Topic: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk IV (2022 Q3) [MODERATED] - page 12. (Read 37880 times)

2: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. AGUNG PRATAMA
2. romeo senja

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

It looks like the user mixed up their accounts and posting information to the wrong account. But he didn't correct it.

Even if what you claim is true, your explanation falls apart when you consider that two or more users participate in campaigns using the same wallet addresses and social media accounts. How do you explain the connection between two accounts if not that they are owned by the same user or group?


The whole point of this thread is to expose cheaters like you: greedy and selfish jerks who take advantage of their fellow campaign participants.

Since it wont show as it wont show as red that was why i didn't even tag all my findings, but since you have corrected me then i will start tagging them.

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

juthimukarji
allahhafeez

Proof:
juthimukarji
[Achieve]

allahhafeez
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication twice, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person, these two users always register for the same bounty and they use the same pattern.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; OzoneChain. Bounty manager; sujonali1819. juthimukarji is number 33 on Twitter spreadsheet and allahhafeez is number 4 on Twitter spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; BillionAir. Bounty manager; CryptopreneurBrainboss. juthimukarji is number 363 on Twitter spreadsheet and allahhafeez is number 224 on Twitter spreadsheet.

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Xavier pz
Shahinbd

Proof:
Xavier pz
[Achieve]

Shahinbd
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet to submit work multiple times, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person, these two users always register for the same bounty and they use the same pattern.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; The OGz Club. Bounty manager; BountyDetective. Xavier pz is number 406 on Facebook spreadsheet and Shahinbd is number 351 on Facebook spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; BillionAir. Bounty manager; CryptopreneurBrainboss. Xavier pz is number 307 on Twitter spreadsheet and Shahinbd is number 64 on Twitter spreadsheet.

---

That so found of him any once mistake done at bounty registration he took it up to report and it won't check may be transactions of  those wallet have been connected once before,in my county here we do have a WhatsApp group which we posted Bounties update and we do beg gas fee from each other to move out tokens for sale and return back to the address which we borrowed it from.. though I don't blame him that only what he did to gets all his merit to this level he flagged me when his was a senior member now hero and you guys keep giving him power to do more... Lol😂

so after you made the mistake of using someone else's wallet in bounty registration. maybe coincidentally your social media is also used by the same person in the bounty report.

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]


and maybe another coincidence that the addresses of your two accounts are also connected to each other.
https://bscscan.com/tx/0x2fac3232800862c4633eeded81833a189a54020f0cb9e0673e725e7e238f763b



@Issa56 I don't know why you didn't tag your findings as you did before.
tag them even though it won't show up in red, but it will help in future investigations if possible.
for those two accounts, I'll tag them.

Were you paid to the "wrong" address?

If so, what steps did you take to recover those funds?

Issa56
I don't really know why you're so against me but I common mistake you took advantage of me, someone text me his wallet to make a transaction which doesn't work out later, but I mistakenly paste it because it was save on my clipboard,and when I'm registering for a project and now you're saying we're same operation, you're talking about participating in same project, is that normal for all Bounty hunters.
I think multiple people would have make same mistakes like that because to me wallet address looks same that if you're in rush to register mistake can happen.
I hope you all should review this and proof me.

Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)



5. balqis adzra
6. Drie Wananta
7. Christina Kaisiri
8. DhaifahKeyshaSalsabil
9. Ejalumi
10. Wujudwajud

Proof:









Reporting:

I have marked these user's trust feedback pages with distrust.

Related Addresses:


Miscellaneous:

• Another alt account from a known bounty cheater.
• Ban evasion.
  

So what have I been doing for the past week?  Well, I've been reviewing my trust feedbacks and trimming the number of posts made.

This time last week I had a couple of dozen more than 3,000 trust feedbacks that I had placed on other UID's, plus sixty "flag created" posts which I have no control over.  Of the 3,000 trustfeedbacks left for others, some 90% to 95% have received negatives from others while of the remaining 5% - 10% about half had been nuked or were otherwise inactive (usually with an accusation against them).

A full third of the 90% - 95% had been banned.

So, to ensure my trust feedbacks are both accurate and relevant in five sessions over the last week I have deleted approx. 2,650 of my prior trust feedbacks and now have approx 350 remaining (plus the aforementioned sixty "flag" comments).  They were no longer relevant. As I said, a third have been banned while the rest have (usually multiple) negative trust feedbacks from others.  Although my comments were usually the first, others following have in a lot of instances copied my comments verbatim, so they live on and are unlikely to be removed.  

I could have easily just left them, but I can only pass on what I have done together with the suggestion that anyone reading considers taking on the same approach by asking yourselves a few quick questions?

Q. Is the UID banned or nuked (zero posts is usually a good indication they have been nuked) - A. Yes --> Your post probably doesn't need to remain in place.  Consider removing it.

Q.  Have you provided a link to a post or archive service back up of the post as "evidence" of your assertion?  A.  No -->  You may need to remove the post as you trust feedback may not be able to be substantiated.

Q.  Have you posted a short phrase such as "Scammer"  "Known Scammer"  "There is a scam accusation against this user" "I don't trust this user"  (even with a reason). A Yes -->  They may well be a scammer, but if someone else has posted a more substantial trust feedback accusation, then your shorter post is only going to be lost on a wall of Red Paint.

Q.  Is the user active?  A. No. -->  How many years has it been since they were last online?  Given what your comment is about, they probably ditched the account.  Suggestion:  If a UID has been offline for as little as three years and you remove your own comment (even if it's the only comment there was on the trust feedback page) when an account reactivates and there is shady activity, then numerous users will observe "This user has recently woken up" which if nothing else can be an orange flag.

Q.  Did you leave a negative for two alts?  A.  Yes.  -->  As a part of your investigation, did you uncover evidence that the two alts participated in claiming from the same campaign/merit or DT abuse/some other actual scam behaviour?  A.  No -->  Two alts who haven't scammed doesn't warrants negative trust feedback (that's been agreed to for quite some time) change the negative to a neutral.

Q.  Is there a flag against this user?  A.  Yes.  There will be a thread covering the allegations against the accused, so you can probably remove those trust feedback posts given the flag itself and other user's negative trust feedbacks will have covered the events.

Q.  Did you leave a positive saying "this person is a great guy/gal - I trust them!"  A. Yes.  Well ... there are some DT who will wiggle their fingers and tell you the trust feedback system is for trades only (but have whole pages of negatives against "scammers" and glowing posts for their circle of friends they think are great guy/gals).  Leaving aside the copious bags of salt for a moment - now is the time to review those glowing trust feedbacks.. You may be surprised to discover some of those glowing trust feedbacks have now gone on to scam.

Q.  Have you left a "This positive/negative trust feedback is to counter X's negative/positive trust feedback?  A.  Yes.  Don't be "That guy" as, in months and years to come, other users will come to realise you counter trust feedback is only due to your being a friend of the one receiving the initial trust/distrust.  Chances are it will prompt users reading YOUR comments will give YOU DT distrust.  Let people figure out whether a person's trust feedback comment is genuine or not based on evidence in a post, not because you're backing or countering someone else.

Q.  How often should I review my trust feedbacks?  A.  Good question.  How many do you do?  How often?  Are they neutral or otherwise? -->  I myself have done similar in the past (but not on this wholesale scale before), so, I might leave it for another six to nine months before I again review my posts.

Q.  What if my own trust feedback post count is even more than yours had at three thousand posts?  A.  Well, that's for you to decide.  "A Journey of a thousand miles begins with one step" aside, may I suggest you start as I did at the oldest trust feedbacks left and sift through and find just those UID's that have been nuked of banned and start with your comments against them.  It may take a while, but you will find a pattern and might just remove 90% of your trust feedbacks as I have done to remain accurate.

As always, comments welcome.

Thanks for reading.

Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)



4. Gunimoto
5. Razimcuy
6. Erma Novela Sabatin
7. Faadhillah Nailah
8. Ricky Tjahyadi
9. DilaraShafiyatunnisa

Proof:








Reporting:

I have marked these user's trust feedback pages with distrust.

Related Addresses:


Miscellaneous:

• Another alt account from a known bounty cheater.
• Ban evasion.
  

Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)




6. BusyraShabiyyah
7. Valentina Awes
8. Fataniah

Proof:





https://ninjastic.space/post/55146113

Reporting:

I have marked these user's trust feedback pages with distrust.

Related Addresses:


Miscellaneous:

• Another alt account from a known bounty cheater.
• Ban evasion.
  

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Questcry
Zazuu01

Proof:
Questcry
[Achieve]

Zazuu01
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication twice, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person, these two users always register for the same bounty and they use the same pattern.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; COMBO Network ex COCOS-BCX. Bounty manager; irfan_pak10. Questcry is number 17 on Twitter spreadsheet and Zazuu01 is number 514 on Twitter spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; BillionAir. Bounty manager; CryptopreneurBrainboss. Questcry is number 119 on Twitter spreadsheet and Zazuu01 is number 140 on Twitter spreadsheet.

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

AlinaAdria
DimitriyMasterov

Proof:
AlinaAdria
[Achieve]

DimitriyMasterov
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication once, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person, these two users always register for the same bounty and they use the same pattern.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; [Bounty 2.0] COMBO Network. Bounty manager; irfan_pak10. AlinaAdria  is number 93 on Twitter spreadsheet and DimitriyMasterov is number 85 on Twitter spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; BillionAir. Bounty manager; CryptopreneurBrainboss. AlinaAdria is number 159 on Twitter spreadsheet and DimitriyMasterov is number 175 on Twitter spreadsheet.

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Lily lewis
Yamina87

Proof:
Lily lewis
[Achieve]

Yamina87
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication once, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person, these two users always register for the same bounty and they use the same pattern.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; COMBO Network ex COCOS-BCX. Bounty manager; irfan_pak10. Lily lewis is number 75 on Twitter spreadsheet and Yamina87 is number 60 on Facebook spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; Stretch To Earn. Bounty manager; BountyDetective. Lily lewis is number 600 on Twitter spreadsheet and Yamina87 is number 575 on Twitter spreadsheet.

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

---

IrynaInna
EvinLewise

Proof:
IrynaInna
[Achieve]

EvinLewise
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication multiple, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person, these two users always register for the same bounty and they use the same pattern.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; COMBO Network ex COCOS-BCX. Bounty manager; irfan_pak10. IrynaInna is number 17 on Twitter spreadsheet and EvinLewise is number 514 on Twitter spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; Starzz. Bounty manager; BountyDetective. IrynaInna is number 342 on Facebook spreadsheet and EvinLewise is number 355 on Facebook spreadsheet.

Nice catch there @    Pandu Geddon - we need to be ever vigilant for scammers who will turn up when you least expect it.

 wizwiz7
 cryptosly
 Unique22

Proof:
https://ninjastic.space/post/44762661

https://ninjastic.space/post/62332345

https://ninjastic.space/post/62151154

Quote Post by cryptosly (delete)
https://ninjastic.space/post/58862823

https://ninjastic.space/post/59987902

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous: Bounty cheater with multiple alts

those alt accounts deserve to be banned. and 3 accounts I mentioned are still actively abusing to join the bounty campaign
[Bounty] OzoneChain | OZO | | Manager: sujonali1819 | SPREADSHEET | Content Writing #92 #95 #99 |

2Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Yhn45
2. Gunafunama

Proof:

[ Archive ]

Post by: Gunafunama
[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

The Alt account above was also caught cheating in the campaign: :[Bounty] OzoneChain | OZO | 5000 USDT Will Be Shared | Weekly Payment | ICO LIVE, managed by: @sujonali1819. Content/article campaign section.

Inside: Spreadsheets also shows the two's underhanded involvement.

---

3 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Kulitkutu
2. DhaifahKeyshaSalsabil
3. BernadettePatriciaMabel

Proof:

[ Archive ]

Post by: DhaifahKeyshaSalsabil
[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

The three of them are proven Alt accounts, based on the addresses used by the three in different campaigns, it can be proven from the Alt account named:@DhaifahKeyshaSalsabil, they use the same BSC address, even though the two addresses are different.

However, two of them commit fraud in the campaign: :[Bounty] OzoneChain | OZO | 5000 USDT Will Be Shared | Weekly Payment | ICO LIVE, in the (Content) section, which is managed by: @sujonali1819.

Written campaign rules:


Linked evidence can be seen above and evidence in: Spreadsheets. Can be seen below.

---

2 Accounts Connected:

1. FaadhillahNailah
2. Opoumbel11

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

Both Alt above, also do the same affair in the campaign: OzoneChain | OZO

The proof of both of them can be seen above and also in the Spreadsheets both are recorded.

---

3 Accounts Connected:

1. AlanaLioraGantari
2. HafizahSyarifah
3. Polislend8

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

The same problem was also carried out by the three tools above, they ignored the rules set by @sujonali1819, as the campaign manager: OzoneChain | OZO. Cheating.

In Spreadsheets the three of them are also recorded as follows.

---

Specifically for the campaign section: content / articles.

No. Don't ask me.

Read the first post. (The both of you)

This thread is not open to everyone. As a newbie, you can post your investigation in a new thread and post a link (once) to this thread. Read the fine print from the OP:

Read carefully what is written in the comment to the deleted post. Your post was deleted not by a moderator, but by the author of the topic. The topic is self-moderated so it can do that. Ask him why he didn't like your post and deleted it.

I've just noticed he's taken out a loan in the last 24 hours which is probably why he's very tetchy that we don't find out he has THREE BANNED ACCOUNTS!

---

---