Topic: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk IV (2022 Q3) [MODERATED] - page 13. (Read 41032 times)

To
The Forum administration.
Subject: Application for the red tag remove.

Honourable sir,
With due respect to known Alts of anyone a user generated list MK IV ( 2023 Q2)

My BTT username  Shahinbd has been red tag.
Issa56 team has made a report against Shahibd.
I have announced.I don’t  bounty cheating and lier. I have cleared my BTT name Shahinbd but it is not my userID Xavier pz

Please  see the proof on complaints bounty work link :
Week 6
https://imgur.com/a/hT4s9QC

Week 7
https://imgur.com/a/aOrVcP1

I don’t used her wallets address. See the above screenshot pictures. Please Justice It's and remove my red tag.


I want justice for forum.
Please check it and taken your red tag
and give me a work opportunity.
Thanks

If accounts are found engaging in cheating or doing other shady stuff, it makes sense to give them a negative tag. However, if there are no such issues, a neutral tag would be more appropriate. Just so you know, having multiple alt accounts on the forum isn't against the rules.

the comment you use for the negative tag you provide shows an account connection. whereas having multiple accounts is allowed as long as you don't use them to cheat in the same campaign which is against campaign manager rules. that's what you haven't presented in your catch proof.

That being said, if your capture only refers to account connections that weren't proven to be cheating in the campaign, then a neutral tag is sufficient.
but if you show evidence of cheating in your campaign, you can negatively tag it.

and for proof of the Twitter social media account that you mentioned cannot be evidence of an evasion ban account report. That's because the user @SaimExch is the last user of the Twitter account. and he has been banned. whereas previous users who used the Twitter social media account, @Waleedhaji and @Waleedzain323 have not been banned.

so as long as you can't show cheating by the three accounts, you can change your negative tag to Neutral with a connected account comment.

I can't understand, so you're saying that feedback on the trust page about some accounts having alts should be written in a neutral style? If my memory serves me right, I've come across such reviews in a negative style. So it turns out that this is wrong and you still need to write a neutral feedback?


If that applies to me, I apologize.

There are things that are interesting and suspicious for both accounts, for example: the @virasisog account, it seems he has a lot of dead Alt here, that can be proven from the ETH address used in the Bounty campaign by: @kacakkipri and @virasisog.

And can also be seen from @kacakkipri's trust list.


Proof:

Post by: @virasisog
[ Archive ]

Although between @virasisog and @virasog, haven't found any proof that they are Alt, but I'm a little curious for both of them, a few percent of my hunch leads them to be the same, still without valid evidence the argument isn't straight.

Or we can see something else new about them, to break the hunch.

---

---

On the other hand I can see about @virasog, he sent ETH to @Qunenin, strong suspicion that they are Alt or the account is being sold, it can be seen from the trust that is owned by: @Qunenin.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=698772


Proof of transactions that they do.

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x80a893e9503e3e756a78445e4a328db6a1ae297112d4a27b315ae0e7313ec4f2



Post by: @virasisog
[ Archive ]

For that, if we explore deeper, we can get @Qunenin, connected to the Alt account linked to @virasisog above.

for that the proof linked by @virasisog with the Alt above and the proof linked by @virasisog with @Qunenin, can say they both @virasisog @virasog are Alt, since the Alt above and below are connected, looks like additional proof is needed to strengthen the proof both are Alt.

Next time, please start a thread for your fishing expedition and only post in this thread when you are able to present evidence of connected alts.

---

---

light_warrior please read and reply to this post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62485294

I couldn't find a match for the addresses. What I did find is that they both like to write in the Gambling section

https://ninjastic.space/user/virasog
https://ninjastic.space/user/virasisog

Both love gambling and playing it

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17118702
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49308697

Both learned about bitcoin by accident

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17180951
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52734225

Figured out that you can make money on bitcoin at the same age

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16350166
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5399573

Both are just over thirty years old

Virasog is now 32
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16350166

virasisog was in his 30s in 2022, according to him
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.60427121

Both prefer poker to other games

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51117886
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16548777

virasog is co-owner of some Brazilian company but couldn't find a match with virasisog on this subject

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16273508

It is clear that all this is subjective. And this information can in no way say that these two accounts are connected.

Continuation from the other locked thread. The connection is definitely solid as part of the farm woke up again and started bumping a scam looking trading signal ANN thread


Accounts that bumped the thread:

Archive - https://ninjastic.space/topic/5456653

OP - Gatyre1
1. BreDvarD
2. PancherSh
3. Aptekary
4. MidnightWolf
5. AngellSky
6. atjiat

Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)



NEW Diya5588


Proof:






Reporting:

I have marked these user's trust feedback pages with distrust.

Related Addresses:


Miscellaneous:

• More alt accounts from a known bounty cheater.
• Ban evasion.
  

Does anyone know anything about these accounts? They both applied for one of the campaign that I manage, but the similarity of the names does not mean the connection between the accounts.

- https://ninjastic.space/user/virasog
- https://ninjastic.space/user/virasisog

- I took a closer look and I see that their accounts were registered with an interval of 5 days.
- They are both interested in ETH mining.
- Both learned about bitcoin at the age of 25 (both love poker)
- Both admitted that they gamble a lot.
- With an interval of several days (in June 2016), they apply for participation in different campaigns.

Although I did not check the similarity for BTC addresses.

Thanks for your report. I notice you've given these users negative trust feedback but haven't stated what their scam is. Can I just ask what their scam is?

E.g.

If they haven't signed up for the same campaign then the only other thing is you have shown SaimExch in red implying ban evasion. If so, then under miscellaneous you should mention their ban evasion and in your trust feedback also state the ban evasion.

If not, then a neutral trust feedback is appropriate to indicate they are alts, but haven't been found to have scammed.

SaimExch has been active within the last six hours too. (And yes, on bpip.org I can see they are banned) 🚫

Thanks again.

3: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Waleedhaji
2. Waleedzain323
3. SaimExch

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Twitter profile link:

3: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. SaimExch
2. AHMEDATIF
3. Taripullah

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Twitter profile link:

3 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. nesty
2. ammo121810
3. axxo


Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

merit exchange:

https://bpip.org/Profile?id=1059990
https://bpip.org/Profile?p=axxo

Three alternate accounts participate in the company signature using AI tools.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62473819

RTYUI23
MNBVC83
Gdhdhd668
Mon4
Jomunanodirpar9023

Proof:
Rpg66
[Achieve]

RTYUI23
[Achieve]

MNBVC83
[Achieve]

Rt12
[Achieve]

Gdhdhd668
[Achieve]

Mon4
[Achieve]

Jomunanodirpar9023
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These nine users have registered the same bounty, from my research i think these nine accounts are operated by one person.

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

hridoy95
Murshalin95

Proof:
hridoy95
[Achieve]

Murshalin95
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet when submitting report, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; GlobeDex. Bounty manager; julerz12. hridoy95 is number 187 on Twitter spreadsheet and Murshalin95 is number 110 on Twitter spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; The $DONS. Bounty manager; BountyDetective. hridoy95 is number 770 on Twitter spreadsheet and Murshalin95 is number 58 on Twitter spreadsheet.
 

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

ROCKDEEbassist
chua

Proof:
ROCKDEEbassist
[Achieve]

chua
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of authentication, but i don't think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; BillionAir. Bounty manager; CryptopreneurBrainboss. ROCKDEEbassist  is number 593 on Twitter spreadsheet and chua  is number 596 on Twitter spreadsheet.

 

---

3 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Kilab
Gama@
Laite

Proof:
Kilab
[Achieve]

Gama@
[Achieve]

Laite
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These three users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these three accounts are operated by one person.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; The $DONS. Bounty manager; BountyDetective. Kilab is number 748 on Twitter spreadsheet, Gama@ is number 895 on Twitter spreadsheet and Laite is number 487 on Twitter spreadsheet.
 

---

You are free to PM me.

Little Villain also uses these telegram handles:



while Heart Broken uses the LittleVillain/Littlevillain28 telegram handle:


as well as the Tabassumafrin007 telegram handle

There will probably be other connections.


Can I PM you, please?

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Little Villain
Heart Broken

Proof:
Little Villain
[Achieve]

Heart Broken
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication multiple times, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; Vinci Token. Bounty manager; Cryptoworldman. Heart Broken is number 126 on Twitter spreadsheet and Little Villainz is number 12 on Twitter spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; The OGz Club. Bounty manager; BountyDetective. Heart Broken is number 541 on Twitter spreadsheet and Little Villainz is number 531 on Twitter spreadsheet.
 

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

habibkhan100
yousufkhan100

Proof:
habibkhan100
[Achieve]

yousufkhan100
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication multiple times, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; Bitnity - Crypto Casino. Bounty manager; julerz12. habibkhan100 is number 75 on Twitter spreadsheet and yousufkhan100 is number 360 on Twitter spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; The $DONS. Bounty manager; BountyDetective. habibkhan100 is number 488 on Twitter spreadsheet and yousufkhan100 is number 788 on Twitter spreadsheet.
 

---

3 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Blx77
KkLlTt
Torekhaisi9


Proof:
Blx77
[Achieve]

KkLlTt
[Achieve]

Torekhaisi9
[Achieve]


Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These three users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these three accounts are operated by one person. Blx77 and KkLlTt accounts was created the last day Torekhaisi9 was active on the forum here.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; The $DONS. Bounty manager; BountyDetective. Blx77 is number 101 on Telegram spreadsheet, KkLlTt is number 30 on Telegram spreadsheet and Torekhaisi9 is number 0 on Telegram spreadsheet.

 

---

3 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

sagormondol9074
vanumitra01
sagormondol

Proof:
sagormondol9074
[Achieve]

vanumitra01
https://ninjastic.space/post/62061132[/color]][Achieve]

sagormondol
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
Bounty cheater and Ban invasion.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; Biokript Round 2. Bounty manager; julerz12. sagormondol9074 is number 197 on Twitter spreadsheet,  vanumitra01 is number 173 on Twitter spreadsheet and sagormondol number 0 on Twitter spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; Soil . Bounty manager; julerz12. sagormondol9074 is number 204 on Twitter spreadsheet,  vanumitra01 is number 187 on Twitter spreadsheet and sagormondol number 0 on Twitter spreadsheet.

Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Filamumut
2. AdeliciaCalista
3. GhalibahMardhatillah
4. Maxime Gonalons
5. Balqis Bahiyyah
6. Lilla Puspita
7. Tosin Adarabioyo
8. Saofit Sunendar
9. DzakiraAftani
10. Lucas Vazquez
11. Lexsa
12. GhadahRahimah
13. Cherly Juno
14. AssyfatuHaifa

Proof:













Reporting:

I have marked these user's trust feedback pages with distrust.

Related Addresses:


Miscellaneous:

• More alt accounts from a known bounty cheater.
• Ban evasion.
  

2: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Gorib112
2. Topfan 420

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses: