KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 135.

Biodom

legendary

Activity: 4004

Merit: 4656

Quote from: MrRoach Sir on July 14, 2018, 11:12:04 AM

Quote from: Biodom on July 14, 2018, 11:05:21 AM

A hint for kano miners: Selling 11.85 th/s S9, works great.
Will include two $250 coupons. See post in marketplace.

Don't want my S9-I can sell you just coupons for $62.5 ea (75% off).
For those who think that coupons ought to be free...I got those for grossly overpaying for some other Bitmain item, hence need at least some back.

ok i'll byte (snicker), where do i find The Marketplace?

here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/wts-s9-price-reduced-4665924

MrRoach Sir

newbie

Activity: 65

Merit: 0

Quote from: Biodom on July 14, 2018, 11:05:21 AM

A hint for kano miners: Selling 11.85 th/s S9, works great.
Will include two $250 coupons. See post in marketplace.

Don't want my S9-I can sell you just coupons for $62.5 ea (75% off).
For those who think that coupons ought to be free...I got those for grossly overpaying for some other Bitmain item, hence need at least some back.

ok i'll byte (snicker), where do i find The Marketplace?

Biodom

legendary

Activity: 4004

Merit: 4656

A hint for kano miners: Selling 11.85 th/s S9, works great.
Will include two $250 coupons. See post in marketplace.

Don't want my S9-I can sell you just coupons for $62.5 ea (75% off).
For those who think that coupons ought to be free...I got those for grossly overpaying for some other Bitmain item, hence need at least some back.

Steamtyme

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 2037

Gobble Gobble
Sweet got us another Turkey.

Maybe I should go back to sleep, wake up to a couple more.

Edit:

Quote from: kano on July 13, 2018, 07:27:45 PM

It would mean that if there was a space availability issue in the block work, it would be weighted the same as normal transactions when vying for the available space.

Edit: I'll have to do so more changes to deal with transactions shortly anyway.
Core took out something that only pools would use ... gee I wonder why they would do that? Tongue

Something that I've used when blocks were full - to force our payout transaction into the pool work: priority.
So I'l have to do more changes to the transaction selection code anyway and I'll remove the 4x then if possible also.

Well thanks for looking at ways to keep those blocks full of as many fees as possible.

And doubly glad you are watching those changes in the code. Helps keep people in the loop, wish more people knew about these things and kept it out in the open.

Apprentice

full member

Activity: 500

Merit: 105

Quote from: clgrissom3 on July 14, 2018, 08:35:13 AM

Quote from: kano on July 14, 2018, 02:13:44 AM

Block! by cryptostarusa Cheesy

Three blocks while I slept...gotta love it!

This is our 3rd of BLOCK SATURDAY! Cheesy

Continue sleeping Grin

clgrissom3

legendary

Activity: 1736

Merit: 1032

Carl, aka Sonny :)

Quote from: kano on July 14, 2018, 02:13:44 AM

Block! by cryptostarusa Cheesy

Three blocks while I slept...gotta love it!

This is our 3rd of BLOCK SATURDAY! Cheesy

Shazam!!!

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 158

#takeminingback

How I feel waking up to a triple BTClock Morning!!!

Hannu

hero member

Activity: 1063

Merit: 502

RIP: S5, A faithful device long time

Where I can get that Ph/second miners. I have only 1Th/s ASIC bitcoin hashing speed.

dutchlincoln

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 30

Superblocks!!!

Thanks for mining guys!

Finnally reached my full 5N yesterday, so this is very welcome Grin

Ze777

jr. member

Activity: 77

Merit: 4

Whooohooo get that dance going for that 4th Cheesy

BTC

highlander113

newbie

Activity: 31

Merit: 0

WOW waking up to not one not but THREE BTClocks good god this is going to be good weekend....

MINE ON WITH KANO SAN!!!

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Block! by cryptostarusa Cheesy

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Block! by 33z Cheesy

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Block! by cryptostarusa Cheesy

again

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: DarkStar_ on July 13, 2018, 10:46:50 PM

Quote from: kano on July 13, 2018, 07:27:45 PM

Quote from: Steamtyme on July 13, 2018, 07:24:05 PM

Quote from: kano on July 13, 2018, 07:19:21 PM

segwit transactions are coded in corecoin to be valued at 1/4 the fees of normal transactions.

Actually ... heh - when I looked at that code - it's almost 2 years ago now that they wrote it I think.
I should find that 4 and change it to 1 in our nodes ...

I had to bite, lol.

Would that do anything? aren't the transactions already broadcast with the fee? So making that change wouldn't be able to just grab more fees.

It would mean that if there was a space availability issue in the block work, it would be weighted the same as normal transactions when vying for the available space.

Edit: I'll have to do so more changes to deal with transactions shortly anyway.
Core took out something that only pools would use ... gee I wonder why they would do that? Tongue

Something that I've used when blocks were full - to force our payout transaction into the pool work: priority.
So I'l have to do more changes to the transaction selection code anyway and I'll remove the 4x then if possible also.

Wouldn't that negatively affect miner's profits by reducing the fees they get? SegWit gives transactions witness data, and the witness data doesn't count towards the 1 MB block maximum, which was the reasoning behind the 4x value.

No, the reason behind the 4x value is to attempt to force people away from non-segwit addresses and thus give momentum to get centrally controlled lightning networks in place where they can take fees from miners and direct them at centrally controlled transaction systems.
I wonder why a decentralised transaction system would consider such a change ... ... ... ... ... ...

Anyway, space vs cost.
You're assuming the result of what I'll change

Hint: I can program better than most of the hackers/idiots in Bitcoin.

DarkStar_

legendary

Activity: 2772

Merit: 3284

Quote from: kano on July 13, 2018, 07:27:45 PM

Quote from: Steamtyme on July 13, 2018, 07:24:05 PM

Quote from: kano on July 13, 2018, 07:19:21 PM

segwit transactions are coded in corecoin to be valued at 1/4 the fees of normal transactions.

Actually ... heh - when I looked at that code - it's almost 2 years ago now that they wrote it I think.
I should find that 4 and change it to 1 in our nodes ...

I had to bite, lol.

Would that do anything? aren't the transactions already broadcast with the fee? So making that change wouldn't be able to just grab more fees.

It would mean that if there was a space availability issue in the block work, it would be weighted the same as normal transactions when vying for the available space.

Edit: I'll have to do so more changes to deal with transactions shortly anyway.
Core took out something that only pools would use ... gee I wonder why they would do that? Tongue

Something that I've used when blocks were full - to force our payout transaction into the pool work: priority.
So I'l have to do more changes to the transaction selection code anyway and I'll remove the 4x then if possible also.

Wouldn't that negatively affect miner's profits by reducing the fees they get? SegWit gives transactions witness data, and the witness data doesn't count towards the 1 MB block maximum, which was the reasoning behind the 4x value.

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: Steamtyme on July 13, 2018, 07:24:05 PM

Quote from: kano on July 13, 2018, 07:19:21 PM

segwit transactions are coded in corecoin to be valued at 1/4 the fees of normal transactions.

Actually ... heh - when I looked at that code - it's almost 2 years ago now that they wrote it I think.
I should find that 4 and change it to 1 in our nodes ...

I had to bite, lol.

Would that do anything? aren't the transactions already broadcast with the fee? So making that change wouldn't be able to just grab more fees.

It would mean that if there was a space availability issue in the block work, it would be weighted the same as normal transactions when vying for the available space.

Edit: I'll have to do so more changes to deal with transactions shortly anyway.
Core took out something that only pools would use ... gee I wonder why they would do that? Tongue

Something that I've used when blocks were full - to force our payout transaction into the pool work: priority.
So I'l have to do more changes to the transaction selection code anyway and I'll remove the 4x then if possible also.

Steamtyme

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 2037

Quote from: kano on July 13, 2018, 07:19:21 PM

segwit transactions are coded in corecoin to be valued at 1/4 the fees of normal transactions.

Actually ... heh - when I looked at that code - it's almost 2 years ago now that they wrote it I think.
I should find that 4 and change it to 1 in our nodes ...

I had to bite, lol.

Would that do anything? aren't the transactions already broadcast with the fee? So making that change wouldn't be able to just grab more fees.

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: BSGMiner on July 12, 2018, 10:06:51 PM

Quote from: kano on July 12, 2018, 09:44:39 PM

Quote from: BSGMiner on July 12, 2018, 08:58:49 PM

Maybe I'm not thinking about all the angles here, but wouldn't this be good if you were the one paying that fee?

I understand it's not good for us miners, but what about the people consolidating these transactions, for example?

There's no trouble consolidating non-segwit transactions.

It's 750Kb of a 1.9Mb block - 10500 inputs - for 1sat/Byte
Nope I don't see how that's good at all.
1.7 times the size of a (current) standard block - 1.7 times the data to transmit and store that block ... for 0.0075 BTC

It's someone taking advantage of segwit's and core's anti-non-segwit design.
But it also looks like segwit spam if you look at the transactions.

Maybe I misunderstood how much the transaction fee was for that 100-into-1 transaction. I just did something like that for my mining rewards--90s-into-1--and it was 0.00013808 BTC.

Edit: So, is it more/less/same expensive for segwit transactions?

segwit transactions are coded in corecoin to be valued at 1/4 the fees of normal transactions.

Actually ... heh - when I looked at that code - it's almost 2 years ago now that they wrote it I think.
I should find that 4 and change it to 1 in our nodes ...

BSGMiner

member

Activity: 490

Merit: 16

1xA921 + 1xA741 + Backup-->1xA6 ;)

Quote from: kano on July 12, 2018, 09:44:39 PM

Quote from: BSGMiner on July 12, 2018, 08:58:49 PM

Maybe I'm not thinking about all the angles here, but wouldn't this be good if you were the one paying that fee?

I understand it's not good for us miners, but what about the people consolidating these transactions, for example?

There's no trouble consolidating non-segwit transactions.

It's 750Kb of a 1.9Mb block - 10500 inputs - for 1sat/Byte
Nope I don't see how that's good at all.
1.7 times the size of a (current) standard block - 1.7 times the data to transmit and store that block ... for 0.0075 BTC

It's someone taking advantage of segwit's and core's anti-non-segwit design.
But it also looks like segwit spam if you look at the transactions.

Maybe I misunderstood how much the transaction fee was for that 100-into-1 transaction. I just did something like that for my mining rewards--90s-into-1--and it was 0.00013808 BTC.

Edit: So, is it more/less/same expensive for segwit transactions?

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 135. (Read 5352527 times)