KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 707.

qrnode

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Quote from: Toll-Booth-Jim on November 22, 2017, 02:59:07 PM

Quote from: minergain.com on November 22, 2017, 02:25:18 PM

Quote from: Toll-Booth-Jim on November 22, 2017, 02:22:23 PM

lol I think one of my boards in my s9 is having some issues it's hw is 6021 the other 2 are 42 and 46.

If yours is, then so is mine which has been that way for weeks with full hashing... Mine is 8188, 80 and 91

anyone else have input on this? lol I have no idea if this is ok or if it's actually a problem with the board.

I have one S9 like this too. After 38 days since last reboot 1st card HW 51575 - 2nd card 4724 - 3rd card 463 total 56763 - 0.0005%
Shortly after I put this unit online I sent the HW numbers to bitmain support asking if there was an issue with the card. They responded that it was normal and not to be concerned. The miner is working good with no issues.

Bitmain support response below
"Thank you for contacting us. Some hardware errors are normal and expected in a good working miner. The errors on your miner are ok. The miner appears to be working well."

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: PeaMine on November 22, 2017, 11:29:15 AM

Quote from: Toll-Booth-Jim on November 21, 2017, 04:58:01 PM

ive got a s9 13.5 and a ebit e9+ 9.5 running on the same worker in and my invalids are only at .065 % is this the norm?

Do you have a screen shot?
For the S9, the only % is for Hardware Errors, which are different than Stales or Invalid Shares I believe.
Look at the Discarded, Rejected, and Stale columns.

58,453 Accepted
497 Rejected
438,883 Discarded
15 Stale

58453/439395 = 0.133 or around 13%, so around 1 out of 8 are invalid
S9 and S7 both have around these levels for me.

For anyone unsure about that "Discarded" number:
It doesn't matter at all.

What it actually is, is the number of work items that bmminer generated but didn't use.
Basically, it generates work to be hashed but they aren't all used, just queued up waiting to be used.
Then a block change comes in with new work, and the old already queued up, but unused, work is "discarded"
So basically you can ignore that number, since it's not related to anything you send back to the pool
(and it's not wasted/rejected hashing done)

It's basically just poor design by Bitmain to generate so much extra unused work.

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: Biffa on November 22, 2017, 05:56:19 PM

Hey kano, why not have a transaction fee wallet address, so we can donate to it if we want to, and then when we find a block and its validated, if there is funds in that wallet it can go out with a transaction fee (enough to validate it in say 24 hours) and if there are no funds in it then we just wait till we find the next block.

I'll add the 42,000 sat on the next one like I've done often before.
It's just that I'd changed it to deal with no fee to me and thus the transaction didn't include anything I could subtract.
I'll sort it out with the next block payout.

Biffa

legendary

Activity: 3234

Merit: 1221

Hey kano, why not have a transaction fee wallet address, so we can donate to it if we want to, and then when we find a block and its validated, if there is funds in that wallet it can go out with a transaction fee (enough to validate it in say 24 hours) and if there are no funds in it then we just wait till we find the next block.

bdog1234

full member

Activity: 132

Merit: 100

Quote from: savecrypto on November 22, 2017, 04:47:15 PM

Two: I been getting EVERY reward about a day after the block is found with no issues. But on the last block is says I got paid but didn't and its been a few days so I'm not sure if or what I should do.

495143 19/Nov 22:06 14.76622958 6.826T 237hr 20m 24s 34.31PHs 0.05% 3.500G 17.59THs 0.00756995
495143 1A25hps7oNtj4agzRFC95SU77sX6EGrKQy 0.00756995

Kano used to pay the transaction fees to send our payments from the mining fee % he collected. He is not charging a fee currently and to the end of the year so to send payments as soon as the block is hit would be money out of his pocket. What he is going to do is add the transactions in on the next block the pool hits and they will get paid then. So basically the way I understand it from now until the end of the year when he is charging no fees you will get paid for each block when the following block is found.

Toll-Booth-Jim

newbie

Activity: 71

Merit: 0

Quote from: stormwind on November 22, 2017, 03:10:07 PM

Quote from: Toll-Booth-Jim on November 22, 2017, 02:15:45 PM

Quote from: PeaMine on November 22, 2017, 11:29:15 AM

Quote from: Toll-Booth-Jim on November 21, 2017, 04:58:01 PM

ive got a s9 13.5 and a ebit e9+ 9.5 running on the same worker in and my invalids are only at .065 % is this the norm?

Do you have a screen shot?
For the S9, the only % is for Hardware Errors, which are different than Stales or Invalid Shares I believe.
Look at the Discarded, Rejected, and Stale columns.

