and it doesn't just come down to faith. Although it has many of religion's virtues, it has none of its vices. Science is based upon verifiable evidence. Religious faith not only lacks evidence, its independence from evidence is its pride and joy, shouted from the rooftops.
No. Science and the tech based on it, works even if you don't believe in it. Cell phones and computers work even if you don't believe. You can be atheist about aerodynamics, but I can stuff you aboard an airliner and you will damn well fly anyway. Religion has no way to tell who is wrong in a diagreement.
Jump to: