Dooglus, maybe you can explain why you have decided on the 1% max profit number exactly. How about a system where the max profit % increases at the total bankroll of the site increases up to a maximum of 1%. While the BR is relatively small (as it is now) that would lessen the price swings and risk from variance to the individual investors. As the BR grows and the the investor risk decreases that way, then the max payout can increase as well.
As an example:
Use the formula Max Profit = Bank Roll/100,000 to calculate the max profit percentage with 0.1% being the minimum (at Bank Roll 10,000) and 1% being the maximum (at Bank Roll 100,000)
At a Bank Roll of 10,000 BTC or less, the max profit will be 0.1%. At a Bank Roll of 50,000, the max profit will be 0.5% and a Bank Roll of 100,000 BTC or more the max profit will be 1%.
This strikes me as an easy solution to implement - the variance issue will go away as the Bank Roll grows but while the BR is relatively small, this would decrease the wild swings. Seems like a simpler and more dynamic solution than two separate Bank Rolls.
WHat is that supposed to address?
If I have 100 BTC in the BR then my variance is pretty much the same for any risk % whether the total BR is 1K BTC or 1 million BTC. As soon as someone starts betting max bets I'll be getting the full risk every roll. Not seeing what total BR size has to do with it. Variance and swings are all relative to the base. Not seeing ANY logic at all for a 10 BTC max bet at 10k deposited but a 1000 BTC max bet if more cash is deposited up to 100k total. I'm assuming the 10k and 100k figures are just random numbers with no math to back why those are better than, say, 9123 and 57243.56.
Plus your suggestion means the max bet is way smaller when deposited cash is low - then rises when there's a lot deposited and, arguably, it doesn't need raising anyway.