58,453 Accepted
497 Rejected
438,883 Discarded
15 Stale

58453/439395 = 0.133 or around 13%, so around 1 out of 8 are invalid
S9 and S7 both have around these levels for me.

Not a screen shot but here are the current figures from the s9, the e9+ doesn't have all that the s9 does.

diff: 10.8k
getworks: 10,487
accepted: 89,352
diffA: 986,371,488
diffr: 677,075
rejected: 61
discarded: 167,725 which is the what were talking about I guess, I didn't see it before.
stale: 26
local work: 15,736,184
best share: 1750787685
time frame: 3d15h16m48s

Look here https://kano.is/index.php?k=workers

My invalids are at .060%. The single worker I have setup houses both my s9 and e9+ so that's the invalids combined.

savecrypto

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Hey Kano,

This is my first post, so I hope I'm doing this correctly and in the right spot. Any who, I started out on p2pool for a month and obviously didn't get a block at all, then found kano and been very happy with the results. I started out with an S7 for 2 weeks and eventually got a S9 and working on getting another S9. I have two questions.

One: Under my workers stats page it shows a steady average almost 19Th's (S7 4.79THs - S9 13.92THs) but yet keeps getting emails that I'm below 2TH threshold as I set that in my setting page. This has been happening since September.

Two: I been getting EVERY reward about a day after the block is found with no issues. But on the last block is says I got paid but didn't and its been a few days so I'm not sure if or what I should do.

495143 19/Nov 22:06 14.76622958 6.826T 237hr 20m 24s 34.31PHs 0.05% 3.500G 17.59THs 0.00756995
495143 1A25hps7oNtj4agzRFC95SU77sX6EGrKQy 0.00756995

BTW: very happy with this Pool and thank you for it. Michael

bdog1234

full member

Activity: 132

Merit: 100

I am out guys.

Kano is great and really no complaints other than our hash rate being 1/5 what it once was has led us to blocks being few and far between. I know it is all based on luck and no one can control that but the higher your hash rate the more predictable the payouts are.

The last few blocks we hit I got over $20 each with just a single 741. I switched over to NiceHash which I know the general consensus is they suck but they are selling your hash power not relying on finding blocks and I earn a steady $10-$12 every day. When Kano hits blocks it is certainly better but I will take my guaranteed $70-$80 a week over maybe getting $20 every 3-4 days.

The way I figure it 80 days of Nice Hash will pay for the miner. Then I can play with the houses money and jump back on the pool where in a sense it is more like gambling with no assured payouts but the potential for higher rewards.

rifleman74

member

Activity: 658

Merit: 21

4 s9's 2 821's

Quote from: minergain.com on November 22, 2017, 02:25:18 PM

Quote from: Toll-Booth-Jim on November 22, 2017, 02:22:23 PM

lol I think one of my boards in my s9 is having some issues it's hw is 6021 the other 2 are 42 and 46.

If yours is, then so is mine which has been that way for weeks with full hashing... Mine is 8188, 80 and 91

Have had that on mine too, as long as they're still hashing away, no biggie. Keep the temp's down.

stormwind

newbie

Activity: 31

Merit: 0

Quote from: Toll-Booth-Jim on November 22, 2017, 02:15:45 PM

Quote from: PeaMine on November 22, 2017, 11:29:15 AM

Quote from: Toll-Booth-Jim on November 21, 2017, 04:58:01 PM

ive got a s9 13.5 and a ebit e9+ 9.5 running on the same worker in and my invalids are only at .065 % is this the norm?

Do you have a screen shot?
For the S9, the only % is for Hardware Errors, which are different than Stales or Invalid Shares I believe.
Look at the Discarded, Rejected, and Stale columns.

58,453 Accepted
497 Rejected
438,883 Discarded
15 Stale

58453/439395 = 0.133 or around 13%, so around 1 out of 8 are invalid
S9 and S7 both have around these levels for me.

Not a screen shot but here are the current figures from the s9, the e9+ doesn't have all that the s9 does.

diff: 10.8k
getworks: 10,487
accepted: 89,352
diffA: 986,371,488
diffr: 677,075
rejected: 61
discarded: 167,725 which is the what were talking about I guess, I didn't see it before.
stale: 26
local work: 15,736,184
best share: 1750787685
time frame: 3d15h16m48s

Look here https://kano.is/index.php?k=workers

bussumseheide

newbie

Activity: 47

Merit: 0

Quote from: minergain.com on November 22, 2017, 02:25:18 PM

Quote from: Toll-Booth-Jim on November 22, 2017, 02:22:23 PM

lol I think one of my boards in my s9 is having some issues it's hw is 6021 the other 2 are 42 and 46.

If yours is, then so is mine which has been that way for weeks with full hashing... Mine is 8188, 80 and 91

better look at the relative error instead of absolute numbers. At the row HW look at the % value, normal/acceptable value is about 0.001% , value higher than 0.01% might be concerning

Toll-Booth-Jim

newbie

Activity: 71

Merit: 0

Quote from: minergain.com on November 22, 2017, 02:25:18 PM

Quote from: Toll-Booth-Jim on November 22, 2017, 02:22:23 PM

lol I think one of my boards in my s9 is having some issues it's hw is 6021 the other 2 are 42 and 46.

If yours is, then so is mine which has been that way for weeks with full hashing... Mine is 8188, 80 and 91

anyone else have input on this? lol I have no idea if this is ok or if it's actually a problem with the board.

minergain.com

member

Activity: 285

Merit: 10

Free mining equipment tracking and reporting

Quote from: Toll-Booth-Jim on November 22, 2017, 02:22:23 PM

lol I think one of my boards in my s9 is having some issues it's hw is 6021 the other 2 are 42 and 46.

If yours is, then so is mine which has been that way for weeks with full hashing... Mine is 8188, 80 and 91

Toll-Booth-Jim

newbie

Activity: 71

Merit: 0

lol I think one of my boards in my s9 is having some issues it's hw is 6021 the other 2 are 42 and 46.

Toll-Booth-Jim

newbie

Activity: 71

Merit: 0

Quote from: PeaMine on November 22, 2017, 11:29:15 AM

Quote from: Toll-Booth-Jim on November 21, 2017, 04:58:01 PM

ive got a s9 13.5 and a ebit e9+ 9.5 running on the same worker in and my invalids are only at .065 % is this the norm?

Do you have a screen shot?
For the S9, the only % is for Hardware Errors, which are different than Stales or Invalid Shares I believe.
Look at the Discarded, Rejected, and Stale columns.

58,453 Accepted
497 Rejected
438,883 Discarded
15 Stale

58453/439395 = 0.133 or around 13%, so around 1 out of 8 are invalid
S9 and S7 both have around these levels for me.

Not a screen shot but here are the current figures from the s9, the e9+ doesn't have all that the s9 does.

diff: 10.8k
getworks: 10,487
accepted: 89,352
diffA: 986,371,488
diffr: 677,075
rejected: 61
discarded: 167,725 which is the what were talking about I guess, I didn't see it before.
stale: 26
local work: 15,736,184
best share: 1750787685
time frame: 3d15h16m48s

rifleman74

member

Activity: 658

Merit: 21

4 s9's 2 821's

Quote from: Steamtyme on November 22, 2017, 11:11:09 AM

Hey,

I just switched over to the pool last night. Figured it was as good a time as any, I did create a username but had issues logging in, and pointing a worker under that username.
Not sure if it had to do with the login issues last night, but I just used a BTC address, I'm wondering after my ramp up will I be able to switch over to using my username or would that cause me to go through a ramp up period again?

Thanks

change it now, you changing to a different username will start from scratch.

overcon

sr. member

Activity: 393

Merit: 250

911 IT Admin. I keep 911 up so you get help ASAP!

Quote from: Steamtyme on November 22, 2017, 11:11:09 AM

Hey,

I just switched over to the pool last night. Figured it was as good a time as any, I did create a username but had issues logging in, and pointing a worker under that username.
Not sure if it had to do with the login issues last night, but I just used a BTC address, I'm wondering after my ramp up will I be able to switch over to using my username or would that cause me to go through a ramp up period again?

Thanks

If you just joined last night then changing anything isn't going to impact your 5ND much at this point.

PeaMine

hero member

Activity: 979

Merit: 510

Quote from: Toll-Booth-Jim on November 21, 2017, 04:58:01 PM

ive got a s9 13.5 and a ebit e9+ 9.5 running on the same worker in and my invalids are only at .065 % is this the norm?

Do you have a screen shot?
For the S9, the only % is for Hardware Errors, which are different than Stales or Invalid Shares I believe.
Look at the Discarded, Rejected, and Stale columns.

58,453 Accepted
497 Rejected
438,883 Discarded
15 Stale

58453/439395 = 0.133 or around 13%, so around 1 out of 8 are invalid
S9 and S7 both have around these levels for me.

Steamtyme

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 2037

Hey,

I just switched over to the pool last night. Figured it was as good a time as any, I did create a username but had issues logging in, and pointing a worker under that username.
Not sure if it had to do with the login issues last night, but I just used a BTC address, I'm wondering after my ramp up will I be able to switch over to using my username or would that cause me to go through a ramp up period again?

Thanks

rifleman74

member

Activity: 658

Merit: 21

4 s9's 2 821's

A pumpkin pie was sacrificed in the name of the next block.

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 707. (Read 5352367 times)