Topic: Is Telegram the new measure of ICO success? - page 41. (Read 5484 times)
A big Telegram group is a good measure of a success of an ICO, an if you read the message you can have a good idea about its potential, but of course it can't be the only one, more over that today is relatively simple to fake it. So, check telegram, but also check the rest.
For me many ICO using telegram for more promoting with thier company , to make it known as well just like twitter and facebook telegram is a part of social media platform that people using. i dont think so if this is a meassurement of success but its good to know if the ICO that we will join is succesful.
Nowadays telegrams groups plays a major role in ICOs because here admin directly interact with the investors/promoters or with its group easily it is the easy medium to interact or communicate with peoples quickly. If the telegram group is real active it also shows project team is very active to hear ones query. Through telegram group admin gives regular updates about the project. No of members in a telegrams groups also indicates that the ICO is getting popular or not. But we can not say it's the measure of ICOs success.
It's not a measure of success but a measure of hype. It only shows that the level of awareness about the project is high. This may however have some influence on the price at launch irrespective of whether the project makes sense or not
There was an official confirmation that the ICO Telegram is held in closed form - https://www.vedomosti.ru/technology/articles/2018/02/16/751315-abramovich-telegram?utm_source=telegram&utm_campaign=share&utm_medium=social&utm_content=751315-abramovich-telegram
This is actually becoming disgusting day by day.
we are seeing ICO gurus talking about how big the telegram groups are of new ICOs, however, most of the participants there are from telegram bounty pool.
People must do their research before investing in ICOs, they must check about the implementation of project in real world, the team behind it, there advisory board, there whitepaper and roadmap and not just from the telegram strength.
Not only that there are appearing telegram campaigns that pay people to join the telegram channel so like always every time there is an indicator that signals whether something could be good or not the scammers do everything to make it seem as if their projects are better, this is similar to Google rankings and all the effort websites go through to try to get to the 1 spot in Google serps. we are seeing ICO gurus talking about how big the telegram groups are of new ICOs, however, most of the participants there are from telegram bounty pool.
People must do their research before investing in ICOs, they must check about the implementation of project in real world, the team behind it, there advisory board, there whitepaper and roadmap and not just from the telegram strength.
I like Telegram, I can find many answers to my questions, because people have asked similar things before. Twitter has bots, Facebook has bots. And a lot of ICO uses bots in Telegrams. I think Telegram is not a measure of the success of ICO.
Telegram is a group of people that participating in one campaign. The participants are from another continent in the world. Less members seems doubtful, more members seems truthful. This may the New measurement of legit project.
I believe that Telegram will be more than just social network in future. With ToN/Gram project it will become a very convenient tool to make payments via any kind of crypto. It's a big step forward.
Nowadays all bug projects has a telegram channel and unfortunately people are used to it. If the project won't have it's channel that may make people choose another one.
This is important but not necessary. With a good community team, where they can quickly answer the questions and solve problems, you can even write in the thread of project here.
Nowadays all bug projects has a telegram channel and unfortunately people are used to it. If the project won't have it's channel that may make people choose another one.
This is important but not necessary. With a good community team, where they can quickly answer the questions and solve problems, you can even write in the thread of project here.
Some projects are using bots and they're not reflecting the exact audience of the Project. This is bad because it's impossible to differentiate them.
Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
Not really because there are alot of spammers evern in telegram. The real measure of success of one project is the continuity of the roadmap, the patronage of the people and the ability of the team to make their project be ome reality. Though telegram is a way of communicating to the project developers, it is necessary and may have contributing factor tonthe use of telegram in the success of one project.
Nowadays all bug projects has a telegram channel and unfortunately people are used to it. If the project won't have it's channel that may make people choose another one.
This is important but not necessary. With a good community team, where they can quickly answer the questions and solve problems, you can even write in the thread of project here.
Nowadays all bug projects has a telegram channel and unfortunately people are used to it. If the project won't have it's channel that may make people choose another one.
This is important but not necessary. With a good community team, where they can quickly answer the questions and solve problems, you can even write in the thread of project here.
Nowadays all bug projects has a telegram channel and unfortunately people are used to it. If the project won't have it's channel that may make people choose another one.
I think that's not the fact that the telegram is always jammed with the chat, and so that it is interesting to find out there is a need to put efforts, the withdrawal of telegram is not so successful!
I always follow the activity of the team in the telegram. I pay more attention to answers to the question about the project, activity in the chat. But if there are too many people in the chat room, it's not good. Since I conclude that these are bots.
If there are a lot of people in the chat, it does not mean that they are bots. Personally, I ask questions in the telegram channel quite rarely, only if necessary. Basically, I just follow the latest news of the project. 
Quite interesting news regarding Telegram, crypto and security:
2018-02-14 - The zero-day flaw which is based on the right-to-left override (RLO) Unicode was used by hackers as a backdoor to mine cryptocurrencies. The RLO Unicode is used for coding languages that are often written from right to left such as Hebrew and Arabic. However, the code is also used by hackers to trick unknowing users into downloading malware that might be in the form of images. A hidden Unicode character in the file name was used by the hackers to reverse the file name character order, ensuring the file name was unchanged. Hackers have continuously exploited the vulnerability since March 2017: Telegram Zero-Day Flaw Leads To Hacking
2018-02-14 - The zero-day flaw which is based on the right-to-left override (RLO) Unicode was used by hackers as a backdoor to mine cryptocurrencies. The RLO Unicode is used for coding languages that are often written from right to left such as Hebrew and Arabic. However, the code is also used by hackers to trick unknowing users into downloading malware that might be in the form of images. A hidden Unicode character in the file name was used by the hackers to reverse the file name character order, ensuring the file name was unchanged. Hackers have continuously exploited the vulnerability since March 2017: Telegram Zero-Day Flaw Leads To Hacking
I do not think telegram can be easily manipulated as in other social media, telegram is just a means to get information, not as a measure of ICO success.
I always follow the activity of the team in the telegram. I pay more attention to answers to the question about the project, activity in the chat. But if there are too many people in the chat room, it's not good. Since I conclude that these are bots.
Jump to: