KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 1161.

clgrissom3

legendary

Activity: 1736

Merit: 1032

Carl, aka Sonny :)

Quote from: torontobitcoinmanager on November 24, 2016, 06:59:14 PM

I also have another question:
I bought 50 more S9s they should come within 20-25 days.
If I connect them all plus my 3 current S9s would I affect this pool. I do not want anyone to be adversely affected including myself

How did you buy 50 S9s as they have been sold out like forever? Are they used?

torontobitcoinmanager

jr. member

Activity: 66

Merit: 3

thank you all, so I assume you do not mind.
I will post once they online.

is there any source where i can check how s9s do in blocks
in compare to other miners

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: torontobitcoinmanager on November 24, 2016, 06:59:14 PM

I also have another question:
I bought 50 more S9s they should come within 20-25 days.
If I connect them all plus my 3 current S9s would I affect this pool. I do not want anyone to be adversely affected including myself

Well S9's have the lowest long term luck, of miners that I can identify directly, since May

But, the stats are not outside the realms of improbability.

So the reality is that either it doesn't matter, or Bitmain is doing something that deserves learning about how to post C4 in the mail

Hopefully no C4 is required

wmabern

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Visualize whirledps

Quote from: -ck on November 24, 2016, 07:08:16 PM

Quote from: torontobitcoinmanager on November 24, 2016, 06:59:14 PM

I bought 50 more S9s they should come within 20-25 days.
If I connect them all plus my 3 current S9s would I affect this pool.?

Yes you will affect this pool. You will increase its chances of finding a block proportionate to the extra hashrate

Yeah, I neglected to mention that effect. But it's a good one. LOL Cool

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: torontobitcoinmanager on November 24, 2016, 06:59:14 PM

I bought 50 more S9s they should come within 20-25 days.
If I connect them all plus my 3 current S9s would I affect this pool.?

Yes you will affect this pool. You will increase its chances of finding a block proportionate to the extra hashrate

wmabern

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Visualize whirledps

Quote from: torontobitcoinmanager on November 24, 2016, 06:59:14 PM

I also have another question:
I bought 50 more S9s they should come within 20-25 days.
If I connect them all plus my 3 current S9s would I affect this pool. I do not want anyone to be adversely affected including myself

Speaking for myself only, I welcome the extra hash rate with open arms. As far as I'm aware, there has been no definite positive correlation between S9's and bad luck on this pool. Until then, mine on!! Cheesy

p.s. I've got four S9's on this pool.

EDIT: And I have found a block on this pool with one of my S9's.

torontobitcoinmanager

jr. member

Activity: 66

Merit: 3

I also have another question:
I bought 50 more S9s they should come within 20-25 days.
If I connect them all plus my 3 current S9s would I affect this pool. I do not want anyone to be adversely affected including myself

clgrissom3

legendary

Activity: 1736

Merit: 1032

Carl, aka Sonny :)

Quote from: kano on November 24, 2016, 05:55:01 PM

Quote from: clgrissom3 on November 24, 2016, 04:11:25 PM

...
I notice the invalids for your A7 is at 0.714% but it has been dropping since I first looked earlier today.

Yeah my home internet sux.
For the last 1.5 days it's been really bad (maybe related to txn spam?) so e.g. last night's overnight network processing I do would have caused a pretty high stale rate.
Even accessing bitcointalk had been slow every time for the last 1.5 days.

It's getting better all the time...it's now in the 0.5% range which is less than the pool average.

elokk

hero member

Activity: 723

Merit: 519

Quote from: torontobitcoinmanager on November 24, 2016, 06:18:37 PM

so how do you experienced guys see the current problem with 1M limit being resolved?
I ve read a lot about this dilemma (increasing limit to .. hardfork or segwit than LN) but have no tech knowledge to actually understand what would make bitcoin more attractive for years to come. (stable and prospering would be my main goal)

Bitcoin politics led by Roger Ver-ified aka Bitcoin Judas...wrong thread

torontobitcoinmanager

jr. member

Activity: 66

Merit: 3

so how do you experienced guys see the current problem with 1M limit being resolved?
I ve read a lot about this dilemma (increasing limit to .. hardfork or segwit than LN) but have no tech knowledge to actually understand what would make bitcoin more attractive for years to come. (stable and prospering would be my main goal)

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: clgrissom3 on November 24, 2016, 04:11:25 PM

...
I notice the invalids for your A7 is at 0.714% but it has been dropping since I first looked earlier today.

Yeah my home internet sux.
For the last 1.5 days it's been really bad (maybe related to txn spam?) so e.g. last night's overnight network processing I do would have caused a pretty high stale rate.
Even accessing bitcointalk had been slow every time for the last 1.5 days.

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: mikefallen on November 24, 2016, 05:37:49 PM

Quote from: kano on November 24, 2016, 05:35:16 PM

Quote from: agentcash on November 24, 2016, 05:17:49 PM

Will this pool be signaling for segwit at any point?

I ran a search to find Kano's opinions on it and it seems he's opposed to it for a few reasons. Attempted dev control of bitcoin and disk space issues stand out the most in my memory. Any further clarifications would be appreciated. I don't visit the forums that much, so I apologize if I missed a post regarding it.

Would also be very interested to hear ck's opinion as well. Thanks.

My most recent post on the subject
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16868494

I've been meaning to ask your opinion on this on IRC for a while.... thanks for posting

LOL if you're in IRC you'd have noticed I'm WAY less polite about it ... though I'm not in that post anyway

(as per normal)

mikefallen

member

Activity: 72

Merit: 10

Quote from: kano on November 24, 2016, 05:35:16 PM

Quote from: agentcash on November 24, 2016, 05:17:49 PM

Will this pool be signaling for segwit at any point?

I ran a search to find Kano's opinions on it and it seems he's opposed to it for a few reasons. Attempted dev control of bitcoin and disk space issues stand out the most in my memory. Any further clarifications would be appreciated. I don't visit the forums that much, so I apologize if I missed a post regarding it.

Would also be very interested to hear ck's opinion as well. Thanks.

My most recent post on the subject
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16868494

I've been meaning to ask your opinion on this on IRC for a while.... thanks for posting

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: agentcash on November 24, 2016, 05:17:49 PM

Will this pool be signaling for segwit at any point?

I ran a search to find Kano's opinions on it and it seems he's opposed to it for a few reasons. Attempted dev control of bitcoin and disk space issues stand out the most in my memory. Any further clarifications would be appreciated. I don't visit the forums that much, so I apologize if I missed a post regarding it.

Would also be very interested to hear ck's opinion as well. Thanks.

My most recent post on the subject
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16868494

wmabern

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Visualize whirledps

Quote from: -ck on November 24, 2016, 05:32:35 PM

Quote from: agentcash on November 24, 2016, 05:17:49 PM

Will this pool be signaling for segwit at any point?

I ran a search to find Kano's opinions on it and it seems he's opposed to it for a few reasons. Attempted dev control of bitcoin and disk space issues stand out the most in my memory. Any further clarifications would be appreciated. I don't visit the forums that much, so I apologise if I missed a post regarding it.

Would also be very interested to hear ck's opinion as well. Thanks.

I'm not against it. Kano and I differ in opinion on this one and ultimately this is his pool; I'm part of the administration and tech support but it's not my pool.

-ck, please forgive me for assuming you were against it. I should know better than assuming anything and putting words in other people's mouths.
I stand corrected.
Mine on!!

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: agentcash on November 24, 2016, 05:17:49 PM

Will this pool be signaling for segwit at any point?

I ran a search to find Kano's opinions on it and it seems he's opposed to it for a few reasons. Attempted dev control of bitcoin and disk space issues stand out the most in my memory. Any further clarifications would be appreciated. I don't visit the forums that much, so I apologise if I missed a post regarding it.

Would also be very interested to hear ck's opinion as well. Thanks.

I'm not against it. Kano and I differ in opinion on this one and ultimately this is his pool; I'm part of the administration and tech support but it's not my pool.

wmabern

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Visualize whirledps

blockmines has really come through with his/her hash rate. I'm certainly glad they fixed their naming issues and are mining with Kano!!!

A big Turkey Day (USA) welcome and thanks for being a part of the best pool!!! Grin

Keep on Mining!!! Cheesy

wmabern

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Visualize whirledps

Quote from: agentcash on November 24, 2016, 05:17:49 PM

Will this pool be signaling for segwit at any point?

I ran a search to find Kano's opinions on it and it seems he's opposed to it for a few reasons. Attempted dev control of bitcoin and disk space issues stand out the most in my memory. Any further clarifications would be appreciated. I don't visit the forums that much, so I apologize if I missed a post regarding it.

Would also be very interested to hear ck's opinion as well. Thanks.

I'm not Kano or -ck, but I know they are both against it and it will not be integrated into the pool software unless over 95% of the miners accept it and it becomes required. I'm completely against it and I'm voting by mining on a pool (Kano/CK) that is against it.

EDIT: I also believe it would mean less transaction fees for individual miner, if I remember correctly.
Come on BLOCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!

EDIT2: I'm also running Bitcoin Core version v0.13.0 (64-bit). I think v0.13.1 adds the segregated witness features. Therefore, I will not update my core from Bitcoin Core version v0.13.0 (64-bit). I don't know if that makes any difference in terms of acceptance or not. But I'm stubborn that way. Cheesy

agentcash

newbie

Activity: 49

Merit: 0

Will this pool be signaling for segwit at any point?

I ran a search to find Kano's opinions on it and it seems he's opposed to it for a few reasons. Attempted dev control of bitcoin and disk space issues stand out the most in my memory. Any further clarifications would be appreciated. I don't visit the forums that much, so I apologize if I missed a post regarding it.

Would also be very interested to hear ck's opinion as well. Thanks.

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: kano on November 24, 2016, 01:40:32 AM

...
Edit2: though it's clear from the Workers page, you can separate out the A6s and A7s on my graph by using at the top "all" ".A6*" and ".A7*" and pressing "Update" - though it will forget your settings if you already had some for your workers.
...

I made a little change to the K.Graph page, it forces the workers to be .A7*,.A6*,all so you don't need to mess with your worker settings if you wish to view my K.Graph page.

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 1161. (Read 5352527 times)