Mine on...
Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 1088. (Read 5352445 times)
January 16, 2017, 09:40:42 PM
I sorta kinda gave up listening to what "a guy" said for Lent in 1983...
Mine on...
Mine on...
January 16, 2017, 09:13:00 PM
kano PPS% last 6 months ( after halving )
(98.17%+72.91%+95.36%+106.06%+98.67%+96.84%)/6 = 94.66%
"Halving" actually occurred towards the end of July so that number would be worse if you 'randomly' chose after halving (98.17%+72.91%+95.36%+106.06%+98.67%+96.84%)/6 = 94.66%
It's not actually correct to just average the numbers either ...
But if we go by the stats shown there (since June) and calculate it correctly:
709 Blocks, Expected 732.11 = Mean 103.3% = Luck 96.8%
Block size (txn) is 103.0% (11383.66479148 BTC, expected 11050 BTC for 709 blocks)
Pool fee = 0.9%
Yes fees are lower here than at slush.
So PPS for the table is 98.8% - better than any of the large pools.
Yes luck for December (and the last block in November) sucked.
Yes you cannot control luck (other than reducing losing blocks e.g. orphans)
When was the last unpaid (orphan) block at slush?
January 16, 2017, 08:51:02 PM
LOL Slush shows Last 50 Blocks @ 87.51 % of expected
January 16, 2017, 08:32:23 PM
Hello, a guy is telling me that kano luck has been bellow average since months, that he recommend slush pool. :S
If you look at the pools stat's, in the past 6 months the only really bad month was December. The others are in the ballpark. You can't have good or bad luck indefinitely, here or on slush.
January 16, 2017, 08:32:01 PM
kano PPS% last 6 months ( after halving )
(98.17%+72.91%+95.36%+106.06%+98.67%+96.84%)/6 = 94.66%
(98.17%+72.91%+95.36%+106.06%+98.67%+96.84%)/6 = 94.66%
January 16, 2017, 08:08:21 PM
Hello, a guy is telling me that kano luck has been bellow average since months, that he recommend slush pool. :S
Forget pools, you should ask the guy for lottery numbers.
January 16, 2017, 07:54:54 PM
Sounds like expert advice to me. I always follow what a guy says... 
January 16, 2017, 07:39:31 PM
Hello, a guy is telling me that kano luck has been bellow average since months, that he recommend slush pool. :S
January 16, 2017, 11:03:01 AM
Block by blockmines! This is his 11th Kano block and our 2nd of the day!
Good way to wake up this morning!
Cheers to blockmines! A quick <20% diff block that's extra juicy fat with fees! Gotta love this pool! Good way to wake up this morning!
Mine on!!!
FAT reward - 13.84266510
January 16, 2017, 10:24:50 AM
Block by blockmines! This is his 11th Kano block and our 2nd of the day!
Good way to wake up this morning!
Cheers to blockmines! A quick <20% diff block that's extra juicy fat with fees! Gotta love this pool! Good way to wake up this morning!
Mine on!!!
January 16, 2017, 10:21:26 AM
Block by blockmines! This is his 11th Kano block and our 2nd of the day!
Good way to wake up this morning!
Good way to wake up this morning!
January 16, 2017, 09:13:22 AM
Anyone considering mining on Eligius, even as a backup - be aware that they have been lying about the pool hash rate for almost a year - ignoring requests in the pool thread to update it for that long also, and they currently hide the pool hash rate completely under the excuse of ... it'll appear some time soon ... though considering their latest update 'soon' took about a year ... you can guess when that might be
Certainly do not use that as a backup pool.
... anyway they mine empty blocks on a block change coz the pool code sux slow - so no one should mine there anyway.
Certainly do not use that as a backup pool.
... anyway they mine empty blocks on a block change coz the pool code sux slow - so no one should mine there anyway.
Thanks for the heads up Kano..
I started with that pool and something just didn't seem quite right to me with the way it was being run. Needless to say, I'm mining here now and appreciate the transparency!
January 16, 2017, 09:07:32 AM
I have one of those, a Radeon, I used to mine with, but can't afford 400W on a video card
The system only consumes 400 Watts when mining. Just using it as a regular video card the power usage is a fraction of that. Even when gaming it shouldn't ever hit the 400 Watt mark.
I mined with two GPU's, Radeon 5770 and 5830, and they never went over 385 Watts.
Well, your system is anything but typical
. I would trust in the objective truth of the watt meter too.So you had some difficulty with a GeForce 230? I just built a test Ubuntu system and had trouble with an integrated nVidia GeForce 6150. I worked around that by installing a Quadro 620 that I borrowed. So I need to get a better nVidia card.
January 16, 2017, 07:47:14 AM
January 16, 2017, 07:10:41 AM
S9v2 by schmokeandapancake
January 16, 2017, 07:06:22 AM
Block !
January 16, 2017, 03:51:09 AM
what happend to the miner if you try to block the comunication and just allow tcp?
Is it then working, and speed up on boot?
I do not know and i do not care dude...All this crap shall be trashed immediately for scrap. That was what i told to my friend. But you know the story he payed for it once and he will continue to pay to BITMAIN on a daly basis End of story!Is it then working, and speed up on boot?
Decision is yours.
If you wish you can play with that if you have one
January 16, 2017, 03:45:45 AM
what happend to the miner if you try to block the comunication and just allow tcp?
Is it then working, and speed up on boot?
Is it then working, and speed up on boot?
January 16, 2017, 03:13:28 AM
Latest update of the miner all time stats (since May 2016)
All OK as usual ... except S9v1
Not a single block from any of the new R4's?Code:
CDF[Erl] | Miner | DiffAcc
0.997872 | S9v1 | 27,650.93G | 112.59655135 BDR | 84 Blocks
0.798780 | A7v2 | 513.85G | 1.60335652 BDR | 1 Block
0.531652 | A7v1 | 2,851.43G | 9.91705950 BDR | 10 Blocks
0.167142 | S9v2 | 5,683.25G | 19.28094844 BDR | 24 Blocks
Wonder how many R4's are in live the pool?
Mine has been hashing away for almost a month now. Hope it finds a block for us soon.
Thanks for the update.
So they are probably S9v2 - if someone wants to tell me a worker that is only R4 I can check to see what they call themselves.
Worker Name: wblaster.antMiner_R4_mab
Yeah...
Yesterday I was just helping a friend to repair his broken S9 (I do not know which revision the crap was) and i was looking at tcpdump in my router to see what S9 is doing....And Guess what....S9 is Sending !!!!unatended!!!! ICP destination host unreachable with a pay load something like json data to X IP. Then X IP responds back WITH UDP and payload something like json data. Sounds familiar
There are a lots of ICMP and UDP packets coming in/out S9 miner to UNKNOWN IP's containing guess what
The funny part is that S9 controller is custom made with special HW and there is no way someone to put customised FW inside it except BITMAIN. So i guess this incredible feature is BY design. The other funny part is that you have to wait this shit for 10 mins or so while ASICS are warming up
Pathetic. Meanwhile the mentioned UDP/ICMP are going in and out like creasy. Probably to help to warming up process More Over after warming up process finishes UDP/ICMP DO CONTINUE TO COME IN AND OUTSo ... If in doubt EVERYONE CAN CHECK THIS BY HIMSELF
I am just wandering how that fact remained in secret having in mind how many folks have them in their hands
It is just one minute to fire a tcpdump and see what is going on. A clean and healthy miner behaviour is:
1 UDP DNS requests to resolve pool ip and NTP IP
2. Sync TIME - UDP to NTP servers
3. Start to MINE TCP ONLY!
4. Repeat one and two
5. MINE TCP ONLY
January 15, 2017, 10:45:31 PM
Of course, if the moon and the stars were to align so that CKPool were to pay out better than any other pool in the history of Bitcoin, well let's just say there would be no complaints from me... or any other miner here either I imagine
One can always dream
One can always dream
Jump to: