Pages:
Author

Topic: Known alts of anyone: User generated - page 9. (Read 124989 times)

copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
October 11, 2016, 08:59:53 PM
users connected: s1ng, BAGOBO, and lili song.

proof: address 1g1pHij1viyJVEnExwoiiNAGDYY5QWnXj was used here, here, and here.

Edit: s1ng has this address on their profile: 1Mbo7t7cB45qprrD6yYUktNpiiFWGmSs9T, which is used here

@Timelord: Yea I'm on a portable device.
btc-facebook has the address 1EYzkw5ZzTmigPY764njrL6bwG9boTUdZx as used here and here.
Part two Edit 2: michietn94 is connectd to these guys: address 1Ns78F3XbkVinj1MYFkbKmrSw3g7nXMgtC was used here and here(not sure what was the point of that address but oh well).
Misc: s1ng cheated a twitter campaign once.


1g1pHij1viyJVEnExwoiiNAGDYY5QWnXj:

s1ng
BAGOBO
lili song




1EYzkw5ZzTmigPY764njrL6bwG9boTUdZx:

BAGOBO
btc-facebook


1Ns78F3XbkVinj1MYFkbKmrSw3g7nXMgtC:

BAGOBO
michietn94
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
October 11, 2016, 07:13:10 PM
users connected: s1ng, BAGOBO, and lili song.

proof: address 1g1pHij1viyJVEnExwoiiNAGDYY5QWnXj was used here, here, and here.

Edit: s1ng has this address on their profile: 1Mbo7t7cB45qprrD6yYUktNpiiFWGmSs9T, which is used here

@Timelord: Yea I'm on a portable device.
btc-facebook has the address 1EYzkw5ZzTmigPY764njrL6bwG9boTUdZx as used here and here.
Part two Edit 2: michietn94 is connectd to these guys: address 1Ns78F3XbkVinj1MYFkbKmrSw3g7nXMgtC was used here and here(not sure what was the point of that address but oh well).
Misc: s1ng cheated a twitter campaign once.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
October 11, 2016, 06:41:31 PM
I notice on this thread there is only hard proof (aka: they posted their address one two accounts asking for a payout from games and rounds) but do you accept circumstantial evidence?

What I'm talking about is there fact that I have negative trust from what is clearly an alt of 'Zoomer'. He was given negative trust by dilatedpixel so he made an alt to say it was hacked. The truth was that it was in fact hacked but it wasn't the original owner that made the account dilatedpixel_alt, it was zoomer. My only proof is the fact that he had negative trust from DT member dilatedpixel for a few days (which I don't have a screens hot of and dont know how to prove it at this point) and his only negative (or any other trust) left to anyone is me, saying scammer. With no reference link (obviously).

It's so clear this is his alt. Does anyone else follow me and agree? It doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things anyways because it was a throw away account and I'm sure he's on his new account that he's probably bought, spamming it up and trying to figure out how much his first loan he asks for should be.

I've always interpreted "Known" to mean there is proof, or a strong suspicion that can be sniffed out by others quickly.  I can't tell you what to do with your own account, however, I have noticed that when someone has a suspicion of a UID that is not quite right, the UID in question receives neutral feedback which states what the suspicion is.

In your case it would be something like

Code:
I believe (name 1) UID is an Alt of (name 2) UID - because (reason)

You then have to weigh up how they react.  If they start PMing you that it was all a misunderstanding or it'll hurt their ability to earn BitCoin or they call you a Kid (or worse) then you can almost (almost) safely say you are on the right track...
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
October 11, 2016, 06:34:07 PM
users connected: s1ng, BAGOBO, and lili song.

proof: address 1g1pHij1viyJVEnExwoiiNAGDYY5QWnXj was used here, here, and here.

Edit: s1ng has this address on their profile: 1Mbo7t7cB45qprrD6yYUktNpiiFWGmSs9T, which is used here

@Timelord: Yea I'm on a portable device.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
October 11, 2016, 06:31:56 PM
users connected: Alepaff and Qwitty.

proof: addresse 1MvjvNedyoYak51yXryvbuGJsqrf6iw8Jw is used here and here.

Archive links:

Qwitty
Alepaff

@satmas:

I'm just wondering why aren't you able to connect to http://www.archive.is/ ?  Are you on a portable device or similar?  Thanks.
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1042
October 11, 2016, 06:28:58 PM
I notice on this thread there is only hard proof (aka: they posted their address one two accounts asking for a payout from games and rounds) but do you accept circumstantial evidence?

What I'm talking about is there fact that I have negative trust from what is clearly an alt of 'Zoomer'. He was given negative trust by dilatedpixel so he made an alt to say it was hacked. The truth was that it was in fact hacked but it wasn't the original owner that made the account dilatedpixel_alt, it was zoomer. My only proof is the fact that he had negative trust from DT member dilatedpixel for a few days (which I don't have a screens hot of and dont know how to prove it at this point) and his only negative (or any other trust) left to anyone is me, saying scammer. With no reference link (obviously).

It's so clear this is his alt. Does anyone else follow me and agree? It doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things anyways because it was a throw away account and I'm sure he's on his new account that he's probably bought, spamming it up and trying to figure out how much his first loan he asks for should be.
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
October 11, 2016, 05:11:18 PM
users connected: Alepaff and Qwitty.

proof: addresse 1MvjvNedyoYak51yXryvbuGJsqrf6iw8Jw is used here and here.

Archive links:

Qwitty
Alepaff
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
October 10, 2016, 05:00:43 PM
users connected: Alepaff and Qwitty.

proof: addresse 1MvjvNedyoYak51yXryvbuGJsqrf6iw8Jw is used here and here.
legendary
Activity: 3094
Merit: 1472
October 09, 2016, 01:39:50 PM
Ok, adding on:Dassi has the address: 1LQS9mtcUFxN5KbZ5CAyFE8urViVJPRLoz on their profile. Pic: http://i.imgur.com/wdYAWKq.png.

Always use archive.is as one can sneak away saying that your posted proof is photoshoped or you used inspect element to change btc address and then took a screenshot. Best is to use archive.is like others like Timelord have been doing this all the time.

Edit: seems like you already archived it. Archive.is shows me "Page was archived 5 mins ago".Anyway here goes the archive version to his profile link :- http://archive.is/8HEgD
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
October 09, 2016, 01:27:01 PM
Ok, adding on:Dassi has the address: 1LQS9mtcUFxN5KbZ5CAyFE8urViVJPRLoz on their profile. Edit: Archive. Thanks for the tip Avirunes. Edit 2: Credit goes to Avirunes and Actmyname for helping me.
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
October 07, 2016, 10:01:21 AM
users connected: Bavarian Illuminati, Ares, and sharryhundal.

Proof: address 13LpQBw2Bj7FPLmkYFZZNuF1Zzw6BqZqf6 was used here, here, and here

WalletExplorer Archive: https://archive.is/WisSE
Archive [Bavarian Illuminati]: https://archive.is/rKyub#selection-6709.0-6719.57
Archive [Ares]: https://archive.is/g1diT#selection-4763.0-4769.99
Archive [sharryhundal]: https://archive.is/RnSTx#selection-2125.0-2152.0
Archive [CryptoGretzky]: https://archive.is/lVNh0#selection-803.0-811.98

users connected: gandame and NetFreak199

proof: address 3MzyxaDWMM3bidTd8jhg2HHgx9p11sKgKB was used here and here.

Archive [gandame]: http://archive.is/IiERE#selection-7305.0-7319.6
Archive [NetFreak199]: http://archive.is/7VZg0#selection-8107.0-8109.52



There.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
October 07, 2016, 09:35:46 AM
users connected: gandame and NetFreak199

proof: address 3MzyxaDWMM3bidTd8jhg2HHgx9p11sKgKB was used here and here.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
October 06, 2016, 01:58:08 PM
users connected: Bavarian Illuminati, Ares, and sharryhundal.

Proof: address 13LpQBw2Bj7FPLmkYFZZNuF1Zzw6BqZqf6 was used here, here, and here
ok, additionally: this address is part of wallet [48055a7ea] and that wallet has address 1AxF1NWxPVSAKigFJZmiQmSR58yVxEX22w, used here, by CryptoGretzsky.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
October 06, 2016, 01:50:02 PM
users connected: Bavarian Illuminati, Ares, and sharryhundal.

Proof: address 13LpQBw2Bj7FPLmkYFZZNuF1Zzw6BqZqf6 was used here, here, and here
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
October 06, 2016, 01:33:50 PM
users connected: dearbesz1219, pinkpather03, braveheart0319, kidsoeagle0312

Proof: wallet address: 18MsJ6k7mvFMZAFfTfqMumoaMJwj2Uvijs was used here, here, here, and here.

The fourth link doesn't link to a message with 18MsJ6k7mvFMZAFfTfqMumoaMJwj2Uvijs in it.  Also, there's still a trailing oblique (forward slash) in your "here" URL's meaning the link only loads at the top of the page, not the actual message, also, it's handy to make an archive of the quote ( somewhere such as http://archive.is/ so that if or when the user deletes the message, there is a permanent record of the quote existing.

You're getting there!  Thanks.  Cool
Problem is, I can't break the code into two separate codes, they'd just be a part of the same code. Anyways, address: 1A7dVXFQXWvH19QNMNWXXAGN16E27AdRJC was used here and here. Edit: I also can't access the archive page from where I'm from.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
October 06, 2016, 12:17:27 PM
users connected: dearbesz1219, pinkpather03, braveheart0319, kidsoeagle0312

Proof: wallet address: 18MsJ6k7mvFMZAFfTfqMumoaMJwj2Uvijs was used here, here, here, and here.

The fourth link doesn't link to a message with 18MsJ6k7mvFMZAFfTfqMumoaMJwj2Uvijs in it.  Also, there's still a trailing oblique (forward slash) in your "here" URL's meaning the link only loads at the top of the page, not the actual message, also, it's handy to make an archive of the quote ( somewhere such as http://archive.is/ so that if or when the user deletes the message, there is a permanent record of the quote existing.

You're getting there!  Thanks.  Cool
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
October 06, 2016, 11:32:43 AM
users connected: dearbesz1219, pinkpather03, braveheart0319, kidsoeagle0312

Proof: wallet address: 18MsJ6k7mvFMZAFfTfqMumoaMJwj2Uvijs was used here, here, here, and here.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
October 04, 2016, 12:08:54 PM
GODground u=881175 is MaxDeliver u=881178 with Skype GODground

Code:
Name: GODGround
Posts: 3
Activity: 3
Position: Newbie
Date Registered: 24 July 2016, 20:55:02
Last Active: 04 October 2016, 23:20:36

Name: MaxDeliver
Posts: 7
Activity: 7
Position: Newbie
Date Registered: 24 July 2016, 20:57:09
Last Active: 04 October 2016, 23:20:51

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16454207

hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1001
October 04, 2016, 11:55:11 AM

I can't recall where I read it, but the entire 100,000 almost without a single UID are all manufactured by bots.
I can't recall if it were the 500,000 600,000 or 700,000's.
Judging by what you've uncovered it's probably the 600,000's that were affected.

Have a look at the UID's being created about ten days ago, almost all created and logged out practically immediately (some as low as two seconds after registering they log out)

you may have read it here? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/post-a-spammer-thread-1591598
This is also useful to see variation in monthly accounts created. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=stats

Many accounts are created, never used, with very similar names. I wonder if these are just cover for accounts that will be used.
There are other zero post accounts that are coming back to life. These have more unique names.
It is impossible to know if an account is inactive or banned. Ridiculous really.
Lauda had said that there were "mass bannings" but we are not privy to know which accounts. Banned accounts need to be marked for all to see.
Without such info, we can only guess if they are likely to be activated in the future, or if they are dead accounts due to banning.

I have not looked yet at accounts created 10 days ago, but accounts created and immediately logged out sound like the throwaway accounts I spoke of. (if you give me a # i will see exactly what you are looking at)
The 300+ farmed accounts I have listed, almost without exception, post immediately. That is the most efficient way to start the ranking up process.
Login - post - logout - repeat.
Of course, the farmer may have to change his strategy since my thread highlights his flaws, so these accounts maybe of a new class.

But again, as we cannot see the status of an account ban, without checking, rechecking and later checking again, we cannot know if they will or have become active. An impossible task for us members. Admin and global mods can see all this easily.
Theymos even deactivated the member search around the time of the last farmed account issue, (may?) as it was "too slow".

Therefore, I have ignored (nearly) all zero post accounts. They hold little or no value without posts/rank.
When they post, if they ever decide to post if they are not banned already, then they will become exposed.

With the connections made on this thread, in conjunction with my thread, it looks a lot like very few people/groups are behind these many hundreds of accounts. Is that how you are seeing this?
(i cannot see a way that theymos/global mods did not/do not know all this already and could have just told us or interacted..)
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
October 04, 2016, 06:08:34 AM
Around the 400-500ks the bots were filling in fake yet real looking addresses, often reusing the same address again within 3-7 days.

Somebody sure is butt-hurt TM to be doing that.  Perhaps that's the DDoS attack that shut down BCT about a year ago (and recently too??).
Pages:
Jump to: