Topic: It's great that AI is taking over jobs, I'm just afraid that... - page 2. (Read 1257 times)

When we assume things this way, do we also consider the cost of affordability and maintenance cost? I'm just curious because I don't think robots, AI or whatever they are being called which can efficiently carried out the task in some companies can be that easy to afford. No matter how rampant it usage grows, there'll be companies that will not completely get rid of human labor. Most private companies here in my country underpay their employees and switching from human operation to machine operation will definitely cost them more when you sum up their monthly expenses and compare to machines operation cost.

When the first machine was invented, people thought workers could take it easy. But what happened? More factories appeared, the workload increased, and capitalists were all smiles, while workers still had to toil away. When computers first came out, we thought we could say goodbye to pen and paper. But what happened? Now, we can't even go to the bathroom without taking our laptops, afraid of missing an email. And don't even get me started on phones—we thought they would broaden our horizons, but our view has shrunk to the size of a screen. Many jobs are now completed with AI assistance, and tasks that used to take three days now have to be done in one. Keynes once said that by the end of the 20th century, technological advancement would reduce the average workweek to 15 hours, but maybe only the Nordic countries have achieved that.

In a place where there is problem, when a solution is proffer and executed, there will be another problem for sure. This AI evolution might be a good thing and perhaps helps mankind reduce their energy consumption, we need helps in some aspect but I'm sure that AI can't do everything, they are not as perfect as they are been displayed, and when AI are need, maybe humans will be needed more for creating more AI, jobs replacement of AI and creating more for humans.

As much as I don't like this AI taking jobs, don't you think it will helpful if farmers have AI robots that will help them makes mechanical farming even more easier. There are heavy machines available for men to do all the farm work they want to do but there is man power consumption at some points, I think it will be worth it if there is more of their extension to agriculture, believe me we will eat free disease food and others that man may not be able to do but there should be limitations in their usage.

When the first machine was invented, people thought workers could take it easy. But what happened? More factories appeared, the workload increased, and capitalists were all smiles, while workers still had to toil away. When computers first came out, we thought we could say goodbye to pen and paper. But what happened? Now, we can't even go to the bathroom without taking our laptops, afraid of missing an email. And don't even get me started on phones—we thought they would broaden our horizons, but our view has shrunk to the size of a screen. Many jobs are now completed with AI assistance, and tasks that used to take three days now have to be done in one. Keynes once said that by the end of the 20th century, technological advancement would reduce the average workweek to 15 hours, but maybe only the Nordic countries have achieved that.

These means that there is steady improvement in the development of AI and with time, if every company can afford to buy this robots, they will actually go for it, to reduce costs of paying workers which will reduce the rate of employment by private companies but I think government jobs will still be available because the government can not allow people to suffer without any source of income.

The invention of Ai has certainly made humans put minimal or no effort to do some specific things. But a lot of people are of the opinion that Ai might take over a lot of jobs in the future. I think this is actually a fictional thing, artificial intelligence cannot take over every job.

You just have to make sure that what are into isn't replaceable, there are certain jobs that would always require human input to achieve.

There's also a theory that Ai's might start malfunctioning and this might result to an outbreak of war between robots and humans, is there a possibility in this?

When the first machine was invented, people thought workers could take it easy. But what happened? More factories appeared, the workload increased, and capitalists were all smiles, while workers still had to toil away. When computers first came out, we thought we could say goodbye to pen and paper. But what happened? Now, we can't even go to the bathroom without taking our laptops, afraid of missing an email. And don't even get me started on phones—we thought they would broaden our horizons, but our view has shrunk to the size of a screen. Many jobs are now completed with AI assistance, and tasks that used to take three days now have to be done in one. Keynes once said that by the end of the 20th century, technological advancement would reduce the average workweek to 15 hours, but maybe only the Nordic countries have achieved that.

That is the kind of development people want, so that they can upgrade to the next level in the country, and it will make many people to learn more about technology so that they will be able to flow with their online job because there are many online jobs that is more paying than the physical Jobs, which you need to be going to work by transport every day before you will be entitle to your wage or salary. You can see what is happening in bitcoinstalk, where full members above are wearing signature and avatar to earn bitcoin weekly, which is more higher than the monthly payment of some people in their working place, why are you afraid? all you need to do is to upgrade yourself so that you can be fix to where you will be earning dollars weekly or monthly in the future.

At first when AI began to trend, I thought the idea behind this AI were limited to online AI were you can chat with a programmed and get your responses base on improvement but after seeing Elon Musk Optimus and the Robots car, I was shocked, surprised and have changed my ignorance of this AI. There was one robot serving drinks in the opening and I have to agree with you that if this things get improved, humans wouldn't get a job again.

The price of those Optimus was price to range from $20 to $30k, now imagine if you buy 5 of that and use them in your restaurant, you are done for life paying wages to your workers and they don't need to be tipping them like many workers do in their job. Just charge them and instruct them to work as you want and you are good to go. People will even be fascinated to come to eat in the place where this AI robots works than see human interfere in their things. The world is rapidly changing my friend.

When the first machine was invented, people thought workers could take it easy. But what happened? More factories appeared, the workload increased, and capitalists were all smiles, while workers still had to toil away. When computers first came out, we thought we could say goodbye to pen and paper. But what happened? Now, we can't even go to the bathroom without taking our laptops, afraid of missing an email. And don't even get me started on phones—we thought they would broaden our horizons, but our view has shrunk to the size of a screen. Many jobs are now completed with AI assistance, and tasks that used to take three days now have to be done in one. Keynes once said that by the end of the 20th century, technological advancement would reduce the average workweek to 15 hours, but maybe only the Nordic countries have achieved that.

It seems like every new tech just adds more pressure instead of making life easier. We need to find a balance and not let it dictate our lives. But I don't think they'll replace us afterall.

It seems like every new tech just adds more pressure instead of making life easier. We need to find a balance and not let it dictate our lives. But I don't think they'll replace us afterall.

.... Many jobs are now completed with AI assistance, and tasks that used to take three days now have to be done in one. Keynes once said that by the end of the 20th century, technological advancement would reduce the average workweek to 15 hours, but maybe only the Nordic countries have achieved that.

I think AI should make working to become less stressful for most companies such that you don't need to rely on manpower for most of the task you have at hand that can easily be achieved with the use of AI. Humans ability can't feasle out regardless of the numbers of AI that's created accross the different niche of production. Instead of looking that AI is here to take your job, why not forget about those simple task that AI can do and focuse more on the ones that's doable for human effort. A lot of real life task can't be done with the use of AI and those are the area that if we shift our interest into, food production will increase drastically. Task that are AI based are mainly tech related and if we can shift our hands off it because there are AI that can sort them out while we focuse on the ones we're certain that AI can't do, productivity will increase drastically.

As humans, we have the ability to adapt to different realities and this has helped us to survive during the era when tech wasn't predominant up till the time it became a dorminant thing and we will still survive pass this phase regardless of the level of growth we witness in the tech industry. I would rather have it that I'm working on best means of making the best use of this AI to my advantage such that I'm becoming more productive rather than I use to be in the past rather than becoming afraid that it's going to take food out of my table.