If Kano thinks there is a way to cut down on the orphans (or do any other improvements), I would vote to increase the fees.
Some quick numbers as an example:
Say there are 2 orphans a month on average (the last month had 3). Right now, that is say $20,000 lost due to orphans (50 BTC ~ $400 each). Kano gets about $180 of that in his fees (0.9%) However, if say with $1,000 a month in extra servers (increasing the number of nodes, nodes on the other side of the GFW, maybe upgrading the current servers, etc), the number of orphans could be reduced in half (again, just using round numbers as an example), it would be be worth $9,000 a month more to the miners in the pool after paying for those upgrades (25 BTC at $400 = $10,000 more - $1,000 in new charges = $9,000 more a month), but result in $910 a month in extra expenses to Kano ($1,000 extra in expenses to Kano + only $90 more in fees to Kano). Long story short, if there is a way to improve things where the net result is more BTC to the members & Kano, even though there is technically an increase in the fee (say from 0.9% to 1.4%, 1.9%, etc) I see no reason not to do it.
I would be happy to pay 1.9% in fees, if that somehow meant I made 1% (or more) mining than what I am currently making. And this is a purely selfish argument, I could make an additional argument that he has taken good care of us, and we should take good care of him (but I will not, as I think the selfish argument is more persuasive
.
Since Kano's fee is such a small amount of the reward, I wonder if additional resources might be useful. Eligius is a good example. The 0% fee left me with about 87% luck there. With 0%, how much can they really do to improve things there? That means I was actually paying a 13% fee, rather than a 0% fee. Lower fees are not necessarily better for anyone.
Kano would be the only one who knows if he thinks improvements could be made. I am just bringing up the possibility that with additional resources Kano might be able to squeeze even more insanely good luck out of the system. He mentioned the other day about possibly getting some hardware behind the GFW. It *might not* make economic sense for him to pay for it, but it *might* make sense for the miners to pay for it (with a small increase in fees). Again, only Kano would know, I just want to bring it up for discussion.
Kano, what do you think? Are there some improvements that could bring in a net positive result for the pool's earnings (if the pool paid for them), but would cause a net negative if you paid for them? Are there any things you have been thinking about doing, or have hesitated doing as they would be overly costly to you?