Pages:
Author

Topic: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk IV (2022 Q3) [MODERATED] - page 12. (Read 41500 times)

staff
Activity: 2436
Merit: 2347
Well, I was just going to ask when the user was banned and what was the reasoning behind that?

I have checked and unfortunately did not find the reason for banning this user. I am unfortunately limited by my status to find such information. And since it was a long time ago, it is useless to ask global moderators, it is unlikely that any of them will remember this particular case.

As for the ban evasion, I completely agree with you.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
@Xal0lex - can I PM you about this post, please?

I read your post. If you're talking about ban evasion, I doubt it. If you want to write about something else, you're welcome. I'm open to all.

Well, I was just going to ask when the user was banned and what was the reasoning behind that?

Why I ask is that as we can see [here] in posts 67 and 68 the user starts two threads:


Both were last edited 16th April, 2018.

The now banned user P2Pfinder last posted on that day.

According to BPIP P2Pfinder has woken up twice but does not shed any light on when they were banned.

Code:
2017-06-28, 22:58:57 Date Registered: 	P2Pfinder

2018-04-19, 17:06:49 - Last post by P2Pfinder

10/1/2021 7:02:19 PM woke up P2Pfinder

1/16/2023 3:47:46 PM woke up P2Pfinder

2023-06-17, 19:54:05Last Active: P2Pfinder

Their avatar as well as the title of the two threads has a distinct capitalization of the "f" in HFx (as in HedgeFx)



In both threads started by P2Pfinder they use the email
Code:
as their contact details.  It's still there.  The email is then used by a second user on more than three separate occasions in unrelated threads:

Hi,

Tell me more about: i've great financial skill and have lot of free time during my trading days.

You should contatc me to [email protected] too


Puoi fornire ulteriori dettagli per chi fosse interessato all'installazione?  Costo, kyc, funzionamento ecc. Puoi scrivermi a [email protected]

Grazie

Interessato per la parte relativa al trading

inviatemi dettagli a [email protected]

HedgeFx is the name in the "HedgeFX Service" started by P2Pfinder and the email contained in that OP is then used by HedgeFX u=2221175 on at least six occasions when replying to other users who are inquiring about that service




On the 2019-11-20 12:16:59 UTC HedgeFX starts a thread which is an exact copy of the two threads started by P2Pfinder

?? HedgeFX Service??

It was scraped by Ninja when the post occurred here: https://ninjastic.space/post/53128526

HedgeFX uses the email six other times, three prior and three after the HedgeFx Services thread was started.

2018-06-19 15:32:32 UTC - email [email protected] used by HedgeFX [HERE] - Archive [1] [2]
2018-06-20 13:12:04 UTC - email [email protected] used by HedgeFX [HERE] - Archive [1] [2]
2018-06-21 10:44:16 UTC - email [email protected] used by HedgeFX [HERE] - Archive [1] [2]

2019-11-20 12:16:59 UTC - Thread started by HedgeFX - https://ninjastic.space/post/53128526 - this is the same word-for-word thread as started twice by P2Pfinder - it was locked on the 2020-10-28 and the contents deleted.

⚡️ Servce Suspended⚡️

2020-02-17 20:20:03 UTC - email [email protected] used by HedgeFX [HERE] - Archive [1] [2]

2021-04-17 17:24:33 UTC - email [email protected] used by HedgeFX [HERE] - Archive [1] [2]
2021-04-17 18:20:53 UTC - email [email protected] used by HedgeFX [HERE] - Archive [1] [2]

At least seven times HedgeFx uses the email posted by P2Pfinder - this is no copy paste accident - three times prior and three more after they recreated the thread P2Pfinder had started.

In addition, both use the term

Code:
hallo

https://ninjastic.space/search?author=P2Pfinder&content=hallo
https://ninjastic.space/search?author=HedgeFx&content=hallo

Conclusion:

Ban Evasion: HedgeFx u=2221175 is the alt of banned user P2Pfinder u=1047338 through their shared use of the email [email protected] and identical "HedgeFX Trading & Investments" thread to scam others with ponzi like offers.




2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

P2Pfinder, HedgeFX,

Proof:

As above

Reporting:

These alts have been reported by me in the "[Report] Ban Evasion [Requesting Admin/mod to check those and ban]" thread for ban evasion - I will shortly.

I have marked these user's trust feedback pages with distrust

Related Addresses:

Code:
Telegram: HedgeFx

Miscellaneous:

The louder the scammer screams - the deeper the hole they dig for themselves.




2: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Kokruu
2. FlexxycDz

...

What's wrong? Alts? Alts. Maybe they'll wake up tomorrow.

FlexxycDz  woke up 5/20/2023 10:51:15 AM    woke up https://bpip.org/Profile?id=3482156

Kokruu Last Active:    2023-05-20, 21:06:10 (GMT +10) https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kokruu-3523427;dt - Archive [1] [2]

Connection Confirmed.

(Don't forget to leave them *neutral* trust feedback).

(And *always* archive your investigations!)
copper member
Activity: 588
Merit: 926
2: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Kokruu
2. FlexxycDz

Proof:

~snip~
You can ask me about any other cam sites in Discord

Payment modes : BTC/ETH/Any Crypto

Contact DISCORD : Kokruuuu#8887

[ Archive ]

~snip~
You can ask me about any other cam sites in Discord

Payment modes : BTC/ETH/Any Crypto

Contact DISCORD : kokruuuu
[ Archive ]

Related Discord:
Code:
kokruuuu

Miscellaneous:

Another proof that these accounts are managed by the same person is that they have exactly the same topics.

[Selling] Chaturbate, OnlyFans and more adult website site tokens
[Selling] Chaturbate, OnlyFans and more adult website site tokens



Which of these accounts is currently active and of interest?

What's wrong? Alts? Alts. Maybe they'll wake up tomorrow.
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 4265
✿♥‿♥✿
5: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in

Which of these accounts is currently active and of interest?
copper member
Activity: 588
Merit: 926
5: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Cryptochel
2. netditaring
3. bitborg
4. 6ardak
5. bitlborg

Proof:

#Proof of authentication
Twitter profile: https://twitter.com/BanHolly
Telegram username: @Billymillygun
[ Archive ]

#Proof of Authentication
Telegram Username: @Billymillygun
Bitcointalk Username: netditaring
Telegram campaign
[ Archive ]

Proof of authentication
Bitcointalk Username: bitborg
Telegram Username: @Billymillygun
Twitter Username: @BanHolly
ETH Wallet: 0x91d9EBcC2C25A4ec579a5b0F31bd1D0cb2Df4E65
[ Archive ]

Campaign : Telegram Advertising Campaign
●   Bitcointalk username: Cryptochel
●   ETH Wallet Address: 0x087A630Be025795156B7aFc373D6ca77082BC502
●   Telegram Username:@Billymillygun
●   Post Links
https://t.me/bablo_ico/1900
https://t.me/bablo_ico/1914
[ Archive ]

#Proof of Authentication
Your telegram username: @Billymillygun
Which Campaign You Joined: YouTube
YouTube channel link: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqMnU4UPClWOnKaq3rFcgzw
Video link: https://youtu.be/wqsO4B3iUh0
[ Archive ]

Related Telegram Username:
Code:
@Billymillygun

Miscellaneous:

Cryptochel seems to have two more inactive alts in reserve. In any case, their nicknames are very similar to Cryptochel's.

1. Cryptochella
2. Cryptochelle

P.S. These are just my thoughts.
copper member
Activity: 588
Merit: 926
2: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Jonaki50sa
2. LACKME666

Proof:

~snip~
Discord Campaign
Discord User Name: Mahmud#3515
[ Archive ]

~snip~
Discord Campaign
Discord username: Mahmud#3515
[ Archive ]

Related Discord username:
Code:
Mahmud#3515
staff
Activity: 2436
Merit: 2347
I dont know maybe i answered your question.

No, you didn't.

First, I didn't say anywhere that the accounts were unrelated. I didn't check because it doesn't violate forum rules, hence it doesn't concern me.

Second, I'm saying that using ninjastic as proof of anything is wrong. As far as I know, moderators don't accept ninjastic as evidence. What is accepted as evidence is information that is specifically on the forum. For example, if you report plagiarism or ban evasion, and link to ninjastic as evidence, the report will be rejected. But, to use such links among the forum community, please, no one forbids it.

Well, thirdly, I said that using ninjastic as an archive is also wrong. Links to archives, real archives, I pointed out above. With the correction from Timelord2067, it is archive.today or web.archive.org.

You used trickery in your post, providing information from ninjastic instead of the forum. You should have done as I described, and in "Miscellaneous" you should have explained the situation, and the forum community would have decided whether you were right or wrong.

P.S. I'm not defending anyone. It's just my opinion.

@Xal0lex - can I PM you about this post, please?

I read your post. If you're talking about ban evasion, I doubt it. If you want to write about something else, you're welcome. I'm open to all.
newbie
Activity: 336
Merit: 0
Hello Issa56!
I participate in the eTukTuk bounty
My twitter number is 138
Name in Bitcointalk - Vladimir Kw
Link to my BitcoinTalk account - https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/vladimir-kw-1307411
Registration confirmation -  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62403387

Here is my account -
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/vladimir-kw-1307411
I have nothing to do with this account.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/allahhafeez-3541841
What do I need to do now?


Why did you set up a red trust for me? I am an honest and decent person. Check me again. You did not act fairly with me.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓

what's wrong with me.🙄 @Mix$$01 and @Mixpip01 they copied my proof.  Where is my fault here? Why should I be considered a cheater for someone else? I am ready to do whatever it takes to prove my innocence.  I will always say I am innocent.
You notice well.  None of them joined the bounty.  Just posted on the forum.  So I think they probably copied my evidence by mistake.  Or they are trying to trick me.  Please investigate thoroughly.  Here I am innocent sir.

if they accidentally copied your POA, did you also accidentally send them bnb for them when they wanted to sell their tokens?
maybe you are too generous, or indeed this is another coincidence.

https://bscscan.com/tx/0x6d75454195734daf8f5d63c1b4240f1590f65ea0b648930f42ea700cb11339cf

Quote
0xfc38fbcda185ea1940354606740a696fc2370208 : Sifat01 / Mixpip01 / Mix$$01
0xe94a3a7f6603b2d72c352581bb7bbbbcfe4399b8 : Mix$$01

so do you still want to say that your accounts are not connected due to a coincidence mistake in using POA?
In cases like this, there is indeed a possibility that they (bounty hunters) entered their details incorrectly as they are simply copying and pasting to quickly register a bounty campaign. but proof of blockchain connection can strengthen the evidence.

Searching the Forum - as the posts are now:

From a locked thread:

Mix$$01 uses the wallet address just once:

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username:Mix$$01
Forum Profile Link:https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/mix01-3531525
Telegram Username:@sifat699
Participated Campaigns:Twitter, telegram, Tiktok
BSC Wallet Address:0xfc38fbcDA185EA1940354606740a696Fc2370208

Sifat01 uses the same wallet address about 50 times:

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username:Sifat01
Forum Profile Link:https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/sifat01-3499015
Telegram Username:@tamim499
Participated Campaigns:Twitter, telegram, Tiktok
BSC Wallet Address:0xfc38fbcDA185EA1940354606740a696Fc2370208

Code:
0xe94a3a7f6603b2d72c352581bb7bbbbcfe4399b8

is used ONLY by Mix$$01 a couple of dozen times.

PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username:Mix$$01
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/mix01-3531525
Telegram Username: @sakib30400
Participated Campaigns:Twitter, telegram, Tiktok
BSC Wallet Address:0xe94a3a7f6603b2D72c352581bb7bBbBCFe4399B8


Code:
tamim499

is only used by Sifat01 a couple of dozen times.

Code:
sakib30400

Is used just six times by Mix$$01




Conclusion:

I am not convinced.





@Xal0lex - can I PM you about this post, please?
copper member
Activity: 588
Merit: 926
2: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. DenisReach
2. EOS_ext

Proof:

0x4B7468469F71709f0e89E663d551Bf1649B4484F
[ Archive ]

Bitcointalk Username: EOS_ext
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/eosext-1326507
Telegram: @TIzCoin (https://t.me/TIzCoin)
0x4B7468469F71709f0e89E663d551Bf1649B4484F
[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:
Code:
0x4B7468469F71709f0e89E663d551Bf1649B4484F
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 583

what's wrong with me.🙄 @Mix$$01 and @Mixpip01 they copied my proof.  Where is my fault here? Why should I be considered a cheater for someone else? I am ready to do whatever it takes to prove my innocence.  I will always say I am innocent.
You notice well.  None of them joined the bounty.  Just posted on the forum.  So I think they probably copied my evidence by mistake.  Or they are trying to trick me.  Please investigate thoroughly.  Here I am innocent sir.

if they accidentally copied your POA, did you also accidentally send them bnb for them when they wanted to sell their tokens?
maybe you are too generous, or indeed this is another coincidence.

https://bscscan.com/tx/0x6d75454195734daf8f5d63c1b4240f1590f65ea0b648930f42ea700cb11339cf

Quote
0xfc38fbcda185ea1940354606740a696fc2370208 : Sifat01 / Mixpip01 / Mix$$01
0xe94a3a7f6603b2d72c352581bb7bbbbcfe4399b8 : Mix$$01

so do you still want to say that your accounts are not connected due to a coincidence mistake in using POA?
In cases like this, there is indeed a possibility that they (bounty hunters) entered their details incorrectly as they are simply copying and pasting to quickly register a bounty campaign. but proof of blockchain connection can strengthen the evidence.
hero member
Activity: 1484
Merit: 928
I had a similar thought, but was wondering perhaps they don't have the BPIP extension to enable them to copy to clipboard from locked threads.
Yes you are right.

That's the thing: all the quoted posts are in UNblocked topics.
After submitting proof of authentication and making mistake, some them will end up editing the proof of authentication, and some might even delete it. If am copying the proof of authentication just as you recommended, then its their new wallet address that will be reflecting not the one they mistakenly submitted.

And that is why I do not understand the actions of Issa56. There's nothing stopping him from going in and copying the post quotes into his own post. And then maybe he would be able to notice that the posts are different from each other in terms of addresses. And one post has no address at all.

1. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62319905
2. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.61822356
3. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62404024
If you can scan this wallet [ 0xfc38fbcDA185EA1940354606740a696Fc2370208 ] You will see that the their are three accounts connected to this account, and each account have used the wallet for proof of authentication more than twice.
Sifat01 (169)
Mix$$01 (6)
Mixpip01 (3)

I dont know maybe i answered your question.
staff
Activity: 2436
Merit: 2347
I had a similar thought, but was wondering perhaps they don't have the BPIP extension to enable them to copy to clipboard from locked threads.

That's the thing: all the quoted posts are in UNblocked topics. And that is why I do not understand the actions of Issa56. There's nothing stopping him from going in and copying the post quotes into his own post. And then maybe he would be able to notice that the posts are different from each other in terms of addresses. And one post has no address at all.

1. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62319905
2. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.61822356
3. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62404024
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
3 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

If the author of the topic does not mind, I would like to comment on this post.

Not at all - I've been on the road for the last week and haven't been able to give this thread my full attention.

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username:Mix$$01
Forum Profile Link:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3531525
Telegram Username:@
Participated Campaigns:Twitter, telegram, Tiktok
BSC Wallet Address:0xe94a3a7f6603b2D72c352581bb7bBbBCFe4399B8

As you can see, the post you quoted is different from the one currently on the forum. Thus, you are misleading forum users.

I had a similar thought, but was wondering perhaps they don't have the BPIP extension to enable them to copy to clipboard from locked threads.

In bounty, some users use previous posts as a sample, they copy that post and then edit it to suit themselves. Ninjastic remembers the post in its original form, which is why such mishaps occur.

Maybe this is just such a case

Yes, I agree and this issue does come up from time to time.  I encourage anyone citing such connections to investigate a user's *entire* post history to ensure such a mistaken connection does not occur.

As I wrote yesterday:

I'm not convinced.

Thanks for stopping by and providing some insight so we can all improve our reports.

Regards,
staff
Activity: 2436
Merit: 2347
3 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

If the author of the topic does not mind, I would like to comment on this post.

First, you are misquoting the posts. Quotes should contain a link to the post you are quoting, so that anyone who wants to can go and see the post.

For example (quote from your post):
#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username:Mix$$01
Forum Profile Link:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3531525
Telegram Username:@
Participated Campaigns:Twitter, telegram, Tiktok
BSC Wallet Address:0xe94a3a7f6603b2D72c352581bb7bBbBCFe4399B8

As you can see, the post you quoted is different from the one currently on the forum. Thus, you are misleading forum users.

Second, ninjastic links are not suitable as an archive. The link to the actual post, not the ninjastic post, should be as an archive. You can archive a post (topic) using well-known archivers such as archive.is or web.archive.org

Well, thirdly, I once wrote that:
In bounty, some users use previous posts as a sample, they copy that post and then edit it to suit themselves. Ninjastic remembers the post in its original form, which is why such mishaps occur.

Maybe this is just such a case
newbie
Activity: 265
Merit: 0
3 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Sifat01
Mix$$01
Mixpip01

Proof:
Sifat01
Quote
#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username:Sifat01
Forum Profile Link:https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/sifat01-3499015
Telegram Username:@Islam449
Participated Campaigns:Twitter, telegram, Tiktok
BSC Wallet Address:0xfc38fbcDA185EA1940354606740a696Fc2370208
[Achieve]

Mix$$01
Quote
#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username:Mix$$01
Forum Profile Link:https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/mix01-3531525
Telegram Username:@
Participated Campaigns:Twitter, telegram, Tiktok
BSC Wallet Address:0xfc38fbcDA185EA1940354606740a696Fc2370208
[Achieve]

Mixpip01
Quote
#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username:Sifat01
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/sifat01-3499015
Telegram Username:@sakib2526
Participated Campaigns:Twitter, telegram, Tiktok
BSC Wallet Address:0xfc38fbcDA185EA1940354606740a696Fc2370208
[Achieve]



what's wrong with me.🙄 @Mix$$01 and @Mixpip01 they copied my proof.  Where is my fault here? Why should I be considered a cheater for someone else? I am ready to do whatever it takes to prove my innocence.  I will always say I am innocent.
You notice well.  None of them joined the bounty.  Just posted on the forum.  So I think they probably copied my evidence by mistake.  Or they are trying to trick me.  Please investigate thoroughly.  Here I am innocent sir.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓

Sir, I think your mistake, for one mistake of yours, I will be rejected from all bounty campaigns. If I can't apply in Bounty Detective's campaign within 5 minutes, the chances of getting approved are very low, so everyone applies together very quickly.

In that case, many people can make many kinds of mistakes. I hope you understand me. Please remove the negative trust. I will be forever grateful to you.

From a very cursory glance I've counted at least two other user profiles that use

Code:
anushreedas

for twitter and facebook profile details (and at least one UID with that term in their profile name).

I'm not convinced.

Fix up your quote by removing the non relevant portions of Isss56's investigation or I will delete it along with any other posts you make.
copper member
Activity: 588
Merit: 926
2: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Balmarka$22
2. Madu$11

Proof:

PROOF OF REGISTRATION#
Forum Username: Madu$11
Forum Profile Link. https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/madu11-3462377
Telegram Username: devilmadu
Participated Campaign: Article Twitter telegram TikTok Facebook
BSC Wallet Address: 0x31cD13A31E9bbb21cC9F1244bBD532D91Edd24d7
[ Archive ]

PROOF OF REGISTRATION#
Forum Username: Madu$11
Forum Profile Link. https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/madu11-3462377
Telegram Username: devilmadu
Participated Campaign: Article TikTok
BSC Wallet Address: 0x31cD13A31E9bbb21cC9F1244bBD532D91Edd24d7
[ Archive ]

Related Addresses and Telegram Username:
Code:
devilmadu
0x31cD13A31E9bbb21cC9F1244bBD532D91Edd24d7

Miscellaneous:

Since the post written by Balmarka$22 has not been edited, I think the user just mixed up his alts.
copper member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 4543
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
May I suggest again that you go back and review your own 344 trust feedbacks, please

I should do that more frequently than I do, I would guess there are more than just two examples that need to be addressed.  We all evolve through out our journey on this forum.

However, out of the two that you referenced the first one is fresh in my memory and I think it's pretty darn accurate.  I don't see any need to revise it, other than maybe reference the thread where he wanted to sell use as collateral a $250 iPhone for a $500 loan.  The second one you referenced I agree it seems rather weak, so yeah I'll take a look at it.


With regards to negatives on alts I can only suggest you look back over the last few pages as the issue came up and each of us has chimed in to remind a newer contributor that having alts does not mean they are out to scam.

Any negative trust feedback on alts has been where there is a solid connection for claiming in a campaign etc.

Feel free to review ALL of my ~350 trust feedback and tell me where they are wrong.

I'll take a look as time permits, and let you know in PM if I think anything needs to be reviewed.  No need to pour salt on old wounds out in public.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
.  I left that post in Poker Player's thread rather brief on purpose, because there seems to be this attitude among some DT members than anyone with an undisclosed alt is up to something nefarious.  I find that assumption simply absurd.

As do I.

As I said to The Sceptical Chymist they are critical of other user's trust feedbacks yet of their own 3,050+ trust feedbacks there are many of the type they are critical of. I have given examples of more than a dozen at a time The Sceptical Chymist has done, so they are not isolated incidents. I have suggested The Sceptical Chymist needs to trim their own trust feedbacks down to about 400 maximum using the ten questions I posed a couple of weeks ago.

This is the type of negative trust feedback others have started threads against me in the past then the DT echo chamber sings in a lipsinc chorus...

Quote
Incorrigible, entitled troll and spammer insisting on being given a loan despite the only collateral he claims to have to offer is an obsolete iPhone that's not worth the amount he wants to borrow, and stolen or hacked identification documents of others.

A similar post

Quote
Troll seeking attention, and obviously an account of someone who's trust is already ruined.

May I suggest again that you go back and review your own 344 trust feedbacks, please based on my post to The Sceptical Chymist, please?




With regards to negatives on alts I can only suggest you look back over the last few pages as the issue came up and each of us has chimed in to remind a newer contributor that having alts does not mean they are out to scam.

Any negative trust feedback on alts has been where there is a solid connection for claiming in a campaign etc.

Feel free to review ALL of my ~350 trust feedback and tell me where they are wrong.
Pages:
Jump to: