Author

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 1729. (Read 5352322 times)

legendary
Activity: 4354
Merit: 9201
'The right to privacy matters'
wish i could get my avalon 6 hashing


what is wrong with it?
legendary
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Dark Passenger Bitcoin miner 2013,Bitcoin node
wish i could get my avalon 6 hashing
legendary
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Dark Passenger Bitcoin miner 2013,Bitcoin node
and hits keep on playing
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1006
Mine for a Bit
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Let's do it again!!  =)
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
Block! dmasys with 63THs hits his first kano.is block!
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Let's do another pool restart.  Woot! 
vh
hero member
Activity: 699
Merit: 666
Block!  Not sure who because it's a BTC but all blocks are appreciated!
seem like ckpool proxy mode is not reporting block solve message downstream.   not sure if that is the nature of the interaction or if i'm missing a setting. 
-ck removed the messages - at my request Smiley - if the miner isn't reporting itself as a proper miner.
I often got the impression, on block changes, that the hash rate would drop, and we took a guess at it being crappy miners/proxies not liking stratum messages.
thanks for the clarification.   that makes sense, aligning with your various other posts.
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
If I've understood right sending shares is just a bookkeeping tool. Pool doesn't do anything with shares, but it shows that you do work.

You can send few high difficult shares or many low difficult shares. End result is the same.

Shares are what you get rewarded for.

Shares are what CKDB counts and uses to decide your part of the reward when one of those shares found by anyone on the pool is a block.

So, yeah I guess you could word them as effectively useless, but, if you don't submit them, you don't get rewarded, and total diff of the shares you submit determines how much you get rewarded.

So although blocks must be found before anyone gets a reward, you get no reward without shares.
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Block!  Not sure who because it's a BTC but all blocks are appreciated!
seem like ckpool proxy mode is not reporting block solve message downstream.   not sure if that is the nature of the interaction or if i'm missing a setting. 
-ck removed the messages - at my request Smiley - if the miner isn't reporting itself as a proper miner.
I often got the impression, on block changes, that the hash rate would drop, and we took a guess at it being crappy miners/proxies not liking stratum messages.
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
Pool restart.. please?  Cheesy

Haha!  I remember a time when you just asking for a restart would seem to trigger a block.  Looks like it worked again!
vh
hero member
Activity: 699
Merit: 666
Block!  Not sure who because it's a BTC but all blocks are appreciated!
seem like ckpool proxy mode is not reporting block solve message downstream.   not sure if that is the nature of the interaction or if i'm missing a setting. 
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
Block!  Not sure who because it's a BTC address but all blocks are appreciated!
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 101
If I've understood right sending shares is just a bookkeeping tool. Pool doesn't do anything with shares, but it shows that you do work.

You can send few high difficult shares or many low difficult shares. End result is the same.

legendary
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1002
Go Big or Go Home.....
Pool restart.. please?  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
ok but in order to solve a block is better submit less share with high difficulty or more share with low difficulty?
Yeah as mentioned above, this isn't relevant to finding blocks.

With regards to finding shares, it's as I said, higher difficulty will mean fewer shares and higher variance, less network.
Lower difficulty will mean more shares and lower variance, more network.

The long term expected share reward of both is of course the same.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
ok but in order to solve a block is better submit less share with high difficulty or more share with low difficulty?

Well only a share with a difficulty high enough to solve a block will solve a block.
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
ok but in order to solve a block is better submit less share with high difficulty or more share with low difficulty?
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
With a hashrate of 1 PH is best to use the proxy for submit share with high difficulties 500K and above or not use the proxy and have more connection for submit more share with a lower difficulty on average 70K.
From a latency point of view, ckproxy will mean much less network traffic between the proxy and the pool (if not run in passthrough mode)
since one work item will be sent each block change to ckproxy and the ckproxy will break it up to each local miner.

From a variance point of view, of course a 500K difficulty will mean higher variance than 70K difficulty.
However there is no average expected loss due to the higher variance, just ... higher variance.
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
With a hashrate of 1 PH is best to use the proxy for submit share with high difficulties 500K and above or not use the proxy and have more connection for submit more share with a lower difficulty on average 70K.
Jump to: