Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 1157. (Read 5352229 times)
November 27, 2016, 02:30:43 PM
He is probably trying to get banned so he can go on r/btc and cry censorship. everyone just ignore him
November 27, 2016, 02:04:37 PM
Well, I'm glad to have your agreement on this issue...
Seems that English is not your first language and I have to be more clear:- No one agrees with you,
- Trolling Kano's thread to call him a "troll" makes you a total hypocrite, and
- Kano registering a concern is not trolling
November 27, 2016, 01:40:45 PM
November 27, 2016, 01:25:07 PM
Kano's talking about banning me from Bitcointalk, I don't mine on his pool (although I am a miner)
--snip
Since you do not mine on this pool, go the hell away and quit clogging up our pool with your ranting. Thank you.
Ignore Option Implemented. Goodbye.
November 27, 2016, 01:15:18 PM
Reading through the comments, my understanding is that a 0.13.1 node will fill its outgoing connections with other 0.13.1 nodes on priority, and only connect to non-0.13.1 nodes if it cannot find any 0.13.1 nodes to connect to. It will accept inbound connections from any version.
Looking at one of my own 0.13.1 daemons, I get the following from calling getpeerinfo (I snipped a lot to only show relevant info):
Based on that, I can clearly see I've got outbound connections to nodes with a version lower than 0.13.1. Here's the call to getinfo (balance removed):
So, I'm running a 0.13.1 node that has outbound connections to nodes with a version less than 0.13.1.
Looking at one of my own 0.13.1 daemons, I get the following from calling getpeerinfo (I snipped a lot to only show relevant info):
Code:
[
{
"id": 6,
"addr": "84.245.27.185:8333",
"addrlocal": "50.2.189.35:42918",
"services": "0000000000000005",
"relaytxes": true,
"lastsend": 1480270212,
"lastrecv": 1480270213,
"bytessent": 224159059,
"bytesrecv": 582881556,
"conntime": 1478943142,
"timeoffset": -6,
"pingtime": 0.120353,
"minping": 0.11485,
"version": 70012,
"subver": "/Satoshi:0.12.0/",
"inbound": false,
"startingheight": 438527,
"banscore": 0,
"synced_headers": 440804,
"synced_blocks": 440804,
"inflight": [
],
...
{
"id": 17,
"addr": "213.251.186.216:8333",
"addrlocal": "50.2.189.35:51776",
"services": "0000000000000005",
"relaytxes": true,
"lastsend": 1480270212,
"lastrecv": 1480270212,
"bytessent": 295398321,
"bytesrecv": 125067139,
"conntime": 1478943165,
"timeoffset": 0,
"pingtime": 0.209322,
"minping": 0.10465,
"version": 70014,
"subver": "/Satoshi:0.13.0/",
"inbound": false,
"startingheight": 438527,
"banscore": 0,
"synced_headers": 440852,
"synced_blocks": 440852,
"inflight": [
],
{
"id": 6,
"addr": "84.245.27.185:8333",
"addrlocal": "50.2.189.35:42918",
"services": "0000000000000005",
"relaytxes": true,
"lastsend": 1480270212,
"lastrecv": 1480270213,
"bytessent": 224159059,
"bytesrecv": 582881556,
"conntime": 1478943142,
"timeoffset": -6,
"pingtime": 0.120353,
"minping": 0.11485,
"version": 70012,
"subver": "/Satoshi:0.12.0/",
"inbound": false,
"startingheight": 438527,
"banscore": 0,
"synced_headers": 440804,
"synced_blocks": 440804,
"inflight": [
],
...
{
"id": 17,
"addr": "213.251.186.216:8333",
"addrlocal": "50.2.189.35:51776",
"services": "0000000000000005",
"relaytxes": true,
"lastsend": 1480270212,
"lastrecv": 1480270212,
"bytessent": 295398321,
"bytesrecv": 125067139,
"conntime": 1478943165,
"timeoffset": 0,
"pingtime": 0.209322,
"minping": 0.10465,
"version": 70014,
"subver": "/Satoshi:0.13.0/",
"inbound": false,
"startingheight": 438527,
"banscore": 0,
"synced_headers": 440852,
"synced_blocks": 440852,
"inflight": [
],
Based on that, I can clearly see I've got outbound connections to nodes with a version lower than 0.13.1. Here's the call to getinfo (balance removed):
Code:
{
"version": 130100,
"protocolversion": 70014,
"walletversion": 60000,
"blocks": 440852,
"timeoffset": 0,
"connections": 125,
"proxy": "",
"difficulty": 281800917193.1958,
"testnet": false,
"keypoololdest": 1452577986,
"keypoolsize": 100,
"paytxfee": 0.00000000,
"relayfee": 0.00005000,
"errors": ""
}
"version": 130100,
"protocolversion": 70014,
"walletversion": 60000,
"blocks": 440852,
"timeoffset": 0,
"connections": 125,
"proxy": "",
"difficulty": 281800917193.1958,
"testnet": false,
"keypoololdest": 1452577986,
"keypoolsize": 100,
"paytxfee": 0.00000000,
"relayfee": 0.00005000,
"errors": ""
}
So, I'm running a 0.13.1 node that has outbound connections to nodes with a version less than 0.13.1.
November 27, 2016, 12:56:50 PM
Well...the "Ignore" button still works.
November 27, 2016, 12:43:44 PM
Well my screwy S9 has started xing out again. Hopefully a night off and a restart tomorrow will bring it back to close to normal again. One of these days that's not going to work anymore. I have a feeling it is the controller. Which part of the controller I don't know. I really hate to be pulling that sucker apart again and swapping out parts to trouble-shoot the problem. Doing that makes for two miners off-line, not just one. %#%^&%$#%^&& Bitman!
There goes my 5Nd
When/if I get it repaired I will be going through Colorado. No more shipping parts to china for hundreds of dollars!
I wish Canaan had been a real competition as far as hash/cash. But if it comes down to it, I'll just plug in one of my old S7's and over-clock it up to about 725 - It's cold enough here for that now with no worriers about over heating - until I can get the part -eventually - repaired. Damn crappy (expensive) cheap manufacturing!! POS
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!
Come on BLOCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!! Fall, you MthrFvkn block!
There goes my 5Nd
When/if I get it repaired I will be going through Colorado. No more shipping parts to china for hundreds of dollars!
I wish Canaan had been a real competition as far as hash/cash. But if it comes down to it, I'll just plug in one of my old S7's and over-clock it up to about 725 - It's cold enough here for that now with no worriers about over heating - until I can get the part -eventually - repaired. Damn crappy (expensive) cheap manufacturing!! POS
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!
Come on BLOCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!! Fall, you MthrFvkn block!
Sorry for the OT.
I plugged back in the crappy S9 that began showing errors last night. After a few minutes, X's started appearing in mass, at random on two of the boards. Changed the frequency to 550Mhz (it's supposed to be a 600Mhz miner), and restarted again.
It's been running about 20 minutes now with just 4 or 5 x's on one board. This was how it has run for the last week or so. It's now averaging 11TH for the miner. Hopefully it will hang in there and stay like that. I'm in no mood to be screwing around with hardware trouble-shooting this Sunday morning!
So I will have to mine with ~48TH on the pool for awhile until I can straighten out this wayward miner. A sledge hammer comes to mind as a good tool for this purpose....
Mine on!!!
EDIT: Having one of four S9 miners off-line for about 12 hours put a big dent in my shift graft. It was looking so pretty and steady.
November 27, 2016, 12:31:21 PM
Block! by Geronimo
More than 1BTC fees
More than 1BTC fees
Yeah, that was very nice!!
A 13.56562919 BTC block reward! More than one whole BTC extra distributed to our miners! (As it should be!)Three blocks for the day so far and the day is young. I'm ready for a 4 or 5-block day!! Let's GO TEAM!!
November 27, 2016, 12:13:32 PM
I've only used "Ignore" once. That individual is apparently no longer "around."
May have to use it again.
May have to use it again.
November 27, 2016, 11:53:04 AM
Banks is a moron!
While I'm the 1st to call Kano on anything that I think he says being bullshit, I cannot (for the life of me) see how pointing out a flaw in application is "trolling"
Well there's a whole thread where he can post as he likes on that subject.While I'm the 1st to call Kano on anything that I think he says being bullshit, I cannot (for the life of me) see how pointing out a flaw in application is "trolling"
I've even left his link to it in my reply to his first post on it
Just seems that's not good enough for him ...
Far be for me to judge whom is right or wrong.
It is your pool and you have the ability to ban an ip for reasons you think are correct.
I am assuming you banned him for good reasons.
I am assuming he thinks you banned him for bad reasons.
If you look at my post on the previous page, I included what he first posted (but deleted his first post)
Since then he's posted that message, again, and again, and again, almost 40 times in this thread.
I keep deleting the repeat posts (and anything else extra of the few other posts he's done)
It would seem that being on the previous page is too much for him to deal with.
I always could just delete it all completely, but for now I've left my reply that includes his original post.
November 27, 2016, 11:48:29 AM
Banks is a moron!
While I'm the 1st to call Kano on anything that I think he says being bullshit, I cannot (for the life of me) see how pointing out a flaw in application is "trolling"
Well there's a whole thread where he can post as he likes on that subject.While I'm the 1st to call Kano on anything that I think he says being bullshit, I cannot (for the life of me) see how pointing out a flaw in application is "trolling"
I've even left his link to it in my reply to his first post on it
Just seems that's not good enough for him ...
Far be for me to judge whom is right or wrong.
It is your pool and you have the ability to ban an ip for reasons you think are correct.
I am assuming you banned him for good reasons.
I am assuming he thinks you banned him for bad reasons.
November 27, 2016, 11:32:52 AM
I love the 'ignore' button, and being BTC miners we hate Banks in principle!
November 27, 2016, 11:19:45 AM
Banks is a moron!
While I'm the 1st to call Kano on anything that I think he says being bullshit, I cannot (for the life of me) see how pointing out a flaw in application is "trolling"
Well there's a whole thread where he can post as he likes on that subject.While I'm the 1st to call Kano on anything that I think he says being bullshit, I cannot (for the life of me) see how pointing out a flaw in application is "trolling"
I've even left his link to it in my reply to his first post on it
Just seems that's not good enough for him ...
November 27, 2016, 11:17:28 AM
Banks is a moron!
While I'm the 1st to call Kano on anything that I think he says being bullshit, I cannot (for the life of me) see how pointing out a flaw in application is "trolling"
While I'm the 1st to call Kano on anything that I think he says being bullshit, I cannot (for the life of me) see how pointing out a flaw in application is "trolling"
November 27, 2016, 11:16:24 AM
Anyway, anyone wondering what's going on with the thread locking
There's this ... Carlton Banks ... who's post I included fully on the previous page.
He seems to think that's not good enough and has so far posted more than 30 times the same post on the thread.
It would also seem that mods are asleep
That repeat posting is clear grounds for a ban since I've deleted the posts but he keeps reposting it over and over.
So sooner or later his account will be banned and then things will be back to normal as they have been for ... 2 years
Well...we had a term for such folks in my previous profession. Ethics prohibits me from typing it. There's this ... Carlton Banks ... who's post I included fully on the previous page.
He seems to think that's not good enough and has so far posted more than 30 times the same post on the thread.
It would also seem that mods are asleep
That repeat posting is clear grounds for a ban since I've deleted the posts but he keeps reposting it over and over.
So sooner or later his account will be banned and then things will be back to normal as they have been for ... 2 years
November 27, 2016, 11:15:38 AM
Look mate.
I don't know who you are but you are a big troll.
We know how to read and write and it is our decision to be in Kano.
So, Fuck off.
I don't know who you are but you are a big troll.
We know how to read and write and it is our decision to be in Kano.
So, Fuck off.
November 27, 2016, 11:00:32 AM
Anyway, anyone wondering what's going on with the thread locking
There's this ... Carlton Banks ... who's post I included fully on the previous page.
He seems to think that's not good enough and has so far posted more than 30 times the same post on the thread.
It would also seem that mods are asleep
That repeat posting is clear grounds for a ban since I've deleted the posts but he keeps reposting it over and over.
So sooner or later his account will be banned and then things will be back to normal as they have been for ... 2 years
There's this ... Carlton Banks ... who's post I included fully on the previous page.
He seems to think that's not good enough and has so far posted more than 30 times the same post on the thread.
It would also seem that mods are asleep
That repeat posting is clear grounds for a ban since I've deleted the posts but he keeps reposting it over and over.
So sooner or later his account will be banned and then things will be back to normal as they have been for ... 2 years
November 27, 2016, 09:59:55 AM
great job miners) three blocks today! rulez diggers)
November 27, 2016, 09:56:49 AM
I see that Kano is wide awake and catching all the blocks
November 27, 2016, 09:51:32 AM
Block! by gmb
Jump to: