The President of the United States has always had only 3 things that he - along with the rest of government - might control regarding you and me. These are:
1. Borders, as long as it has to do with corporations, and not simple people passing through with their personal property;
2. National banking and money;
3. Some of the contracts and agreements people make with the United States Government.
That's it.
If you want to take something over the border, make sure it is your own private property and not under contract to the government.
If you want to do this, make your own private money that is only used among people who agree to use it among themselves.
Regarding agreements and contracts with gov, recognize that you are not the person on the agreement. A simple way to prove it to yourself is to get the original of the agreement, and cut into the paper with a sharp knife. Do the same with yourself... a not-very-deep cut on your arm. Which one bleeds? If only you bleed, the contract/agreement isn't you. If you signed it, however, make sure that the paper person does the job required by the agreement.
Or you could block rescind your signature of all contracts with government. But watch out for this, because you perjure yourself if you expect government to do something regarding a canceled contract, later.
So if someone wants to escape exit tax just buy bitcoin and take it over the border. Its not government issued money and president has no control of it. Same with contracts and agreements if it is done peer to peer without goverment middlemen. Border bitcoin does not have a border.
So formal or informal no matter in some peoples opinion. Then where is the borderline, where does it stop?
Australian news he is to busy to hold press conference standing lost in a hardware store is more importend
https://youtu.be/-48gfGpKNNUIt starts with the understanding that that all government directives are aimed at persons, not people. Persons are artificial entities. But sometimes persons are people, when deluded people - men and women - accept that they are persons.
The problem is wiggling - except if you love to take public servants to court on a regular basis for harming you or your property - around past ignorant public servants so that you don't waste your time on their accusations that you are one of their persons, to be controlled.
Mostly they don't shoot people dead on the spot. Usually they simply attempt to enforce service on people, or arrest them. If they arrest someone, they really better know what they are doing... which they mostly don't. Why? Because arresting someone involves hindering their right to travel... their right to go from point A to point B unhindered. Such has been adjudicated by American law to be an infraction of rights granted to people by the 1st Amendment.
Further, if they try to apply a name on a warrant or indictment to you, they can't, until you accept such. So, you have to keep your head screwed on, and tell the judge before trial - a meeting in his chambers - that:
1. The indictment person isn't you, as proven by the knife blood stab into the indictment and into you. One of them doesn't bleed, but if it does, it isn't your blood;
2. You want a statement signed by the judge, that you can show to law enforcement, that the person on the indictment isn't you... so that they leave you alone;
3. Give him fair warning that if he persists in maintaining that the indictment person is you, you will have to file charges against him in his capacity as a man for endangering your life, health, freedom, and your right to pursue happiness. Judges don't like a record that is tarnished like this. It takes them off the job for a while, and might take them off permanently if you prove your case against them.
Next, you need to be a man (woman) and take the necessary steps depending on the result of your meeting.
Government has a job to do. It's only duty is to uphold your right to pursue happiness, as long as you don't wrong someone else. The whole Constitution process is set up for precisely this. It isn't set up to tax men and women. It is set up to tax persons and taxpayers.
The Constitution Preamble sets out the reason for the Constitution. When any governmental authority acts against the Preamble, such governmental authority is acting outside his position in government. He needs to be prosecuted for wrongdoing against anyone. The difficult part is finding out how he harmed you. But it is easy when he attacks you directly for simply exercising your rights.
Now, note that I am talking about the USA. People in Britain and Canada do it differently, although similar.
