Pages:
Author

Topic: Known alts of anyone: User generated - page 13. (Read 124989 times)

jr. member
Activity: 39
Merit: 2
September 29, 2016, 12:42:23 AM
Too funny ... http://archive.is/C839q#selection-12937.0-12937.39

I am not connected to this. Any proof ?

Your profile page https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/zarfund-897243 which is archived here http://archive.is/KQpND#selection-497.0-501.34

Has the Wallet Address 15SDkNhpqVsJmzrBnvWtGJSs4jwWmv6v19 which MagicIsMe uses more than a dozen times to claim from the numerous tipping / give-outs here...

http://archive.is/wRkCa#selection-3489.0-3515.57

I followed and retweeted (1) with the account: twitter.com/bitcoin_about
Wallet is 15SDkNhpqVsJmzrBnvWtGJSs4jwWmv6v19
https://twitter.com/annabetcoin/status/687950190909743104


lol...Now check my profile.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/zarfund-897243;sa=summary

My BTC address listed there is of yours. 1GaLLifreynEg6456XqDKYJYyBmyY2cJbw

So now you and me are connected.


Timelord2067 and Zarfund are connected having same BTC in profile.


Fu*K to your calculations.

legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
September 29, 2016, 07:42:53 AM
Do you really believe you just proved that you don't control both accounts?
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Negative trust resolution: index.php?topic=1439270
September 29, 2016, 07:38:45 AM
Now if only Zazarb can sign a message from that address...

ooo sneaky sneaky.

If he can't sign the message then it will be proof that he isn't you, right?

(wrong)



How did zazarb get dragged into this?

Sorry, typo. I meant Zarfund. And yes, I assume so. If he isn't able to sign a message from my wallet, then he isn't me.

That is the logic. Isn't that what you meant by:

Given that you are unable to sign a message with that Wallet Address 1GaLLifreynEg6456XqDKYJYyBmyY2cJbw , you are not Timelord2067.

I would edit this with a signed message later on.

So, if he were you, then he (you) would sign the message without realizing that you (he) would be incriminating yourself (himself)?


Code:
Address: 15SDkNhpqVsJmzrBnvWtGJSs4jwWmv6v19

I, MagicIsMe, am the ONLY owner of this address. This disproves Zarfund's claim on this address as well as any future claims that further spread false information.

Signature: H1InjW+boWnZj6RixT8nK73zaTJlEDA2ZL9dC1burNf8QUTiYztr0wQ/bFhHmD3QJt0Kc9NUVOQsCRSDHC5Wiyc=

I am incriminating him of posting false information on his profile. By analyzing behaviour and the fact that he has never received any money to the address, this case can be dismissed.

@Timelord2067: Once again, thanks for giving me a chance to know about this before people start getting scammed by the impersonator.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
September 29, 2016, 07:23:25 AM
Now if only Zazarb can sign a message from that address...

ooo sneaky sneaky.

If he can't sign the message then it will be proof that he isn't you, right?

(wrong)



How did zazarb get dragged into this?

Sorry, typo. I meant Zarfund. And yes, I assume so. If he isn't able to sign a message from my wallet, then he isn't me.

That is the logic. Isn't that what you meant by:

Given that you are unable to sign a message with that Wallet Address 1GaLLifreynEg6456XqDKYJYyBmyY2cJbw , you are not Timelord2067.

I would edit this with a signed message later on.

So, if he were you, then he (you) would sign the message without realizing that you (he) would be incriminating yourself (himself)?

sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Negative trust resolution: index.php?topic=1439270
September 29, 2016, 04:57:40 AM
Now if only Zazarb can sign a message from that address...

ooo sneaky sneaky.

If he can't sign the message then it will be proof that he isn't you, right?

(wrong)



How did zazarb get dragged into this?

Sorry, typo. I meant Zarfund. And yes, I assume so. If he isn't able to sign a message from my wallet, then he isn't me.

That is the logic. Isn't that what Timelord2067 meant by:

Given that you are unable to sign a message with that Wallet Address 1GaLLifreynEg6456XqDKYJYyBmyY2cJbw , you are not Timelord2067.

I would edit this with a signed message later on.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
September 29, 2016, 02:47:16 AM
Now if only Zazarb can sign a message from that address...

ooo sneaky sneaky.

If he can't sign the message then it will be proof that he isn't you, right?

(wrong)



How did zazarb get dragged into this?
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
September 29, 2016, 02:46:34 AM
Too funny ... http://archive.is/C839q#selection-12937.0-12937.39

I am not connected to this. Any proof ?

Your profile page https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/zarfund-897243 which is archived here http://archive.is/KQpND#selection-497.0-501.34

Has the Wallet Address 15SDkNhpqVsJmzrBnvWtGJSs4jwWmv6v19 which MagicIsMe uses more than a dozen times to claim from the numerous tipping / give-outs here...

http://archive.is/wRkCa#selection-3489.0-3515.57

I followed and retweeted (1) with the account: twitter.com/bitcoin_about
Wallet is 15SDkNhpqVsJmzrBnvWtGJSs4jwWmv6v19
https://twitter.com/annabetcoin/status/687950190909743104


lol...Now check my profile.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/zarfund-897243;sa=summary

My BTC address listed there is of yours. 1GaLLifreynEg6456XqDKYJYyBmyY2cJbw

So now you and me are connected.


Timelord2067 and Zarfund are connected having same BTC in profile.


Fu*K to your calculations.

Archived for future reference that you have adopted my Wallet Address as your own.

http://archive.is/oN6e5#selection-8175.0-8088.21

Given that you are unable to sign a message with that Wallet Address 1GaLLifreynEg6456XqDKYJYyBmyY2cJbw , you are not Timelord2067.
jr. member
Activity: 39
Merit: 2
September 28, 2016, 09:49:01 PM
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
September 29, 2016, 12:28:33 AM
Now if only Zazarb can sign a message from that address...

ooo sneaky sneaky.

If he can't sign the message then it will be proof that he isn't you, right?

(wrong)

jr. member
Activity: 39
Merit: 2
September 28, 2016, 09:38:58 PM
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Negative trust resolution: index.php?topic=1439270
September 29, 2016, 12:11:03 AM
Nope, not my account but I do own the address. Zarfund has explaining to do. Now if only Zarfund can sign a message from that address...
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
September 28, 2016, 10:24:26 PM
MagicIsMe https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/magicisme-709462 has the same Wallet Address on their profile page also...

http://archive.is/8skpt#selection-485.0-489.34

Code:
Name: MagicIsMe
Posts: 613
Activity: 252
Position: Sr. Member
Date Registered: 29 December 2015, 22:07:32
Last Active: Today at 10:43:01
ICQ:
AIM:
MSN:
YIM:
Email: hidden
Website:
Current Status: Offline Offline
Bitcoin address: 15SDkNhpqVsJmzrBnvWtGJSs4jwWmv6v19
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
September 28, 2016, 09:53:28 PM
Too funny ... http://archive.is/C839q#selection-12937.0-12937.39

I am not connected to this. Any proof ?

Your profile page https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/zarfund-897243 which is archived here http://archive.is/KQpND#selection-497.0-501.34

Has the Wallet Address 15SDkNhpqVsJmzrBnvWtGJSs4jwWmv6v19 which MagicIsMe uses more than a dozen times to claim from the numerous tipping / give-outs here...

http://archive.is/wRkCa#selection-3489.0-3515.57

I followed and retweeted (1) with the account: twitter.com/bitcoin_about
Wallet is 15SDkNhpqVsJmzrBnvWtGJSs4jwWmv6v19
https://twitter.com/annabetcoin/status/687950190909743104
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
September 28, 2016, 08:36:12 PM
http://www.whois.com/whois/zarfund.com

http://archive.is/qDO6O

Code:
zarfund.com registry whois
Updated 17 hours ago - Refresh
Domain Name: ZARFUND.COM
Registrar: GODADDY.COM, LLC
Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID: 146
Whois Server: whois.godaddy.com
Referral URL: http://www.godaddy.com
Name Server: ALEX.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM
Name Server: ERIN.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM
Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Status: clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Updated Date: 30-jul-2016
Creation Date: 27-jul-2016
Expiration Date: 27-jul-2018
zarfund.com registrar whois
Updated 17 hours ago
Domain Name: zarfund.com
Registry Domain ID: 2047018662_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
Update Date: 2016-07-27T21:40:56Z
Creation Date: 2016-07-27T21:40:55Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2018-07-27T21:40:55Z
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: [email protected]
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4806242505
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: Not Available From Registry
Registrant Name: Registration Private
Registrant Organization: Domains By Proxy, LLC
Registrant Street: DomainsByProxy.com
Registrant Street: 14747 N Northsight Blvd Suite 111, PMB 309
Registrant City: Scottsdale
Registrant State/Province: Arizona
Registrant Postal Code: 85260
Registrant Country: US
Registrant Phone: +1.4806242599
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax: +1.4806242598
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: [email protected]
Registry Admin ID: Not Available From Registry
Admin Name: Registration Private
Admin Organization: Domains By Proxy, LLC
Admin Street: DomainsByProxy.com
Admin Street: 14747 N Northsight Blvd Suite 111, PMB 309
Admin City: Scottsdale
Admin State/Province: Arizona
Admin Postal Code: 85260
Admin Country: US
Admin Phone: +1.4806242599
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax: +1.4806242598
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email: [email protected]
Registry Tech ID: Not Available From Registry
Tech Name: Registration Private
Tech Organization: Domains By Proxy, LLC
Tech Street: DomainsByProxy.com
Tech Street: 14747 N Northsight Blvd Suite 111, PMB 309
Tech City: Scottsdale
Tech State/Province: Arizona
Tech Postal Code: 85260
Tech Country: US
Tech Phone: +1.4806242599
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax: +1.4806242598
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email: [email protected]
Name Server: ALEX.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM
Name Server: ERIN.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2016-09-28T08:00:00Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/epp-status-codes-2014-06-16-en

The data contained in GoDaddy.com, LLC's WhoIs database,
while believed by the company to be reliable, is provided "as is"
with no guarantee or warranties regarding its accuracy.  This
information is provided for the sole purpose of assisting you
in obtaining information about domain name registration records.
Any use of this data for any other purpose is expressly forbidden without the prior written
permission of GoDaddy.com, LLC.  By submitting an inquiry,
you agree to these terms of usage and limitations of warranty.  In particular,
you agree not to use this data to allow, enable, or otherwise make possible,
dissemination or collection of this data, in part or in its entirety, for any
purpose, such as the transmission of unsolicited advertising and
and solicitations of any kind, including spam.  You further agree
not to use this data to enable high volume, automated or robotic electronic
processes designed to collect or compile this data for any purpose,
including mining this data for your own personal or commercial purposes.

Please note: the registrant of the domain name is specified
in the "registrant" section.  In most cases, GoDaddy.com, LLC
is not the registrant of domain names listed in this database.
related domain names

There isn't actually any information here (all "proxy"), except the dates which could be useful in future...
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
September 28, 2016, 08:27:17 PM
I actually just wanted you to clear things up for me on the three accounts you linked to me and not find more dirt on me. I have already given evidence proving me innocent of such. That is all.

If you think that leaving false negative trust on being both an alt of Kiyoko, an account which I ALREADY CLAIMED TO OWN because of the defaulted loan nobody cared about and the three accounts listed above is morally correct, then it would be up to you, as well.


For the record, all the users that I contacted to advertise my services replied positively. They did not treat me as though I had negative trust but as a regular user of this forum. Perhaps, they realized themselves that the accusations were pointless.

Regards,
MagicIsMe

P.S. Please reply based on reason, and not upon accusation. Also, I would like to stay on topic as much as you do.

OK... (unbuttons cufflinks...) https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/zarfund-897243

Code:
Name: Zarfund
Posts: 11
Activity: 11
Position: Newbie
Date Registered: 09 September 2016, 02:10:09
Last Active: Today at 05:45:09
ICQ:
AIM:
MSN:
YIM:
Email: hidden
Website:
Current Status: Offline Offline
Bitcoin address: 15SDkNhpqVsJmzrBnvWtGJSs4jwWmv6v19

Code:
Alt of MagicIsMe -4: -2 / +0 u=709462

http://archive.is/KQpND
http://archive.is/f8f8r

with Wallet Address 15SDkNhpqVsJmzrBnvWtGJSs4jwWmv6v19 [5c71aef001]



Quote
Vod 119: -0 / +12   2016-09-18   0.00000000   Reference   Running ponzi scheme. Stealing from other members.
cryptodevil 6: -0 / +1   2016-09-12   0.00000000   Reference   Scammer posting for people to urgently send money to scam, I mean totallylegitimateinvestmentplatform, in return for some more number to be added 'for free' to their balance on the scam website.

Avoid like the fucking plague on this industry this dirtbag is.

 Kiss  Cool  Grin
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
September 28, 2016, 02:08:10 PM
I understand that you being a concerned member of this forum has brought you to post this and due to your judgment flagged me for having multiple accounts but I assure you that I only use one.

http://archive.is/8U3WC#selection-8287.0-8339.214
That was a defaulted collateral. As you can see in the Loans section, I was scammed for 0.02BTC and, if you still can't remember, you can check the negative trust you left me for "having" his account.

EDIT: I would appreciate that you remove the feedback as well as the post accusing me of such instead of snubbing me and staining my reputation further.

It's funny, the first UID to contact me to have negative trust removed was TomatoCage ? ? ?: -1 / +23 u=37522 and since then there have been a handful of others. Gildarts -7: -3 / +1 u=532733 is another one.

My work here is open to public scrutiny and no one has posted to say it is wrong such is the benefit of having work peer reviewed.

I notice in each of these attempts to have my negative trust removed that there is also no attempt to reach out to any other person who have left negative trust

In your case this:

Quote
suchmoon 10: -0 / +2   2016-04-14   0.00000000   Reference   This user is attempting to purchase PayPal accounts and trade PayPal funds for BTC. PayPal is reversible up to 180 days not to mention the risk of dealing with a purchased/stolen/hacked account. Avoid like plague.

which is from a person on the DT (1?/2?/3?), so their post I would have thought would have more weight than mine, so I'm am quietly pleased you hold my negative trust in higher esteem than someone on the DT - could it be that I am indeed on the right path with my assertion and if I dig a little more, I might just find something else?  Perhaps.

or these:

Quote
The Pharmacist 1: -0 / +1   2016-06-09   0.00000000   Reference   Account sales encourage scams, spam, and account farming.

Baryom 0: -0 / +0   2016-04-17   0.00050000   Reference   Tried to abuse happy hour system. Bad behavior.

Sasukeevil 0: -0 / +0   2016-04-14   0.00000000   Reference   This user is trying to buy Paypal accounts. Trade with cautions!!

SlidingHorn 10: -0 / +1   2016-02-29   0.00000000   Reference   Deals in BTCTalk account trading. There are only 2 reasons for this:

1) to spam the forums for sig campaigns

2) Trust Scams. Naive members see accounts with high ranks or old, out-dated trust comments, etc., and assume that they can trust them.

All in all, there is absolutely no beneficial, legitimate reason for the trade of forum accounts.


TheButterZone 27: -0 / +4   2016-01-17   0.00000000   https://db.tt/0CJpyk1M   What... the... FUCK!?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Brillantes


The purchased/stolen/hacked account in the above quote are the UID's that you have admitted to have receiving.  You'll notice that I crossed out the hacked / stolen as I have not made the assertion that any of the UID's in your control are stolen or hacked.

Quote
instead of snubbing me and staining my reputation further.

As to the last two links... https://db.tt/0CJpyk1M https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Brillantes I've already left you red trust, it's up to others how they respond...  Undecided

Is there any bounty paid on finding an Alt ?
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
September 28, 2016, 11:14:29 AM
Every little bit helps, thanks TwitchySeal will have a look at them when I can.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
September 28, 2016, 11:09:59 AM
Accounts connected: jonatuzc, Sweetbtc, SanaButt

Proof:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/free-bitcoin-no-action-needed-post-wallet-address-1435450 (Locked thread) -

I am interested. Please Tell me the XRB address.
My BTC is 15tA1XEDmxQnqyYMcjY9eEBpS41TeNWuGe

http://archive.is/U0HVm

Name:  SanaButt  
Post count:  86
Rank: Member
Bitcoin address:  15tA1XEDmxQnqyYMcjY9eEBpS41TeNWuGe

Please add me to Your campaign. Thank you.  Smiley

Addresses:

Code:
15tA1XEDmxQnqyYMcjY9eEBpS41TeNWuGe

Miscellaneous: There is also an accusation in the same thread that Sweetbtc is an Alt of bapparabi https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bapparabi-543461 because of their OP

[PAYMENT PROOF] CAPTCHA Work at 0.00085 BTC (85000 SAT) for 100 CAPTCHA  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1438183.0
Data Entry/Captha Work at 0.00015 BTC (15000 SAT) for 1 Captha https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/data-entrycaptha-work-at-000015-btc-15000-sat-for-1-captha-1421508

Sweetbtc wants to join bapparabi 's capture project on 16th April 2016 which was started that day.  Only trouble is Sweetbtc started their thread on the 2nd of April 2016

Both use

Code:
https://raiblocks.net/#/distribution
https://raiblocks.net/#/start
for their resource material.

Not very conclusive as the website comes up quite a lot in searches here.  But, in saying that a thread [RaiBlocks] RaiBlocks trading thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/raiblocks-raiblocks-trading-thread-1422828 was also started on the 2nd of April 2016.

Just found a bunch of alts connected to these.

All obvious sig spammers using same wallet [036b2e80ea]


Qunenin, 124oASLGiSzvhLnrptigYsr9QrAWio3TQu, u=698772 (Coinmixer) https://archive.is/GvOyl
Oralmat, 1NmniWRXEo3D6j91pYU2AkHHpc2v3t8PeZ, u=698392 (wealthydice) https://archive.is/eXpok
posternat, 1LzhiDcFijPfTtVUo8y9C3ScTSneazqUow , u=639598 (seconds trade) https://archive.is/QmJZF
Sweetbtc, 128N8LgpwbqMTwXtGWrG8ECvdXNd86EGGe, u=807006 (seconds trade) https://archive.is/fZ4o1
salmanahmedone, 1ESvtgwDZPwgFW8VHa5KCVYKv1bQ6C1DkH , u=778854 (seconds trade)  <---Date Registered:February 21, 2016, 09:47:50 AM
BitcoinPC, 1Jzo1MCjZ868kwopUmeUzuevJNfLuQBbwe, =778864 (Betcoin) https://archive.is/RxSNZ  <--Date Registered:February 21, 2016, 09:55:30 AM
SanaButt, 15tA1XEDmxQnqyYMcjY9eEBpS41TeNWuGe, u=775162, http://archive.is/U0HVm

sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Negative trust resolution: index.php?topic=1439270
September 23, 2016, 10:57:58 PM
I actually just wanted you to clear things up for me on the three accounts you linked to me and not find more dirt on me. I have already given evidence proving me innocent of such. That is all.

If you think that leaving false negative trust on being both an alt of Kiyoko, an account which I ALREADY CLAIMED TO OWN because of the defaulted loan nobody cared about and the three accounts listed above is morally correct, then it would be up to you, as well.


For the record, all the users that I contacted to advertise my services replied positively. They did not treat me as though I had negative trust but as a regular user of this forum. Perhaps, they realized themselves that the accusations were pointless.

Regards,
MagicIsMe

P.S. Please reply based on reason, and not upon accusation. Also, I would like to stay on topic as much as you do.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
September 23, 2016, 09:47:06 PM
I understand that you being a concerned member of this forum has brought you to post this and due to your judgment flagged me for having multiple accounts but I assure you that I only use one.

http://archive.is/8U3WC#selection-8287.0-8339.214
That was a defaulted collateral. As you can see in the Loans section, I was scammed for 0.02BTC and, if you still can't remember, you can check the negative trust you left me for "having" his account.

EDIT: I would appreciate that you remove the feedback as well as the post accusing me of such instead of snubbing me and staining my reputation further.

It's funny, the first UID to contact me to have negative trust removed was TomatoCage ? ? ?: -1 / +23 u=37522 and since then there have been a handful of others. Gildarts -7: -3 / +1 u=532733 is another one.

My work here is open to public scrutiny and no one has posted to say it is wrong such is the benefit of having work peer reviewed.

I notice in each of these attempts to have my negative trust removed that there is also no attempt to reach out to any other person who have left negative trust

In your case this:

Quote
suchmoon 10: -0 / +2   2016-04-14   0.00000000   Reference   This user is attempting to purchase PayPal accounts and trade PayPal funds for BTC. PayPal is reversible up to 180 days not to mention the risk of dealing with a purchased/stolen/hacked account. Avoid like plague.

which is from a person on the DT (1?/2?/3?), so their post I would have thought would have more weight than mine, so I'm am quietly pleased you hold my negative trust in higher esteem than someone on the DT - could it be that I am indeed on the right path with my assertion and if I dig a little more, I might just find something else?  Perhaps.

or these:

Quote
The Pharmacist 1: -0 / +1   2016-06-09   0.00000000   Reference   Account sales encourage scams, spam, and account farming.

Baryom 0: -0 / +0   2016-04-17   0.00050000   Reference   Tried to abuse happy hour system. Bad behavior.

Sasukeevil 0: -0 / +0   2016-04-14   0.00000000   Reference   This user is trying to buy Paypal accounts. Trade with cautions!!

SlidingHorn 10: -0 / +1   2016-02-29   0.00000000   Reference   Deals in BTCTalk account trading. There are only 2 reasons for this:

1) to spam the forums for sig campaigns

2) Trust Scams. Naive members see accounts with high ranks or old, out-dated trust comments, etc., and assume that they can trust them.

All in all, there is absolutely no beneficial, legitimate reason for the trade of forum accounts.


TheButterZone 27: -0 / +4   2016-01-17   0.00000000   https://db.tt/0CJpyk1M   What... the... FUCK!?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Brillantes


The purchased/stolen/hacked account in the above quote are the UID's that you have admitted to have receiving.  You'll notice that I crossed out the hacked / stolen as I have not made the assertion that any of the UID's in your control are stolen or hacked.

Quote
instead of snubbing me and staining my reputation further.

As to the last two links... https://db.tt/0CJpyk1M https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Brillantes I've already left you red trust, it's up to others how they respond...  Undecided
Pages:
Jump to: