Topic: its time bounty hunters should start taking actions - page 3. (Read 4811 times)
I think it is a good step to give a bad effect on bounty project who is a scam and also a bounty manager who deliberately does not pay the participants, so at least the bounty managers will be able to better appreciate the bounty participants.
prize hunters can't do anything about gift projects I mean prize hunters can only avoid by considering before joining a project, I see a trusted manager or a popular manager but they have red trust, I think we need to consider that and also the project work map that wants to you follow.
We should better research projects and if we took part in a scam, it is only our fault. You cannot just enter every bounty campaign and hope that you can get up to 1k USD from each one. Be patient and everything will be great with hunting.
You know people still come to market with the mindset of 2017 when they use to be ought, I could remember then that there were some project that I participated in before that 2017 that even paid me as high as $2599, but not now again, most projects are even quite very stingy now that they allocate very little amount for hunters, not to talk of those that would even use hunters without paying them.I think one of the reason again is that we have too many people that has been exposed to the hunting idea from different parts of the world and they all want to join also, so you see many people without researching rushing to join campaign and then promoting rubbish projects to the public without ever checking what the project is if it’s reliable or not.
Bounty hunters should come together as one from now on to avoid developers and bounty managers that are treating hunters very wrongfully for example many bounty projects ends up breaking their very own made rulesafter bounty ends or even before bounty ends and secondly we need to start RED TAGGING projects account or bounty managers account that did awful things to bounty hunters or not paying bounty hunters fully after bounty ends.
What do you guys say? do you accept or not?
All have rules and are controlled. Bounty hunters are also controlled by rules, as are bounty managers. As a bounty hunters, I feel happy with your thoughts, but I am still on my path as a bounty hunters. Up to here, you understand what I mean. What do you guys say? do you accept or not?
snip ~
I agree with you, the red tagging will be a warning sign for people when the bounty manager is doing a new bounty again........
that idea is already implemented on this forum . so many managers as well as project owners and even hunters have already been tagged for thier inapropriate doings but there are those new accounts that may seem to useless to tag because they can still create another one and do the same thing again . i think we should level up the punishment because red tags are not enough .
Bounty hunters should come together as one from now on to avoid developers and bounty managers that are treating hunters very wrongfully for example many bounty projects ends up breaking their very own made rulesafter bounty ends or even before bounty ends and secondly we need to start RED TAGGING projects account or bounty managers account that did awful things to bounty hunters or not paying bounty hunters fully after bounty ends.
What do you guys say? do you accept or not?
What do you guys say? do you accept or not?
I agree with you, the red tagging will be a warning sign for people when the bounty manager is doing a new bounty again to deceive people and steal their efforts, Also a topics in the "Reputation" and the "Scam Accusations" sections would be a good idea until DT members make a flag for the bounty manager and for project team accounts, As for the scam project, all participants in all campaigns of the bounty for this project should write down the article, tweet, post, or video they posted, that this project is scam to warn people.
Right, now many projects and bounty managers don't value bounty hunters. They make rules but when it's time for distribution they make new rules that aren't listed when the campaign starts.
Is your case to red tag a scam project or red tag projects who change their rules.
Projects change bounty payout due to their raised funds during IEO or STO or ICO exercise. You can't expect a project to pay you higher than they raised during their ICO. I think it will be reasonable for everyone to consider everyone else before being emotional about their decisions. If a project underpays after bounty campaign, you ask them reasons for such decision not to red tag. After all such rules are always stated in the campaign.
Projects change bounty payout due to their raised funds during IEO or STO or ICO exercise. You can't expect a project to pay you higher than they raised during their ICO. I think it will be reasonable for everyone to consider everyone else before being emotional about their decisions. If a project underpays after bounty campaign, you ask them reasons for such decision not to red tag. After all such rules are always stated in the campaign.
Bounty hunters should come together as one from now on to avoid developers and bounty managers that are treating hunters very wrongfully for example many bounty projects ends up breaking their very own made rulesafter bounty ends or even before bounty ends and secondly we need to start RED TAGGING projects account or bounty managers account that did awful things to bounty hunters or not paying bounty hunters fully after bounty ends.
What do you guys say? do you accept or not?
i think this is GOOD idea... a lot of bounty managers treats bounty hunters like garbage - any mistake and you will not get your tokens. Sometimes them create own rules at the end of bounty, add KYC etc... What do you guys say? do you accept or not?
Bounty hunters should come together as one from now on to avoid developers and bounty managers that are treating hunters very wrongfully for example many bounty projects ends up breaking their very own made rulesafter bounty ends or even before bounty ends and secondly we need to start RED TAGGING projects account or bounty managers account that did awful things to bounty hunters or not paying bounty hunters fully after bounty ends.
What do you guys say? do you accept or not?
What do you guys say? do you accept or not?
If the case happened to me, I would accept, as a bounty hunter, I was very disappointed, because of the hard work and time spent. Giving a red tagged effective way to signal in the future that the gift project is a scam.
Bounty hunters should come together as one from now on to avoid developers and bounty managers that are treating hunters very wrongfully for example many bounty projects ends up breaking their very own made rulesafter bounty ends or even before bounty ends and secondly we need to start RED TAGGING projects account or bounty managers account that did awful things to bounty hunters or not paying bounty hunters fully after bounty ends.
What do you guys say? do you accept or not?
Well, you can red tagged those managers or project accounts that did bad things to the you bounty hunters but it will not take effect if the DT members doesn't neg them themselves but creating a red tag against the bounty managers (especially popular ones) will create awareness to those bounty hunters that they must avoid that manager because of his past experience. What do you guys say? do you accept or not?
Bounty hunters should come together as one from now on to avoid developers and bounty managers that are treating hunters very wrongfully for example many bounty projects ends up breaking their very own made rulesafter bounty ends or even before bounty ends and secondly we need to start RED TAGGING projects account or bounty managers account that did awful things to bounty hunters or not paying bounty hunters fully after bounty ends.
What do you guys say? do you accept or not?
What do you guys say? do you accept or not?
We can give red trust to the account of the scam project, but usually they are just a new bitcointalk account.
I think it is more effective to give negative trust to the account who accepting to manage or promote the bounty campaign of the scam project.
Bounty hunters should come together as one from now on to avoid developers and bounty managers that are treating hunters very wrongfully for example many bounty projects ends up breaking their very own made rulesafter bounty ends or even before bounty ends and secondly we need to start RED TAGGING projects account or bounty managers account that did awful things to bounty hunters or not paying bounty hunters fully after bounty ends.
What do you guys say? do you accept or not?
What do you guys say? do you accept or not?
We can give red trust to the account of the scam project, but usually they are just a new bitcointalk account.
I think it is more effective to give negative trust to the account who accepting to manage or promote the bounty campaign of the scam project.
what is clear is that bounty participants, bounty managers, project developers and also investors like their chains are interconnected with one another.
so don't just blame one side, there are many factors in a project being a scam.
that is true, because mistakes we cannot see from the mistakes seen by our eyes. many points of view that we must look at and observe to get a conclusion. when the project scam, then all that is purely the fault of the project. bounty managers and bounty hunters or people who promote projects from any advertising or media are Korbar of those who plan to benefit. so don't just blame one side, there are many factors in a project being a scam.
what is clear is that bounty participants, bounty managers, project developers and also investors like their chains are interconnected with one another.
so don't just blame one side, there are many factors in a project being a scam.
so don't just blame one side, there are many factors in a project being a scam.
Yes I appreciate your thoughts and I also like to invite bounty Hunter to create a group to remove fake bounty
You're absolutely right pal, my only consern is that projects that are unpromising and not paying bounty hunters shall be ban with their corresponding team and staffs, but in the part of the manager it should be having red tag so that we cannot anymire join projects that are just fraud and not paying.
Bounty hunter never give up with bad situation of altcoin and bitcoin price, keep start for joining all bounty campaign kinds maybe we found many worth bounty campaign project next time.
from the very beginning I entered bitcointalk, there was a lot that I passed, when following a project, it was not uncommon to find my work not assessed or even no reward at all. and from this I learned how to look at good projects and certainly held by professional teams. and vice versa for ugly projects certainly there are only teams that are only looking for their own benefits. take all the wisdom that exists, as long as we are right and do not violate the rules.
Yes I appreciate your thoughts and I also like to invite bounty Hunter to create a group to remove fake bounty
No need a group man for removing fake bounty because here you can got all info with scam bounty options, then you will find more skills and choose a right bounty. Basically you need more skills for checking trust project and avoid scam project so keep learning do fast. 
Bounty hunters should come together as one from now on to avoid developers and bounty managers that are treating hunters very wrongfully for example many bounty projects ends up breaking their very own made rulesafter bounty ends or even before bounty ends and secondly we need to start RED TAGGING projects account or bounty managers account that did awful things to bounty hunters or not paying bounty hunters fully after bounty ends.
What do you guys say? do you accept or not?
What do you guys say? do you accept or not?
There are two kinds of bounty manager, the independent bounty manager, and the team bounty manager
The independent bounty manager will try to balance both parties, of course, he wants to have positive feedback on bounty hunters communities, because the competition is so stiff, and they don't want to have some sort of boycott on his business.
But he is also working on the campaign and this is where he gets his salary, he will do everything to balance both, because his last campaign will be his best recommendation for the future campaign.
Then we have the own team bounty manager, they work on the project and part of it, although he serves the campaign, he must see to it that there are no reports on their campaign so they will they have the trust of investors.
If both managers are not doing their duty and fulfill their promise they really deserve to get tagged do we have the majority of participants to do that since it will have the risk of not getting their shares.
Jump to: