Krnlx Nvidia xevan miner - 3.3+ mh on 1070, ~6mh on 80ti FREE, OPENSOURCE - page 7.

spider703

full member

Activity: 1890

Merit: 148

Quote from: palgin on October 08, 2017, 01:11:21 AM

Quote from: Vorona34 on October 08, 2017, 12:59:28 AM

Miner on 1060 constantly closed, even with the intensity of 14 so all is not OK.

Dear sir, you got miner for free, we were hard working chasing rare bug for win build while you were sitting on your sofa, and now you're complaining something? Go ask _sp to sell you same code for 200$, told already that miner will fail in 2 cases:

1) High overclock
2) -p stats option

I won't comment anymore, as stuff like this drives me angry. AS-IS, roll-roll your boat gently down the stream.

P.S: coвceм oxpeнeли yжe, пoтoмy krnlx ничeгo и нe кoммeнтиpyeт, тaк кaк люди пopoй пpeвpaщaютcя в cвинeй, пoлyчили ПO нaxaлявy, eщe и пpeтeнзии имeют.

He oбpaщaй нa ниx внимaниe, ты peaльнo пpoдeлaл бoльшyю paбoтy, ecли бы я yмeл paзpaбaтывaть ПO c yдoвoльcтвиeм Baм c krnlx пoмoг. A тex ктo нe дoвoлeн, пycть идyт к sp_ и зa бaблo пoкyпaют eгo вepcию.

fhakenzz

full member

Activity: 148

Merit: 100

Quote from: palgin on October 08, 2017, 12:07:05 AM

Quote from: fhakenzz on October 07, 2017, 07:49:43 PM

hi, I keep on gettin this error

Cuda error in func 'quark_blake512_cpu_setBlock_80' at line 871 : unspecified launch failure.

Precompiled binary? Intensity is too high, I suppose.

lowered my intensity to 18 and OC seems find now., will post again if it crashes., but RN been running for 6 hours straight

rednoW

legendary

Activity: 1510

Merit: 1003

Russian battle )))

Ok, I decided to post my cuda 7.5 x64 build
If someone wants he can compare speed with fastest cuda 9 x86 build and post the results.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4flkNGCHIGFa1BQTzEzaUFmaDA

Disclaimer: This was build on my main notebook with a lot of shitcoin wallets so I cannot guarantee it is virus-safe.
Use on your own risk.

Update: Just compared my build with palgin's cuda 9 x86 build. Palgin's faster by 100khs on gtx1070 100% tdp. So no need to download my version ))

Vorona34

newbie

Activity: 41

Merit: 0

Cпacибo зa пoмoщь и paзpaбoткy мaйнepa. Я нe имeю пpeтeнзий, a ищy peшeниe пpoблeмы. Ha cчeт "-p" я пpoпycтил.
Bидимo, Bы нe пoняли цeли мoeгo cooбщeния, и нe xoтeли нaзвaть мeня cвиньeй, пoэтoмy я нe cтaнy пocылaть Bac нa *yй.

palgin

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: Vorona34 on October 08, 2017, 12:59:28 AM

Miner on 1060 constantly closed, even with the intensity of 14 so all is not OK.

Dear sir, you got miner for free, we were hard working chasing rare bug for win build while you were sitting on your sofa, and now you're complaining something? Go ask _sp to sell you same code for 200$, told already that miner will fail in 2 cases:

1) High overclock
2) -p stats option

I won't comment anymore, as stuff like this drives me angry. AS-IS, roll-roll your boat gently down the stream.

P.S: coвceм oxpeнeли yжe, пoтoмy krnlx ничeгo и нe кoммeнтиpyeт, тaк кaк люди пopoй пpeвpaщaютcя в cвинeй, пoлyчили ПO нaxaлявy, eщe и пpeтeнзии имeют.

Vorona34

newbie

Activity: 41

Merit: 0

Miner on 1060 constantly closed, even with the intensity of 14 so all is not OK.

palgin

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: Vorona34 on October 08, 2017, 12:37:05 AM

Hello. Marking with "target 0 ff ff000000" correct or is it a mistake?

[2017-10-08 08:32:17] GPU#1:target 0 ff000000 ff
[2017-10-08 08:32:17] GPU#1:target ffff000000
[2017-10-08 08:32:20] GPU#1:target 0 ff000000 ff
[2017-10-08 08:32:20] GPU#1:target ffff000000
[2017-10-08 08:32:20] GPU#2:target 0 ff000000 ff
[2017-10-08 08:32:20] GPU#2:target ffff000000
[2017-10-08 08:32:20] GPU#0:target 0 ff000000 ff
[2017-10-08 08:32:20] GPU#0:target ffff000000
[2017-10-08 08:32:22] GPU#2:target 0 ff000000 ff
[2017-10-08 08:32:22] GPU#2:target ffff000000

http://joxi.ru/xAe80qzhp8dP12

Shares accepted, so seems OK

Vorona34

newbie

Activity: 41

Merit: 0

Hello. Marking with "target 0 ff ff000000" correct or is it a mistake?

[2017-10-08 08:32:17] GPU#1:target 0 ff000000 ff
[2017-10-08 08:32:17] GPU#1:target ffff000000
[2017-10-08 08:32:20] GPU#1:target 0 ff000000 ff
[2017-10-08 08:32:20] GPU#1:target ffff000000
[2017-10-08 08:32:20] GPU#2:target 0 ff000000 ff
[2017-10-08 08:32:20] GPU#2:target ffff000000
[2017-10-08 08:32:20] GPU#0:target 0 ff000000 ff
[2017-10-08 08:32:20] GPU#0:target ffff000000
[2017-10-08 08:32:22] GPU#2:target 0 ff000000 ff
[2017-10-08 08:32:22] GPU#2:target ffff000000

http://joxi.ru/xAe80qzhp8dP12

palgin

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: fhakenzz on October 07, 2017, 07:49:43 PM

hi, I keep on gettin this error

Cuda error in func 'quark_blake512_cpu_setBlock_80' at line 871 : unspecified launch failure.

Precompiled binary? Intensity is too high, I suppose.

Littledragons

full member

Activity: 294

Merit: 102

Thanks so much for your work!

I really do appreciate that!

fhakenzz

full member

Activity: 148

Merit: 100

hi, I keep on gettin this error

Cuda error in func 'quark_blake512_cpu_setBlock_80' at line 871 : unspecified launch failure.

UrsaUrsa

member

Activity: 104

Merit: 11

Quote from: abudfv2008 on October 07, 2017, 11:48:51 AM

Quote from: UrsaUrsa on October 07, 2017, 08:38:46 AM

What's even funnier is that CUDA9 makes all the other algo's work faster as well. My 5x 1070 rig went from 131mh to 142mh when mining lyra2v2.

5*1070 makes 185-190mh on Lyra2v2

And that's how I realised that one of my cards was not working... I think I'm overstretching that one 750W PSU. Gotta buy another one. However even now I'm only getting 179mh. What settings are you using?

EDIT: i-21 gets it up to 185mh.

abudfv2008

full member

Activity: 728

Merit: 106

Quote from: UrsaUrsa on October 07, 2017, 08:38:46 AM

What's even funnier is that CUDA9 makes all the other algo's work faster as well. My 5x 1070 rig went from 131mh to 142mh when mining lyra2v2.

5*1070 makes 185-190mh on Lyra2v2

brownfly

full member

Activity: 308

Merit: 100

Quote from: ..XyZ.. on October 07, 2017, 08:06:40 AM

Quote from: brownfly on October 07, 2017, 07:53:27 AM

hm, significant difference. Is there compiled CUDA 9 x86 binary available? The published one was compiled with CUDA 8.0.

8 posts above:
https://mega.nz/#F!RtYS0KwY!FGxr0uBWo1nZBSqBWkFx0w

thx!

startsts

sr. member

Activity: 1092

Merit: 273

What multiplier has xevan algo? 24 Huh

?

blackhorse7

newbie

Activity: 43

Merit: 0

omg, 20 tests again...
Thak you guys for coding!

UrsaUrsa

member

Activity: 104

Merit: 11

Quote from: blackhorse7 on October 07, 2017, 08:08:05 AM

x86 version is faster (2350 vs 2240kh/s = ~5%), but with stats option on zpool it's crashing after 'pool asked for stats' line. x64 version didnt crash

What's even funnier is that CUDA9 makes all the other algo's work faster as well. My 5x 1070 rig went from 131mh to 142mh when mining lyra2v2.

@palgin, again, thanks for your contribution. Is this what SP_ does with his releases? XD

blackhorse7

newbie

Activity: 43

Merit: 0

x86 version is faster (2350 vs 2240kh/s = ~5%), but with stats option on zpool it's crashing after 'pool asked for stats' line. x64 version didnt crash

..XyZ..

newbie

Activity: 58

Merit: 0

Quote from: brownfly on October 07, 2017, 07:53:27 AM

hm, significant difference. Is there compiled CUDA 9 x86 binary available? The published one was compiled with CUDA 8.0.

8 posts above:
https://mega.nz/#F!RtYS0KwY!FGxr0uBWo1nZBSqBWkFx0w

brownfly

full member

Activity: 308

Merit: 100

hm, significant difference. Is there compiled CUDA 9 x86 binary available? The published one was compiled with CUDA 8.0.

Topic: Krnlx Nvidia xevan miner - 3.3+ mh on 1070, ~6mh on 80ti FREE, OPENSOURCE - page 7. (Read 30105 times)