Topic: ▂▃▅▆▇⫷[ 🆉🅿🅾🅾🅻.🅲🅰 ]⫸⫷[!KAWPOW!]⫸⫷[ the miners multipool ]⫸ ▇▆▅▃▂ - page 67. (Read 279601 times)

I think he means something like this...

Day 1 - you mine 1000 ABCs, converts to ~0.5mBTC, and at that time BTC is worth $10k
Day 2 - you mine 1000 ABCs, converts to ~1.0mBTC, and this time BTC is worth $5k (assuming the mined coin stayed the same value compared to BTC)
Day 3 - you mine 1000 ABCs, mine's ~0.5mBTC, and BTC dropped and is worth $10k again.....

The question is, after the third day will he get credited for 2.0mBTC (assuming it'll let you cash out at 2.0mBTC), or will all the credits adjust to the cash out time - which means, it looks at the value of 3000 ABCs during cash out which really equals 1.5mBTC.

Is it 2.0 or 1.5 mBTC?

You are paid the same amount in BTC but it is worth less $ because of the BTC price.

This is a random question but how does the rise and fall of BTC price affect what we get paid for the ALT coins we mine on zpool. Do we get paid less or more for mining when the BTC value drops?

https://twitter.com/_zpool_/status/953650655822008320

We've dropped $VLT and algo veltor. Seems this coin has all it's online resources compromised, such as block explorer and website. Do not visit their sites they're injecting malicious code which cause your desktops to lock.

https://twitter.com/_zpool_/status/953622193723854849

Until further notice and a working wallet is provided, $XVG has been dropped from the pool. Please stop mining using XVG addresses. This means x17 algo is also toast.

What funds were left in the XVG wallet were pushed out with a manual payout.

Annnnd 15 minutes later its back up again.  

EDIT: With the message they are short on currency again. 

Yah dude it's jacked the x17 stratum is offline now.  On my backup again.   

On x17 - last 3 hours all blocks are Orphan..
Is all ok ?

I have noticed that when a new solution is found for an algo the shares are only allocated at the percentage share you are sitting at when the solution switches from new to immature. if you mining this algo 24/7 this has no affect on you.

But, if you are using algo switching this has a potentially big affect. For example if I am mining x17 and during a hour long period 10 solutions are found but they are all still sitting at new when my miner now decides to switch to something else. When the x17 sols start changing to immature I only receive a share of the 1st solution and get nothing from the next 9 even although I was hashing x17 at the time the sol was found.

This also works in reverse if you start mining an algo after a new sol is found but before it changes from new to immature you will get a share even if you where not actually hashing that algo when the sol was found.

I am assuming the delay in switching from new to immature was to counteract the questions that keep popping up caused by orphans and this is an unintended side affect?

Thanks for the detailed explanation.  This is on point.  No dick stuck in fan.

You're not wrong in saying that m7m=5,yescrypt=7 and m7m=5000,yescrypt=7000 will provide identical results. However, if your intention is for the stratum servers to ensure that you're always mining the most profitable algo for your equipment, then the profitability factors you provide in your password need to be the same denomination as the current estimate for the algo.

Here are the "current" profitability estimates for m7m and yescrypt:

m7m, 0.0733
yescrypt, 0.01403

Let's say you have an Intel Core i5-6600K. Your hash rates are as follows:

m7m, 69kH/s
yescrypt, 2.4kH/s

If you specify your password as m7m=69,yescrypt=2.4, this is the math that the stratum server does:

m7m, 0.0733 * 69 = 5.0577
yescrypt, 0.01403 * 2.4 = 0.033672

Well, m7m should be way more profitable for you than yescrypt, right? According to these calculations, you'd be making $0.38/day with yescrypt, but $56.57/day with m7m. Thus, the stratum server will keep you mining m7m all day long.

Except m7m is measured in MH/s, while yescrypt is measured in kH/s. So, you won't be making $56/day in reality. Thus, the correct password would be m7m=0.069,yescrypt=2.4. This give us:

m7m, 0.0733 * 0.069 = 0.0050577
yescrypt, 0.01403 * 2.4 = 0.033672

In reality, m7m is only going to bring you $0.06/day at that rate. Not $56. Then, yescrypt is more profitable at this point in time. And that's why right now, you see 21,000 miners on yescrypt, and only 634 on m7m.

This can be confusing because if you look at the chart on the website, m7m is listed higher in the table than yescrypt, because it's "current" estimate is a bigger number. But because they're measured using different denominations, yescrypt is currently far more profitable.

The yescrypt chart shows kH/s. Check the caption for the chart on the left, not the table on the right.


Anyway, if you do the math, MH/s doesn't make sense. The pool hash rate for yescrypt is only 6.1MH/s right now. If the profitability calculation was in fact using MH/s and not kH/s, that means that the entire pool of 21,000 miners would only generate $0.91 combined per day at the current rate. That's not right.

it doesn't matter, as long as you're consistent - the profitability factors are relative to each other.  you could do m7m=5,yescrypt=7  or you could do m7m=5000,yescrypt=7000  and the results would be identical

Using that method, both m7m and yescrypt should be in MH/s.

Yea nothing changes scrypt still under paid and drops out constantly, all other algo's too fix the damn pool Foo!

Not sure what cards your mining with but the most profitable algo's to mine have for the most part been
Nvidia
Phi, Nist5, Skein
AMD
Neoscrypt

Been mining Equihash for almost the whole day now seeing it was the highest profit pool and all just to notice that my current unpaid balance hasnt increased at all In like 10 hours! Is this normal, or is Equihash like LBRY when it comes to payments, next to non existent.

Edit: screw this, I stopped mining. Basically nothing made the whole day. Nobody is paying due to the whole Asia closing shop story.

Plus the whole Zpool page isnt loading 80% of the time.

same address is now stating its UNO same address changed to 3 different coins??

@ crackfoo

Vardiff bug happened again phi diff under minimum but I got a screenshot this time

https://www.awesomescreenshot.com/image/3102596/215f980f9a25c9d00002c07735ffe8c9

The way I do it is to navigate to Pool, select an algo, and look at the graph for "Last 24 Hours Estimate (mBTC/XXX/day)." Whatever it lists for XXX is usually the metric you need to specify in your password. If you're really unsure about a particular algo, you can verify simply by doing the multiplication yourself (estimate * hash rate), and checking to see that the mBTC amount is reasonable for a day of mining.