Author

Topic: ▂▃▅▆▇⫷[ 🆉🅿🅾🅾🅻.🅲🅰 ]⫸⫷[!KAWPOW!]⫸⫷[ the miners multipool ]⫸ ▇▆▅▃▂ - page 105. (Read 279744 times)

newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
I'm using MultiPoolMiner for several Zpool algos and the daily average for me is around 0.00029. About 2 weeks ago was fine but since then it dropped significantly (at around the NiceHash hack). I started writing down the Total Unpaid balance into a spreadsheet every day and by calculating the deltas for the timeframes I'm getting only 0.0001 BTC daily which is way less than expected for an overclocked GTX 1060.

crackfoo could you give an explanation for this massive difference?
hey there

You're tracking the unpaid balance (in bitcoin?), which is what I do.  With the massive spike in BTC a week or two ago, your earnings in BTC should decrease, yet equivalent earnings in fiat should remain the same or be higher.  I don't know about the 1060, but my O/C'd 960 does about that now too.  It is what it is.

.earl

Yes, I'm tracking the unpaid BTC and once in a while I write the time and balance into a spreadsheet calculating the elapsed time and balance delta. From that I calculate the 24 hours earning. MultiPoolMiner is getting every algo's earnings from Zpool's API and calculates my earnings based on a previous benchmark speeds (which get updated every minute so they become very accurate mining speed measurements) and also makes an average of earnings reported by Zpool as well. So it becomes pretty accurate after a few days. Usually it's around 0.00028 ±19% (0.00023-0.00033) BTC per day and that is what I was getting about weeks ago but since then my earnings went down to about 1/3 which is not profitable at all anymore.

So my question is why is this huge earnings difference from 2 weeks ago. Is there some bug in the profitability calucation on Zpool's side or on the exchange?

Two weeks ago BTC was ~10k USD cheaper; so when you compare your numbers, you must factor in BTC sale price at that time, or rather before that time....

It makes sense that earnings are .5x of what they were if the price is 2x now.

It's a sliding scale.

I get that but the pool is reporting bad data:

Code:
"neoscrypt":{"name":"neoscrypt","port":4233,"coins":5,"fees":2,"hashrate":8260022991,"workers":4176,"estimate_current":"0.00027344","estimate_last24h":"0.00027605","actual_last24h":"0.22017","hashrate_last24h":6664788894.7634}

So we know the earnings in BTC per GH / MH / KH (depending on algo) from which is easy to calculate the estimated earnings for my speed. However my earnings are way less. MultiPoolMiner also logs past estimates evey minute and makes an average so over a long period of time so it's pretty accurate even considering fluctuations in profitability. MPM also mines the most profitable algos and almost always there's a few around 0.00025
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 1
What is wrong with this calculation?

zpool payout at 0.0025 ($40)

Average bitcoin transfer cost 0.00125 ($20)  https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-transactionfees.html#3m


= 50% lost in transfer??

I have never transfered any bitcoin so I realize I must be missing something.
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
The setting of a lower difficulty (d=xxx) on sha256 algo does not work anymore - why?
sr. member
Activity: 544
Merit: 250
So, has all the upgrades/server issues/dropouts/coins in and out/and etc been resolved yet? Would love to come back to zpool but waiting till it's back on it's stable feet first, since the nicehash recruits overloading zpool.
legendary
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1166
My AR-15 ID's itself as a toaster. Want breakfast?
I'm using MultiPoolMiner for several Zpool algos and the daily average for me is around 0.00029. About 2 weeks ago was fine but since then it dropped significantly (at around the NiceHash hack). I started writing down the Total Unpaid balance into a spreadsheet every day and by calculating the deltas for the timeframes I'm getting only 0.0001 BTC daily which is way less than expected for an overclocked GTX 1060.

crackfoo could you give an explanation for this massive difference?
hey there

You're tracking the unpaid balance (in bitcoin?), which is what I do.  With the massive spike in BTC a week or two ago, your earnings in BTC should decrease, yet equivalent earnings in fiat should remain the same or be higher.  I don't know about the 1060, but my O/C'd 960 does about that now too.  It is what it is.

.earl

Yes, I'm tracking the unpaid BTC and once in a while I write the time and balance into a spreadsheet calculating the elapsed time and balance delta. From that I calculate the 24 hours earning. MultiPoolMiner is getting every algo's earnings from Zpool's API and calculates my earnings based on a previous benchmark speeds (which get updated every minute so they become very accurate mining speed measurements) and also makes an average of earnings reported by Zpool as well. So it becomes pretty accurate after a few days. Usually it's around 0.00028 ±19% (0.00023-0.00033) BTC per day and that is what I was getting about weeks ago but since then my earnings went down to about 1/3 which is not profitable at all anymore.

So my question is why is this huge earnings difference from 2 weeks ago. Is there some bug in the profitability calucation on Zpool's side or on the exchange?

Two weeks ago BTC was ~10k USD cheaper; so when you compare your numbers, you must factor in BTC sale price at that time, or rather before that time....

It makes sense that earnings are .5x of what they were if the price is 2x now.

It's a sliding scale.
newbie
Activity: 85
Merit: 0
Finally, ended using Nemosminer... and  looks to work good.
However, it uses different versions of ccminer depending of algo to mine, like alexis and klaust, the one wich uses for Lyra2v2 (Alexis) cause a huge fps drop as i wrote this... is that better than last version of ccminer 2.2.3? For me i see the same MHs (Lyra2v2 35 on GTX 980Ti)

I watch Whattomine page but there is some coins lacking there and zpool too

As For Neoscript: No Vivo coin, Trezarcoin not present on Zpool
What happened to them?
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
I'm using MultiPoolMiner for several Zpool algos and the daily average for me is around 0.00029. About 2 weeks ago was fine but since then it dropped significantly (at around the NiceHash hack). I started writing down the Total Unpaid balance into a spreadsheet every day and by calculating the deltas for the timeframes I'm getting only 0.0001 BTC daily which is way less than expected for an overclocked GTX 1060.

crackfoo could you give an explanation for this massive difference?
hey there

You're tracking the unpaid balance (in bitcoin?), which is what I do.  With the massive spike in BTC a week or two ago, your earnings in BTC should decrease, yet equivalent earnings in fiat should remain the same or be higher.  I don't know about the 1060, but my O/C'd 960 does about that now too.  It is what it is.

.earl

Yes, I'm tracking the unpaid BTC and once in a while I write the time and balance into a spreadsheet calculating the elapsed time and balance delta. From that I calculate the 24 hours earning. MultiPoolMiner is getting every algo's earnings from Zpool's API and calculates my earnings based on a previous benchmark speeds (which get updated every minute so they become very accurate mining speed measurements) and also makes an average of earnings reported by Zpool as well. So it becomes pretty accurate after a few days. Usually it's around 0.00028 ±19% (0.00023-0.00033) BTC per day and that is what I was getting about weeks ago but since then my earnings went down to about 1/3 which is not profitable at all anymore.

So my question is why is this huge earnings difference from 2 weeks ago. Is there some bug in the profitability calucation on Zpool's side or on the exchange?
jr. member
Activity: 39
Merit: 1
I'm using MultiPoolMiner for several Zpool algos and the daily average for me is around 0.00029. About 2 weeks ago was fine but since then it dropped significantly (at around the NiceHash hack). I started writing down the Total Unpaid balance into a spreadsheet every day and by calculating the deltas for the timeframes I'm getting only 0.0001 BTC daily which is way less than expected for an overclocked GTX 1060.

crackfoo could you give an explanation for this massive difference?
hey there

You're tracking the unpaid balance (in bitcoin?), which is what I do.  With the massive spike in BTC a week or two ago, your earnings in BTC should decrease, yet equivalent earnings in fiat should remain the same or be higher.  I don't know about the 1060, but my O/C'd 960 does about that now too.  It is what it is.

.earl
legendary
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1166
My AR-15 ID's itself as a toaster. Want breakfast?
"0.0025 are paid several evenings each week."

I bet lots of people will love this.   Hopefully it doesn't stack too much TX fees on you because it looks like you loose about half of your 2% average pool fee....

As for profitability concerns;  guys:

This recent nicehash instance caused a big ripple in profitability.    I have noticed it tapering off again myself;  but;  it is still consistent.

Most of the people comparing their earnings to nicehash earnings need to realize that they charged a premium for the rental, which could trickle down easier to you than the luck factor of finding blocks etc.


FWIW;  my profitability is still on par with what I have been getting in the past few months.   No major deviations.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 512
Hope to see ZPOOL fully restored / bug-free again soon. I miss it mining on other pools for only 2 days, haha.

Still hanging out on Hash Refinery -- how goes the process of re-stabilizing the pool to handle the excess traffic ?

I will be leaving town for ~3 weeks soon so I won't be able to change pools for a while if I don't swap back before that (I'll just have people capable of re-booting the machines... but nothing technical).
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
What is the min. payment amount? I think all payment details are different then the ritten in the pool? I need details

I got paid 0.00201994 BTC an hour ago so I guess it's 0.002



I'm using MultiPoolMiner for several Zpool algos and the daily average for me is around 0.00029. About 2 weeks ago was fine but since then it dropped significantly (at around the NiceHash hack). I started writing down the Total Unpaid balance into a spreadsheet every day and by calculating the deltas for the timeframes I'm getting only 0.0001 BTC daily which is way less than expected for an overclocked GTX 1060.

crackfoo could you give an explanation for this massive difference?
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 1
Just started mining today. I have question about transferring BTC from zpool to my bitcoin wallet. The sites states : "balances more than 0.0025 are paid several evenings each week" which I think is about $40 usd. I have heard that bitcoins transaction fees are very high. Who pays the transaction fee and how much is it going to be? Would it be smart for use a different wallet with lower transaction fees?
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
I'm using awesome miner and zpool. But the problem is that I only get like 1 dollar per hour using 6 gtx 1080 TI's.
newbie
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
No - in the passwordfield where you have put the c=BTC value, ZPool uses the Password field to pass this information so as far as the miner software it IS the password!

Do you know if this would be typed under "Command line parameters (optional)" on awesomeminer?

Thanks a lot


as per the web site
http://zpool.ca/site/diff

you add a parameter d=xxx to your password, so it will (probably) look like
c=BTC,d=512

Does anyone know how to set a specific difficulty for neoscrypt through Awesomeminer?  It keeps pushing my difficulty to 2186 and then my estimated hash rate plummets, then it drops down to 256 and starts the cycle of working back up over again.  If anyone has a suggested difficulty recommendation, I'm getting about 7.2-7.3 MH/s.  Thanks!
newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
Do you know if this would be typed under "Command line parameters (optional)" on awesomeminer?

Thanks a lot


as per the web site
http://zpool.ca/site/diff

you add a parameter d=xxx to your password, so it will (probably) look like
c=BTC,d=512

Does anyone know how to set a specific difficulty for neoscrypt through Awesomeminer?  It keeps pushing my difficulty to 2186 and then my estimated hash rate plummets, then it drops down to 256 and starts the cycle of working back up over again.  If anyone has a suggested difficulty recommendation, I'm getting about 7.2-7.3 MH/s.  Thanks!
newbie
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
as per the web site
http://zpool.ca/site/diff

you add a parameter d=xxx to your password, so it will (probably) look like
c=BTC,d=512

Does anyone know how to set a specific difficulty for neoscrypt through Awesomeminer?  It keeps pushing my difficulty to 2186 and then my estimated hash rate plummets, then it drops down to 256 and starts the cycle of working back up over again.  If anyone has a suggested difficulty recommendation, I'm getting about 7.2-7.3 MH/s.  Thanks!
newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
Does anyone know how to set a specific difficulty for neoscrypt through Awesomeminer?  It keeps pushing my difficulty to 2186 and then my estimated hash rate plummets, then it drops down to 256 and starts the cycle of working back up over again.  If anyone has a suggested difficulty recommendation, I'm getting about 7.2-7.3 MH/s.  Thanks!
newbie
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
Is there someting up with the Scrypt pool - last 24 hour profitability is barely half the current (projected is completely wacky...) and has been consistently low since the major issues.
I was willing to think it was purely a display issue but have switched my miner back (I needed to get to a withdrawal threshold on another pool) and it does look like my current rate of return is in line with the 'last 24' figure. 
With my L3+ (500Mh/s) over 24h I can get 0.08 - 0.1 LTC on an LTC pool which is roughly 0.001 BTC , Here I have got about 0.0002 BTC (from 0.00146 up to 0.00168) over 10 hours or so which is around 0.0005 BTC over 24 hours (and in line with the displayed 1.2 mBTC/GH).
All the coins show profitability of 2-3 mBTC/GH so it is difficult to see why the pool is only making 1.2mBTC/GH...
legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1126
Is there an issue with the lyra2z pool?  I"m getting 98% rejection with invalid job id as the reason.  Other pools seem to be working okay.    Rebooted/relaunched all miners, and my network as well.  Issue persists since late last night.

we're updating that wallet right now as a req from the dev. The update forced a re-index and so it's currently syncing and should be back again shortly.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
Is there an issue with the lyra2z pool?  I"m getting 98% rejection with invalid job id as the reason.  Other pools seem to be working okay.    Rebooted/relaunched all miners, and my network as well.  Issue persists since late last night.
Jump to: