Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 875. (Read 5352367 times)

block by bobsyouruncle

every 1% increase these days constitutes many jaw dropping G's

7.3% - well not as bad as it could have been, without the fork it would have been noticeably higher.

New Diff...

[2017-08-09 07:06:54] Network diff set to 860G
[2017-08-09 07:10:33] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2017-08-09 07:15:39] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2017-08-09 07:20:04] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2017-08-09 07:20:20] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2017-08-09 07:34:21] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2017-08-09 07:43:46] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2017-08-09 07:46:29] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2017-08-09 07:54:46] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2017-08-09 08:06:04] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2017-08-09 08:08:35] Network diff set to 923G

If you mean the last block we found - 479731 - yep I haven't sent that payout yet.
It's gotta wait for the 101 confirms before I can spend it, so that's when I send out the payout - when it matures
(and it says on the blocks page when it's matured - after the + counter gets to 101)

If you mean any before that - let me know, coz they've all already confirmed, the last one was 479656 that confirmed 38 blocks ago.

I know why the pool hash rate goes up and down
OK I've set it to 80PH now.

Once it's colder and many mining datacentres around the world are no longer in summer, I'll consider put the thread title up more.
Also, of course, if someone points another 5PH or more at the pool I'd put it up more

PM me your username and I'll check.

The rewards page will show all the rewards you've got.
The payouts page will show all the payouts sent (or due to be sent), but also show all the dust not sent (with a red *) and comments at the top and bottom about that.
No dust is sent yet (as it says) - but it will be a while yet before that happens.

Of course, if you are mining to an address, and not to an account, then you wont be able to see any of that.
You'd have to PM your address your mining to, so I can check.

Hey Kano-san, Do you think it is time to update the title in the forum to [80+ PH]?

The average Pool rate has been above 80 for a little while.

Mine on!!

Nice. Thanks for the input :-)

I can't understand why some people are not having esteem for a programmer who build some serious cool code
and share it with the rest of the world for free.

So good luck the node<->pool testings.

Lulz - no at the moment it makes no sense.
Why mine a pump-and-dump altcoin when you are going to get less than if you were mining BTC.
I'd not expect that to change in the near future either, but saying ... it may be better in the future ... means: yeah good to know - but it's worse now
I know one sizeable miner on there that's apparently only there for "a publicity stunt"

The whole point of BitCH was to avoid the issue of the minority groups trying to force the miners to do something.
The miners all decided to go with BIP91 and that ended it.
BitCH was, however, an obvious way to make some money by those who had the idea in the first place, so they still went ahead after the "supposed" reason why it was going to exist no longer existed.

Meanwhile, whoever the retard was who coded the changes for BitCH, unbelievable how stupid he was.
He clearly had no idea about the fact that people run Bitcoin wallets, duh! and Bitcoin will exist for way longer than that scam.
His wallet screws up or overrides the Bitcoin wallet by default, and uses all the Bitcoin ports, folders and even the same node list lookup.
This all means that they're using the place on the internet (and on your computer) that Bitcoin uses and causing issues doing so.
Every altcoin knows not to use the Bitcoin settings/ports and channels ... except for this retard.

Seeing these things every so often:
i.e. someone running a BitCH node connecting to a Bitcoin node ... duh how stupid is that ... and the cause is that the guy who coded it didn't bother to use their own ports.
I guess it required him to know what he was doing and spend 30 seconds changing them

At the colo I am in we were finally seeing the s7s powering down and with the price up they stopped turning them off.  Right now BCH is about half as profitable as BTC but with the difficulty increases and the fact that the BCH difficulty is going down we may begin to see some more hash moving.

... and 2 payouts, we got the $2.84 back
Just over 1BTC fees also, on a 39 second network block, so not too shabby

Block danbel79! 

This is our 1st of BLOCK WEDNESDAY!

Well, we still have BTM powerhouse continue pumping out S9 machines. The appreciation of btc will also revive more previously unprofitable older rigs.

That is what I'm seeing as well...it is less than 9 minutes a block average right now so it is faster than the 10 minutes expected.

It looks like not very much went over to bitcoin cash and even more than that amount has been brought online in the last 2 weeks as there is still an expected diff increase of 8.12% in 17 hours.

So with the hashing power lost that went over to bitcoin cash, it means that in average for the network it should be taking a bit more time to mine those 12.5 bitcoins until a network difficulty update comes over. So the flow of new bitcoin will be slowed down until network diff adjustment, right?

The mining code is ckpool.
For this update I've just done a few changes as mentioned above (and rolled forward to the current ckpool git ... that failed)

Seems the node code can't handle a pool version update It may need a complete restart of everything.
I'll do some node<->pool testing and work out what's up with that - I was more concerned about block code, and I tested that thoroughly - didn't expect a network protocol problem.
Weird, coz some of the nodes are current code also. As I said ... more work to do

Everything else is my KanoDB
That's the name for the updated closed source version - so no one has any wrong ideas about who wrote almost all of it
The CKDB in the public ckpool git (that I got thrown out of) works fine for a single pool and can handle a few hundred PH - but has no support at all.

A few pools use it: Ver's bitcoin.com did (no idea if they still do) BitClub does, so does LinuxJounal
There's 1 other I know of but I wont mention their names since:
 they removed my copyright off the web site and replaced it with their own copyright ... scumbags

Mine on

Updating suckz 

Hope you'll find the faulty codesnipped soon!

Is there a posting somewhere out here where you explain how the pool is build up?
Which programming language, which hardware you use etc...?
No details about the code or hardware but maybe some infos about.

I don't wanna build up a pool but i'm coding every now and than some stuff.
So I'm a bit curious bout all this pool stuff. 

You're doing a great job kano! I like the pool you build!
Your avarage working time seems to be nearly 24/7/356 ...RESPECT! 
Don't waste your time with morons trying to annoy you. 
I think you have to do much more important stuff.

Mine ON guys.