Author

Topic: ▂▃▅▆▇⫷[ 🆉🅿🅾🅾🅻.🅲🅰 ]⫸⫷[!KAWPOW!]⫸⫷[ the miners multipool ]⫸ ▇▆▅▃▂ - page 104. (Read 279601 times)

newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
Hi guys. do we all observe strangeness in the hashray and the work of the miners on the neoscript? In the last five hours.

what can be associated with such a drawdown hash?
http://s018.radikal.ru/i520/1712/45/a6f91375747a.png

I am seeing the same thing, except with Lyra2RE2.  I have been hashing it for 5 hours and the last two have seen a massive drop off in hash rate.

Edit:  Seems to have just started working again.  Perhaps my miner was stuck in a lower difficulty pool?  It seems to affect the miner that was mining at a difficulty of 256 a lot more than the one mining at a difficulty of 90.
Ive noticed on some algos, profitability (luck shares) seems to come in waves... rising up and down in the hashrate displayed.

Im not sure if this is something related to your situation, but I remember seeing it a bit on skien, x11evo and in lyra2 in the past...


seeing the photo;  it looks like you were loosing internet connection or something.....

the Internet did not disappear, the miners worked stably. what can be the reason for such differences?
can this be a pool problem or with my hardware?
newbie
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
Looks like LTC is working now - good jumps in unpaid when we find an LTC block!

Crackfoo

TBH I would suggest dropping LTC in any case because of the long block times - it would seem to make sense not to mine any coin where you won't get a block reasonably often (say 1 in 10 or 1 in 20 blocks?)

I am pretty sure the returns had an uptick while you had LTC disabled but now most of the hashpower is back on LTC again...

It occurred to me - could you 'piggy back' the LTC mining onto another (bigger) pool - or is that not possible or ethical?

You're probaly right on LTC dragging down the profitability. It's doubled in diff since BCC went POS and now needs another 1Th pool speed to make it consistent.

I'll drop it for a few days and see how it does.

So that is the explanation why even mining the most profitable algos with MultiPoolMiner I get half or 1/3 the expected income over 24 hours?

I'm no expert but wouldn't make sense to adjust profitability by taking into account the time needed to find a block or simply multiply the profitability with poolhash/networkhash ratio?

I discovered several rejected LTC blocks, so we should have had better profitability. Unsure why they were rejected but I've updated LTC to the latest code and I'm going to try it for today. If I see another reject I'll have to take it off and dig further.
legendary
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1166
My AR-15 ID's itself as a toaster. Want breakfast?
Hi guys. do we all observe strangeness in the hashray and the work of the miners on the neoscript? In the last five hours.

what can be associated with such a drawdown hash?


I am seeing the same thing, except with Lyra2RE2.  I have been hashing it for 5 hours and the last two have seen a massive drop off in hash rate.

Edit:  Seems to have just started working again.  Perhaps my miner was stuck in a lower difficulty pool?  It seems to affect the miner that was mining at a difficulty of 256 a lot more than the one mining at a difficulty of 90.
Ive noticed on some algos, profitability (luck shares) seems to come in waves... rising up and down in the hashrate displayed.

Im not sure if this is something related to your situation, but I remember seeing it a bit on skien, x11evo and in lyra2 in the past...


seeing the photo;  it looks like you were loosing internet connection or something.....
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
Hi guys. do we all observe strangeness in the hashray and the work of the miners on the neoscript? In the last five hours.

what can be associated with such a drawdown hash?
http://s018.radikal.ru/i520/1712/45/a6f91375747a.png

I am seeing the same thing, except with Lyra2RE2.  I have been hashing it for 5 hours and the last two have seen a massive drop off in hash rate.

Edit:  Seems to have just started working again.  Perhaps my miner was stuck in a lower difficulty pool?  It seems to affect the miner that was mining at a difficulty of 256 a lot more than the one mining at a difficulty of 90.
legendary
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1166
My AR-15 ID's itself as a toaster. Want breakfast?
What is wrong with this calculation?

zpool payout at 0.0025 ($40)

Average bitcoin transfer cost 0.00125 ($20)  https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-transactionfees.html#3m


= 50% lost in transfer??

I have never transfered any bitcoin so I realize I must be missing something.

per individual TX... yes... but the pool sends a massive single TX...  plus, that is not subtracted from your earnings, it comes out of the pool's 2%.
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
Hi guys. do we all observe strangeness in the hashray and the work of the miners on the neoscript? In the last five hours.

what can be associated with such a drawdown hash?
http://s018.radikal.ru/i520/1712/45/a6f91375747a.png
newbie
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
Crackfoo

TBH I would suggest dropping LTC in any case because of the long block times - it would seem to make sense not to mine any coin where you won't get a block reasonably often (say 1 in 10 or 1 in 20 blocks?)

I am pretty sure the returns had an uptick while you had LTC disabled but now most of the hashpower is back on LTC again...

It occurred to me - could you 'piggy back' the LTC mining onto another (bigger) pool - or is that not possible or ethical?

You're probaly right on LTC dragging down the profitability. It's doubled in diff since BCC went POS and now needs another 1Th pool speed to make it consistent.

I'll drop it for a few days and see how it does.

So that is the explanation why even mining the most profitable algos with MultiPoolMiner I get half or 1/3 the expected income over 24 hours?

I'm no expert but wouldn't make sense to adjust profitability by taking into account the time needed to find a block or simply multiply the profitability with poolhash/networkhash ratio?

I discovered several rejected LTC blocks, so we should have had better profitability. Unsure why they were rejected but I've updated LTC to the latest code and I'm going to try it for today. If I see another reject I'll have to take it off and dig further.
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
Please can someone tell me the minimum payout on zpool? I mean in BTC. Your input will be appreciated.

Answered just a few posts ago. It's also on the first page.

Quote
Payouts are made automatically every 2 hours for all balances above 0.01 and balances more than 0.002 are paid several evenings each week.
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
Please can someone tell me the minimum payout on zpool? I mean in BTC. Your input will be appreciated.
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
No - in the passwordfield where you have put the c=BTC value, ZPool uses the Password field to pass this information so as far as the miner software it IS the password!

Do you know if this would be typed under "Command line parameters (optional)" on awesomeminer?

Thanks a lot


as per the web site
http://zpool.ca/site/diff

you add a parameter d=xxx to your password, so it will (probably) look like
c=BTC,d=512

Does anyone know how to set a specific difficulty for neoscrypt through Awesomeminer?  It keeps pushing my difficulty to 2186 and then my estimated hash rate plummets, then it drops down to 256 and starts the cycle of working back up over again.  If anyone has a suggested difficulty recommendation, I'm getting about 7.2-7.3 MH/s.  Thanks!

I have a d= set in my password field for sha256, but it keeps defaulting the pool diff to 262400, seems to be ignoring the d= i have set, I'm using some gridseed orbs, whcih I know are old and slow, but I would still like to try and mine with them for kicks.  im using d=1024 and tried d=2056, but with the 262400 popping up, seems I will never get a share.
any ideas?

p.s. I did have it working for a few days with d=1024, but then it stopped and I noticed the 262400 thing.

The setting of a lower difficulty (d=xxx) on sha256 algo does not work anymore - why?
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
No - in the passwordfield where you have put the c=BTC value, ZPool uses the Password field to pass this information so as far as the miner software it IS the password!

Do you know if this would be typed under "Command line parameters (optional)" on awesomeminer?

Thanks a lot


as per the web site
http://zpool.ca/site/diff

you add a parameter d=xxx to your password, so it will (probably) look like
c=BTC,d=512

Does anyone know how to set a specific difficulty for neoscrypt through Awesomeminer?  It keeps pushing my difficulty to 2186 and then my estimated hash rate plummets, then it drops down to 256 and starts the cycle of working back up over again.  If anyone has a suggested difficulty recommendation, I'm getting about 7.2-7.3 MH/s.  Thanks!

I have a d= set in my password field for sha256, but it keeps defaulting the pool diff to 262400, seems to be ignoring the d= i have set, I'm using some gridseed orbs, whcih I know are old and slow, but I would still like to try and mine with them for kicks.  im using d=1024 and tried d=2056, but with the 262400 popping up, seems I will never get a share.
any ideas?

p.s. I did have it working for a few days with d=1024, but then it stopped and I noticed the 262400 thing.
legendary
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1126
You're probaly right on LTC dragging down the profitability. It's doubled in diff since BCC went POS and now needs another 1Th pool speed to make it consistent.

I'll drop it for a few days and see how it does.

So that is the explanation why even mining the most profitable algos with MultiPoolMiner I get half or 1/3 the expected income over 24 hours?

I'm no expert but wouldn't make sense to adjust profitability by taking into account the time needed to find a block or simply multiply the profitability with poolhash/networkhash ratio?

I discovered several rejected LTC blocks, so we should have had better profitability. Unsure why they were rejected but I've updated LTC to the latest code and I'm going to try it for today. If I see another reject I'll have to take it off and dig further.
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
You're probaly right on LTC dragging down the profitability. It's doubled in diff since BCC went POS and now needs another 1Th pool speed to make it consistent.

I'll drop it for a few days and see how it does.

So that is the explanation why even mining the most profitable algos with MultiPoolMiner I get half or 1/3 the expected income over 24 hours?

I'm no expert but wouldn't make sense to adjust profitability by taking into account the time needed to find a block or simply multiply the profitability with poolhash/networkhash ratio?
legendary
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1126
Re: profitability
I am looking at Scrypt only - my concern isn't that I was earning X last week and I am earning Y this week, but the actual last 24h earnings are barely 1/2 of the current estimate - I know there can be variation but it is usually about right, Also the individual coins are all showing between 2 and 3 mBTC/GH/Day

With 500Mhs I should be getting about 0.08 LTC (whattomine and manual calcs), which is currently at 0.016 BTC (current @ Bittrex) so this should come come out around 0.00128 BTC/24h.

Over the last 26 hours I have made 0.00055 BTC which is less than 1/2 what I could get by mining LTC straight. 

I don't know what the issue is but there seems to be one. it MAY be that the pool keeps dropping large amounts of hash onto LTC, but not enough to get a block (last LTC block was 30h), so it would seem sensible to drop LTC from the coin list as we don't have enough hash to mine it effectively.



You're probaly right on LTC dragging down the profitability. It's doubled in diff since BCC went POS and now needs another 1Th pool speed to make it consistent.

I'll drop it for a few days and see how it does.
newbie
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
Re: profitability
I am looking at Scrypt only - my concern isn't that I was earning X last week and I am earning Y this week, but the actual last 24h earnings are barely 1/2 of the current estimate - I know there can be variation but it is usually about right, Also the individual coins are all showing between 2 and 3 mBTC/GH/Day

With 500Mhs I should be getting about 0.08 LTC (whattomine and manual calcs), which is currently at 0.016 BTC (current @ Bittrex) so this should come come out around 0.00128 BTC/24h.

Over the last 26 hours I have made 0.00055 BTC which is less than 1/2 what I could get by mining LTC straight. 

I don't know what the issue is but there seems to be one. it MAY be that the pool keeps dropping large amounts of hash onto LTC, but not enough to get a block (last LTC block was 30h), so it would seem sensible to drop LTC from the coin list as we don't have enough hash to mine it effectively.

newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
[2017-12-15 14:48:15] Stratum connection interrupted
[2017-12-15 14:48:17] Stratum connect failed: Failed to connect to neoscrypt.mine.zpool.ca port 4233: Connection refused
[2017-12-15 14:48:17] ...retry after 10 seconds
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
I'm using MultiPoolMiner for several Zpool algos and the daily average for me is around 0.00029. About 2 weeks ago was fine but since then it dropped significantly (at around the NiceHash hack). I started writing down the Total Unpaid balance into a spreadsheet every day and by calculating the deltas for the timeframes I'm getting only 0.0001 BTC daily which is way less than expected for an overclocked GTX 1060.

crackfoo could you give an explanation for this massive difference?
hey there

You're tracking the unpaid balance (in bitcoin?), which is what I do.  With the massive spike in BTC a week or two ago, your earnings in BTC should decrease, yet equivalent earnings in fiat should remain the same or be higher.  I don't know about the 1060, but my O/C'd 960 does about that now too.  It is what it is.

.earl

Yes, I'm tracking the unpaid BTC and once in a while I write the time and balance into a spreadsheet calculating the elapsed time and balance delta. From that I calculate the 24 hours earning. MultiPoolMiner is getting every algo's earnings from Zpool's API and calculates my earnings based on a previous benchmark speeds (which get updated every minute so they become very accurate mining speed measurements) and also makes an average of earnings reported by Zpool as well. So it becomes pretty accurate after a few days. Usually it's around 0.00028 ±19% (0.00023-0.00033) BTC per day and that is what I was getting about weeks ago but since then my earnings went down to about 1/3 which is not profitable at all anymore.

So my question is why is this huge earnings difference from 2 weeks ago. Is there some bug in the profitability calucation on Zpool's side or on the exchange?

Two weeks ago BTC was ~10k USD cheaper; so when you compare your numbers, you must factor in BTC sale price at that time, or rather before that time....

It makes sense that earnings are .5x of what they were if the price is 2x now.

It's a sliding scale.

I get that but the pool is reporting bad data:

Code:
"neoscrypt":{"name":"neoscrypt","port":4233,"coins":5,"fees":2,"hashrate":8260022991,"workers":4176,"estimate_current":"0.00027344","estimate_last24h":"0.00027605","actual_last24h":"0.22017","hashrate_last24h":6664788894.7634}

So we know the earnings in BTC per GH / MH / KH (depending on algo) from which is easy to calculate the estimated earnings for my speed. However my earnings are way less. MultiPoolMiner also logs past estimates evey minute and makes an average so over a long period of time so it's pretty accurate even considering fluctuations in profitability. MPM also mines the most profitable algos and almost always there's a few around 0.00025
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 1
What is wrong with this calculation?

zpool payout at 0.0025 ($40)

Average bitcoin transfer cost 0.00125 ($20)  https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-transactionfees.html#3m


= 50% lost in transfer??

I have never transfered any bitcoin so I realize I must be missing something.
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
The setting of a lower difficulty (d=xxx) on sha256 algo does not work anymore - why?
Jump to: