KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 1164.

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: philipma1957 on November 23, 2016, 04:05:06 PM

Quote from: traxor on November 23, 2016, 03:46:50 PM

Quote from: philipma1957 on November 23, 2016, 02:37:11 PM

Figures I do an important transaction (for me) and now it is stuck.

https://blockchain.info/tx/0cc5710b4ed426189ffe21e1ff89471a0c967b348b5f8db4d1268dbe17a3daee

I pm'd kano to see if he could include it in the next block but he is yet to reply.

That looks like about the right amount of coin for your Canaan order. Were you finally successful in convincing them to accept btc?

I will not confirm or deny that .

I will confirm that paypal was politely denied. So I asked about BTC or CC for payment.

I do suggest that if you want to buy an Avalon 721 with BTC or CC you could ask politely as being nice can not hurt.

So far it (the btc payment of 2.74 ) is stuck and i am annoyed that some A--- hole decided to spam the blockchain.

In like Flynn ...

Edit: lol at blocktrail
Bitmain added a link on blocktrail to view it on BTC.com their 3rd pool website ... but they wont confirm it the fuckers Cheesy

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4326

Merit: 8950

'The right to privacy matters'

Quote from: traxor on November 23, 2016, 03:46:50 PM

Quote from: philipma1957 on November 23, 2016, 02:37:11 PM

Figures I do an important transaction (for me) and now it is stuck.

https://blockchain.info/tx/0cc5710b4ed426189ffe21e1ff89471a0c967b348b5f8db4d1268dbe17a3daee

I pm'd kano to see if he could include it in the next block but he is yet to reply.

That looks like about the right amount of coin for your Canaan order. Were you finally successful in convincing them to accept btc?

I will not confirm or deny that .

I will confirm that paypal was politely denied. So I asked about BTC or CC for payment.

I do suggest that if you want to buy an Avalon 721 with BTC or CC you could ask politely as being nice can not hurt.

So far it (the btc payment of 2.74 ) is stuck and i am annoyed that some A--- hole decided to spam the blockchain.

traxor

full member

Activity: 228

Merit: 100

Quote from: philipma1957 on November 23, 2016, 02:37:11 PM

Figures I do an important transaction (for me) and now it is stuck.

https://blockchain.info/tx/0cc5710b4ed426189ffe21e1ff89471a0c967b348b5f8db4d1268dbe17a3daee

I pm'd kano to see if he could include it in the next block but he is yet to reply.

That looks like about the right amount of coin for your Canaan order. Were you finally successful in convincing them to accept btc?

sorry2xs

legendary

Activity: 924

Merit: 1000

Dark Passenger Bitcoin miner 2013,Bitcoin node

Quote from: traxor on November 23, 2016, 01:35:54 PM

The network has been under a spam attack since last night/this morning.

Link: http://www.newsbtc.com/2016/11/23/spamming-continues-on-bitcoin-network-delays-transactions/

Mempool is clogged up - higher than normal tx fees

the spam lobby is very powerful
Edit: in the 90's sha256 was used to curtail spam in the emails and that industry has adopted very well Grin

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4326

Merit: 8950

'The right to privacy matters'

Quote from: traxor on November 23, 2016, 01:35:54 PM

The network has been under a spam attack since last night/this morning.

Link: http://www.newsbtc.com/2016/11/23/spamming-continues-on-bitcoin-network-delays-transactions/

Mempool is clogged up - higher than normal tx fees

Figures I do an important transaction (for me) and now it is stuck.

https://blockchain.info/tx/0cc5710b4ed426189ffe21e1ff89471a0c967b348b5f8db4d1268dbe17a3daee

I pm'd kano to see if he could include it in the next block but he is yet to reply.

traxor

full member

Activity: 228

Merit: 100

The network has been under a spam attack since last night/this morning.

Link: http://www.newsbtc.com/2016/11/23/spamming-continues-on-bitcoin-network-delays-transactions/

Mempool is clogged up - higher than normal tx fees

firetreeactual

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1003

Quote from: edonkey on November 23, 2016, 12:04:28 PM

FYI, if you're thinking about a hardware wallet at some point, the Trezor's web application also uses 21.co for calculating fee predictions automatically.

Thanks for the thought, but I will likely never consider a hardware wallet. I'm fine with Core on my hardware on my network. We've had nui (plenty) discussion on that one, I think. Grin

edonkey

legendary

Activity: 1150

Merit: 1004

Quote from: firetreeactual on November 23, 2016, 11:55:12 AM

Quote from: jonnybravo0311 on November 23, 2016, 11:50:49 AM

Core typically does a good job estimating fees, but I almost always check against https://bitcoinfees.21.co to see how the network looks. For example, right now Core is giving me an estimate of 0.0007BTC per kb; however, the website is suggesting 100000 satoshi per kb. If I were to send a transaction now, I'd probably use the higher estimate to fast track it, especially since my last reply there are now more than 64k unconfirmed transactions.

Cool. I learned something new...and useful...today. Kiss

EDIT: ...and again, that's why we all stick around here, methinks...

FYI, if you're thinking about a hardware wallet at some point, the Trezor's web application also uses 21.co for calculating fee predictions automatically.

firetreeactual

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1003

Quote from: jonnybravo0311 on November 23, 2016, 11:50:49 AM

Core typically does a good job estimating fees, but I almost always check against https://bitcoinfees.21.co to see how the network looks. For example, right now Core is giving me an estimate of 0.0007BTC per kb; however, the website is suggesting 100000 satoshi per kb. If I were to send a transaction now, I'd probably use the higher estimate to fast track it, especially since my last reply there are now more than 64k unconfirmed transactions.

Cool. I learned something new...and useful...today. Kiss

EDIT: ...and again, that's why we all stick around here, methinks...

jonnybravo0311

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1024

Mine at Jonny's Pool

Core typically does a good job estimating fees, but I almost always check against https://bitcoinfees.21.co to see how the network looks. For example, right now Core is giving me an estimate of 0.0007BTC per kb; however, the website is suggesting 100000 satoshi per kb. If I were to send a transaction now, I'd probably use the higher estimate to fast track it, especially since my last reply there are now more than 64k unconfirmed transactions.

firetreeactual

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1003

Quote from: jonnybravo0311 on November 23, 2016, 10:20:26 AM

it could very well be a case of transaction fee being too low. There are currently almost 50k unconfirmed transactions out there and you're looking at a fee of at least 80 satoshi per byte to get you confirmed in a reasonable time.

Thanks...that makes sense, but seemed unusual as I always just take the Core's default on fees and have never had a tx take more than 30 min or so to confirm. Guess I've just been lucky. I'll take your advice, though, and bump the fee.

jonnybravo0311

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1024

Mine at Jonny's Pool

it could very well be a case of transaction fee being too low. There are currently almost 50k unconfirmed transactions out there and you're looking at a fee of at least 80 satoshi per byte to get you confirmed in a reasonable time.

firetreeactual

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1003

Minor...I think...problem maybe someone can clue me in. I sent my partner his daily payout on Monday (our time). Small transaction...we do this every day, no problem. The transaction from Monday is still showing unconfirmed...zero confirms. Something doesn't look right on the BT screen, but I just don't see it. The tx amt appears to be double what it should be. If anyone has thoughts, you should probably PM me so we don't clutter the board. I'm not so akamai (knowledgeable) on this end of things. Thx.

clgrissom3

legendary

Activity: 1736

Merit: 1032

Carl, aka Sonny :)

Quote from: kano on November 22, 2016, 09:42:29 PM

Quote from: clgrissom3 on November 22, 2016, 08:46:09 PM

Kano, what does this mean? I'm still scratching my head over this one...same block number but different time stamp...

Code:

[2016-11-22 20:40:46] Pool 0 message: Block 440140 solved by cobramining.C1-2 @
ckpool!
[2016-11-22 20:40:47] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2016-11-22 20:40:50] Pool 0 message: Block 440140 solved by cobramining.C1-2 @
ckpool!

His miner submitted the block twice.
A 'duplicate' is accepted as a block since it's not impossible for the main pool node to see the block after it's main bitcoind sees it
(unlikely but not impossible)
CKDB spits out lotsa extra messages when this happens also - but I've coded it so that it just means one block properly in both situations

Edit: here's the main CKDB message related to it:

Code:

[2016-11-23 01:40:49.932+00] blocks_add(): Duplicate (1-Confirm) blocks ignored, Status: New, Block: 440140/...00001c50e5b79b5e/2016-11-23 01:40:49.930201+00

Wow! Thanks Kano! Where else can you get the skinny on anything like you can here on Kano.is!

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: clgrissom3 on November 22, 2016, 08:46:09 PM

Kano, what does this mean? I'm still scratching my head over this one...same block number but different time stamp...

Code:

[2016-11-22 20:40:46] Pool 0 message: Block 440140 solved by cobramining.C1-2 @
ckpool!
[2016-11-22 20:40:47] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2016-11-22 20:40:50] Pool 0 message: Block 440140 solved by cobramining.C1-2 @
ckpool!

His miner submitted the block twice.
A 'duplicate' is accepted as a block since it's not impossible for the main pool node to see the block after it's main bitcoind sees it
(unlikely but not impossible)
CKDB spits out lotsa extra messages when this happens also - but I've coded it so that it just means one block properly in both situations

Edit: here's the main CKDB message related to it:

Code:

[2016-11-23 01:40:49.932+00] blocks_add(): Duplicate (1-Confirm) blocks ignored, Status: New, Block: 440140/...00001c50e5b79b5e/2016-11-23 01:40:49.930201+00

wmabern

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Visualize whirledps

Loving the GREEN! Grin

Let's get this next block too! It's doable!!!

clgrissom3

legendary

Activity: 1736

Merit: 1032

Carl, aka Sonny :)

Kano, what does this mean? I'm still scratching my head over this one...same block number but different time stamp...

Code:

[2016-11-22 20:40:46] Pool 0 message: Block 440140 solved by cobramining.C1-2 @
ckpool!
[2016-11-22 20:40:47] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2016-11-22 20:40:50] Pool 0 message: Block 440140 solved by cobramining.C1-2 @
ckpool!

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4326

Merit: 8950

'The right to privacy matters'

you know I had a hunch and did a small rental for a bit more hash. nice

wmabern

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Visualize whirledps

BLOCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

clgrissom3

legendary

Activity: 1736

Merit: 1032

Carl, aka Sonny :)

Block by cobramining! This is his 7th Kano block and our 2nd of the day! Cheesy

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 1164. (Read 5352229 times)