In my own opinion, I think telegram is just one criteria to know how successful an project is going to be.
You're opinion is right, additionally, telegram is also a way to make a campaign successful, if there are lots of people know about the campaign then it has a possibility to success by supporting it. I think they use telegram to disseminate the good news of having crypto or the campaign it self(ICO). 
Topic: Is Telegram the new measure of ICO success? - page 42. (Read 5484 times)
Yes I agree with you telegram is the new measurement of ICO success and it is one of the strength of the ICO project because the people want to know the project are asking through telegram channel and if the admin are response immediately to the queries it means that the project is reliable then if the volume of the members are crowded we can say it a great project and a successful ICO.
This is one of the largest social media, which is the first to organize ICO. Perhaps, it will be followed by the rest
There are suspicions that this ICO will be the most untwisted of all that we have seen, and getting into it will not be easy.
I do not think that telegrams are an indicator of the success of an ICO company. As for the telegrams of users who are subscribed to the ICO, it is 90 percent real people, but it still will not save you from the quality of the issued product!
I think the quality will suffer or will be lower than claimed? Their team is strong, I can handle it.
I do not think that telegrams are an indicator of the success of an ICO company. As for the telegrams of users who are subscribed to the ICO, it is 90 percent real people, but it still will not save you from the quality of the issued product!
I don't think that you can relay on the dimensions of Telegram group to evaluate the success of an ICO.
It seems to me that other parameters are much more important.
But sure, a big group is a good sign.
It seems to me that other parameters are much more important.
But sure, a big group is a good sign.
I big Telegram group does not necessarily equal a solid project. However, what it does indicate is a lot of hype, and hype equals quick profit. I use Telegram to sort out which ICO's are quick flips, and which are long term HODL.
Telegram has a big impact in ICOs life, we cant deny it that being the talk of the channel will strengthen the ICO, being an investor/trader i will not depend only on how popular these ICO telegram group are. I still have to check everything before moving forward. 
Telegram is globally accepted in most countries in the world. So, Telegram made easy business linkages. As a result of this. It has now been perceived that majority ICO currently are now dependent of Telegram for initializing, projecting and adequately actualizing their success dream. Owing to this, Telegram had been a new measure of ICO success because of its immense contribution in the economy.
Though it is just a social media, telegram connected people all over the world. It helps for the investors and developers to communicate for the welfare of all. I also set telegram as a standard for a successful ICO because yhe more people joined the telegram, the more it will is popular.
Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
I'm part of a bunch of telegram alt coin and ico groups and tbh the set up seems messy and all over the place
I'd much prefer a more structured solution for two way communication between users, investors and the project's team
Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
There are a lot of Telegrams that have blown out of proportion and just seem to be a method of the creator/admins to advertise some fake coin alongside their bot which spams airdrops.
There's one i'm following currently that has 17k members that consists of no spam/bots; fortunately - take a look: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/airdrop-ternio-blockchain-for-digital-advertising-1500-per-person-airdrop-2937292
It's for a digital advertising project: Ternio
A good reponsive Telegram channel is always required to see if the project is active, having some potential or not.
Even if can't be the only parameter to evaluate an ICO, a big and active group on telegram is usually a good indicator of potential success.
Then, as already stated, it's better to verify all the other aspects.
Then, as already stated, it's better to verify all the other aspects.
Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
I really don't judge an ICO success when it comes to their telegram account because some of this ICO are just accumulating members or people because of their airdrops. That's why they have thousands of members. A successful ICO will be based on how they can handle their advertisement and how they can prove to people that they can really do their project. White Paper and roadmap is one of the best assets of an upcoming ICO for me.
A big Telegram group COULD be a measure of success, but not the only one.
You know, it's very simple to make a group artificially big, just to show your muscle.
So, check also all the other aspect of an ICO, as the whitepaper, the staff, the project, and so on
You know, it's very simple to make a group artificially big, just to show your muscle.
So, check also all the other aspect of an ICO, as the whitepaper, the staff, the project, and so on
Telegram or other messengers should be used mostly for the team to quickly answer questions and solve emerging issues. Lately we see a lot of users joining telegram groups to get free tokens. Real ICO investors read whitepaper and analyze the project potential.
Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
I don't think the telegram user is the reason of success ICO. most of them are bounty hunters though.
but it has an advantage, more user equals more advertising. more advertising of an ico is more likely to have a success.
I do not know what is an important super idea has in itself Telegram ICO. They can collect a fantastically huge amount and have a large number of investors, but I still do not understand why they want to do this. What is the real purpose of this ICO?
Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
The problem is that once you use something to measure success it becomes and objective in itself and the ICO promoters start making airdrops and referrals, so you no longer know if it is real interest.
Jump to: