Author

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 502. (Read 5352367 times)

jr. member
Activity: 33
Merit: 2
I also find the current Monthly Statistics confusing/not relevant. According to january:

Code:
---------------------------- Monthly Statistics ----------------------------
UTC Month       Pool Avg        Blocks  Expected        Mean Diff%      MeanTx% CDF[Erl]        Luck%   PAPPS%
2018 January    31.98PHs        8       6.87    85.86%  132.04% 0.3817  116.47% 152.40%

what was the number of blocks expected for January? 6,87 ---> Looks like wrong, as the rest of the data for January.

This system of calculating only for last block is showing best luck possible calculated just when block is won. In the case of January it shows to be a extreme case. Of course January has been an very unlucky month... but.. it will always show green (good luck month) historically to the user giving "wrong" quick look information.

Last row (current month) in Monthly Statistics should be calculated daily, at my point of view, with a cron job so it doesn't give every day (except the day when block is found) "uncorrect" info for the month, as it is happening now.

Calculating last row daily would probide exactly the on-going stasts and the final stats for the month. That is, in my oppinion more useful for the user than the info linked to the moment when las block was won. In fact, for me knowing what happened in January, those Monthly Statistics, would seem to be wrong, if I would not know that they are linked to the last block won (in this month case skipping the last almost 10 days (1/3 of the month) BAD LUCK)... and well... As said, even knowing the related "trick" these stats for me seem to provide no use for the specific and extreme case of January.

I am not critisising, I am just sharing my point of view, because I would like a change there... to the daily Monthly Statistics's last row update cron task approach. That would make me happy! :-)

First of all, if you want daily luck projections, use one of the many calculators that are available out there.  For example, I just used one and it shows that the expected number of blocks for our average pool hash rate for the 31 days in January was 8.9 blocks.  We hit 8 blocks so I'm not sure how you can say January was a "very unlucky month".  For the month of January 8 out of 8.9 is pretty damn good in anybody's book so you people need to stop making off-the-cuff statements that are not based on anything but your emotions.

Second, The Monthly Statistics table is simply to show the actual blocks hit and how much work went into each one compared to what the expected would be at that instant.  It's not just simply another projection into the future...you can do that yourself.  Since we had 9 days of work at the end of January where no blocks were found, that work will be included in the first block hit in February's block line.

You disqualify my comment because "it is not so unlucky month" as I am saying and I am making off-the-cuff statement based on my emotions... WOW!

do You think it is ok to show WRONG data? or do really think that it is ok to read that January was a sightly lucky month? interesting!

wht happens if we dont win a block in whole february 2018? I guess February will not appear AT ALL in the Monthly Statistics table, right? Instead of showing the reallity: February 2018 was the unluckiest month EVER!!

OK... AMEN JESUS...

You keep harping on future speculation and you want to change the Kano website to show speculation data.  The charts and data tables on the Kano web site is about displaying actual historical data; not speculation into the future about things that have not happened.  There's a huge difference.  Like I said, you can use any of the many calculators out there to do all the speculations and all the what-if scenarios you want.

You are wrong. I am not speculating. I am predicting!

But well...  The person I would like to read my comment and to reply with his opinion is Kano
member
Activity: 85
Merit: 16
The anime version of Nyarlathotep and Cthulhu Smiley
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q07xoKmrPpg
Cthulhu is the red-head with black ribbons.
Nyarlathotep is the silver-haired main character.

Kind of like we are all stuck in the Force of Will world recently waiting to get a block on the Kano pool Smiley
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkNuW66uGfA
(Side note: I can't wait for this film to be released in 2018 - it looks amazing!)

Just to add fuel to the fire - luck is not something you can control - for every really bad unlucky 500% streak there is eventually a good under 100% streak.
It is just as likely you will have bad luck at another pool as here - in the end Kano does pay more per block.

Finally, there should be more miners coming on soon from those who buying 821s.  Personally, I will be adding about 40TH more soon!
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
I also find the current Monthly Statistics confusing/not relevant. According to january:

Code:
---------------------------- Monthly Statistics ----------------------------
UTC Month       Pool Avg        Blocks  Expected        Mean Diff%      MeanTx% CDF[Erl]        Luck%   PAPPS%
2018 January    31.98PHs        8       6.87    85.86%  132.04% 0.3817  116.47% 152.40%

what was the number of blocks expected for January? 6,87 ---> Looks like wrong, as the rest of the data for January.

This system of calculating only for last block is showing best luck possible calculated just when block is won. In the case of January it shows to be a extreme case. Of course January has been an very unlucky month... but.. it will always show green (good luck month) historically to the user giving "wrong" quick look information.

Last row (current month) in Monthly Statistics should be calculated daily, at my point of view, with a cron job so it doesn't give every day (except the day when block is found) "uncorrect" info for the month, as it is happening now.

Calculating last row daily would probide exactly the on-going stasts and the final stats for the month. That is, in my oppinion more useful for the user than the info linked to the moment when las block was won. In fact, for me knowing what happened in January, those Monthly Statistics, would seem to be wrong, if I would not know that they are linked to the last block won (in this month case skipping the last almost 10 days (1/3 of the month) BAD LUCK)... and well... As said, even knowing the related "trick" these stats for me seem to provide no use for the specific and extreme case of January.

I am not critisising, I am just sharing my point of view, because I would like a change there... to the daily Monthly Statistics's last row update cron task approach. That would make me happy! :-)

First of all, if you want daily luck projections, use one of the many calculators that are available out there.  For example, I just used one and it shows that the expected number of blocks for our average pool hash rate for the 31 days in January was 8.9 blocks.  We hit 8 blocks so I'm not sure how you can say January was a "very unlucky month".  For the month of January 8 out of 8.9 is pretty damn good in anybody's book so you people need to stop making off-the-cuff statements that are not based on anything but your emotions.

Second, The Monthly Statistics table is simply to show the actual blocks hit and how much work went into each one compared to what the expected would be at that instant.  It's not just simply another projection into the future...you can do that yourself.  Since we had 9 days of work at the end of January where no blocks were found, that work will be included in the first block hit in February's block line.

You disqualify my comment because "it is not so unlucky month" as I am saying and I am making off-the-cuff statement based on my emotions... WOW!

do You think it is ok to show WRONG data? or do really think that it is ok to read that January was a sightly lucky month? interesting!

wht happens if we dont win a block in whole february 2018? I guess February will not appear AT ALL in the Monthly Statistics table, right? Instead of showing the reallity: February 2018 was the unluckiest month EVER!!

OK... AMEN JESUS...

You keep harping on future speculation and you want to change the Kano website to show speculation data.  The charts and data tables on the Kano web site are about displaying actual historical data; not speculation into the future about things that have not happened.  There's a huge difference.  Like I said, you can use any of the many calculators out there to do all the speculations and all the what-if scenarios you want.
jr. member
Activity: 33
Merit: 2
I also find the current Monthly Statistics confusing/not relevant. According to january:

Code:
---------------------------- Monthly Statistics ----------------------------
UTC Month       Pool Avg        Blocks  Expected        Mean Diff%      MeanTx% CDF[Erl]        Luck%   PAPPS%
2018 January    31.98PHs        8       6.87    85.86%  132.04% 0.3817  116.47% 152.40%

what was the number of blocks expected for January? 6,87 ---> Looks like wrong, as the rest of the data for January.

This system of calculating only for last block is showing best luck possible calculated just when block is won. In the case of January it shows to be a extreme case. Of course January has been an very unlucky month... but.. it will always show green (good luck month) historically to the user giving "wrong" quick look information.

Last row (current month) in Monthly Statistics should be calculated daily, at my point of view, with a cron job so it doesn't give every day (except the day when block is found) "uncorrect" info for the month, as it is happening now.

Calculating last row daily would probide exactly the on-going stasts and the final stats for the month. That is, in my oppinion more useful for the user than the info linked to the moment when las block was won. In fact, for me knowing what happened in January, those Monthly Statistics, would seem to be wrong, if I would not know that they are linked to the last block won (in this month case skipping the last almost 10 days (1/3 of the month) BAD LUCK)... and well... As said, even knowing the related "trick" these stats for me seem to provide no use for the specific and extreme case of January.

I am not critisising, I am just sharing my point of view, because I would like a change there... to the daily Monthly Statistics's last row update cron task approach. That would make me happy! :-)

First of all, if you want daily luck projections, use one of the many calculators that are available out there.  For example, I just used one and it shows that the expected number of blocks for our average pool hash rate for the 31 days in January was 8.9 blocks.  We hit 8 blocks so I'm not sure how you can say January was a "very unlucky month".  For the month of January 8 out of 8.9 is pretty damn good in anybody's book so you people need to stop making off-the-cuff statements that are not based on anything but your emotions.

Second, The Monthly Statistics table is simply to show the actual blocks hit and how much work went into each one compared to what the expected would be at that instant.  It's not just simply another projection into the future...you can do that yourself.  Since we had 9 days of work at the end of January where no blocks were found, that work will be included in the first block hit in February's block line.

You disqualify my comment because "it is not so unlucky month" as I am saying and I am making off-the-cuff statement based on my emotions... WOW!

do You think it is ok to show WRONG data? or do really think that it is ok to read that January was a sightly lucky month? interesting!

wht happens if we dont win a block in whole february 2018? I guess February will not appear AT ALL in the Monthly Statistics table, right? Instead of showing the reallity: February 2018 was the unluckiest month EVER!!

OK... AMEN JESUS...
newbie
Activity: 81
Merit: 0
today we solve a block I can't wait for you
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
I also find the current Monthly Statistics confusing/not relevant. According to january:

Code:
---------------------------- Monthly Statistics ----------------------------
UTC Month       Pool Avg        Blocks  Expected        Mean Diff%      MeanTx% CDF[Erl]        Luck%   PAPPS%
2018 January    31.98PHs        8       6.87    85.86%  132.04% 0.3817  116.47% 152.40%

what was the number of blocks expected for January? 6,87 ---> Looks like wrong, as the rest of the data for January.

This system of calculating only for last block is showing best luck possible calculated just when block is won. In the case of January it shows to be a extreme case. Of course January has been an very unlucky month... but.. it will always show green (good luck month) historically to the user giving "wrong" quick look information.

Last row (current month) in Monthly Statistics should be calculated daily, at my point of view, with a cron job so it doesn't give every day (except the day when block is found) "uncorrect" info for the month, as it is happening now.

Calculating last row daily would probide exactly the on-going stasts and the final stats for the month. That is, in my oppinion more useful for the user than the info linked to the moment when las block was won. In fact, for me knowing what happened in January, those Monthly Statistics, would seem to be wrong, if I would not know that they are linked to the last block won (in this month case skipping the last almost 10 days (1/3 of the month) BAD LUCK)... and well... As said, even knowing the related "trick" these stats for me seem to provide no use for the specific and extreme case of January.

I am not critisising, I am just sharing my point of view, because I would like a change there... to the daily Monthly Statistics's last row update cron task approach. That would make me happy! :-)

First of all, if you want daily luck projections, use one of the many calculators that are available out there.  For example, I just used one and it shows that the expected number of blocks for our average pool hash rate for the 31 days in January was 8.9 blocks.  We hit 8 blocks so I'm not sure how you can say January was a "very unlucky month".  For the month of January 8 out of 8.9 is pretty damn good in anybody's book so you people need to stop making off-the-cuff statements that are not based on anything but your emotions.

Second, The Monthly Statistics table is simply to show the actual blocks hit and how much work went into each one compared to what the expected would be at that instant.  It's not just simply another projection into the future...you can do that yourself.  Since we had 9 days of work at the end of January where no blocks were found, that work will be included in the first block hit in February's block line.
newbie
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
I think the days of home mining and small mining pools are coming to an end. If you cannot add hashing power to match difficulty you are just spinning your wheels. The mining manufacturers need to produce a 20THs miner at 1500w that is affordable for us to buy. This latest round from Ant and Canaan is just a money grab taking advantage of people looking for an answer. If things keep going at the rate they are now my 55THs operation will not be profitable after June 2018. If BTC goes back to $20K it will give me a few more months. If China bans mining the overpriced S9 will be worthless on the resale market. We went from 72 blocks in June to 8 in January you do the math.

Everyone with free electricity mine on! I am searching for answers if anyone has a plan.  
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
Wow! It looks like we are getting close to that October block! On a positive note, BTC is up 9% today! Where is this blasted block?  Smiley
member
Activity: 490
Merit: 16
1xA921 + 1xA741 + Backup-->1xA6 ;)
this block has now moved to the 2nd hardest (from a difficulty standpoint) of any block in the past 88...

haha, we passed groundhog day... did the rodent see its shadow?

Actually, it's Groundhog Day again--and will be until we CRACK THIS BTCLOCK!

Edit:
Quote from: InsideAddition.com
Punxsutawney Phil, the legendary groundhog forecaster of Punxsutawney, Pa., saw his shadow Friday, meaning the already bitter winter will continue for six more weeks.

^ Might be fake news, though. Not sure.
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
this block has now moved to the 2nd hardest (from a difficulty standpoint) of any block in the past 88...

haha, we passed groundhog day... did the rodent see its shadow?
4th Smiley

Code:
3rd 492867 2017‑11‑03 00:28:59 332.594% +
    492189 2017‑10‑29 10:56:16 107.460% Stale

1st 491758 2017‑10‑26 00:42:04 928.788%
2nd 491085 2017‑10‑22 04:35:54 875.193%
member
Activity: 285
Merit: 10
Free mining equipment tracking and reporting
What my wife said after watching the video

"I don't think the cables and adapters will hold up. Mineral oil dissolves a lot of things it touches. Maybe the metal will hold up, but I don't know about the plastic. Plus, the oil may get gummy as small particles start to mix with it.

Think about putting horses' manes & tails up. Mineral oil dissolves the rubber bands within a few days."

Uh she's always right...
she might be... after all mineral oil is petroleum based, and I can see that may interact with petroleum based plastic connectors and wires....
DOH  I hate it when your wife is right!

Maybe just submerge it up to the point just to the top of the hash boards and not any higher.  Not even the control board since that doesnt make any noise.  Use the fans from the antminers to blow air thorugh the radiator, ( With quieter ones anayways) that way the control board still sees a fan is spinning.

If you notice on the last part of that video, only one fan is at 240 rpm, and all others are at 0rpm.  AAnd we do not know if he actually logged into that particular S9 on his network...
Is a good idea to fry a bunch and make the global hasrate less...
Your wife is right.  Here is another discussion on it and the recommendation to use silicon liquid.  Also talks about eating the capacitors - yikes!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16082485
member
Activity: 140
Merit: 18
this block has now moved to the 2nd hardest (from a difficulty standpoint) of any block in the past 88...

haha, we passed groundhog day... did the rodent see its shadow?
jr. member
Activity: 33
Merit: 2
First off, I allowed for difficulty change as I specifically mentioned in my post.

Second, no way our numbers for January are those that are currently on the website.
As you say, they will be adjusted once the first block in February is found.
I expect the number at around 100%, maybe even lower, but NOT 116%.
116% number was there since the last block and it did not budge the week (or so) without blocks.
I fail to see the relevance of this number in such case.
The January number wont change.

As I said, it shows the stats for blocks found in January - not the hashing done in January.
The code works as: any block with a date of the month of interest, then it's numbers are included in the calculation for a given month.
The hash rate is easy:
 Elapsed = from the time of the last block of the previous month to the time of the last block of the current month.
 Hashes done = total hashes of each of the blocks in the month (including invalids before them of course)
 Hash rate = Hashes done / Elapsed

The next block found will be in February, so that wont affect the January numbers.

OK, I think I finally got it.
Thanks for the detailed explanation, it was helpful.

I also find the current Monthly Statistics confusing/not relevant. According to january:

Code:
---------------------------- Monthly Statistics ----------------------------
UTC Month       Pool Avg        Blocks  Expected        Mean Diff%      MeanTx% CDF[Erl]        Luck%   PAPPS%
2018 January    31.98PHs        8       6.87    85.86%  132.04% 0.3817  116.47% 152.40%

what was the number of blocks expected for January? 6,87 ---> Looks like wrong, as the rest of the data for January.

This system of calculating only for last block is showing best luck possible calculated just when block is won. In the case of January it shows to be a extreme case. Of course January has been an very unlucky month... but.. it will always show green (good luck month) historically to the user giving "wrong" quick look information.

Last row (current month) in Monthly Statistics should be calculated daily, at my point of view, with a cron job so it doesn't give every day (except the day when block is found) "uncorrect" info for the month, as it is happening now.

Calculating last row daily would probide exactly the on-going stasts and the final stats for the month. That is, in my oppinion more useful for the user than the info linked to the moment when las block was won. In fact, for me knowing what happened in January, those Monthly Statistics, would seem to be wrong, if I would not know that they are linked to the last block won (in this month case skipping the last almost 10 days (1/3 of the month) BAD LUCK)... and well... As said, even knowing the related "trick" these stats for me seem to provide no use for the specific and extreme case of January.

I am not critisising, I am just sharing my point of view, because I would like a change there... to the daily Monthly Statistics's last row update cron task approach. That would make me happy! :-)
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 4597
...
Are you saying that we will see the final data for January ONLY when we will see the first block in February OR that the current posted data for January IS already final. If it is not final, maybe explain why not? Thanks.
The monthly blocks table is for blocks found in the month.
We won't find any more in January - so it's final.

I probably don't get how the the stats are being displayed.
It could be entirely my misunderstanding of some params.

Specifically, 21.68 ph in dec, 31.98 ph in Jan, 22% increase in Ph.
expected blocks: 6.8 in January vs 10.2 in Dec, a 32.7% decrease
Hashing power went up 22%, expected blocks decreased 32.7%
Yet, the network hashing power had the arithmetic average of 12.88 Zetah/s in Dec vs 18.56 Zetah/s in january, a 44% increase
I can't match the numbers with roughly 10% mismatch.

The first block each month includes shares mined at the end in the previous month after the last block found.
How much it overlaps depends on luck and pool hash rate.

Edit: yeah and difficulty as mentioned by Mr.Joe Smiley
(each month has 2 or 3 diff changes)

First off, I allowed for difficulty change as I specifically mentioned in my post.

Second, no way our numbers for January are those that are currently on the website.
As you say, they will be adjusted once the first block in February is found.
I expect the number at around 100%, maybe even lower, but NOT 116%.
116% number was there since the last block and it did not budge the week (or so) without blocks.
I fail to see the relevance of this number in such case.
The January number wont change.

As I said, it shows the stats for blocks found in January - not the hashing done in January.
The code works as: any block with a date of the month of interest, then it's numbers are included in the calculation for a given month.
The hash rate is easy:
 Elapsed = from the time of the last block of the previous month to the time of the last block of the current month.
 Hashes done = total hashes of each of the blocks in the month (including invalids before them of course)
 Hash rate = Hashes done / Elapsed

The next block found will be in February, so that wont affect the January numbers.

OK, I think I finally got it.
Thanks for the detailed explanation, it was helpful.
jr. member
Activity: 196
Merit: 4
S9 too loud?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCWhF8g8Rvw

You try it first and let me know... then I can quiet my 7 down...   :-)

I do not think the gravel is neccisary but, maybe it helps.

What my wife said after watching the video

"I don't think the cables and adapters will hold up. Mineral oil dissolves a lot of things it touches. Maybe the metal will hold up, but I don't know about the plastic. Plus, the oil may get gummy as small particles start to mix with it.

Think about putting horses' manes & tails up. Mineral oil dissolves the rubber bands within a few days."

Uh she's always right...
she might be... after all mineral oil is petroleum based, and I can see that may interact with petroleum based plastic connectors and wires....
DOH  I hate it when your wife is right!

Maybe just submerge it up to the point just to the top of the hash boards and not any higher.  Not even the control board since that doesnt make any noise.  Use the fans from the antminers to blow air thorugh the radiator, ( With quieter ones anayways) that way the control board still sees a fan is spinning.

If you notice on the last part of that video, only one fan is at 240 rpm, and all others are at 0rpm.  AAnd we do not know if he actually logged into that particular S9 on his network...
Is a good idea to fry a bunch and make the global hasrate less...


legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
...
Are you saying that we will see the final data for January ONLY when we will see the first block in February OR that the current posted data for January IS already final. If it is not final, maybe explain why not? Thanks.
The monthly blocks table is for blocks found in the month.
We won't find any more in January - so it's final.

I probably don't get how the the stats are being displayed.
It could be entirely my misunderstanding of some params.

Specifically, 21.68 ph in dec, 31.98 ph in Jan, 22% increase in Ph.
expected blocks: 6.8 in January vs 10.2 in Dec, a 32.7% decrease
Hashing power went up 22%, expected blocks decreased 32.7%
Yet, the network hashing power had the arithmetic average of 12.88 Zetah/s in Dec vs 18.56 Zetah/s in january, a 44% increase
I can't match the numbers with roughly 10% mismatch.

The first block each month includes shares mined at the end in the previous month after the last block found.
How much it overlaps depends on luck and pool hash rate.

Edit: yeah and difficulty as mentioned by Mr.Joe Smiley
(each month has 2 or 3 diff changes)

First off, I allowed for difficulty change as I specifically mentioned in my post.

Second, no way our numbers for January are those that are currently on the website.
As you say, they will be adjusted once the first block in February is found.
I expect the number at around 100%, maybe even lower, but NOT 116%.
116% number was there since the last block and it did not budge the week (or so) without blocks.
I fail to see the relevance of this number in such case.
The January number wont change.

As I said, it shows the stats for blocks found in January - not the hashing done in January.
The code works as: any block with a date of the month of interest, then it's numbers are included in the calculation for a given month.
The hash rate is easy:
 Elapsed = from the time of the last block of the previous month to the time of the last block of the current month.
 Hashes done = total hashes of each of the blocks in the month (including invalids before them of course)
 Hash rate = Hashes done / Elapsed

The next block found will be in February, so that wont affect the January numbers.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
S9 too loud?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCWhF8g8Rvw

You try it first and let me know... then I can quiet my 7 down...   :-)

I do not think the gravel is neccisary but, maybe it helps.

What my wife said after watching the video

"I don't think the cables and adapters will hold up. Mineral oil dissolves a lot of things it touches. Maybe the metal will hold up, but I don't know about the plastic. Plus, the oil may get gummy as small particles start to mix with it.

Think about putting horses' manes & tails up. Mineral oil dissolves the rubber bands within a few days."

Uh she's always right...
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 4597
...
Are you saying that we will see the final data for January ONLY when we will see the first block in February OR that the current posted data for January IS already final. If it is not final, maybe explain why not? Thanks.
The monthly blocks table is for blocks found in the month.
We won't find any more in January - so it's final.

I probably don't get how the the stats are being displayed.
It could be entirely my misunderstanding of some params.

Specifically, 21.68 ph in dec, 31.98 ph in Jan, 22% increase in Ph.
expected blocks: 6.8 in January vs 10.2 in Dec, a 32.7% decrease
Hashing power went up 22%, expected blocks decreased 32.7%
Yet, the network hashing power had the arithmetic average of 12.88 Zetah/s in Dec vs 18.56 Zetah/s in january, a 44% increase
I can't match the numbers with roughly 10% mismatch.

The first block each month includes shares mined at the end in the previous month after the last block found.
How much it overlaps depends on luck and pool hash rate.

Edit: yeah and difficulty as mentioned by Mr.Joe Smiley
(each month has 2 or 3 diff changes)

First off, I allowed for difficulty change as I specifically mentioned in my post.

Second, no way our numbers for January are those that are currently on the website.
As you say, January numbers will be adjusted once the first block in February is found.
I expect the number at around 100%, maybe even lower, but NOT 116%.
116% number was there since the last block and it did not budge the week (or so) without blocks.
I fail to see the relevance of this number in such case.

legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
I'm making a sacrifice to Cthulhu to get crack this block!

Since I'm still a newbie, here is a link to my block dance:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iI0xfFNKWxs
The anime version of Nyarlathotep and Cthulhu Smiley
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q07xoKmrPpg
Cthulhu is the red-head with black ribbons.
Nyarlathotep is the silver-haired main character.
newbie
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
I'm making a sacrifice to Cthulhu to get crack this block!

Since I'm still a newbie, here is a link to my block dance:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iI0xfFNKWxs



Good song, with this motivation there is no way my Antminers WOn'T solve a block!
Jump to: