Topic: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk IV (2022 Q3) [MODERATED] - page 12. (Read 41032 times)

If the author of the topic does not mind, I would like to comment on this post.

First, you are misquoting the posts. Quotes should contain a link to the post you are quoting, so that anyone who wants to can go and see the post.

For example (quote from your post):

As you can see, the post you quoted is different from the one currently on the forum. Thus, you are misleading forum users.

Second, ninjastic links are not suitable as an archive. The link to the actual post, not the ninjastic post, should be as an archive. You can archive a post (topic) using well-known archivers such as archive.is or web.archive.org

Well, thirdly, I once wrote that:

Maybe this is just such a case

what's wrong with me.🙄 @Mix$$01 and @Mixpip01 they copied my proof.  Where is my fault here? Why should I be considered a cheater for someone else? I am ready to do whatever it takes to prove my innocence.  I will always say I am innocent.
You notice well.  None of them joined the bounty.  Just posted on the forum.  So I think they probably copied my evidence by mistake.  Or they are trying to trick me.  Please investigate thoroughly.  Here I am innocent sir.

From a very cursory glance I've counted at least two other user profiles that use


for twitter and facebook profile details (and at least one UID with that term in their profile name).

I'm not convinced.

Fix up your quote by removing the non relevant portions of Isss56's investigation or I will delete it along with any other posts you make.

2: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Balmarka$22
2. Madu$11

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses and Telegram Username:

Miscellaneous:

Since the post written by Balmarka$22 has not been edited, I think the user just mixed up his alts.

I should do that more frequently than I do, I would guess there are more than just two examples that need to be addressed.  We all evolve through out our journey on this forum.

However, out of the two that you referenced the first one is fresh in my memory and I think it's pretty darn accurate.  I don't see any need to revise it, other than maybe reference the thread where he wanted to sell use as collateral a $250 iPhone for a $500 loan.  The second one you referenced I agree it seems rather weak, so yeah I'll take a look at it.



I'll take a look as time permits, and let you know in PM if I think anything needs to be reviewed.  No need to pour salt on old wounds out in public.

As do I.

As I said to The Sceptical Chymist they are critical of other user's trust feedbacks yet of their own 3,050+ trust feedbacks there are many of the type they are critical of. I have given examples of more than a dozen at a time The Sceptical Chymist has done, so they are not isolated incidents. I have suggested The Sceptical Chymist needs to trim their own trust feedbacks down to about 400 maximum using the ten questions I posed a couple of weeks ago.

This is the type of negative trust feedback others have started threads against me in the past then the DT echo chamber sings in a lipsinc chorus...


A similar post


May I suggest again that you go back and review your own 344 trust feedbacks, please based on my post to The Sceptical Chymist, please?

---

---

With regards to negatives on alts I can only suggest you look back over the last few pages as the issue came up and each of us has chimed in to remind a newer contributor that having alts does not mean they are out to scam.

Any negative trust feedback on alts has been where there is a solid connection for claiming in a campaign etc.

Feel free to review ALL of my ~350 trust feedback and tell me where they are wrong.

3 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Sifat01
Mix$$01
Mixpip01

Proof:
Sifat01
[Achieve]

Mix$$01
[Achieve]

Mixpip01
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These three users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet multiple times, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these three accounts are operated by one person.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; The $DONS. Bounty manager; BountyDetective. Sifat01 is number 122 on Twitter spreadsheet, Mix$$01 is number 788 on Telegram spreadsheet and Mixpip01  is number 0 on Twitter spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; RADA - Making Changes in Football with Blockchain. Bounty manager; julerz12. Sifat01 is number 179 on Telegram spreadsheet, Mix$$01 is number 340 on Telegram spreadsheet and Mixpip01  is number 0 on Telegram spreadsheet.

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Gucci12
Siam20

Proof:
Gucci12
[Achieve]

Siam20
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet multiple times, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; RydeSwap . Bounty manager; BountyDetective. Gucci12 is number 47 on Twitter spreadsheet and Siam20 is number 15 on Twitter spreadsheet.

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Swieetboyhood66
Lezyboyhoodson88

Proof:
Swieetboyhood66
[Achieve]

Lezyboyhoodson88
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet multiple times, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; The $DONS. Bounty manager; BountyDetective. Swieetboyhood66 is number 873 on Twitter spreadsheet and Lezyboyhoodson88 is number 803 on Twitter spreadsheet.

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

edisonali
Uzzalroy

Proof:
edisonali
[Achieve]

Uzzalroy
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet twice, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; RydeSwap. Bounty manager; BountyDetective. edisonali is number 467 on Twitter spreadsheet and Uzzalroy is number 477 on Twitter spreadsheet.

Sorry, I missed that post you wrote to The Sceptical Chymist, so I'm not sure to what you're referring.  As for tagging alts of known scammers, of course I'm in support of that, given the evidence linking the accounts is compelling enough that a reasonable person would be left without a doubt.  I left that post in Poker Player's thread rather brief on purpose, because there seems to be this attitude among some DT members than anyone with an undisclosed alt is up to something nefarious.  I find that assumption simply absurd.

2: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Alex Joe
2. Khalilan

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses and Telegram Username:

Thank you for your post, it's thoughtful and concise.

I was wanting to respond to something you posted in the poker player thread concerning trust feedback where you mention slapping negative feedback on alts.

Unfortunately, Poker Player locked that thread before I could point out that investigators here in this thread have a policy of negative against alts ONLY where there is evidence the alts have scanned e.g. claiming from the same campaign.

I was also going to suggest in that thread you go back and review your legacy trust feedback posts in the same way I suggested The Sceptical Chymist needs to review their legacy posts - alas, my suggestion to them fell on deaf ears.  

2: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Dorimon45
2. Btc.06

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses and Telegram Username:

You've been a member of this forum for almost 4 years, you've made over 6k posts, and have yet to earn a single merit.  But you think it's the recently exposed red-tags that are keeping you from having work opportunities?  Wow.

Two and a half years ago you were tagged for plagerism but only now want to bellyache because you've been slapped for having been identified as having an alt two weeks ago?