Author

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 1313. (Read 5352429 times)

legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 3284
@Kano, do you not have legal recourse against them for modifying your code without permission?
I believe he does, since CGMiner is licensed under GPLv3. Not for modifying it without permission though, but for making modifications without releasing the new source. See https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/official-cgminer-mining-software-thread-for-linuxwinosxmipsarmr-pi-4110-28402 (The CGMiner thread) Not sure if he plans on legal action against them, but if he was, I would think he would have announced it already. He's had contact with Bitmain too (see the statement about asking if he wanted to buy a S9)
Quote
NOTE: This code is licensed under the GPLv3. This means that the source to any
modifications you make to this code MUST be provided by law if you distribute
modified binaries. See COPYING for details.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
Visualize whirledps
@Kano, do you not have legal recourse against them for modifying your code without permission?
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Don't think we have ever had back to back 400% blocks. Ouch.
Glad we didn't that time either Smiley

Block by Citronick Smiley

@Kano

Since you are on the subject of the s9.  Here is a log of what my batch 8 are doing.  im getting a ton of rejects on nicehash and then thought maybe was low diff coin or somehting.. so i moved it here and its no better.  Could be that the first batchs test ok with your pool and now maybe they change something idk.. Here is the log from cgminer(bmminer).

(5s):11.83T (1m):2.959T (5m):656.7G (15m):222.8G (avg):11.85Th/s
 A:639804  R:303566  HW:3  WU:117045.2/m
 Connected to stratum.kano.is diff 8.01K with stratum as user d57heinz.s901
 Block: cee61344...  Diff:48K  Started: [17:57:56]  Best share: 2.87M
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management Settings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 0: BC5 0       :                         | 11.01T / 11.80Th/ WU:0.0/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
)
 [2016-07-28 18:03:32] Found block for pool 0!
 [2016-07-28 18:03:32] Accepted a04c082e Diff 105K/8009 BLOCK! BC5 0 pool 0
 [2016-07-28 18:03:36] Accepted 0319512a Diff 21.1K/8009 BC5 0 pool 0
 [2016-07-28 18:03:39] Accepted 02183469 Diff 31.3K/8009 BC5 0 pool 0
 [2016-07-28 18:03:39] Accepted 03b0aa83 Diff 17.8K/8009 BC5 0 pool 0
 [2016-07-28 18:03:44] Found block for pool 0!
 [2016-07-28 18:03:44] Accepted 01007738 Diff 65.4K/8009 BLOCK! BC5 0 pool 0
 [2016-07-28 18:03:44] Found block for pool 0!
 [2016-07-28 18:03:44] Rejected a04c082e Diff 105K/8009 BLOCK! BC5 0 pool 0 (Duplicate)
 [2016-07-28 18:03:48] Rejected 0319512a Diff 21.1K/8009 BC5 0 pool 0 (Duplicate)
 [2016-07-28 18:03:51] Rejected 02183469 Diff 31.3K/8009 BC5 0 pool 0 (Duplicate)
 [2016-07-28 18:03:51] Rejected 03b0aa83 Diff 17.8K/8009 BC5 0 pool 0 (Duplicate)


Best Regards
d57heinz

Edit what stands out to me is why the network diff is only 48k?  Should be 213 g  correct?

Edit .. it seems to clear up after a random amount of time mining.  I also changed my diff on the workers tab to 10000 so that it wouldnt get bombarded with shares on connect.  I thought --suggest-diff in the password would do it.. cgminer showing correct network diff now.

Well ... .... mining through nicehash reduces your reward by their 3% fee (yep more than 3 times the pool fee) and increases stales and slows down any block you might find getting to the pool, and their closed source software inspects every share/block that goes through their poxy and does who knows what with them.

As for your output:
Those block messages above are bitmain's usual screwing around with the main cgminer code and breaking it.

You are looking there at the results of bitmain's (so far) closed source hack of cgminer that they call bmminer
I've no idea exactly what they have changed in it and screwed up, since, like for everyone else, there's no sign of any s9 source code.
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1003
I know there is no 100% answer. but since avalon was sold, I would think the new owners would develop a new and improved avalon 7,8,9, what ever.
 To compete with the S9s.  Do you think you could link them with the A6s?
I'm so confused, do I buy some S9s or wait for avalon to do there thing.

Well, at the moment you can't get a new S9 anyway...they're sold out (or at least they were when I checked earlier this morning). If I were LYT (the new owners of Avalon), I'd be busting my posterior to put out a competitor to best the S9. I'm waiting a bit to see what develops. Either the price will have to come down on S9s, or Avalon comes out with a 5TH/1400W machine that's around USD$1.5-2K...and the BTC world rejoices...and LYT makes a mint.  Cool

Afterthought...I don't think LYT would have bought out Avalon if there wasn't something in the works.
legendary
Activity: 1453
Merit: 1011
Bitcoin Talks Bullshit Walks
Don't think we have ever had back to back 400% blocks. Ouch.
Glad we didn't that time either Smiley

Block by Citronick Smiley

@Kano

Since you are on the subject of the s9.  Here is a log of what my batch 8 are doing.  im getting a ton of rejects on nicehash and then thought maybe was low diff coin or somehting.. so i moved it here and its no better.  Could be that the first batchs test ok with your pool and now maybe they change something idk.. Here is the log from cgminer(bmminer).

(5s):11.83T (1m):2.959T (5m):656.7G (15m):222.8G (avg):11.85Th/s
 A:639804  R:303566  HW:3  WU:117045.2/m
 Connected to stratum.kano.is diff 8.01K with stratum as user d57heinz.s901
 Block: cee61344...  Diff:48K  Started: [17:57:56]  Best share: 2.87M
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management Settings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 0: BC5 0       :                         | 11.01T / 11.80Th/ WU:0.0/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
)
 [2016-07-28 18:03:32] Found block for pool 0!
 [2016-07-28 18:03:32] Accepted a04c082e Diff 105K/8009 BLOCK! BC5 0 pool 0
 [2016-07-28 18:03:36] Accepted 0319512a Diff 21.1K/8009 BC5 0 pool 0
 [2016-07-28 18:03:39] Accepted 02183469 Diff 31.3K/8009 BC5 0 pool 0
 [2016-07-28 18:03:39] Accepted 03b0aa83 Diff 17.8K/8009 BC5 0 pool 0
 [2016-07-28 18:03:44] Found block for pool 0!
 [2016-07-28 18:03:44] Accepted 01007738 Diff 65.4K/8009 BLOCK! BC5 0 pool 0
 [2016-07-28 18:03:44] Found block for pool 0!
 [2016-07-28 18:03:44] Rejected a04c082e Diff 105K/8009 BLOCK! BC5 0 pool 0 (Duplicate)
 [2016-07-28 18:03:48] Rejected 0319512a Diff 21.1K/8009 BC5 0 pool 0 (Duplicate)
 [2016-07-28 18:03:51] Rejected 02183469 Diff 31.3K/8009 BC5 0 pool 0 (Duplicate)
 [2016-07-28 18:03:51] Rejected 03b0aa83 Diff 17.8K/8009 BC5 0 pool 0 (Duplicate)


Best Regards
d57heinz

Edit what stands out to me is why the network diff is only 48k?  Should be 213 g  correct?

Edit .. it seems to clear up after a random amount of time mining.  I also changed my diff on the workers tab to 10000 so that it wouldnt get bombarded with shares on connect.  I thought --suggest-diff in the password would do it.. cgminer showing correct network diff now.
newbie
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
I know there is no 100% answer. but since avalon was sold, I would think the new owners would develop a new and improved avalon 7,8,9, what ever.
 To compete with the S9s.  Do you think you could link them with the A6s?
I'm so confused, do I buy some S9s or wait for avalon to do there thing.
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
Congrats Citronic with your block.... wonder if it was an S9, but it looks like you are more an hash renter, so you cant tell ?

All S9s, I am off rentals to do another project...  Grin

That S9 was installed less than 24 hours ago!

Brilliant Citronick, then there is hope for all us that did purchase a bunch of S9´s before we knew they screwed Kano and Ck.kolivas and the Cgminer license....

Yup....

Bitmain "stealing" cgminer codes and labelling it their own is totally unprofessional - IMHO.... but the fact remains - S9 delivers more hashing power at lower power consumption. I hope new mining hardware from other vendors can catch up as soon as possible and the break Bitmain's miner hw monopoly.
sr. member
Activity: 546
Merit: 253
I find it amazing that an S9 commissioned barely 24 hours ago has hit a block !!!  Shocked

I had the same thing happen with my first batch of s9's one hit a block in 4 hours. My one and only block Sad
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
Congrats Citronic with your block.... wonder if it was an S9, but it looks like you are more an hash renter, so you cant tell ?

All S9s, I am off rentals to do another project...  Grin

That S9 was installed less than 24 hours ago!

Brilliant Citronick, then there is hope for all us that did purchase a bunch of S9´s before we knew they screwed Kano and Ck.kolivas and the Cgminer license....
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
Congrats Citronic with your block.... wonder if it was an S9, but it looks like you are more an hash renter, so you cant tell ?

All S9s, I am off rentals to do another project...  Grin

That S9 was installed less than 24 hours ago!
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
Thank you cobramining and citronick for the blocks!  I went outside to clean out my old shed and when I got back in all is better on the Kano pool!   Grin
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
Congrats Citronic with your block.... wonder if it was an S9, but it looks like you are more an hash renter, so you cant tell ?
full member
Activity: 219
Merit: 100
Bitcoin Mining Hosting
Don't think we have ever had back to back 400% blocks. Ouch.
Glad we didn't that time either Smiley

Block by Citronick Smiley

good stuff , was getting red like the shining.
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Don't think we have ever had back to back 400% blocks. Ouch.
Glad we didn't that time either Smiley

Block by Citronick Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
I find it amazing that an S9 commissioned barely 24 hours ago has hit a block !!!  Shocked
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1005
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 523
Don't think we have ever had back to back 400% blocks. Ouch.
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Silence when we finally find it? Smiley

Block by cobramining to break another long block.
... and an interesting but useless bit of information about that block.
We had a close share at 55.08% Tongue

[2016-07-28 03:29:29.496+10] Share ok Diff 98.0% (209172127210/213492501107.5) ... Pool 117586000615.0 118G 55.08%

(and another 2 days ago)

[2016-07-26 04:43:20.302+10] Share ok Diff 98.8% (210980230869/213492501107.5) ... Pool 250112033855.0 250G 117.15%
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1003
0330 here...another sleepwalking thing, I guess...at least three of us are awake and see the block! More red, though...
hero member
Activity: 1610
Merit: 538
I'm in BTC XTC
Finally, now we've done our part to help with the diff drop, time for some multi block cracking action!!
Jump to: