Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 670. (Read 5352367 times)
December 14, 2017, 06:27:14 PM
162.58% Let's crack it!
December 14, 2017, 05:53:56 PM
This one better have like 29 BTC in it. LoL 
Latest avgs from Slush have been 16 and change...
December 14, 2017, 05:52:08 PM
This one better have like 29 BTC in it. LoL
In the long run, everything evens out.
December 14, 2017, 04:39:05 PM
This one better have like 29 BTC in it. LoL
December 14, 2017, 04:05:14 PM
On another note kano, on the invalid screen for workers, I understand what all of the acronyms but the "Hi" I don't know....I only get that on my S7 which isn't perfectly set up.
Anyone else can answer too.
Stale, Duplidate "Hi" Rejected.
Anyone else can answer too.
Stale, Duplidate "Hi" Rejected.
December 14, 2017, 04:01:37 PM
Since I've not posted it for a while ... here's the CDF table 
What line 5 says, is that we expect, on average, 1 in 20.1 blocks, to be over 300%
etc.
It's something that a lot of people don't realise about the expected results when finding blocks
Just thought I'd post it again for the newer members
Kano,Code:
1 0.39346934028737 50.000% 1 in 1.6
2 0.63212055882856 100.000% 1 in 2.7
3 0.77686983985157 150.000% 1 in 4.5
4 0.86466471676339 200.000% 1 in 7.4
5 0.95021293163214 300.000% 1 in 20.1
6 0.98168436111127 400.000% 1 in 54.6
7 0.99326205300091 500.000% 1 in 148.4
8 0.99752124782333 600.000% 1 in 403.4
9 0.99872735771441 666.666% 1 in 785.8
10 0.99908811803445 700.000% 1 in 1096.6
11 0.99966453737210 800.000% 1 in 2981.0
12 0.99987659019591 900.000% 1 in 8103.1
What line 2 says, is that we expect, on average, 1 in 2.7 blocks, to be over 100%2 0.63212055882856 100.000% 1 in 2.7
3 0.77686983985157 150.000% 1 in 4.5
4 0.86466471676339 200.000% 1 in 7.4
5 0.95021293163214 300.000% 1 in 20.1
6 0.98168436111127 400.000% 1 in 54.6
7 0.99326205300091 500.000% 1 in 148.4
8 0.99752124782333 600.000% 1 in 403.4
9 0.99872735771441 666.666% 1 in 785.8
10 0.99908811803445 700.000% 1 in 1096.6
11 0.99966453737210 800.000% 1 in 2981.0
12 0.99987659019591 900.000% 1 in 8103.1
What line 5 says, is that we expect, on average, 1 in 20.1 blocks, to be over 300%
etc.
It's something that a lot of people don't realise about the expected results when finding blocks
Just thought I'd post it again for the newer members
What is the relationship between Pool Hash Rate, Diff and Probabilities, if any? Meaning as Diff Increases without Pool Hash Increase, how does that affect our Probabilities? I am thinking it only affects time to 100% Diff, your thoughts.
Thanks -Mine On
December 14, 2017, 03:54:36 PM
Sorry for the question that I am sure has already been asked but I can't find an answer too.
I understand that currently our payouts happen in the following block to avoid fees. I understand that we had two blocks hit back to back over the weekend (498476 and 498508) and they hit to close together to have the latter confirm the former, so they will both be payed out in our next block. My issue is I am seeing the payouts in my wallet. Why/how could that be? What am I missing?
I understand that currently our payouts happen in the following block to avoid fees. I understand that we had two blocks hit back to back over the weekend (498476 and 498508) and they hit to close together to have the latter confirm the former, so they will both be payed out in our next block. My issue is I am seeing the payouts in my wallet. Why/how could that be? What am I missing?
They were sent out fairly quickly...you should already have the BTC in your wallet. No reason to wait for the next block. The first block wasn't in the second block because it hadn't confirmed.
December 14, 2017, 03:41:09 PM
Sorry for the question that I am sure has already been asked but I can't find an answer too.
I understand that currently our payouts happen in the following block to avoid fees. I understand that we had two blocks hit back to back over the weekend (498476 and 498508) and they hit to close together to have the latter confirm the former, so they will both be payed out in our next block. My issue is I am seeing the payouts in my wallet. Why/how could that be? What am I missing?
I understand that currently our payouts happen in the following block to avoid fees. I understand that we had two blocks hit back to back over the weekend (498476 and 498508) and they hit to close together to have the latter confirm the former, so they will both be payed out in our next block. My issue is I am seeing the payouts in my wallet. Why/how could that be? What am I missing?
They matured. Happy dance.
December 14, 2017, 03:40:36 PM
Sorry for the question that I am sure has already been asked but I can't find an answer too.
I understand that currently our payouts happen in the following block to avoid fees. I understand that we had two blocks hit back to back over the weekend (498476 and 498508) and they hit to close together to have the latter confirm the former, so they will both be payed out in our next block. My issue is I am seeing the payouts in my wallet. Why/how could that be? What am I missing?
You will see the payouts, at the latest, in our pool's block after they have matured.I understand that currently our payouts happen in the following block to avoid fees. I understand that we had two blocks hit back to back over the weekend (498476 and 498508) and they hit to close together to have the latter confirm the former, so they will both be payed out in our next block. My issue is I am seeing the payouts in my wallet. Why/how could that be? What am I missing?
The transaction is sent out once the block matures.
However, when I add a transaction fee to the payout, it can be confirmed sooner by another pool - as I usually do lately.
December 14, 2017, 03:29:59 PM
Sorry for the question that I am sure has already been asked but I can't find an answer too.
I understand that currently our payouts happen in the following block to avoid fees. I understand that we had two blocks hit back to back over the weekend (498476 and 498508) and they hit to close together to have the latter confirm the former, so they will both be payed out in our next block. My issue is I am seeing the payouts in my wallet. Why/how could that be? What am I missing?
I understand that currently our payouts happen in the following block to avoid fees. I understand that we had two blocks hit back to back over the weekend (498476 and 498508) and they hit to close together to have the latter confirm the former, so they will both be payed out in our next block. My issue is I am seeing the payouts in my wallet. Why/how could that be? What am I missing?
December 14, 2017, 01:59:24 PM
December 14, 2017, 01:58:08 PM
What would be the reason that one would purchase this unit over the S9? Reliability is much better or so I have read, but power consumption is not. Would it be the fact that bitmain is not months behind and paying the scalper prices on ebay is absurd? Not trying to start anything here. Just attempting to confirm what I believe the reasons are based on my research. All in all given the retail pricing of both units wouldn't the S9 be the better machine 9 (not considering reliability).
Well with Bitmain where you have to pay 3 months in advance for an S9 ... that's 3 months of lost mining ... which is a VERY long time.If instead you can get a miner much faster ... then that also needs to be factored in.
At the moment neither of them can supply miners quickly, but a few months back most people ignored the fact you could get an A7 when you couldn't get an S9.
We'll see what happens when the A8 is released ...
Then of course, as mentioned above, the RMA on an S9 is pretty much a joke ... so you gotta hope your S9 never fails ...
I ordered two S9 in the beginning of November and they arrived today. I was totally not prepared as everyone says two months out and even the details on the order page said it would be from the January lot. So now I am rush shipping power supplies to make use of miners that arrived over a month early.
Yikes I would have had the PSU's on-hand just waiting to be used.
December 14, 2017, 01:57:13 PM
No more than a 200% block please, thinking positive and MINE ON!
Sounds good
Now that just may do it! Although hopefully you are international to North/South America, not sure how good an egg salad sandwich would be in the morning?
MINE ON AND CRACK THAT BLOCK!
could it be the bitcoin gods don't like egg salad sammiches?
L O L Egg salad is acceptable! Going to sacrifice a ham sandwich in the next hour for this block.
December 14, 2017, 01:50:49 PM
OK lady luck, it's time!
December 14, 2017, 11:53:53 AM
What would be the reason that one would purchase this unit over the S9? Reliability is much better or so I have read, but power consumption is not. Would it be the fact that bitmain is not months behind and paying the scalper prices on ebay is absurd? Not trying to start anything here. Just attempting to confirm what I believe the reasons are based on my research. All in all given the retail pricing of both units wouldn't the S9 be the better machine 9 (not considering reliability).
Well with Bitmain where you have to pay 3 months in advance for an S9 ... that's 3 months of lost mining ... which is a VERY long time.If instead you can get a miner much faster ... then that also needs to be factored in.
At the moment neither of them can supply miners quickly, but a few months back most people ignored the fact you could get an A7 when you couldn't get an S9.
We'll see what happens when the A8 is released ...
Then of course, as mentioned above, the RMA on an S9 is pretty much a joke ... so you gotta hope your S9 never fails ...
I ordered two S9 in the beginning of November and they arrived today. I was totally not prepared as everyone says two months out and even the details on the order page said it would be from the January lot. So now I am rush shipping power supplies to make use of miners that arrived over a month early.
wow, this is the first time I've heard of someone stressing out over an early delivery of their miners. Usually, people are freaking because they're late or never show up at all.
That's awesome you got 'em!
December 14, 2017, 11:49:17 AM
What would be the reason that one would purchase this unit over the S9? Reliability is much better or so I have read, but power consumption is not. Would it be the fact that bitmain is not months behind and paying the scalper prices on ebay is absurd? Not trying to start anything here. Just attempting to confirm what I believe the reasons are based on my research. All in all given the retail pricing of both units wouldn't the S9 be the better machine 9 (not considering reliability).
Well with Bitmain where you have to pay 3 months in advance for an S9 ... that's 3 months of lost mining ... which is a VERY long time.If instead you can get a miner much faster ... then that also needs to be factored in.
At the moment neither of them can supply miners quickly, but a few months back most people ignored the fact you could get an A7 when you couldn't get an S9.
We'll see what happens when the A8 is released ...
Then of course, as mentioned above, the RMA on an S9 is pretty much a joke ... so you gotta hope your S9 never fails ...
I ordered two S9 in the beginning of November and they arrived today. I was totally not prepared as everyone says two months out and even the details on the order page said it would be from the January lot. So now I am rush shipping power supplies to make use of miners that arrived over a month early.
December 14, 2017, 11:20:33 AM
Is anyone else getting an invalid SSL cert on kano.is?
Check if your system date and time are correct and synced properly with internet. Most of the times SSL cert issues are due to this reason only.
I found the issue - our infrastructure guy put some interesting ACL's on our 'free' wifi AP.
December 14, 2017, 11:09:32 AM
Is anyone else getting an invalid SSL cert on kano.is?
Check if your system date and time are correct and synced properly with internet. Most of the times SSL cert issues are due to this reason only.
December 14, 2017, 11:07:35 AM
Is anyone else getting an invalid SSL cert on kano.is?
Nope. Running Firefox latest on Ubuntu 16.04LTS, and no issues on that. December 14, 2017, 11:01:33 AM
Is anyone else getting an invalid SSL cert on kano.is?
Jump to: