Topic: Known alts of anyone: User generated - page 11. (Read 124907 times)

I think you'll find it's KLF like the band... (Think 3 A.M. Eternal)

As to the trust given and received, I can't see anything wrong with them - care to elaborate?

KIF has received a trust feedback from fullypack:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=369702 FYI. Is that something to worry about, or should we leave it as it is?

What the fuck?

one of the summer I found in this list . and now I will take action against him for his alternate account for this forum . since he already getted negative trust at his one of the account but still I think it is not enough .

You would be right, if it weren't for the fact that you were trust abusing by giving your alts trust. Now as for you linking some other account by usign the same wallet addy, that wouldn't work unless you were able to sign a message from that address.

Now why u jumped in this mess ? U know yours and mine BTC are same. 1ActBTCi5XUMjqnyFxVWgSfE5xWicj8g3o

See my profile
 
actmyname and zarfund are connected   

You were not a newbie literally a month before you replied. Certainly not. And, that's also completely irrelevant. Don't justify your crappy spam post quality with the fact that you were ignorant of the rules - because the rules are available for all to see, and I see no reason why you shouldn't have been educated before posting. After all, many communities have rules. What made you think you were allowed to spam left and right?

Why does your co-worker use your bitcoin address for his payment? How come both Omegasun and PhilPrime are your "friends" but use your bitcoin address?


You're telling me that PhilPrime decided to use an address that you also used when they were a newbie? Please.

---

Why don't you edit your post instead of double-posting? (Like I've done right now.)


Of course it's easily done. However, I don't think that one of your enemies would post their address before you... That's kind of impossible, don't you think?

PhilPrime: (June 30)
grim07: (July 12)


Sure. But if you spam with those accounts, and aim to use both of those accounts in the same campaign (with applications right next to one another) I think that deserves a red trust. Besides, trust is given by people who have opinions. And the opinion is that you deserve negative feedback.

Do you want me to make you a sample to link you on other account just by using the same wallet addy of yours? It is easily to be done intentionally by one of your enemy..


And in addition. Having an alt account is not deserved a negative feedback if the user didn't commit scamming. That is what i know when i read the statement of theymos regarding trust. It is for trading on marketplace and not for detective play of yours.

Because i'm not active on this forum and i didn't notice that thread i have job in real life. Just see my feedback for all account that link to me. Do you think that is right? I am not superman to manage that all account. And the users that gave me that feed back is the true trust abuser. And to clarify all the post that others mention to be spam. That is occured during i'm still newbie in this forum and lack of knowledge. Even reputable users here once  commit that when they are new. I just gave cheers feedback to my grim07. Do you think that is abusing of trust? Im not on DT and i didn't state any statement their. About philprime. He is my real coworker and not my alt. I'm just very happy that im famous here for all aspiring detective. But make sure first all accusation is true and no other person will get involve. You verify to mods if i really the owner of all the accounts listed on my feedback

How old are you?

Seeing as you're trying to cover up your mistake by acting as if it were on purpose, MagicIsMe, you must not understand how to respond properly.

Enough with the random fake linkages. Admit that you are alts - since you can't hide it anyway, and get that done and over with. Trying to act as if you're not linked to MagicIsMe, but then defending them over and over again with petty crap is so childish.

---

It's sad, really.

---

---

Bringing back this quote I found aimed at you from back in late August:


Care to explain, yet again? Because you simply just came to that thread and left. There's no reply from the pages onward until now.

Looking at the first post history's, we can conclude the same ownership.

Sept 29, 2015.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/stellgod-558220  stellgod (78)          sep 29x2,   oct 6x2,21  nov 6,15  dec 6,21  jan 2,16
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/redsun114-558226  redsun114 (495)    sep 29x2,   oct 6x2,22  nov 6,15  dec 6,21  jan 2,13
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/gtglener-558231  gtglener (467)        sep 29x2,  oct 6x2       nov 6,15  dec 6,21  jan 2,16
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/jostorres-558233  jostorres (311)       sep 29       oct 6x2,23  nov 6,15  dec 6,21  jan 2,13x12
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/super5star-558236  super5star (67)      sep 29x2,  oct 6x2,22  nov 6,15  dec 6,21  jan 2,16
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/martha5dool-558237  martha5dool (119) sep 29       oct 6, 23     nov 6,15  dec 6,21  jan 2,16
....
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/jonatuzc-558240  jonatuzc (207)        sep 29x2,  oct 7,23  nov 6,16   dec 6,21   jan 2,16
....
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/garmerys-558247  garmerys (123)       sep 29x2,   oct 7,23  nov 7,16  dec 6,21   jan 2,16
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kateryana81-558251  kateryana81 (109)   sep 29       oct 7,23  nov 7,17  dec 6,21   jan 2,13
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/katrimans-558253  katrimans (538)       sep 29x3,  oct 7,27  nov 7,17  dec 6,21   jan 2,16
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/richkellj-558268  richkellj  (360)         sep 29       oct 7,23  nov 7,17  dec 7,21   jan 2,16
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/maricampos-558277  maricampos (8.)      sep 29       oct 7,23  nov 7,17  dec 7,21   jan    16
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/natalieneo-558280  natalieneo (25)        sep 29x2   oct 7,23  nov 7,17  dec 7,21   jan 2,13x11
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/nelsledma-558287  nelsledma (43)        sep 29       oct 8,23  nov 7,17  dec 7,21   jan 2,16
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/pureclckr-558289  pureclckr (75)         sep 29       oct 8,23  nov 7,17  dec 7,21   jan 2,16
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/lawhence-558297  lawhence (23)         sep 29       oct 8,27  nov 7,17  dec 7,21   jan 2,11



https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/daisy14-812240  Daisy14 (158)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/dank14-812245  Dank14 (143) 
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/das-812251  Das (340)       
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/dinki-812256  Dinki (136)

dank also has 1Dk35CC2bktMUJoUwWGKmR35ykVLyBCJ92
First post history's almost identical. Conclusive.

(satmas, you are listed on my thread?)

Ok, so this wallet that the 1Dk35CC2bktMUJoUwWGKmR35ykVLyBCJ92 address is out of (000001e522) has this address: 3DWBSSAue32YS8PcW2gLs6m52BCCv3UgDA, which is actually a part of the waves platform address, as seen here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15451536.

By that logic, timelord, zarfund, and magicisme are talking to each other, so they must be the same accounts. Disclaimer: There is no proof that they are the same accounts.

hahaha. very amusing thread. Accused me all you want. You just conclude with that "correct me if im wrong" phrase to connect on other user. Almost thousand of user here use that phrase if you really are a good detective. And i am not denying that grim07 is my alt account since i already publicly announce it in one of my thread for free signature space. But all the other account you accused is a B.S.. I hope there is some penalty for all aspiring detectives here that have false accusation. My God i hate drugs. Don't take that too much guys.


And i didn't join my alt account and my main account in one sig campaign at the same time


***eating some popcorn***



And i will join to your accusation thread game.


Satmas and Timelord is connected notice the way they are talking to each other. Looks like same account.  

Safedice thread archive: here.

Adding on:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15979156

[Archive]

(quote date timestamp is 1 since topic is locked and I can't quote it)

---

addendum

Accounts connected: PhilPrime, grim07, and iamgrimmm

Proof; address: 31rjaGRnAUZc2ee2VgugxfYuGbdsSj4rjo was used here by PhilPrime and here by grim07 and here by iamgrimmm.

Misc: I didn't want to say anything about grim07 earlier because I didn't have proof of them being alts, but now I do.

I don't know about you, but that wallet has address: 1C3dHBqsciQvvsa2c6BUvW9H3U23fy83tT, which is used here by kif.

There's also a

grim07 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=732026

Giving / receiving trust from

grim007 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=553970
Omegasun https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=639376
PhilPrime https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=859971

Notice how these UID's are all mid 500,000's, 600,000's, 700,000's and 800,000's?

Likewise, you MagicIsMe haven't answered the question I put to you: Out of all the people who have given you negative feedback / trust, why are you trying to hammer me so hard about the negative trust I gave you given that I am not on the default trust?  Could it be that if I dug a little harder, I might find out other things about you?

Given that I see no reason to remove my negative trust of MagicIsMe, I feel this conversation has run its course.

He actually never answered any response I directed at him. Plus if I was responding even the slightest as Zarfund, I would immediately edit my posts to correct the mistakes.

Timelord actually directed a message at me:

which I strongly detest because it is false.


As I reasoned out earlier in this thread, users use other Bitcoin addresses to give a sense of trust. If I were to make an alt and scam, wouldn't it be wise not to put a Bitcoin address instead of exposing one to be marked a scammer?