Telegram is a way of communication. It is used in many countries of the world, and in some of them as in mine is completely unknown.
It is a social media platform if you run it on your phone, you can share with your friends among others, your opinion about cryptocurrencies and ICOs. It is the other way of promotion as twitter and facebook.
It is definitely not an indication of success but it can help spreading new ideas to many peoople
good service for ICO from my point
Topic: Is Telegram the new measure of ICO success? - page 35. (Read 5486 times)
as offering option on investor to gains with the news on release from the officials of manage with the developer reference, the use might helps as expanding the following on challenge as disputing request with the table of displacement with the business on crypto finance.
I think so. It is interested to know that telegram is a centralized platform yet very effective. Most of the rules telegram operate on were borrow from decentralised ideals. Telegram is open and you can create as well maintain your privacy.
Hello, do you have dates for the ico?
The project is ambitious telegram will be supported no matter what happens.
On the other hand I don't think it's really useful, it's my personal opinion.
The project is ambitious telegram will be supported no matter what happens.
On the other hand I don't think it's really useful, it's my personal opinion.
No, absolutely not! You can't measure the ICO project success with the number of members from Telegram. The members of Telegram can be easily achieved increased by hiring Blackhat internet service providers they use fake Telegram accounts and add them to Telegram Channel/group by bots.
It can be also increased rapidly by offering bounty and airdrops to Bitcointlk members. Only the quantity of members on Telegram channel/ group doesn't grantee a successful ICO.
It can be also increased rapidly by offering bounty and airdrops to Bitcointlk members. Only the quantity of members on Telegram channel/ group doesn't grantee a successful ICO.
Telegram is now at the peak of popularity, but I think that it's not worthwhile to rely on only certain social networks. It is necessary to observe the course of the coin for a while.
Telegram could be a part of the measure of an ICOs success, but I wouldn't pay attention to only that. All it proves is that the ICO has caught the attention of investors. If the team fails to deliver the product, abandons it, has a crappy ICO structure or something similar to that type of mismanagement then it will still fail. Also, aren't there some services to gain false Telegram users?
I think telegram is a reference standard, but most of the time I only care about the discussion of the ICO project in the telegram, if more people talking about the ICO project, means that there r more potential participants, and not a robot.
I also hold the opinion that a good project is worth checking in social networks. Telegrams are very popular among crypto investors, however, crypts can be advertised also there.
The telegram group is very important for community building, but many ICOs try to manipulate the numbers by ofering somthing just for joining, so is not always trustable.
If the project is really successful, then it will be actively discussed in social networks, and since Telegram is one of the most popular instant messengers among crypto enthusiasts, I think that you are absolutely right.
Thats a big ask, to stake the measure of ico success on Telegram alone. Yes it could be a determinant, considering its popularity and convenience, but still its reach is not all pervasive over crypto investors.
Recently, I also start noticing that the size of ICO telegram channel is used as some indication of investor interest and project prospective as the consequence. Think it is a little bit tricky indicator as small group can actually mean the absence of investor interest and appetite but the bigger number is not necessary mean the greater interest. In fact, it can be the evidence of inappropriate approach to marketing/promotion.
Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
Actually there is significance that telegram is the new measure of ICO success,because there in you can determine if the development project is successfull or cannot get the hard caps or public sale in the market.actually joining telegram is very important,because all you want to know about the result or the status of your joining ICO you can communicate in telegram. With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
New measure? Maybe but it is also an indicator. You can see how the ICO's status and how many people are being interested and wanted to be a part of that certain ICO. Having an ICO telegram that have only a few members and doesn't update quite frequently is more likely to fail. You can also see there if the team is really working hard for that certain ICO to achieve.
It's an interesting measurement and a reward, but I will not invest because it will only make me feel better, because there is a community behind the project.
Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
I feel telegram channels do provide a lot of information about the project development & great way to connect directly with the founders in the open.
Of course, this is a good platform for communication. I think she has a future. It is convenient and completely satisfies all requirements.
telegram is not a benchmark for judging an ICO to be successful or not because telegram is merely a means of liaison for investors, ICO teams and bounty hunters.
usually telegram is used by the ICO team when they have an important announcement for investors, so I think ICO will be successful not from the number of users in an ICO telegram. but from the uniqueness of a technology that will be launched in the ICO, the team is also very influential in determining the ICO will be successful or not.
I agree with you. Assessing the prospects of the ICO should be comprehensive and should take into account as many factors as possible to be confident in the potential of the project. usually telegram is used by the ICO team when they have an important announcement for investors, so I think ICO will be successful not from the number of users in an ICO telegram. but from the uniqueness of a technology that will be launched in the ICO, the team is also very influential in determining the ICO will be successful or not.
yes, I always judge a project will be successful or not from the number of followers in social media, one of them is telegram, the more interaction between potential investors and developers will be better, this could be one reference to success or failure of a project
Jump to: