Topic: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk IV (2022 Q3) [MODERATED] - page 11. (Read 41032 times)

Dude, you didn't create a POA in the campaign: Topic: [New Bounty] SpookyHalloweenCEO 🤑🤑 ~$10,000 worth of token and you did not register in the associated Bounty campaign.
After all above and below POA @Averill Gio, in the SpookyHalloweenCEO campaign that's not your POA.

Question.
* Where did the POA posted by: @Averill Gio come from, did he take it from your notebook at home.
*then why does @Averill Gio, have to choose your POA, while you don't register on the related Bounty, Is it a girlfriend, grandmother, aunt or uncle.

Dude, that's a fact, if you have multiple accounts and cheats, that's a risk because you rush to post a POA, so you don't check it in the notes, in the end you send an POA Alt.

You still have another Alt here, because your other Alt is connected to Twitter that you posted in another bounty campaign, named: Tweets:https://twitter.com/Nick2khan

He may have copied mine and not solved it.
After I explained to him a lot, he solved it.
Please don't blame me for other people's mistakes

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EFlH8uhzL5TpiO-1E_aKcWDOSFu3mcUo/view?usp=drivesdk

Please fix up your post to reflect what is required from investigators.


You don't cite actual posts in the Forum where this is supposed to have occurred yet you expect us to go looking for the proof elsewhere.


Probably?  Why not IS connected - if you can prove it.

You've used the first line of the submission form so you know where it is located.  Please go back and fix up your post using the submission form and clarify your post.

Thank you.

2: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. AGUNG PRATAMA
2. Sikopong180

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:

2Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Ikemefuna_achebe
2. Elden_Padula

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

The account above is an Alt account, which is involved in the affair in the campaign: (COMBO ex COCOS network, campaign managed by: @irfan_pak10.

Them as an Alt account can be proven by using the same Twitter account in different campaigns, not one time over and over again.

Other evidence at: , they sign up with an Alt account.

---

2Accounts Connected:

1. Save world
2. Averill Gio

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

These two Alts also proved to be cheaters in the campaign (COMBO ex COCOS). Blog and Article campaign sections.
Evidence inside: . Both are recorded.

---

Pls can i PM you?

3: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. touseefahmad1771 (red tag -1)
2. touseefahmad1999 (red tag -1)
3. BountyHunter15 (red tag -1)

Proof:

touseefahmad1771


BountyHunter15


touseefahmad1999


Related Addresses:

Also related Telegram,


archive all data from : ninjastic.space



Miscellaneous:

In the campaign rules clearly states:



Alt account linked, still involving Alt in the "👉{ESCROWED} FireDAO Bounty Campaign | 4weeks | 9 platforms | 3 millions $FLM." campaign managed by: @CryptopreneurBrainboss

Proof of the application of all three can be seen below.

• Topic: "👉{ESCROWED} FireDAO Bounty Campaign | 4weeks | 9 platforms | 3 millions $FLM." CryptopreneurBrainboss Managment 🔥Escrow page:(1).

Also at: SPREADSHEET number:(5), can be seen below, Twitter section.


Edited.
16.07.2023

A ban appeal was posted: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62544809

Open a post like that in meta https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ban-appeal-uid-1035888-5455005

I’m at work. Can’t write more. But appreciate if someone kindly help how to appeal.
Thank you

In some previous cases (at least as I concluded) only the moderator who issued the ban can give the correct answer. Also, I think that most of the moderators have a log somewhere with ban reasons just because of such cases and later explanations. I am of the opinion that there are real chances to get an answer regarding the reason for this ban.


I don't think it's a matter of whether he wants to or not, it's an obligation. With regard to one banned account, the HedgeFx user has the right to write only in the Meta section about the ban appeal. Although it seems that he did not take it seriously because he did not take any action about it.

Appreciate this too. Maybe VPN? But really, no idea about.

Thanks for looking - I had a thought that bpip describes the ban as "auto ban" which my understanding is that it would be based on such things as an I.P. or email used etc.  I guess we will never know.

Maybe there was another reason?  In any event the user has now admitted both UID's are their creation, so we will have to wait and see whether or not they intend to start a ban appeal thread.

Kudos.

I have checked and unfortunately did not find the reason for banning this user. I am unfortunately limited by my status to find such information. And since it was a long time ago, it is useless to ask global moderators, it is unlikely that any of them will remember this particular case.

As for the ban evasion, I completely agree with you.

Well, I was just going to ask when the user was banned and what was the reasoning behind that?

Why I ask is that as we can see [here] in posts 67 and 68 the user starts two threads:

• ?? HedgeFX Trading & Investments ?? 2017-12-12 15:26:19 UTC (Securities section) - Archive [1] [2]
• [ANN] ?? HedgeFX Trading & Investments ?? 2017-12-12 15:28:07 UTC (Service announcements section) - Archive [1] [2]

Both were last edited 16th April, 2018.

The now banned user P2Pfinder last posted on that day.

According to BPIP P2Pfinder has woken up twice but does not shed any light on when they were banned.


Their avatar as well as the title of the two threads has a distinct capitalization of the "f" in HFx (as in HedgeFx)



In both threads started by P2Pfinder they use the email as their contact details.  It's still there.  The email is then used by a second user on more than three separate occasions in unrelated threads:





HedgeFx is the name in the "HedgeFX Service" started by P2Pfinder and the email contained in that OP is then used by HedgeFX u=2221175 on at least six occasions when replying to other users who are inquiring about that service

---

---

On the 2019-11-20 12:16:59 UTC HedgeFX starts a thread which is an exact copy of the two threads started by P2Pfinder

?? HedgeFX Service??

It was scraped by Ninja when the post occurred here: https://ninjastic.space/post/53128526

HedgeFX uses the email six other times, three prior and three after the HedgeFx Services thread was started.

2018-06-19 15:32:32 UTC - email [email protected] used by HedgeFX [HERE] - Archive [1] [2]
2018-06-20 13:12:04 UTC - email [email protected] used by HedgeFX [HERE] - Archive [1] [2]
2018-06-21 10:44:16 UTC - email [email protected] used by HedgeFX [HERE] - Archive [1] [2]

2019-11-20 12:16:59 UTC - Thread started by HedgeFX - https://ninjastic.space/post/53128526 - this is the same word-for-word thread as started twice by P2Pfinder - it was locked on the 2020-10-28 and the contents deleted.


2020-02-17 20:20:03 UTC - email [email protected] used by HedgeFX [HERE] - Archive [1] [2]

2021-04-17 17:24:33 UTC - email [email protected] used by HedgeFX [HERE] - Archive [1] [2]
2021-04-17 18:20:53 UTC - email [email protected] used by HedgeFX [HERE] - Archive [1] [2]

At least seven times HedgeFx uses the email posted by P2Pfinder - this is no copy paste accident - three times prior and three more after they recreated the thread P2Pfinder had started.

In addition, both use the term


https://ninjastic.space/search?author=P2Pfinder&content=hallo
https://ninjastic.space/search?author=HedgeFx&content=hallo

Conclusion:

Ban Evasion: HedgeFx u=2221175 is the alt of banned user P2Pfinder u=1047338 through their shared use of the email [email protected] and identical "HedgeFX Trading & Investments" thread to scam others with ponzi like offers.

---

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

P2Pfinder, HedgeFX,

Proof:

As above

Reporting:

These alts have been reported by me in the "[Report] Ban Evasion [Requesting Admin/mod to check those and ban]" thread for ban evasion - I will shortly.

I have marked these user's trust feedback pages with distrust

Related Addresses:


Miscellaneous:

The louder the scammer screams - the deeper the hole they dig for themselves.

---

---

FlexxycDz  woke up 5/20/2023 10:51:15 AM    woke up https://bpip.org/Profile?id=3482156

Kokruu Last Active:    2023-05-20, 21:06:10 (GMT +10) https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kokruu-3523427;dt - Archive [1] [2]

Connection Confirmed.

(Don't forget to leave them *neutral* trust feedback).

(And *always* archive your investigations!)

2: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Kokruu
2. FlexxycDz

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Discord:

Miscellaneous:

Another proof that these accounts are managed by the same person is that they have exactly the same topics.

[Selling] Chaturbate, OnlyFans and more adult website site tokens
[Selling] Chaturbate, OnlyFans and more adult website site tokens

---

What's wrong? Alts? Alts. Maybe they'll wake up tomorrow.

Which of these accounts is currently active and of interest?

5: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Cryptochel
2. netditaring
3. bitborg
4. 6ardak
5. bitlborg

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Telegram Username:

Miscellaneous:

Cryptochel seems to have two more inactive alts in reserve. In any case, their nicknames are very similar to Cryptochel's.

1. Cryptochella
2. Cryptochelle

P.S. These are just my thoughts.

2: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Jonaki50sa
2. LACKME666

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Discord username:

No, you didn't.

First, I didn't say anywhere that the accounts were unrelated. I didn't check because it doesn't violate forum rules, hence it doesn't concern me.

Second, I'm saying that using ninjastic as proof of anything is wrong. As far as I know, moderators don't accept ninjastic as evidence. What is accepted as evidence is information that is specifically on the forum. For example, if you report plagiarism or ban evasion, and link to ninjastic as evidence, the report will be rejected. But, to use such links among the forum community, please, no one forbids it.

Well, thirdly, I said that using ninjastic as an archive is also wrong. Links to archives, real archives, I pointed out above. With the correction from Timelord2067, it is archive.today or web.archive.org.

You used trickery in your post, providing information from ninjastic instead of the forum. You should have done as I described, and in "Miscellaneous" you should have explained the situation, and the forum community would have decided whether you were right or wrong.

P.S. I'm not defending anyone. It's just my opinion.


I read your post. If you're talking about ban evasion, I doubt it. If you want to write about something else, you're welcome. I'm open to all.