Topic: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk IV (2022 Q3) [MODERATED] - page 9. (Read 37593 times)

Thanks for looking - I had a thought that bpip describes the ban as "auto ban" which my understanding is that it would be based on such things as an I.P. or email used etc.  I guess we will never know.

Maybe there was another reason?  In any event the user has now admitted both UID's are their creation, so we will have to wait and see whether or not they intend to start a ban appeal thread.

Kudos.

I have checked and unfortunately did not find the reason for banning this user. I am unfortunately limited by my status to find such information. And since it was a long time ago, it is useless to ask global moderators, it is unlikely that any of them will remember this particular case.

As for the ban evasion, I completely agree with you.

Well, I was just going to ask when the user was banned and what was the reasoning behind that?

Why I ask is that as we can see [here] in posts 67 and 68 the user starts two threads:

• ?? HedgeFX Trading & Investments ?? 2017-12-12 15:26:19 UTC (Securities section) - Archive [1] [2]
• [ANN] ?? HedgeFX Trading & Investments ?? 2017-12-12 15:28:07 UTC (Service announcements section) - Archive [1] [2]

Both were last edited 16th April, 2018.

The now banned user P2Pfinder last posted on that day.

According to BPIP P2Pfinder has woken up twice but does not shed any light on when they were banned.


Their avatar as well as the title of the two threads has a distinct capitalization of the "f" in HFx (as in HedgeFx)



In both threads started by P2Pfinder they use the email as their contact details.  It's still there.  The email is then used by a second user on more than three separate occasions in unrelated threads:





HedgeFx is the name in the "HedgeFX Service" started by P2Pfinder and the email contained in that OP is then used by HedgeFX u=2221175 on at least six occasions when replying to other users who are inquiring about that service

---

---

On the 2019-11-20 12:16:59 UTC HedgeFX starts a thread which is an exact copy of the two threads started by P2Pfinder

?? HedgeFX Service??

It was scraped by Ninja when the post occurred here: https://ninjastic.space/post/53128526

HedgeFX uses the email six other times, three prior and three after the HedgeFx Services thread was started.

2018-06-19 15:32:32 UTC - email [email protected] used by HedgeFX [HERE] - Archive [1] [2]
2018-06-20 13:12:04 UTC - email [email protected] used by HedgeFX [HERE] - Archive [1] [2]
2018-06-21 10:44:16 UTC - email [email protected] used by HedgeFX [HERE] - Archive [1] [2]

2019-11-20 12:16:59 UTC - Thread started by HedgeFX - https://ninjastic.space/post/53128526 - this is the same word-for-word thread as started twice by P2Pfinder - it was locked on the 2020-10-28 and the contents deleted.


2020-02-17 20:20:03 UTC - email [email protected] used by HedgeFX [HERE] - Archive [1] [2]

2021-04-17 17:24:33 UTC - email [email protected] used by HedgeFX [HERE] - Archive [1] [2]
2021-04-17 18:20:53 UTC - email [email protected] used by HedgeFX [HERE] - Archive [1] [2]

At least seven times HedgeFx uses the email posted by P2Pfinder - this is no copy paste accident - three times prior and three more after they recreated the thread P2Pfinder had started.

In addition, both use the term


https://ninjastic.space/search?author=P2Pfinder&content=hallo
https://ninjastic.space/search?author=HedgeFx&content=hallo

Conclusion:

Ban Evasion: HedgeFx u=2221175 is the alt of banned user P2Pfinder u=1047338 through their shared use of the email [email protected] and identical "HedgeFX Trading & Investments" thread to scam others with ponzi like offers.

---

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

P2Pfinder, HedgeFX,

Proof:

As above

Reporting:

These alts have been reported by me in the "[Report] Ban Evasion [Requesting Admin/mod to check those and ban]" thread for ban evasion - I will shortly.

I have marked these user's trust feedback pages with distrust

Related Addresses:


Miscellaneous:

The louder the scammer screams - the deeper the hole they dig for themselves.

---

---

FlexxycDz  woke up 5/20/2023 10:51:15 AM    woke up https://bpip.org/Profile?id=3482156

Kokruu Last Active:    2023-05-20, 21:06:10 (GMT +10) https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kokruu-3523427;dt - Archive [1] [2]

Connection Confirmed.

(Don't forget to leave them *neutral* trust feedback).

(And *always* archive your investigations!)

2: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Kokruu
2. FlexxycDz

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Discord:

Miscellaneous:

Another proof that these accounts are managed by the same person is that they have exactly the same topics.

[Selling] Chaturbate, OnlyFans and more adult website site tokens
[Selling] Chaturbate, OnlyFans and more adult website site tokens

---

What's wrong? Alts? Alts. Maybe they'll wake up tomorrow.

Which of these accounts is currently active and of interest?

5: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Cryptochel
2. netditaring
3. bitborg
4. 6ardak
5. bitlborg

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Telegram Username:

Miscellaneous:

Cryptochel seems to have two more inactive alts in reserve. In any case, their nicknames are very similar to Cryptochel's.

1. Cryptochella
2. Cryptochelle

P.S. These are just my thoughts.

2: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Jonaki50sa
2. LACKME666

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Discord username:

No, you didn't.

First, I didn't say anywhere that the accounts were unrelated. I didn't check because it doesn't violate forum rules, hence it doesn't concern me.

Second, I'm saying that using ninjastic as proof of anything is wrong. As far as I know, moderators don't accept ninjastic as evidence. What is accepted as evidence is information that is specifically on the forum. For example, if you report plagiarism or ban evasion, and link to ninjastic as evidence, the report will be rejected. But, to use such links among the forum community, please, no one forbids it.

Well, thirdly, I said that using ninjastic as an archive is also wrong. Links to archives, real archives, I pointed out above. With the correction from Timelord2067, it is archive.today or web.archive.org.

You used trickery in your post, providing information from ninjastic instead of the forum. You should have done as I described, and in "Miscellaneous" you should have explained the situation, and the forum community would have decided whether you were right or wrong.

P.S. I'm not defending anyone. It's just my opinion.


I read your post. If you're talking about ban evasion, I doubt it. If you want to write about something else, you're welcome. I'm open to all.

Hello Issa56!
I participate in the eTukTuk bounty
My twitter number is 138
Name in Bitcointalk - Vladimir Kw
Link to my BitcoinTalk account - https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/vladimir-kw-1307411
Registration confirmation -  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62403387

Here is my account -
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/vladimir-kw-1307411
I have nothing to do with this account.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/allahhafeez-3541841
What do I need to do now?


Why did you set up a red trust for me? I am an honest and decent person. Check me again. You did not act fairly with me.

Searching the Forum - as the posts are now:

From a locked thread:

Mix$$01 uses the wallet address just once:


Sifat01 uses the same wallet address about 50 times:



is used ONLY by Mix$$01 a couple of dozen times.



is only used by Sifat01 a couple of dozen times.


Is used just six times by Mix$$01

---

---

Conclusion:

I am not convinced.

---

---

@Xal0lex - can I PM you about this post, please?

2: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. DenisReach
2. EOS_ext

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:

if they accidentally copied your POA, did you also accidentally send them bnb for them when they wanted to sell their tokens?
maybe you are too generous, or indeed this is another coincidence.

https://bscscan.com/tx/0x6d75454195734daf8f5d63c1b4240f1590f65ea0b648930f42ea700cb11339cf


so do you still want to say that your accounts are not connected due to a coincidence mistake in using POA?
In cases like this, there is indeed a possibility that they (bounty hunters) entered their details incorrectly as they are simply copying and pasting to quickly register a bounty campaign. but proof of blockchain connection can strengthen the evidence.

Yes you are right.

After submitting proof of authentication and making mistake, some them will end up editing the proof of authentication, and some might even delete it. If am copying the proof of authentication just as you recommended, then its their new wallet address that will be reflecting not the one they mistakenly submitted.

If you can scan this wallet [ 0xfc38fbcDA185EA1940354606740a696Fc2370208 ] You will see that the their are three accounts connected to this account, and each account have used the wallet for proof of authentication more than twice.
Sifat01 (169)
Mix$$01 (6)
Mixpip01 (3)

I dont know maybe i answered your question.

That's the thing: all the quoted posts are in UNblocked topics. And that is why I do not understand the actions of Issa56. There's nothing stopping him from going in and copying the post quotes into his own post. And then maybe he would be able to notice that the posts are different from each other in terms of addresses. And one post has no address at all.

1. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62319905
2. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.61822356
3. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62404024

Not at all - I've been on the road for the last week and haven't been able to give this thread my full attention.


As you can see, the post you quoted is different from the one currently on the forum. Thus, you are misleading forum users.