Author

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 1010. (Read 5352429 times)

full member
Activity: 120
Merit: 100
ordered 5 x T9s and 4 x S9s. Lets grow

Wow, you've got the bug bad.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 18
ordered 5 x T9s and 4 x S9s. Lets grow
sr. member
Activity: 508
Merit: 250
Block by Tech-Display!  This is your 7th Kano block and our 1st of the new day! Cheesy
Beat me also ... I usually see them first - except for whoever finds the block - though few people watch their miners output Smiley
A7v2

Sweet!!!  I can almost smell the green now! Haha Smiley. What a size too!  Looks like the loyalty to Kano is paying off guys!  Hurray! Smiley Smiley Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
Just got the notice that my new miners shipped!  Grin Adding a T9 and an Avalon 721 come Monday. Should bring me up to about 103th/s  Grin Grin Grin

Sweet!  The more the merrier! Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 277
Merit: 250
Just got the notice that my new miners shipped!  Grin Adding a T9 and an Avalon 721 come Monday. Should bring me up to about 103th/s  Grin Grin Grin
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
Block!
You beat me to it! And I saw it 7 seconds in. Welcome Block Friday!

I was just starting to watch episode 11 of The Expanse and I saw the block pop up on the cgminer monitor right when it happened.  I'm not always right in front of the computer Grin
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Block by Tech-Display!  This is your 7th Kano block and our 1st of the new day! Cheesy
Beat me also ... I usually see them first - except for whoever finds the block - though few people watch their miners output Smiley
A7v2
hero member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 597
Block again Smiley pool luck is 111.55% , i think the total pool hashrate will jump a few TH/s in the next few days Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 277
Merit: 250
Block!
You beat me to it! And I saw it 7 seconds in. Welcome Block Friday!
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
Block by Tech-Display!  This is your 7th Kano block and our 1st of the new day! Cheesy
member
Activity: 118
Merit: 10
Anyway I'm done. Have a wonderful night. May it bring the pool many blocks.
member
Activity: 118
Merit: 10
I get it now. I now see why CK left. Kiss
If you think I falsify my statistics then you shouldn't be mining here.
Seriously, don't mine on a pool you don't trust, even if that's me.

Edit: and he didn't leave, he kicked me out Smiley

Just a FYI. If your wife kicks you out. She's leaving you. Wink
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
I get it now. I now see why CK left. Kiss
If you think I falsify my statistics then you shouldn't be mining here.
Seriously, don't mine on a pool you don't trust, even if that's me.

Edit: and he didn't leave, he kicked me out Smiley
member
Activity: 118
Merit: 10
I get it now. I now see why CK left. Kiss
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Please. With the power of mathmatics.  Compare your pool with antpool and bitfury. It will prove your bad luck S9v1 bullshit.

I don't have the statistics on any other pool.
I'd hazard a guess that no other pool that doesn't use CKDB has those statistics available and those that do use CKDB probably have no idea about how to analyse it (I know one specific case of that being a fact)
Simple. Hash rate to blocks found over the past year.
Everyone is claiming that the s9's are performing better on bitmain pools. Which is bullshit. Your pool has performed as well (or as shitty) as every other pool out there. So either the s9v1 is shitty on everyone's pool. Or just as good.
Again - incorrect.
Firstly, you are assuming that every pool is only mining with S9v1 - which is obviously false.
If you mix statistics you then have a result about the mixed statistics, not about one part of those statistics.

Secondly, if you separated out the S9v1 from everything else, you'd also have to ensure that every pool mining with S9v1 is doing so in the same manner - that may be true, but it's not something you can know for sure without knowing in 100% detail pretty much everything about what's inside an S9v1.
This is where the S9v1 statistics come into play ... ... ... ... ...
Again incorrect. I am assuming that bitfury is not using any s9 at all. Yet they are performing as well as antpool. And Kano pool is performing as well as both. So that means s9's are not performing better on antpool. And it also means that the s9's are not performing worse on Kano pool.
Um ... the numbers clearly say the S9v1 are performing badly ... ... ...
member
Activity: 118
Merit: 10
Please. With the power of mathmatics.  Compare your pool with antpool and bitfury. It will prove your bad luck S9v1 bullshit.

I don't have the statistics on any other pool.
I'd hazard a guess that no other pool that doesn't use CKDB has those statistics available and those that do use CKDB probably have no idea about how to analyse it (I know one specific case of that being a fact)
Simple. Hash rate to blocks found over the past year.
Everyone is claiming that the s9's are performing better on bitmain pools. Which is bullshit. Your pool has performed as well (or as shitty) as every other pool out there. So either the s9v1 is shitty on everyone's pool. Or just as good.
Again - incorrect.
Firstly, you are assuming that every pool is only mining with S9v1 - which is obviously false.
If you mix statistics you then have a result about the mixed statistics, not about one part of those statistics.

Secondly, if you separated out the S9v1 from everything else, you'd also have to ensure that every pool mining with S9v1 is doing so in the same manner - that may be true, but it's not something you can know for sure without knowing in 100% detail pretty much everything about what's inside an S9v1.
This is where the S9v1 statistics come into play ... ... ... ... ...
Again incorrect. I am assuming that bitfury is not using any s9 at all. Yet they are performing as well as antpool. And Kano pool is performing as well as both. So that means s9's are not performing better on antpool. And it also means that the s9's are not performing worse on Kano pool.
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Please. With the power of mathmatics.  Compare your pool with antpool and bitfury. It will prove your bad luck S9v1 bullshit.

I don't have the statistics on any other pool.
I'd hazard a guess that no other pool that doesn't use CKDB has those statistics available and those that do use CKDB probably have no idea about how to analyse it (I know one specific case of that being a fact)
Simple. Hash rate to blocks found over the past year.
Everyone is claiming that the s9's are performing better on bitmain pools. Which is bullshit. Your pool has performed as well (or as shitty) as every other pool out there. So either the s9v1 is shitty on everyone's pool. Or just as good.
Again - incorrect.
Firstly, you are assuming that every pool is only mining with S9v1 - which is obviously false.
If you mix statistics you then have a result about the mixed statistics, not about one part of those statistics.

Secondly, if you separated out the S9v1 from everything else, you'd also have to ensure that every pool mining with S9v1 is doing so in the same manner - that may be true, but it's not something you can know for sure without knowing in 100% detail pretty much everything about what's inside an S9v1.
This is where the S9v1 statistics come into play ... ... ... ... ...
member
Activity: 118
Merit: 10
I'm  done.
 I really doubt you will compare pools. Even though it would bring more people to the pool. Your ego can't stand being wrong.

Mine on.
member
Activity: 118
Merit: 10
...
Variance. Just like your total pool hash rate. The higher the hash rate, the less variance. Same with the s9v1. Had the majority of the S9v1 people not left. The less variance which means more blocks.
That's false.
Again learn about statistics.

And yet you claim a higher pool hash rate will lower the variance.  So I guess you have been lying to everyone.
Logic fail.

A implies B
does not guarantee
B implies A

That car is green.
Everything green is a car ...............

Variance goes both ways: more and less. That's why it's called variance.

Logic fail.

More hash equals more blocks.  Equals Less variance
member
Activity: 118
Merit: 10
Please. With the power of mathmatics.  Compare your pool with antpool and bitfury. It will prove your bad luck S9v1 bullshit.

I don't have the statistics on any other pool.
I'd hazard a guess that no other pool that doesn't use CKDB has those statistics available and those that do use CKDB probably have no idea about how to analyse it (I know one specific case of that being a fact)
Simple. Hash rate to blocks found over the past year.
Everyone is claiming that the s9's are performing better on bitmain pools. Which is bullshit. Your pool has performed as well (or as shitty) as every other pool out there. So either the s9v1 is shitty on everyone's pool. Or just as good.
Jump to: