Author

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 1085. (Read 5352445 times)

legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 4597

Well it is actually just that run of 19 blocks + 1 orphan that killed the stats.
(and the fact that the orphan was so out of the pools control it was ridiculous - caused by 3 separate external events at the same time)

The 20 starting from last block in November 630.819% and finishing with an orphan + 178.228%, and finally that worst record 744.977%

If we just pretend those 20 blocks never happened it all looks great Cheesy

Those 20 are now just outside the last 50 blocks, so all the stats for 50 blocks or less look ok again and the very long term stats are good enough to cover that run of bad luck.

I am curios to learn whether the following had any relation to late November-December bad luck?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16605935
and the discussion between Matt and kano that follows

this change seems to correlate precisely in time with pool's performance in that period.
is this just a coincidence?
I am cool with current performance, but would you care to comment, please?
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
I just thought I'd also pop in and say 'Hi' as I've just pointed some miners towards the pool.

I'll be progressively adding additional hash over the coming week.
The more the merrier Cheesy
full member
Activity: 120
Merit: 100
I just thought I'd also pop in and say 'Hi' as I've just pointed some miners towards the pool.

I'll be progressively adding additional hash over the coming week.
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
LOL I hope no one here listened to "a guy"

Quote from: slush pool
59.37 %
Last 10 Blocks
82.06 %
Last 50 Blocks
97.79 %
Last 250 Blocks

Kano, I still can't put into PG words what I think of you personally, but you run a good pool. Cheers!

Well it is actually just that run of 19 blocks + 1 orphan that killed the stats.
(and the fact that the orphan was so out of the pools control it was ridiculous - caused by 3 separate external events at the same time)

The 20 starting from last block in November 630.819% and finishing with an orphan + 178.228%, and finally that worst record 744.977%

If we just pretend those 20 blocks never happened it all looks great Cheesy

Those 20 are now just outside the last 50 blocks, so all the stats for 50 blocks or less look ok again and the very long term stats are good enough to cover that run of bad luck.
hero member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 552
Retired IRCX God
LOL I hope no one here listened to "a guy"

Quote from: slush pool
59.37 %
Last 10 Blocks
82.06 %
Last 50 Blocks
97.79 %
Last 250 Blocks

Kano, I still can't put into PG words what I think of you personally, but you run a good pool. Cheers!
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1003
Ditto on the welcome, bit2255...a good place to be here,
member
Activity: 136
Merit: 11
Welcome bit2255!

Glad you are here Smiley
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
up and running!!!

Feels good to be a (productive) member of your pool!
We got lots of them - but always good to have more - welcome aboard Cheesy
member
Activity: 125
Merit: 10
up and running!!!

Feels good to be a (productive) member of your pool!
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Apologies in advance...

I'm a brand new R4 (home) miner. Just started hashing today and I am totally a NEWBIE!

I would like to use your pool - CKPool - but I cannot get my antminer configured properly. I am currently mining (i guess) directly to antminer .  When I attempt to configure antminer to CKpool the miner status goes to zero, instead of the approx 8800 GH/s prior to my attempts.

Again, I am a very very newbie and as soon as i figure this out, I will get a second R4.

Do you guys have a CKpool config for dummies/screenshots for blockheads like me?

Again, I apologize for all of this. (i have searched and read allot of this thread, but without success)
On the miner setup page, use something like this:
Code:
+--------------------+-------------------------------------+
+ Pool1:             | stratum+tcp://stratum.kano.is:3333  |
+--------------------+-------------------------------------+
+ Worker:            | bit2255.worker                      |
+--------------------+-------------------------------------+
+ Password:          | x                                   +
+--------------------+-------------------------------------+
Of course if your pool username is different then replace bit2255 with your pool username Smiley
member
Activity: 125
Merit: 10
I started there and still when I change the config data to that, the result is no hashing... I am trying to get a screenshot to post here..still working on how to do that.
hero member
Activity: 1610
Merit: 538
I'm in BTC XTC
Go to Kano.is.  The first page will teach you all you need to know to connect here.  Good choice on pool, BTW!!

Mine ON!
member
Activity: 125
Merit: 10
Apologies in advance...

I'm a brand new R4 (home) miner. Just started hashing today and I am totally a NEWBIE!

I would like to use your pool - CKPool - but I cannot get my antminer configured properly. I am currently mining (i guess) directly to antminer .  When I attempt to configure antminer to CKpool the miner status goes to zero, instead of the approx 8800 GH/s prior to my attempts.

Again, I am a very very newbie and as soon as i figure this out, I will get a second R4.

Do you guys have a CKpool config for dummies/screenshots for blockheads like me?

Again, I apologize for all of this. (i have searched and read allot of this thread, but without success)



legendary
Activity: 4354
Merit: 9201
'The right to privacy matters'
This speaks for itself.  I am hoping for it to get greener for the year.

I have a new R4  coming  how well are they doing here?  Better then the old firmware s9's I moved away?




Latest update of the miner all time stats (since May 2016)
Code:
 CDF[Erl] | Miner |    DiffAcc
 0.997872 | S9v1  | 27,650.93G | 112.59655135 BDR |  84 Blocks
 0.798780 | A7v2  |    513.85G |   1.60335652 BDR |   1 Block
 0.531652 | A7v1  |  2,851.43G |   9.91705950 BDR |  10 Blocks
 0.167142 | S9v2  |  5,683.25G |  19.28094844 BDR |  24 Blocks
All OK as usual ... except S9v1 Tongue
Not a single block from any of the new R4's?
Wonder how many R4's are in live the pool?
Mine has been hashing away for almost a month now. Hope it finds a block for us soon.
Thanks for the update.
That's a good point!  No R4's have found a block yet on the pool..
They probably fall under S9v2 - bitmain don't say "S9" they just say the version of their fork.
So they are probably S9v2 - if someone wants to tell me a worker that is only R4 I can check to see what they call themselves.
My only miner is an R4 B2.
Worker Name: wblaster.antMiner_R4_mab
OK, that shows the same firmware as S9v2 - so I'll mark that from now on as S9v2+R4v2

Will be hard to tell how the new R4's are doing because they show up the same as an S9v2.

Well if auto tune r4  firmware is the same as s9 auto tune firmware  the assumption would be they make blocks at a decent pace.

So my 30th in older manual tune s9's  remains with f2pool
I will expand on kano with the auto-tune R4 which should not hurt luck.
newbie
Activity: 65
Merit: 0
This speaks for itself.  I am hoping for it to get greener for the year.

I have a new R4  coming  how well are they doing here?  Better then the old firmware s9's I moved away?


https://i.imgur.com/U7PknCm.png

Latest update of the miner all time stats (since May 2016)
Code:
 CDF[Erl] | Miner |    DiffAcc
 0.997872 | S9v1  | 27,650.93G | 112.59655135 BDR |  84 Blocks
 0.798780 | A7v2  |    513.85G |   1.60335652 BDR |   1 Block
 0.531652 | A7v1  |  2,851.43G |   9.91705950 BDR |  10 Blocks
 0.167142 | S9v2  |  5,683.25G |  19.28094844 BDR |  24 Blocks
All OK as usual ... except S9v1 Tongue
Not a single block from any of the new R4's?
Wonder how many R4's are in live the pool?
Mine has been hashing away for almost a month now. Hope it finds a block for us soon.
Thanks for the update.
That's a good point!  No R4's have found a block yet on the pool..
They probably fall under S9v2 - bitmain don't say "S9" they just say the version of their fork.
So they are probably S9v2 - if someone wants to tell me a worker that is only R4 I can check to see what they call themselves.
My only miner is an R4 B2.
Worker Name: wblaster.antMiner_R4_mab
OK, that shows the same firmware as S9v2 - so I'll mark that from now on as S9v2+R4v2

Will be hard to tell how the new R4's are doing because they show up the same as an S9v2.
hero member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 552
Retired IRCX God
Blocktastic! Glad we're all smart enough not to listen to "a guy"...  Cheesy
Best reply ever  Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 1610
Merit: 538
I'm in BTC XTC
Blocktastic! Glad we're all smart enough not to listen to "a guy"...  Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 508
Merit: 250
We're on GREEN FIRE guys!  Haha Smiley
legendary
Activity: 4354
Merit: 9201
'The right to privacy matters'
This speaks for itself.  I am hoping for it to get greener for the year.

I have a new R4  coming  how well are they doing here?  Better then the old firmware s9's I moved away?


newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
Killin' it on these blocks today Smiley
Also, the AvalonMiner 741 is apparently now available! https://canaan.io/2017/01/18/the-canaan-avalonminer-741-roq-solid-refined/
Jump to: