Topic: its time bounty hunters should start taking actions - page 2. (Read 4811 times)
That will be great. Breaking the bounty initial agreement is an awful things but sometimes, some hunters become so greedy using multiple accounts to acquire more and thereby dump to bastardize prices on the exchanges.
I can name a number of Bounty managers and projects CEO that changed bounty rules in the middle or towards the end of the Bounty Campaign. All they said afterwards was that it was stated in the general guidelines that they had the right to make changes to the rules at anytime. This is what most always hold on to and subsequently get away with it. Hunters deserve more than what BM or project offers them and I hope the community finds a way out to always protect the interests of the hunters.
Bounty hunters should come together as one from now on to avoid developers and bounty managers that are treating hunters very wrongfully for example many bounty projects ends up breaking their very own made rulesafter bounty ends or even before bounty ends and secondly we need to start RED TAGGING projects account or bounty managers account that did awful things to bounty hunters or not paying bounty hunters fully after bounty ends.
What do you guys say? do you accept or not?
We cannot do anything really about scammers because they are everywhere and as long as money involves they will always do something about it. Even when i am new in this kind earning profits scammers and scam ICO's exsisted already and until now they are continouing what they started just to steal money to other people. What do you guys say? do you accept or not?
Yeah the forum should give their support to hunters and help stop this project taking advantage of the bounty hunters effort just because they have a rule written in their campaign about having the right to make adjustment when they please, this particular rule should be re-address, this is what is given some project the audacity to treat hunters in an unpleasant way.
Bounty hunters should come together as one from now on to avoid developers and bounty managers that are treating hunters very wrongfully for example many bounty projects ends up breaking their very own made rulesafter bounty ends or even before bounty ends and secondly we need to start RED TAGGING projects account or bounty managers account that did awful things to bounty hunters or not paying bounty hunters fully after bounty ends.
What do you guys say? do you accept or not?
What do you guys say? do you accept or not?
Red tagging and creating a flag is only good if it can generate support coming from DT members, creating a scam report or a report in the reputation thread can accomplish this goal, but not all bounty managers are guilty of this, they do not have a control on the distribution, it's the developers who has a say, they just do a report and submit to the developers.
we can't do much about it as we agree to their rules. However, you can accuse the campaign at scam accusation thread and hope that ah dt member tagged them.
I agree with you. Bounty hunters are in a very bad position right now because they are the most vulnerable. It is almost impossible to get a good profit now. In addition, among the bounty managers reign chaos. So it's time to look for some alternative ways of earning.
Yes, bounty reward cannot be expected anymore, all for nothing, months of work, but the results are unsatisfactory and managers change strict rules for us.
I agree with you. Bounty hunters are in a very bad position right now because they are the most vulnerable. It is almost impossible to get a good profit now. In addition, among the bounty managers reign chaos. So it's time to look for some alternative ways of earning.
As far as I know some bounty managers have red tagging for what they doing bad bounty projects. And I think it's right. We have to fight for our rights somehow.
Since the implemented this new system I have seen many projects that have the warning in big over the thread and this has helped me and I am sure others. We do need it to a greater extent though.
However, it is a good start to something that once was not even there. We need protection not them. They have far too much power.
However, it is a good start to something that once was not even there. We need protection not them. They have far too much power.
Just to clear you OP, generally red tagging (leaving negative feedback) only affect an account when you're a DT member. The best you can do is create a flag and request for support to make this flag active. The flag type 2&3 is most appropriate for issues like this as they (project and in some cases campaign mangers) have broken a contract with the bounty participants.
Though flag type 2 and 3 may is useful and appropriate when it comes to project refusing distribution of rewards to bounty hunters, a phenomenon we are starting to see quite frequently these days, shit projects would just use of hunters promoting and never reward them.These kind of projects should be flagged to prevent future behavior.
Now in the cryptocurrency market there is a situation when bounty hunters are in difficult conditions.
On the one hand, they are due to the high volatility of the cryptocurrency market, and on the other hand, fraudulent actions by developers of bounty campaigns.
This should encourage them to work together to resolve the injustice associated with the performance of work without a subsequent award.
On the one hand, they are due to the high volatility of the cryptocurrency market, and on the other hand, fraudulent actions by developers of bounty campaigns.
This should encourage them to work together to resolve the injustice associated with the performance of work without a subsequent award.
The managers of the Bounty companies created special platforms for the Bounty companies in order to set the conditions for the projects for the Bounty companies. Thus, you can create a group of Bounty Hunters, which can not only play the role of Trade Unions, but also be the official company where most of the Bounty Hunters are registered, which will also not only have standard conditions for holding a Bounty Company, but also monitor the fulfillment of the terms of the contract by both sides.
Bounty hunters should come together as one from now on to avoid developers and bounty managers that are treating hunters very wrongfully for example many bounty projects ends up breaking their very own made rulesafter bounty ends or even before bounty ends and secondly we need to start RED TAGGING projects account or bounty managers account that did awful things to bounty hunters or not paying bounty hunters fully after bounty ends.
What do you guys say? do you accept or not?
Have you read bounty rules? Typically contains clause: Bounty rules can be changed. So no DT-member will tag the bounty managers because they didn´t do anything against the rules.What do you guys say? do you accept or not?
As a bounty hunter, to be honest I am also often disappointed with what I get. All is not worth the work I do. But I also did not dare to take such actions, because that would also be detrimental to us. if many prize managers get negative trust, then the Bounty campaign will eventually disappear.
Right, now many projects and bounty managers don't value bounty hunters. They make rules but when it's time for distribution they make new rules that aren't listed when the campaign starts.
Therefore, you should choose proven bounty managers. Trusted by the BTT community and personally you have had a positive experience of bounty campaigns. Of course, do not forget that the bounty manager can deceive the project team; but now is increasingly being used to deposit funds/escrow.
sometimes I often make complaints about it, but the bounty manager still insists on the total stake or token that will be given. what I do is question the credibility and also ask the project team to take action. in this case the bounty manager needs to be observed in choosing the bounty.
I think it is a good step to give a bad effect on bounty project who is a scam and also a bounty manager who deliberately does not pay the participants, so at least the bounty managers will be able to better appreciate the bounty participants.
It maybe a good way to discourage them from making shit projects that will only waste the efforts of thousands of bunty hunters and end up being unpaid. But we can still avoid this kind of scamming if we are researchful and studious enough about the projects we are going to participate. If we can smell something wrong with the bounty project, then leave it behind. After all, we all get scammed just because of our own wrong choice or decision. 
your problem is that you only care about yourself and your own payment. as long as they pay you, you won't care what kind of scam you were advertising.
the fact is that these ICO tokens that people have been advertising for the past two years have been 90% pure s cams and the 10% remaining were shitcoins. so you really can't complain when a scammer creating a bounty campaign to sell a scam token with no use is refusing to pay you or changes the rules, ... it is what scammers do.
Your generalization, "the fact is that these ICO tokens that people have been advertising for the past two years have been 90% pure s cams and the 10% remaining were shitcoins" is at best misleading. There have been worthy ICOs whose coins are still doing well in the market. However, I agree that most are shitty but that should also leave a certain percentage out for those worthy one. Saying 90% pure and remaining 10% doesn't leave any percent, does it? the fact is that these ICO tokens that people have been advertising for the past two years have been 90% pure s cams and the 10% remaining were shitcoins. so you really can't complain when a scammer creating a bounty campaign to sell a scam token with no use is refusing to pay you or changes the rules, ... it is what scammers do.
I think it is a good step to give a bad effect on bounty project who is a scam and also a bounty manager who deliberately does not pay the participants, so at least the bounty managers will be able to better appreciate the bounty participants.
Tagging bounty manager who promote the project and end up to scam is not good idea at this time. They can easily make a new copper member account and try to make a new project and promoting it again. It will be better if bounty hunter make an analyst to resolve the problem so as they can be able to differentiate which one the project scam and which one the legitimate project. So as when they knew or found the project will end up to scam they will avoid it and report the bounty manager and bounty hunter will not have a wasting time to take part the bounty campaign first. Your idea has been done by this forum but if bounty hunter do as what I mentioned above I have less confidence against it whilst these thing is the best solution.
Jump to: