Well, I think you would be a bit subjective if you consider Telegram a mean of measuring success.
Media attention and the popularity of the ico is the factor that measures the success of an ICO. Telegram members are just one of the pointers.
Topic: Is Telegram the new measure of ICO success? - page 39. (Read 5484 times)
I started noticing that more and more people consider Telegram group size as one of the factors that show ICO visibility and the level of hype around it. It seems that it should attract people attention, lead to a successful ICO and strong uptrend performance on secondary market.
I also used that method to see if that projects were hot or not, but recently I find that some projects use airdrops to attract lot of baby accounts, and there are not really followers or supporters there, then I think this is not a good way.
A big telegram group can be ONE indicator of success, but of course it's not the only one; more over, it can be faked very easily.
So, before to put your money somewhere, check ALL the aspects, not just this one.
Right. People should remember that bots exists in every platform so don't think telegram is an exception to this. I agree that telegram is very helpful addressing your concerns because their team responds quickly but the numbers don't mean complete success for me.So, before to put your money somewhere, check ALL the aspects, not just this one.
A big telegram group can be ONE indicator of success, but of course it's not the only one; more over, it can be faked very easily.
So, before to put your money somewhere, check ALL the aspects, not just this one.
So, before to put your money somewhere, check ALL the aspects, not just this one.
Right. People should remember that bots exists in every platform so don't think telegram is an exception to this. I agree that telegram is very helpful addressing your concerns because their team responds quickly but the numbers don't mean complete success for me.
A big Telegram group - if its really active and not a fake one - is a good indicator of an ICO success.
Of course, it can be the result of a good marketing campaigns , so it has nothing to do with the quality of the project itself.
So, it's a good idea to check also the "structural" parts of the project.
Of course, it can be the result of a good marketing campaigns , so it has nothing to do with the quality of the project itself.
So, it's a good idea to check also the "structural" parts of the project.
A big telegram group can be ONE indicator of success, but of course it's not the only one; more over, it can be faked very easily.
So, before to put your money somewhere, check ALL the aspects, not just this one.
So, before to put your money somewhere, check ALL the aspects, not just this one.
A large number of members of the Telegram ICO group is a good indicator of its success. Unfortunately, you can buy fake participants. I always look at the activity in the group, and it's very good when the administration responds.
But in any case, do not take a good telegram group as an ICO success. It's like one of the components.
But in any case, do not take a good telegram group as an ICO success. It's like one of the components.
Unfortunately, the size of the telegram group is not an indicator of the quality of success. For example, GBX - a small community-is a very strong project. INSTAR with the larger community very bad went on exchange.
May be it's my problem, but I'm in some Telegram groups, and I find them completely useless, as all you have is an uninterrupted flow of messages and it's clearly impossible to read them all, even if you stay all the time on it.
And if you close you mobile just for little time, the quantity of unread messages become huge.
So, I really don't understand why a big telegram group should be an indicator of success.
And if you close you mobile just for little time, the quantity of unread messages become huge.
So, I really don't understand why a big telegram group should be an indicator of success.
It might be correlated to the team's strength in marketing, but not multipliers which I assume is your measure of success. Nowadays coins with telegram groups with 80k members are still half scammy with dubious partnerships and what not. Whereas I've been in 3k telegram groups which have proven solid with responsiveness and keeping to the milestones. To this day, some of those groups have less than 10k members.
Large chats in telegram are often bots or threaded users. Therefore, I do not pay attention to the number of participants. I'm more looking for team responses to questions from participants and updates on the project. It is also important to pay attention to other social networks - Twitter, FB, Medium.
I agree, I also pay more attention to assessing the quality of questions and answers in the telegram channel, the number of members in the channel is a secondary indicator. I saw projects that solve the problems of investors and bounty hunters in the course of 5-10 minutes. This is a real indicator of the quality of the project. 
Large chats in telegram are often bots or threaded users. Therefore, I do not pay attention to the number of participants. I'm more looking for team responses to questions from participants and updates on the project. It is also important to pay attention to other social networks - Twitter, FB, Medium.
For me many ICO using telegram for more promoting with thier company , to make it known as well just like twitter and facebook telegram is a part of social media platform that people using. i dont think so if this is a meassurement of success but its good to know if the ICO that we will join is succesful.
Agreed, telegram is one of the most popular in terms of communication and promotion as to be part of the different ICO. It really helps a lot which we can easily to communicate thise bounty manager if there is any concern as well as questions on that particular ICO projects. Also, to be updated on their up coming events or the status of their ICO which you can ask for furthermore announcements.
I also believe that telegram ICO will be one of the most successful projects during the last time. I try not to listen to those so-called experts that foresee that this ICO will die and its coins will have no price.
I strongly doubt that telegram is some unique way of communicating. What's a bad twitter or facebook score?
Is it really like that ? certainly difficult to measure, because telegram is definitely needed for direct and fast communication, so it can solve everything quickly and possible followed together.
which certainly is definitely one of the successful components of ICO, it can not be denied.
It is one tool of ICO success and not measure.
I started noticing that more and more people consider Telegram group size as one of the factors that show ICO visibility and the level of hype around it. It seems that it should attract people attention, lead to a successful ICO and strong uptrend performance on secondary market.
It is mostly so because of the airdrops or bounty programs that are run by the ICOs. Telegram channels get pumped by bounty hunters or airdroppers. My 2 cents about it.
I think for now there are many things that are important and informed by their project about iconya, and this is also including the main factor because malalui all investor information to know clearly the movement of the ico that is taking it.
its true we can track what kind of person that manage the ICO by looking at social media. But i dont think we can judge whether the ico have good team from the number of person in telegram group. Sometimes they got so many members on telegram from bounty and the member there only fake people who only seek bounty. But i do still agree that telegram member determined whether the ico is popular or not. The best way to make sure they have a good team is by asking question to the telegram group and you can judge whether they got a good team from the respond they do.
Jump to: