Topic: ▂▃▅▆▇⫷[ 🆉🅿🅾🅾🅻.🅲🅰 ]⫸⫷[!KAWPOW!]⫸⫷[ the miners multipool ]⫸ ▇▆▅▃▂ - page 104. (Read 279744 times)
December 16, 2017, 10:45:13 AM
m7m MAGi taken offline as it looks like they have some chain issues now.
December 16, 2017, 06:11:57 AM
the Internet did not disappear, the miners worked stably. what can be the reason for such differences?
can this be a pool problem or with my hardware?
can this be a pool problem or with my hardware?
Whats your miner's A/R/S numbers? accepted, rejected, stale
I see solid connection and no problems on my end except for ~4-6 hours ago; but the frontend was offline then... so its understandable in my eyes.... The deltas during these times don't correlate to actual historical deltas cause the frontend can only see stuff when its online.
http://zpool.ca/?address=1PHSDYvVp6HpqtuUPocK41DrdeHbbezaeP
phot screen with statistics from statistics
https://hostingkartinok.com/show-image.php?id=8434b686e21c8bfb14caf344a1cdb44e
sometimes there is a reject in the pool statistics, overclocking or failure of the pool? screenshot on the link
https://hostingkartinok.com/show-image.php?id=02a212e60348c141e5e84879ffe58159
legendary
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1166
My AR-15 ID's itself as a toaster. Want breakfast?
December 16, 2017, 05:53:28 AM
the Internet did not disappear, the miners worked stably. what can be the reason for such differences?
can this be a pool problem or with my hardware?
can this be a pool problem or with my hardware?
Whats your miner's A/R/S numbers? accepted, rejected, stale
I see solid connection and no problems on my end except for ~4-6 hours ago; but the frontend was offline then... so its understandable in my eyes.... The deltas during these times don't correlate to actual historical deltas cause the frontend can only see stuff when its online.
http://zpool.ca/?address=1PHSDYvVp6HpqtuUPocK41DrdeHbbezaeP
December 16, 2017, 05:12:15 AM
Hi guys. do we all observe strangeness in the hashray and the work of the miners on the neoscript? In the last five hours.
what can be associated with such a drawdown hash?
http://s018.radikal.ru/i520/1712/45/a6f91375747a.png
what can be associated with such a drawdown hash?
http://s018.radikal.ru/i520/1712/45/a6f91375747a.png
I am seeing the same thing, except with Lyra2RE2. I have been hashing it for 5 hours and the last two have seen a massive drop off in hash rate.
Edit: Seems to have just started working again. Perhaps my miner was stuck in a lower difficulty pool? It seems to affect the miner that was mining at a difficulty of 256 a lot more than the one mining at a difficulty of 90.
Im not sure if this is something related to your situation, but I remember seeing it a bit on skien, x11evo and in lyra2 in the past...
seeing the photo; it looks like you were loosing internet connection or something.....
the Internet did not disappear, the miners worked stably. what can be the reason for such differences?
can this be a pool problem or with my hardware?
December 16, 2017, 02:33:13 AM
Looks like LTC is working now - good jumps in unpaid when we find an LTC block!
Crackfoo
TBH I would suggest dropping LTC in any case because of the long block times - it would seem to make sense not to mine any coin where you won't get a block reasonably often (say 1 in 10 or 1 in 20 blocks?)
I am pretty sure the returns had an uptick while you had LTC disabled but now most of the hashpower is back on LTC again...
It occurred to me - could you 'piggy back' the LTC mining onto another (bigger) pool - or is that not possible or ethical?
So that is the explanation why even mining the most profitable algos with MultiPoolMiner I get half or 1/3 the expected income over 24 hours?
I'm no expert but wouldn't make sense to adjust profitability by taking into account the time needed to find a block or simply multiply the profitability with poolhash/networkhash ratio?
I discovered several rejected LTC blocks, so we should have had better profitability. Unsure why they were rejected but I've updated LTC to the latest code and I'm going to try it for today. If I see another reject I'll have to take it off and dig further.
TBH I would suggest dropping LTC in any case because of the long block times - it would seem to make sense not to mine any coin where you won't get a block reasonably often (say 1 in 10 or 1 in 20 blocks?)
I am pretty sure the returns had an uptick while you had LTC disabled but now most of the hashpower is back on LTC again...
It occurred to me - could you 'piggy back' the LTC mining onto another (bigger) pool - or is that not possible or ethical?
You're probaly right on LTC dragging down the profitability. It's doubled in diff since BCC went POS and now needs another 1Th pool speed to make it consistent.
I'll drop it for a few days and see how it does.
I'll drop it for a few days and see how it does.
So that is the explanation why even mining the most profitable algos with MultiPoolMiner I get half or 1/3 the expected income over 24 hours?
I'm no expert but wouldn't make sense to adjust profitability by taking into account the time needed to find a block or simply multiply the profitability with poolhash/networkhash ratio?
I discovered several rejected LTC blocks, so we should have had better profitability. Unsure why they were rejected but I've updated LTC to the latest code and I'm going to try it for today. If I see another reject I'll have to take it off and dig further.
legendary
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1166
My AR-15 ID's itself as a toaster. Want breakfast?
December 15, 2017, 11:03:11 PM
Hi guys. do we all observe strangeness in the hashray and the work of the miners on the neoscript? In the last five hours.
what can be associated with such a drawdown hash?
what can be associated with such a drawdown hash?
I am seeing the same thing, except with Lyra2RE2. I have been hashing it for 5 hours and the last two have seen a massive drop off in hash rate.
Edit: Seems to have just started working again. Perhaps my miner was stuck in a lower difficulty pool? It seems to affect the miner that was mining at a difficulty of 256 a lot more than the one mining at a difficulty of 90.
Im not sure if this is something related to your situation, but I remember seeing it a bit on skien, x11evo and in lyra2 in the past...
seeing the photo; it looks like you were loosing internet connection or something.....
December 15, 2017, 09:56:41 PM
Hi guys. do we all observe strangeness in the hashray and the work of the miners on the neoscript? In the last five hours.
what can be associated with such a drawdown hash?
http://s018.radikal.ru/i520/1712/45/a6f91375747a.png
what can be associated with such a drawdown hash?
http://s018.radikal.ru/i520/1712/45/a6f91375747a.png
I am seeing the same thing, except with Lyra2RE2. I have been hashing it for 5 hours and the last two have seen a massive drop off in hash rate.
Edit: Seems to have just started working again. Perhaps my miner was stuck in a lower difficulty pool? It seems to affect the miner that was mining at a difficulty of 256 a lot more than the one mining at a difficulty of 90.
legendary
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1166
My AR-15 ID's itself as a toaster. Want breakfast?
December 15, 2017, 08:22:24 PM
What is wrong with this calculation?
zpool payout at 0.0025 ($40)
Average bitcoin transfer cost 0.00125 ($20) https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-transactionfees.html#3m
= 50% lost in transfer??
I have never transfered any bitcoin so I realize I must be missing something.
zpool payout at 0.0025 ($40)
Average bitcoin transfer cost 0.00125 ($20) https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-transactionfees.html#3m
= 50% lost in transfer??
I have never transfered any bitcoin so I realize I must be missing something.
per individual TX... yes... but the pool sends a massive single TX... plus, that is not subtracted from your earnings, it comes out of the pool's 2%.
December 15, 2017, 05:24:47 PM
Hi guys. do we all observe strangeness in the hashray and the work of the miners on the neoscript? In the last five hours.
what can be associated with such a drawdown hash?
http://s018.radikal.ru/i520/1712/45/a6f91375747a.png
what can be associated with such a drawdown hash?
http://s018.radikal.ru/i520/1712/45/a6f91375747a.png
December 15, 2017, 04:43:05 PM
Crackfoo
TBH I would suggest dropping LTC in any case because of the long block times - it would seem to make sense not to mine any coin where you won't get a block reasonably often (say 1 in 10 or 1 in 20 blocks?)
I am pretty sure the returns had an uptick while you had LTC disabled but now most of the hashpower is back on LTC again...
It occurred to me - could you 'piggy back' the LTC mining onto another (bigger) pool - or is that not possible or ethical?
So that is the explanation why even mining the most profitable algos with MultiPoolMiner I get half or 1/3 the expected income over 24 hours?
I'm no expert but wouldn't make sense to adjust profitability by taking into account the time needed to find a block or simply multiply the profitability with poolhash/networkhash ratio?
I discovered several rejected LTC blocks, so we should have had better profitability. Unsure why they were rejected but I've updated LTC to the latest code and I'm going to try it for today. If I see another reject I'll have to take it off and dig further.
TBH I would suggest dropping LTC in any case because of the long block times - it would seem to make sense not to mine any coin where you won't get a block reasonably often (say 1 in 10 or 1 in 20 blocks?)
I am pretty sure the returns had an uptick while you had LTC disabled but now most of the hashpower is back on LTC again...
It occurred to me - could you 'piggy back' the LTC mining onto another (bigger) pool - or is that not possible or ethical?
You're probaly right on LTC dragging down the profitability. It's doubled in diff since BCC went POS and now needs another 1Th pool speed to make it consistent.
I'll drop it for a few days and see how it does.
I'll drop it for a few days and see how it does.
So that is the explanation why even mining the most profitable algos with MultiPoolMiner I get half or 1/3 the expected income over 24 hours?
I'm no expert but wouldn't make sense to adjust profitability by taking into account the time needed to find a block or simply multiply the profitability with poolhash/networkhash ratio?
I discovered several rejected LTC blocks, so we should have had better profitability. Unsure why they were rejected but I've updated LTC to the latest code and I'm going to try it for today. If I see another reject I'll have to take it off and dig further.
December 15, 2017, 03:44:18 PM
Much appreciated lads
December 15, 2017, 03:42:53 PM
Please can someone tell me the minimum payout on zpool? I mean in BTC. Your input will be appreciated.
Answered just a few posts ago. It's also on the first page.
Quote
Payouts are made automatically every 2 hours for all balances above 0.01 and balances more than 0.002 are paid several evenings each week.
December 15, 2017, 03:21:00 PM
Please can someone tell me the minimum payout on zpool? I mean in BTC. Your input will be appreciated.
December 15, 2017, 02:40:54 PM
No - in the passwordfield where you have put the c=BTC value, ZPool uses the Password field to pass this information so as far as the miner software it IS the password!
Do you know if this would be typed under "Command line parameters (optional)" on awesomeminer?
Thanks a lot
Thanks a lot
as per the web site
http://zpool.ca/site/diff
you add a parameter d=xxx to your password, so it will (probably) look like
c=BTC,d=512
http://zpool.ca/site/diff
you add a parameter d=xxx to your password, so it will (probably) look like
c=BTC,d=512
Does anyone know how to set a specific difficulty for neoscrypt through Awesomeminer? It keeps pushing my difficulty to 2186 and then my estimated hash rate plummets, then it drops down to 256 and starts the cycle of working back up over again. If anyone has a suggested difficulty recommendation, I'm getting about 7.2-7.3 MH/s. Thanks!
I have a d= set in my password field for sha256, but it keeps defaulting the pool diff to 262400, seems to be ignoring the d= i have set, I'm using some gridseed orbs, whcih I know are old and slow, but I would still like to try and mine with them for kicks. im using d=1024 and tried d=2056, but with the 262400 popping up, seems I will never get a share.
any ideas?
p.s. I did have it working for a few days with d=1024, but then it stopped and I noticed the 262400 thing.
The setting of a lower difficulty (d=xxx) on sha256 algo does not work anymore - why?
December 15, 2017, 01:44:38 PM
No - in the passwordfield where you have put the c=BTC value, ZPool uses the Password field to pass this information so as far as the miner software it IS the password!
Do you know if this would be typed under "Command line parameters (optional)" on awesomeminer?
Thanks a lot
Thanks a lot
as per the web site
http://zpool.ca/site/diff
you add a parameter d=xxx to your password, so it will (probably) look like
c=BTC,d=512
http://zpool.ca/site/diff
you add a parameter d=xxx to your password, so it will (probably) look like
c=BTC,d=512
Does anyone know how to set a specific difficulty for neoscrypt through Awesomeminer? It keeps pushing my difficulty to 2186 and then my estimated hash rate plummets, then it drops down to 256 and starts the cycle of working back up over again. If anyone has a suggested difficulty recommendation, I'm getting about 7.2-7.3 MH/s. Thanks!
I have a d= set in my password field for sha256, but it keeps defaulting the pool diff to 262400, seems to be ignoring the d= i have set, I'm using some gridseed orbs, whcih I know are old and slow, but I would still like to try and mine with them for kicks. im using d=1024 and tried d=2056, but with the 262400 popping up, seems I will never get a share.
any ideas?
p.s. I did have it working for a few days with d=1024, but then it stopped and I noticed the 262400 thing.
December 15, 2017, 12:42:40 PM
You're probaly right on LTC dragging down the profitability. It's doubled in diff since BCC went POS and now needs another 1Th pool speed to make it consistent.
I'll drop it for a few days and see how it does.
I'll drop it for a few days and see how it does.
So that is the explanation why even mining the most profitable algos with MultiPoolMiner I get half or 1/3 the expected income over 24 hours?
I'm no expert but wouldn't make sense to adjust profitability by taking into account the time needed to find a block or simply multiply the profitability with poolhash/networkhash ratio?
I discovered several rejected LTC blocks, so we should have had better profitability. Unsure why they were rejected but I've updated LTC to the latest code and I'm going to try it for today. If I see another reject I'll have to take it off and dig further.
December 15, 2017, 09:35:37 AM
You're probaly right on LTC dragging down the profitability. It's doubled in diff since BCC went POS and now needs another 1Th pool speed to make it consistent.
I'll drop it for a few days and see how it does.
I'll drop it for a few days and see how it does.
So that is the explanation why even mining the most profitable algos with MultiPoolMiner I get half or 1/3 the expected income over 24 hours?
I'm no expert but wouldn't make sense to adjust profitability by taking into account the time needed to find a block or simply multiply the profitability with poolhash/networkhash ratio?
December 15, 2017, 09:10:34 AM
Re: profitability
I am looking at Scrypt only - my concern isn't that I was earning X last week and I am earning Y this week, but the actual last 24h earnings are barely 1/2 of the current estimate - I know there can be variation but it is usually about right, Also the individual coins are all showing between 2 and 3 mBTC/GH/Day
With 500Mhs I should be getting about 0.08 LTC (whattomine and manual calcs), which is currently at 0.016 BTC (current @ Bittrex) so this should come come out around 0.00128 BTC/24h.
Over the last 26 hours I have made 0.00055 BTC which is less than 1/2 what I could get by mining LTC straight.
I don't know what the issue is but there seems to be one. it MAY be that the pool keeps dropping large amounts of hash onto LTC, but not enough to get a block (last LTC block was 30h), so it would seem sensible to drop LTC from the coin list as we don't have enough hash to mine it effectively.
I am looking at Scrypt only - my concern isn't that I was earning X last week and I am earning Y this week, but the actual last 24h earnings are barely 1/2 of the current estimate - I know there can be variation but it is usually about right, Also the individual coins are all showing between 2 and 3 mBTC/GH/Day
With 500Mhs I should be getting about 0.08 LTC (whattomine and manual calcs), which is currently at 0.016 BTC (current @ Bittrex) so this should come come out around 0.00128 BTC/24h.
Over the last 26 hours I have made 0.00055 BTC which is less than 1/2 what I could get by mining LTC straight.
I don't know what the issue is but there seems to be one. it MAY be that the pool keeps dropping large amounts of hash onto LTC, but not enough to get a block (last LTC block was 30h), so it would seem sensible to drop LTC from the coin list as we don't have enough hash to mine it effectively.
You're probaly right on LTC dragging down the profitability. It's doubled in diff since BCC went POS and now needs another 1Th pool speed to make it consistent.
I'll drop it for a few days and see how it does.
December 15, 2017, 08:51:34 AM
Re: profitability
I am looking at Scrypt only - my concern isn't that I was earning X last week and I am earning Y this week, but the actual last 24h earnings are barely 1/2 of the current estimate - I know there can be variation but it is usually about right, Also the individual coins are all showing between 2 and 3 mBTC/GH/Day
With 500Mhs I should be getting about 0.08 LTC (whattomine and manual calcs), which is currently at 0.016 BTC (current @ Bittrex) so this should come come out around 0.00128 BTC/24h.
Over the last 26 hours I have made 0.00055 BTC which is less than 1/2 what I could get by mining LTC straight.
I don't know what the issue is but there seems to be one. it MAY be that the pool keeps dropping large amounts of hash onto LTC, but not enough to get a block (last LTC block was 30h), so it would seem sensible to drop LTC from the coin list as we don't have enough hash to mine it effectively.
I am looking at Scrypt only - my concern isn't that I was earning X last week and I am earning Y this week, but the actual last 24h earnings are barely 1/2 of the current estimate - I know there can be variation but it is usually about right, Also the individual coins are all showing between 2 and 3 mBTC/GH/Day
With 500Mhs I should be getting about 0.08 LTC (whattomine and manual calcs), which is currently at 0.016 BTC (current @ Bittrex) so this should come come out around 0.00128 BTC/24h.
Over the last 26 hours I have made 0.00055 BTC which is less than 1/2 what I could get by mining LTC straight.
I don't know what the issue is but there seems to be one. it MAY be that the pool keeps dropping large amounts of hash onto LTC, but not enough to get a block (last LTC block was 30h), so it would seem sensible to drop LTC from the coin list as we don't have enough hash to mine it effectively.
December 15, 2017, 07:54:19 AM
[2017-12-15 14:48:15] Stratum connection interrupted
[2017-12-15 14:48:17] Stratum connect failed: Failed to connect to neoscrypt.mine.zpool.ca port 4233: Connection refused
[2017-12-15 14:48:17] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2017-12-15 14:48:17] Stratum connect failed: Failed to connect to neoscrypt.mine.zpool.ca port 4233: Connection refused
[2017-12-15 14:48:17] ...retry after 10 seconds
Jump to: