Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 1157. (Read 5352633 times)
November 27, 2016, 03:59:21 PM
November 27, 2016, 03:43:58 PM
Quit quoting this imbecile, I have him on ignore for a reason! 
November 27, 2016, 03:35:53 PM
Incidentally, if anyone ever gets into a dispute with Kano and/or CKolivas on Bitcointalk, and the following users appear in the thread to uncritically back every word that Kano/CK says:
- ...
- ComputerGenie
- ...
Dafuq are you smoking? I, truly, think this is the first thing Kano and I have ever agreed on...
November 27, 2016, 03:00:46 PM
You are calling Kano unreliable for fucking zero reasons, payouts have always came in time and just in the way that's been told us.
I can't see how you are here now "helping" us miners.
I can't see how you are here now "helping" us miners.
Kano is reliable: reliably unpredictable.
He's a psychologically damaged man-child, constantly seeking the attention and the approval he was likely deprived of growing up, and all too willing to behave in an apallingly anti-social manner in order to soothe his miniature ego.
Trusting a supposed adult that can't clean that act up with your money is not sensible, he's too temperamental to be running any kind of asset trust.
And the pool is great.
You can't say the same about Antpool or F2pool for example.
November 27, 2016, 02:58:39 PM
Yeah I'm part of the Finnish Polar Bear Investigation Team 
November 27, 2016, 02:57:41 PM
Can we start a new conspiracy thread to continue this discussion? There I will reveal how Ck and Kano are CIA and I am a paid shill.
We should reserve this thread for chicken sacrifices and finding blocks (reward money then used to fund our black operations to subvert btc
We should reserve this thread for chicken sacrifices and finding blocks (reward money then used to fund our black operations to subvert btc
November 27, 2016, 02:54:52 PM
Careful HaggsFIN, your name could also go on the list of co-conspirators 
November 27, 2016, 02:53:56 PM
Incidentally, if anyone ever gets into a dispute with Kano and/or CKolivas on Bitcointalk, and the following users appear in the thread to uncritically back every word that Kano/CK says:
....then don't worry. The fact that they're behaving as if they literally are Kano and CK arguing for themselves, probably means that these are the sock puppet accounts that Kano and CK used to kick this thread off, so that it didn't look like a graveyard to miners shopping for pools.
Gentlemen, stick to computer/hardware programming. Your internet bullying abilities leave much to be desired.
Well this is a crazy and a false accusement. ....then don't worry. The fact that they're behaving as if they literally are Kano and CK arguing for themselves, probably means that these are the sock puppet accounts that Kano and CK used to kick this thread off, so that it didn't look like a graveyard to miners shopping for pools.
Gentlemen, stick to computer/hardware programming. Your internet bullying abilities leave much to be desired.
Sounds like someone is drinking the cough syrup again. Pretty pitiful. Kindly go away and stop cluttering up our pool forum with your cry-baby non-sense.
I've got you on "Ignore", yet your shit still clutters up our space. Please, someone go ahead and ban this idiot.
Get out of your momma's basement and go play outside. Shesh....
P.S. Your accusations are pretty funny and are laughable, but still pathetic.
November 27, 2016, 02:51:31 PM
Well this is a crazy and a false accusement.
You should be concerned about the operators of the CKPool in which case, one of whom made an egregiously false statement about Bitcoin development because he was bored or emotional one Saturday afternoon.
What do you think someone that fickle and highly strung might do with your balance of BTC held at this pool?
I can't see how you are here now "helping" us miners.
November 27, 2016, 02:46:10 PM
Incidentally, if anyone ever gets into a dispute with Kano and/or CKolivas on Bitcointalk, and the following users appear in the thread to uncritically back every word that Kano/CK says:
....then don't worry. The fact that they're behaving as if they literally are Kano and CK arguing for themselves, probably means that these are the sock puppet accounts that Kano and CK used to kick this thread off, so that it didn't look like a graveyard to miners shopping for pools.
Gentlemen, stick to computer/hardware programming. Your internet bullying abilities leave much to be desired.
Well this is a crazy and a false accusement. ....then don't worry. The fact that they're behaving as if they literally are Kano and CK arguing for themselves, probably means that these are the sock puppet accounts that Kano and CK used to kick this thread off, so that it didn't look like a graveyard to miners shopping for pools.
Gentlemen, stick to computer/hardware programming. Your internet bullying abilities leave much to be desired.
November 27, 2016, 02:30:43 PM
He is probably trying to get banned so he can go on r/btc and cry censorship. everyone just ignore him
November 27, 2016, 02:04:37 PM
Well, I'm glad to have your agreement on this issue...
Seems that English is not your first language and I have to be more clear:- No one agrees with you,
- Trolling Kano's thread to call him a "troll" makes you a total hypocrite, and
- Kano registering a concern is not trolling
November 27, 2016, 01:40:45 PM
November 27, 2016, 01:25:07 PM
Kano's talking about banning me from Bitcointalk, I don't mine on his pool (although I am a miner)
--snip
Since you do not mine on this pool, go the hell away and quit clogging up our pool with your ranting. Thank you.
Ignore Option Implemented. Goodbye.
November 27, 2016, 01:15:18 PM
Reading through the comments, my understanding is that a 0.13.1 node will fill its outgoing connections with other 0.13.1 nodes on priority, and only connect to non-0.13.1 nodes if it cannot find any 0.13.1 nodes to connect to. It will accept inbound connections from any version.
Looking at one of my own 0.13.1 daemons, I get the following from calling getpeerinfo (I snipped a lot to only show relevant info):
Based on that, I can clearly see I've got outbound connections to nodes with a version lower than 0.13.1. Here's the call to getinfo (balance removed):
So, I'm running a 0.13.1 node that has outbound connections to nodes with a version less than 0.13.1.
Looking at one of my own 0.13.1 daemons, I get the following from calling getpeerinfo (I snipped a lot to only show relevant info):
Code:
[
{
"id": 6,
"addr": "84.245.27.185:8333",
"addrlocal": "50.2.189.35:42918",
"services": "0000000000000005",
"relaytxes": true,
"lastsend": 1480270212,
"lastrecv": 1480270213,
"bytessent": 224159059,
"bytesrecv": 582881556,
"conntime": 1478943142,
"timeoffset": -6,
"pingtime": 0.120353,
"minping": 0.11485,
"version": 70012,
"subver": "/Satoshi:0.12.0/",
"inbound": false,
"startingheight": 438527,
"banscore": 0,
"synced_headers": 440804,
"synced_blocks": 440804,
"inflight": [
],
...
{
"id": 17,
"addr": "213.251.186.216:8333",
"addrlocal": "50.2.189.35:51776",
"services": "0000000000000005",
"relaytxes": true,
"lastsend": 1480270212,
"lastrecv": 1480270212,
"bytessent": 295398321,
"bytesrecv": 125067139,
"conntime": 1478943165,
"timeoffset": 0,
"pingtime": 0.209322,
"minping": 0.10465,
"version": 70014,
"subver": "/Satoshi:0.13.0/",
"inbound": false,
"startingheight": 438527,
"banscore": 0,
"synced_headers": 440852,
"synced_blocks": 440852,
"inflight": [
],
{
"id": 6,
"addr": "84.245.27.185:8333",
"addrlocal": "50.2.189.35:42918",
"services": "0000000000000005",
"relaytxes": true,
"lastsend": 1480270212,
"lastrecv": 1480270213,
"bytessent": 224159059,
"bytesrecv": 582881556,
"conntime": 1478943142,
"timeoffset": -6,
"pingtime": 0.120353,
"minping": 0.11485,
"version": 70012,
"subver": "/Satoshi:0.12.0/",
"inbound": false,
"startingheight": 438527,
"banscore": 0,
"synced_headers": 440804,
"synced_blocks": 440804,
"inflight": [
],
...
{
"id": 17,
"addr": "213.251.186.216:8333",
"addrlocal": "50.2.189.35:51776",
"services": "0000000000000005",
"relaytxes": true,
"lastsend": 1480270212,
"lastrecv": 1480270212,
"bytessent": 295398321,
"bytesrecv": 125067139,
"conntime": 1478943165,
"timeoffset": 0,
"pingtime": 0.209322,
"minping": 0.10465,
"version": 70014,
"subver": "/Satoshi:0.13.0/",
"inbound": false,
"startingheight": 438527,
"banscore": 0,
"synced_headers": 440852,
"synced_blocks": 440852,
"inflight": [
],
Based on that, I can clearly see I've got outbound connections to nodes with a version lower than 0.13.1. Here's the call to getinfo (balance removed):
Code:
{
"version": 130100,
"protocolversion": 70014,
"walletversion": 60000,
"blocks": 440852,
"timeoffset": 0,
"connections": 125,
"proxy": "",
"difficulty": 281800917193.1958,
"testnet": false,
"keypoololdest": 1452577986,
"keypoolsize": 100,
"paytxfee": 0.00000000,
"relayfee": 0.00005000,
"errors": ""
}
"version": 130100,
"protocolversion": 70014,
"walletversion": 60000,
"blocks": 440852,
"timeoffset": 0,
"connections": 125,
"proxy": "",
"difficulty": 281800917193.1958,
"testnet": false,
"keypoololdest": 1452577986,
"keypoolsize": 100,
"paytxfee": 0.00000000,
"relayfee": 0.00005000,
"errors": ""
}
So, I'm running a 0.13.1 node that has outbound connections to nodes with a version less than 0.13.1.
November 27, 2016, 12:56:50 PM
Well...the "Ignore" button still works.
November 27, 2016, 12:43:44 PM
Well my screwy S9 has started xing out again. Hopefully a night off and a restart tomorrow will bring it back to close to normal again. One of these days that's not going to work anymore. I have a feeling it is the controller. Which part of the controller I don't know. I really hate to be pulling that sucker apart again and swapping out parts to trouble-shoot the problem. Doing that makes for two miners off-line, not just one. %#%^&%$#%^&& Bitman!
There goes my 5Nd
When/if I get it repaired I will be going through Colorado. No more shipping parts to china for hundreds of dollars!
I wish Canaan had been a real competition as far as hash/cash. But if it comes down to it, I'll just plug in one of my old S7's and over-clock it up to about 725 - It's cold enough here for that now with no worriers about over heating - until I can get the part -eventually - repaired. Damn crappy (expensive) cheap manufacturing!! POS
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!
Come on BLOCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!! Fall, you MthrFvkn block!
There goes my 5Nd
When/if I get it repaired I will be going through Colorado. No more shipping parts to china for hundreds of dollars!
I wish Canaan had been a real competition as far as hash/cash. But if it comes down to it, I'll just plug in one of my old S7's and over-clock it up to about 725 - It's cold enough here for that now with no worriers about over heating - until I can get the part -eventually - repaired. Damn crappy (expensive) cheap manufacturing!! POS
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!
Come on BLOCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!! Fall, you MthrFvkn block!
Sorry for the OT.
I plugged back in the crappy S9 that began showing errors last night. After a few minutes, X's started appearing in mass, at random on two of the boards. Changed the frequency to 550Mhz (it's supposed to be a 600Mhz miner), and restarted again.
It's been running about 20 minutes now with just 4 or 5 x's on one board. This was how it has run for the last week or so. It's now averaging 11TH for the miner. Hopefully it will hang in there and stay like that. I'm in no mood to be screwing around with hardware trouble-shooting this Sunday morning!
So I will have to mine with ~48TH on the pool for awhile until I can straighten out this wayward miner. A sledge hammer comes to mind as a good tool for this purpose....
Mine on!!!
EDIT: Having one of four S9 miners off-line for about 12 hours put a big dent in my shift graft. It was looking so pretty and steady.
November 27, 2016, 12:31:21 PM
Block! by Geronimo
More than 1BTC fees
More than 1BTC fees
Yeah, that was very nice!!
A 13.56562919 BTC block reward! More than one whole BTC extra distributed to our miners! (As it should be!)Three blocks for the day so far and the day is young. I'm ready for a 4 or 5-block day!! Let's GO TEAM!!
November 27, 2016, 12:13:32 PM
I've only used "Ignore" once. That individual is apparently no longer "around."
May have to use it again.
May have to use it again.
November 27, 2016, 11:53:04 AM
Banks is a moron!
While I'm the 1st to call Kano on anything that I think he says being bullshit, I cannot (for the life of me) see how pointing out a flaw in application is "trolling"
Well there's a whole thread where he can post as he likes on that subject.While I'm the 1st to call Kano on anything that I think he says being bullshit, I cannot (for the life of me) see how pointing out a flaw in application is "trolling"
I've even left his link to it in my reply to his first post on it
Just seems that's not good enough for him ...
Far be for me to judge whom is right or wrong.
It is your pool and you have the ability to ban an ip for reasons you think are correct.
I am assuming you banned him for good reasons.
I am assuming he thinks you banned him for bad reasons.
If you look at my post on the previous page, I included what he first posted (but deleted his first post)
Since then he's posted that message, again, and again, and again, almost 40 times in this thread.
I keep deleting the repeat posts (and anything else extra of the few other posts he's done)
It would seem that being on the previous page is too much for him to deal with.
I always could just delete it all completely, but for now I've left my reply that includes his original post.
Jump to: