Topic: Is Telegram the new measure of ICO success? - page 43. (Read 5489 times)
I big Telegram group does not necessarily equal a solid project. However, what it does indicate is a lot of hype, and hype equals quick profit. I use Telegram to sort out which ICO's are quick flips, and which are long term HODL.
The real asset when you are promoting an ICO is your credibility, so you try to gain trust with every means.
And as many people seem to believe that a big Telegram group is a sign of success, of course ICO manager try to build asap a big group.
This is understandable, but it seems to me so simple to fake it, that I don't see any reason to use the group dimension as the only measure of success.
And as many people seem to believe that a big Telegram group is a sign of success, of course ICO manager try to build asap a big group.
This is understandable, but it seems to me so simple to fake it, that I don't see any reason to use the group dimension as the only measure of success.
for me it's not measure of successful ICO, it's only measurement of how many hyip created around project
For You there is no-for other Yes.
for me it's not measure of successful ICO, it's only measurement of how many hyip created around project
No ICO coin has ever achieved any level of success.. ever ...period.
All you are talking about is how the premined / ICO coin prices go up on exchanges.
period.
All you are talking about is how the premined / ICO coin prices go up on exchanges.
period.
Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
Actually in my opinion,telegram.is only helpul to determine of how many people who join in that ICO campaign and not the main measurement of its success,actually the big impact for me is the bounty campaign,social media, and those marketing strategy of the platform on how they introduce to the market,and how they convience all the investor to joined there platform exchange and the help of all team in that campaign.
No,telegram campaign is only created because some of these ICO review websites requires these new ICOs to have more participants in the telegrams so they can list the ICO,it is measured by the participants in telegram so these new ICOs would be listed or featured in these ICO review sites if they have a lot of participants in their telegram bounty group.
Telegram is, indeed, a reference standard, but most of the time I only care about the discussion of the ICO project in the telegram, if more people talking about the ICO project, means that there are more potential participants, and not a robot.
It's important to note that almost everything can be faked and scammy nowadays.
So I wouldn't really put a lot of weight on using their telegram as a measure of ICO success.
Most of the projects are garbage and do not have an important goal but they have been very successful. Ripple is the example of it. Telegram is not only a popular messenger but also an interesting ico.So I wouldn't really put a lot of weight on using their telegram as a measure of ICO success.
It's important to note that almost everything can be faked and scammy nowadays.
So I wouldn't really put a lot of weight on using their telegram as a measure of ICO success.
Most of the projects are garbage and do not have an important goal but they have been very successful. Ripple is the example of it. Telegram is not only a popular messenger but also an interesting ico. So I wouldn't really put a lot of weight on using their telegram as a measure of ICO success.
It's important to note that almost everything can be faked and scammy nowadays.
So I wouldn't really put a lot of weight on using their telegram as a measure of ICO success.
So I wouldn't really put a lot of weight on using their telegram as a measure of ICO success.
It's not like that, sometimes it can be way to find ico is good or not.
I have been part of icos where they only 300 members but ico was successful and i have seen telegram group with 16000 members but still not successful. For measure ico success going through team and their activity on social networing.
I have been part of icos where they only 300 members but ico was successful and i have seen telegram group with 16000 members but still not successful. For measure ico success going through team and their activity on social networing.
I think it affects, but indirectly. Because sometimes projects pay people for activity in the chat. Although usually it is noticeable. But we must look at everything in the complex. And this is still not a guarantee of success.
I wouldn't say it's necessarily the Telegram that can be used as a measure, but how responsive the staff are.
I don't think so, it's too simple to fake it. So, even if a too small group is an evident sign of failure, a big group doesn't mean necessarily a success.
Perhaps that is why there is the most anticipated ICO of 2018. 
Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
Actually, I can see why you said that, you can see in their telegram group if their campaign is actually doing well, not only by the perspective of the developers or their team, but also in what other investors and believers are thinking, so in a way we are really having a great insight if the project is doing well or not, but its not a hundred percent accurate, well actually, nothing is, so its better to just keep in touch with project and support the team.
Yes all traders are there new ICO are always On telegram and they are making billions of dollars. I think you should try it and ask some question regarding the token you want to purchase.
This is actually becoming disgusting day by day.
we are seeing ICO gurus talking about how big the telegram groups are of new ICOs, however, most of the participants there are from telegram bounty pool.
People must do their research before investing in ICOs, they must check about the implementation of project in real world, the team behind it, there advisory board, there whitepaper and roadmap and not just from the telegram strength.
I don't think that people just believe in Telegram reviews. It doesn't have any logic for those who want to make a profit.we are seeing ICO gurus talking about how big the telegram groups are of new ICOs, however, most of the participants there are from telegram bounty pool.
People must do their research before investing in ICOs, they must check about the implementation of project in real world, the team behind it, there advisory board, there whitepaper and roadmap and not just from the telegram strength.
Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
I think this is big truth because a mine friend having a telegram channel and also YouTube channel .With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
He is getting better earnings from YouTube by giving sponsor videos but still with that he is also making earnings from telegram from the ICOs promotion .
From the advertiser he got a information that they are getting much better no. Of investors from.telegram in bulk amount and from YouTube they are getting few investors only .
So here it is better for us that we are going with new social platform that is telegram and telegram is much better for the unlimited people to have channel and also personally I seen that many people are in cryptourrency are connected with telegram Because Thier they can get better information about cryptourrency Because of lots of channels of bitcoin related things are available at telegram .
Jump to: