Topic: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk IV (2022 Q3) [MODERATED] - page 13. (Read 37880 times)

Yes, he is now all white and fluffy. And at the time of creating his account with the name ZAINmalik75, he did not support his alternative accounts in any way.






Dude, you are a saint. But history tells a different story. I added only neutral feedback, only neutral.

I'm going to have a look at your connected alts later on, but I'm wondering when you and irfan_pak10 exchanged positive DT trust and glowing trust feedback? 

At least two of your alts trust that UID.

(and some of your alts have been active as little as 24 hours ago)

From what I can see, it looks like your account has only received one neutral feedback from a DT member, specifically from lovesmayfamilis. After reviewing the feedback, it appears to be based on factual information, and I don't see anything unfair about it.


Even if the feedback is negative, it would still be considered an appropriate use of the trust system in this case.

At the moment this the only my active account is... in 2021 i had accounts but since that time I never used any account for the signature campaign... this is now my only account and you can see activity of this account i not participating in multiple campaigns with my alts....   
 
It's really sad and unfair to tag someone multiple times for the old mistakes.. My this account ZAINmalik75 was created in 2020 so there's no way I could have created this after allegations in 2021.
 
that was turning point and its true i carefully understood the rules at that time for signature campaigns but after 2021 when I understood I focused all my energy and effort on this account alone  ZAINmalik75 
 
The referenced connection which lovesmayfamilis linked is from the same era of 2021... so how is it fair since that time there is no single allegation, no cheating or using alts whatsoever.
 
So please I don't deserve this tag, at least not this time please...

Report link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62270856

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Gitahandsems
2. Fulan56

Proof:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.61743519
[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

I noticed a mystical activity singing with Alt in the Blog section of the campaign: COMBO Network ex COCOS-BCX, managed by: @irfan_pak10

The rules expressly say, don't involve Alt, but it doesn't apply to accounts above and below.

In addition to proof of connected addresses, anyone can see their involvement in: Spreadsheets. And also the screenshot below.

---

2 Accounts Connected:

1. Ilersemot
2. Oborlamok

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

This is also an Alt cheat in the COMBO Network campaign ex COCOS-BCX.

What distinguishes them is the address used by the account that has been painted, is still used by the fraudulent account.

Evidence can be seen inside Spreadsheets. And below.

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Jktv
2. Pushpa10

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

cheating bounty programs.

🔵[BOUNTY ALADDIN - ACTIVE]🔵 Joseon Mun $JSM | ESCROWED | 2 WEEKS


https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DbyfMo6NpyZjaH2-DxUJwBdCfEn0TMZILJ5Y9BNsEoU/edit#gid=187081334

7 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Aum Ram, John White, Torwald Go, Art 111, Rampue, Bezdonov Art, Asgar 9,

Proof:

Self admitted alts admitted after being exposed by cheater detector:

---

---

Reporting:

These alts have been reported by me in the "[Report] Ban Evasion [Requesting Admin/mod to check those and ban]" thread for ban evasion - Yes

I have marked these user's trust feedback pages with distrust feedback.

(as has @The Sceptical Chymist )


Related Addresses:

Plenty of ETH wallet addresses as uncovered by @cheater detector [HERE]

(note @TryNinja 's website does not appear to have scraped these addresses)

Miscellaneous:

The six alts of banned UID Aum Ram registered within a few days of each-other and have last active dates close to each-other too:

2016-05-23, 08:24:29 Date Registered:    Aum Ram

2017-09-08, 19:18:39 Date Registered:    John White
2017-09-08, 20:00:41 Date Registered:    Torwald Go
2017-09-09, 00:49:07 Date Registered:    Art 111
2017-09-09, 17:11:25 Date Registered:    Rampue
2017-09-11, 18:17:15 Date Registered:    Bezdonov Art
2017-09-20, 21:15:24 Date Registered:    Asgar 9

12/30/2019 1:33:48 PM    woke up   Aum Ram

7/22/2020 5:34:23 PM    woke up   Asgar 9

2020-11-20, 06:50:35 Last Active:    Asgar 9

2021-05-13, 21:12:04 Last Active:    Torwald Go

11/24/2021 12:06:29 PM    woke up   Aum Ram

5/19/2022 2:58:45 PM    woke up   John White

2022-08-03, 05:27:56 Last Active:    John White

2020-11-20, 06:46:00 Last Active:    Art 111

2021-12-21, 02:04:20 Last Active:    Rampue

6/11/2022 4:21:41 PM    woke up   Bezdonov Art
2022-06-12, 02:21:41 Last Active:    Bezdonov Art

10/9/2022 5:34:45 PM    woke up   Aum Ram
2022-10-10, 03:34:45 Last Active:    Aum Ram

---

---

Registration Date:5/22/2016 10:24:29 PM (Active 224 days ago)    Aum Ram
Registration Date:9/8/2017 9:18:39 AM (Active 292 days ago)    John White
Registration Date:9/8/2017 10:00:41 AM (Active 738 days ago)    Torwald Go
Registration Date:9/8/2017 2:49:07 PM (Active 913 days ago)    Art 111
Registration Date:9/9/2017 7:11:25 AM (Active 517 days ago)    Rampue
Registration Date:9/11/2017 8:17:15 AM (Active 344 days ago)    Bezdonov Art
Registration Date:9/20/2017 11:15:24 AM (Active 913 days ago)    Asgar 9

I've taken the liberty of unlocking the Mark III Known Alts thread to enable anyone who is tec savvy to run the script from Ninja to replace broken images with working ones via the talkimg.com web site.

Please try not to post over there as I'll be relocking it soon once people have updated their images.

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. jacafbiz
2. disconnectme

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

There is an exchange of merits.

Just giving everyone the heads up of a new tool for the Forum at large:


Basically, as a means to preserve images uploaded will be able to be viewed in twenty years, not twenty weeks as is the case with some image upload serves already in place.

Today I accidentally saw profile: @Veleor, by chance I saw Alt discovery linked published by @Veleor In thread: Topic: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2022 Q2)

Here I see there are 57 connected accounts, by transaction, Twitter, ETH Address, Facebook and also Alt's involvement in some campaigns and some have been banned by Forum Bitcointalk.

For clarity and certainty of their evidence Alt, connected and so on, can be seen below.

Topic: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2022 Q2)

Bottom line: From the data I've seen and the evidence above, stating they are Alt linked to each other, by using addresses and twitter back and forth with Alt 1-57.

However, new stories and discoveries were discovered, based on evidence published by @Veleor, and I noticed four (4) other Alt accounts that were fraudulently involved in the campaign: Topic: [Bounty] COMBO Network ex COCOS-BCX | 🚀 100k USD Worth of Tokens 🚀 LISTED, signature section, Maintained by: @irfan_pak10.

The rules have been stated clearly by the manager.


These four accounts are included in the interrogation and investigation conducted by: @Veleor above.

4. Accounts Connected

1. Ani1985
2. Pujangga
3. Sang Prabu
4. Sir Legend

Evidence of their involvement and fraud can be seen below in the campaign: COMBO Network ex COCOS-BCX.

:(SPREADSHEETS):




So, from the available evidence, it's quite clear that they violated the written campaign rules and were involved fraudulently in the COMBO Network ex COCOS-BCX campaign.

3 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Akb551
2. Olk khan
3. Blk Khan

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
cheating bounty programs.

 
👉{END} OptionBlitz's Bounty Campaign | Budget: 1M $BLX | 16 weeks | ESCROWED.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_J1smgvxIE9Nzc3Vt4f7EJvUaJxV-n9L_HMPObTdNU0/edit#gid=1249222350

Can you please provide a more detailed explanation of that part?


You and Dekleni used different addresses for the first time on the forum on the same day in the Seasonal Tokens Bounty Campaign:

https://ninjastic.space/post/59592248

https://ninjastic.space/post/59595226

Based on the information from the blockchain explorer, it seems that these addresses are not associated with an exchange but rather a privately owned wallet. Moreover, both of these addresses have made transactions to a single address: bc1qtufnf2mxxkp3cak4lhfd2ky5xzw9z9fjs4pmr4, which appears to be a Binance deposit address. So, even if Dekleni did not have access to the exchange to "cash out his BTC", it is still possible for him to have a personal Bitcoin wallet address, right?

Another piece of evidence is that you used Dekleni's address again on the HUNNYPLAY Signature Campaign almost a year later:

https://ninjastic.space/post/61623942

You have applied for participation with a dekleni wallet number; look at the date, despite the fact that your second account could not participate according to the rules of the subscription company.


https://ninjastic.space/post/61623942

Provided that the dekleni account itself has been inactive since December 15th.


You decided to participate with a dekleni wallet number, most likely by mixing up the wallet numbers, and this is understandable since owning multiple account profiles very often leads to errors.
I don't need to talk about help. The second account has a registration on a forum not far from yours, I don't think that for several years it just existed on the forum.


What leads cheaters to the bottom is always called cowardice and lies.

Hello, dear lovesmayfamilis
I want to give a little rebuttal to the case that you raised, which was just my attempt to help Dekleni, who at that time did not have his own exchange to cash out his BTC.  But I don't know if it can be considered wrong by some people in this forum, but in this opportunity I just want to apologize to you and beg not to be negatively tagged because I only made that small mistake and never made more mistakes  besides that, because now I'm trying to be better than before.

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. zaki12
2. dekleni

Proof:

https://ninjastic.space/addresses?address=bc1qrfz8eqqgr096xerd28ark33t9drrmzfppj9r75



[ Archive ]


[ Archive ]

Miscellaneous:
cheating bounty programs.

 
👉 {Paid} Seasonal Tokens Campaign | Budget: $50k ~ BTC | 8 weeks. ESCROWED.
manager   @CryptopreneurBrainboss


https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1b-bbxLckVD2qdBSUZ4wYNwgVrDwFOWlVEMrTM2lA-dg/edit#gid=1324549851





https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/address/bc1qtufnf2mxxkp3cak4lhfd2ky5xzw9z9fjs4pmr4

All information is removed, which only indicates that the user wanted to cover his tracks.
Payment received, I leave the information for the manager and his right to put a negative tag.

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Trikoman
Aalkaline

Proof:
Trikoman
[Achieve]

Aalkaline
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication once, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person, these two users always register for the same bounty and they use the same pattern.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; Hexhash.xyzl. Bounty manager; julerz12. Trikoman is number 206 on Twitter spreadsheet and Aalkaline is number 224 on Twitter spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; BillionAir. Bounty manager; CryptopreneurBrainboss. Trikoman is number 574 on Twitter spreadsheet and Aalkaline is number 789 on Twitter spreadsheet.

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Sk Sobug
sabuj499

Proof:
Sk Sobug
[Achieve]

sabuj499
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication once, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person, these two users always register for the same bounty and they use the same pattern.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; Hexhash.xyzl. Bounty manager; julerz12. Sk Sobug is number 216 on Twitter spreadsheet and sabuj499 is number 254 on Twitter spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; Xircus. Bounty manager; irfan_pak10. Sk Sobug is number 495 on Twitter spreadsheet and sabuj499 is number 445 on Twitter spreadsheet.

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Jembe
Rayon

Proof:
Jembe
[Achieve]

Rayon
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication twice, it could be a coincidence but I have a feeling that two different independent accounts cannot repeat the same mistakes.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; PoseiSwap. Bounty manager; julerz12. Jembe is number 77 on Twitter spreadsheet and Rayon is number 378 on Twitter spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; BillionAir. Bounty manager; CryptopreneurBrainboss. Jembe is number 42 on Twitter spreadsheet and Rayon is number 459 on Twitter spreadsheet.

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Baby Queen
FahriZah

Proof:
Baby Queen
[Achieve]

FahriZah
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication multiple times, but i don't think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person, these two users always register for the same bounty and they use the same pattern.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; PoseiSwap. Bounty manager; julerz12. Baby Queen is number 132 on Twitter spreadsheet and FahriZah is number 139 on Twitter spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; Hexhash.xyz . Bounty manager; julerz12. Baby Queen is number 459 on Twitter spreadsheet and FahriZah is number 285 on Twitter spreadsheet.

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

monkeydluffy_1
naruto007

Proof:
monkeydluffy_1
[Achieve]

naruto007
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication twice, it could be a coincidence but I have a feeling that two different independent accounts cannot repeat the same mistakes.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; COMBO Network ex COCOS-BCX . Bounty manager; irfan_pak10. monkeydluffy_1 is number 275 on Twitter spreadsheet and naruto007 is number 295 on Twitter spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; BillionAir. Bounty manager; CryptopreneurBrainboss. monkeydluffy_1 is number 435 on Twitter spreadsheet and naruto007 is number 440 on Twitter spreadsheet.

Your link doesn't show the same link as the ones referenced in the posts above.

---

---

As you can see even we can overlook an item and a person will be incorrectly tagged as has happened here.  This is why newbies and Junior members are banned from posting investigations because they make this mistake more often than not.

This link:


We have a new number twelve:

12. Zeshan275

Proof:

https://ninjastic.space/search?content=waris363

naeeskera really does use the term first:



https://ninjastic.space/post/59192087

Zeshan275's post:  (the entire post has been deleted)


Zeshan275 has been tagged by @CryptopreneurBrainboss as having multiple alts, so it's unlikely to be a false positive there either.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5384578.0;dt - @YOSHIE is the author


Miscellaneous:

As these UID's are tied to the others above, they are all guilty of ban evasion.

I did some digging, but I could not find any blockchain evidence that ties GoldenView to those other alts. It appears to be a false positive.

Sorry about that, @GoldenView! I have edited the reference post and removed the tag from your profile. Moving forward, I recommend that you tag the accounts you come across using your links or social media profiles. This will help investigators and campaign managers to avoid such misunderstandings in the future.

Check the previous feedback left for naeeskera:


They did not, GoldenView was the first one to link the channel.

https://ninjastic.space/search?content=MRCryptoAnalyzer

@Stalker22 is there blockchain evidence that ties GoldenView to these other alts?