Author

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 708. (Read 5352367 times)

member
Activity: 285
Merit: 10
Free mining equipment tracking and reporting
Might be the DDoS/restart?
THt was about 4:10am UTC to 4:35
CkMonitor does issue a notice every time your server restarts and is between their 5 minute check-in time.
member
Activity: 285
Merit: 10
Free mining equipment tracking and reporting
and of course when was the last time you noticed a DDoS on my web site ... they aren't rare, just rarely have an effect Smiley
In this case I just have a command I wrote to deal with it, that doesn't stop anyone using the site except logging in.
Kano, do you have memcached running on your site?  how much ram is there?  My strandvision site has a home built ddos system using memcached (so it is fast) that auto slows all non important requests if the server load gets too high.  It also counts hits from each class c ip address range.  If it exceeds the max per minute hits, then the system instantly dies (for that ip address) for a day.  If they do not visit again for a minute, the memory is released.  I do have white lists for paying customers to prevent issues.  Anyway it sounds like you do not have issues with it, but if you do, this type of system does not take long to implement.  PM me if you would like details.
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Then it just happened again this morning.  Thought we had a block, but nope.  And got the same "your hashrate dipped" alert as well.

App problem, or related to the DDoS reported by Kano, or... ?  



Same here. Also got a flood of false notifications.
Might be the DDoS/restart?
THt was about 4:10am UTC to 4:35
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0

Then it just happened again this morning.  Thought we had a block, but nope.  And got the same "your hashrate dipped" alert as well.

App problem, or related to the DDoS reported by Kano, or... ?  



Same here. Also got a flood of false notifications.
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0

I just started using the ckpool android app about a week ago. Is it possible the app is being used as part of a DDos attack?
I like the ability to check my hash rate and to get an alert when the pool finds a block. It does check it every 10 minutes or so.
Just wondering. I realize the "distributed" part of the attack means it comes from a lot of different sources, but there is the possibility of over 900 users hitting your pool info at whatever interval the app is set for.


I've been using the CKPool android app for a while too.  Last week I got a whole bunch of block alerts coupled with "your hashrate has dipped below... " alerts... I got really excited that we scored a string of blocks until I realized how unlikely that really was given our luck lately  Wink

Then it just happened again this morning.  Thought we had a block, but nope.  And got the same "your hashrate dipped" alert as well.

App problem, or related to the DDoS reported by Kano, or... ?  

Thanks all.  Still hanging in this pool since I started mining over the summer... I will be sacrificing a TURKEY tomorrow... two in fact... that must count for something!

*Edit:  crikeys, can you tell I really don't post too many messages here?? ha! 

newbie
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
I can only hope we stay at this size for as long as it can be. We will receive less but bigger inputs, making us save on transaction fees. And we still are finding 4 blocks per difficulty, which is good to fight variance, something a 1-2 block per difficulty pool would not be able to do.
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Guys, doesn't it look for you like we have some issues with invalid shares? Huh

That's how pool looks right now:

KanoPool:     22,098.71THs
Shares:     703,336,606,279 (51.55%)
Invalids:     25.4M (21.5%) · 104.5G (12.9%)
Last    Block
Pool:     40h 56m (495143)
Network:     2m 27s (495434)

Odds are it is old hardware. For example, Canaan has removed a majority of their hardware, but they probably leave old S7 or stuff running which would have a lot of invalids. Same goes for Cobra etcetera. That is my guess.

I just sent a message to nicehash thread. Would it have anything to do with the insanely high diff they have on our machines.  S9 65536 diff. Lowest Vardiff will drop. Same goes with s3 etc. I have about a 4% loss just in rejects due to high diff also my local work completed showing on s3 since they remove it on s9 is almost double that of accepted shares.  Could this be a problem. A form of inadvertent block withholding. Nicehash being slow to push shares is causing stales etc. just curious

BR
I try to block not-nicehash as much as possible since nothing good comes of having miners from there mining here.

Remember that long double block, about half of that hash rate came from there ... so one single source of shares had VERY bad luck ... ... ... not in any way definitive proof ... but I certainly consider it better to stop a single source of horrible bad luck, than to wait to find it's actually 10 blocks of lost blocks and absolutely no recourse if we find it is the cause (they specifically state they will keep the BTC) ... ... ...

I've also blocked an IP of not-nicehash once before that had really bad luck.

The simple problem is that EVERYONE mining on the pool must trust EVERY single physical miner mining through not-nicehash,
Yet mining through not-nicehash has a clear financial advantage for any of them to at least sometimes withhold blocks, in a simple way that they will also never be caught by not-nicehash.
... and those miners pointed at not-nicehash get paid PPS ... which means it doesn't matter if they find blocks or not, they'll still be paid.

We're dealing with a lot of money ... and a lot of people in this world are easily swayed to make decisions that are to their own financial advantage, that may not be to the advantage of others.
To think otherwise is simple foolishness.
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Kano,

I'm sure you're already aware and you have your reasons, but have you thought about utilizing CloudFlare? They offer unlimited DDOS mitigation and their CDN might take a little load off the server. Anyway, it might make it so you don't have to remove login functionality while the DDOS is in effect.


Firstly, Cloudflare wont help,
... and I'd have to give them control of my SSL certificate which no one in their right mind would do
who has a site that deals with something of great value.

and of course when was the last time you noticed a DDoS on my web site ... they aren't rare, just rarely have an effect Smiley
In this case I just have a command I wrote to deal with it, that doesn't stop anyone using the site except logging in.
legendary
Activity: 1453
Merit: 1011
Bitcoin Talks Bullshit Walks
Guys, doesn't it look for you like we have some issues with invalid shares? Huh

That's how pool looks right now:

KanoPool:     22,098.71THs
Shares:     703,336,606,279 (51.55%)
Invalids:     25.4M (21.5%) · 104.5G (12.9%)
Last    Block
Pool:     40h 56m (495143)
Network:     2m 27s (495434)

Odds are it is old hardware. For example, Canaan has removed a majority of their hardware, but they probably leave old S7 or stuff running which would have a lot of invalids. Same goes for Cobra etcetera. That is my guess.

I just sent a message to nicehash thread. Would it have anything to do with the insanely high diff they have on our machines.  S9 65536 diff. Lowest Vardiff will drop. Same goes with s3 etc. I have about a 4% loss just in rejects due to high diff also my local work completed showing on s3 since they remove it on s9 is almost double that of accepted shares.  Could this be a problem. A form of inadvertent block withholding. Nicehash being slow to push shares is causing stales etc. just curious

BR
sr. member
Activity: 508
Merit: 250
That reminds me when you’ve mentioned Android.  Something about a new risk for Android wallets.  For those that keep the funds there might want to read this.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/major-risk-for-mobile-android-wallet-users

Good night and let’s please crack this block by morning!  Grin
member
Activity: 118
Merit: 14

[/quote]Edit: nope, it was the DDoS that caused the crash, I'll disable logins for a while until the DDoS stops.
(yeah it crashed/restarted again - that why I disabled logins)
[/quote]

I just started using the ckpool android app about a week ago. Is it possible the app is being used as part of a DDos attack?
I like the ability to check my hash rate and to get an alert when the pool finds a block. It does check it every 10 minutes or so.
Just wondering. I realize the "distributed" part of the attack means it comes from a lot of different sources, but there is the possibility of over 900 users hitting your pool info at whatever interval the app is set for.
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Anyone wondering about the web access in the last 10 minutes,
the DB restarted (unexpectedly) but all ok again now.
I've got the info for the cause and will track it down later.

Also someone is DDoSing the web site so you might get some timeouts - but prolly not since it's only a tiny DDoS
(and the web site doesn't even notice them unless they're sizeable)
(and that's another reason why it doesn't put out a lot of data - since that makes DDoSing it so much easier)

Edit: nope, it was the DDoS that caused the crash, I'll disable logins for a while until the DDoS stops.
(yeah it crashed/restarted again - that why I disabled logins)

Edit2: and it seems to be continuing again (no more DB crashes though) on and off
so you'll find on occasion not being able to login if I'm blocking the DDoS
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
I got a feeling that we’re about to get a block!  Grin How about you comrades?  Wink

Same here my man!!! EMBRACE YOSELF!!!!
sr. member
Activity: 508
Merit: 250
I got a feeling that we’re about to get a block!  Grin How about you comrades?  Wink
sr. member
Activity: 508
Merit: 250
I am not showing the last payment in my wallet.

When I check https://blockchain.info/address/35efSwzRYdYFfxy82CgNSTdukd1gStVYEN the last I see are from 11/16/2017.

I have verified that the correct wallet address was used to send the payment.

Block   Address   Status   BTC   
495143   35efSwzRYdYFfxy82CgNSTdukd1gStVYEN       0.00584797   

Did it recently confirm and the payment hasn't been released?

Once we find next block it will show up in your wallet, end of story.  Smiley
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
I am not showing the last payment in my wallet.

When I check https://blockchain.info/address/35efSwzRYdYFfxy82CgNSTdukd1gStVYEN the last I see are from 11/16/2017.

I have verified that the correct wallet address was used to send the payment.

Block   Address   Status   BTC   
495143   35efSwzRYdYFfxy82CgNSTdukd1gStVYEN       0.00584797   

Did it recently confirm and the payment hasn't been released?
Read the last couple of pages. The payment will be confirmed in our next block.


Thanks for confirming. There is a lot of noise about killing goats, dolls, etc to sift through so after reading a page about that stuff I decided it was easier to just ask.

unfortunately  Sad

Thank you as well.
newbie
Activity: 71
Merit: 0
sr. member
Activity: 277
Merit: 250
I am not showing the last payment in my wallet.

When I check https://blockchain.info/address/35efSwzRYdYFfxy82CgNSTdukd1gStVYEN the last I see are from 11/16/2017.

I have verified that the correct wallet address was used to send the payment.

Block   Address   Status   BTC   
495143   35efSwzRYdYFfxy82CgNSTdukd1gStVYEN       0.00584797   

Did it recently confirm and the payment hasn't been released?
Read the last couple of pages. The payment will be confirmed in our next block.
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
I am not showing the last payment in my wallet.

When I check https://blockchain.info/address/35efSwzRYdYFfxy82CgNSTdukd1gStVYEN the last I see are from 11/16/2017.

I have verified that the correct wallet address was used to send the payment.

Block   Address   Status   BTC   
495143   35efSwzRYdYFfxy82CgNSTdukd1gStVYEN       0.00584797   

Did it recently confirm and the payment hasn't been released?






newbie
Activity: 71
Merit: 0
ive got a s9 13.5 and a ebit e9+ 9.5 running on the same worker in and my invalids are only at .065 % is this the norm?
Jump to: