Krnlx Nvidia xevan miner - 3.3+ mh on 1070, ~6mh on 80ti FREE, OPENSOURCE - page 9.

Vorona34

newbie

Activity: 41

Merit: 0

Quote from: startsts on October 06, 2017, 12:56:07 PM

Maximum result that I could get, seems very profitable

GPU#0:MSI GTX 1060 3GB, 2178.23kH/s

Long works? I have a miner inevitably die after 1 minute or after 5 , depending on the intensity. Dropped to 14 could not wait for fall, but normal speed not seen )))

UrsaUrsa

member

Activity: 104

Merit: 11

Quote from: stzcze on October 06, 2017, 01:02:31 PM

Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 5243.33kH/s
Gigabyte GTX 1080, 3855.18kH/s

cuda 9 build x86

tdp 65 -i 21

cude 9 build x86 (thank god for windows defender...)

tdp 73 -i 21

5x 1070 @ 15.28Mh/s

stzcze

jr. member

Activity: 109

Merit: 1

Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 5243.33kH/s
Gigabyte GTX 1080, 3855.18kH/s

cuda 9 build x86

tdp 65 -i 21

brownfly

full member

Activity: 308

Merit: 100

anybody can tell me what I am doing wrong?
When I start the miner with altminer config like this:

Code:

ccminer_x86 -a xevan -o stratum+tcp://eu1.altminer.net:3739 -u Vo...Z -p c=VSX
Windows 10

it always gives me an error message:

Code:

[2017-10-06 13:59:06] Starting on stratum+tcp://eu1.altminer.net:3739
[2017-10-06 13:59:06] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-10-06 13:59:06] 6 miner threads started, using 'xevan' algorithm.
[2017-10-06 13:59:07] Stratum authentication failed
[2017-10-06 13:59:07] ...retry after 30 seconds

WTF??? coin code is correct, wallet address is correct, startum address is correct, so why it complains???

Vivik

full member

Activity: 197

Merit: 100

CUDA 9.0 x86 - 8x1070 28Mh

startsts

sr. member

Activity: 1092

Merit: 273

Maximum result that I could get, seems very profitable

GPU#0:MSI GTX 1060 3GB, 2178.23kH/s

UrsaUrsa

member

Activity: 104

Merit: 11

Quote from: palgin on October 06, 2017, 12:49:44 PM

Quote from: UrsaUrsa on October 06, 2017, 12:35:20 PM

Quote from: palgin on October 06, 2017, 10:15:50 AM

Quote from: Gaglam on October 06, 2017, 09:39:54 AM

where to find the 9.0 binary?

https://mega.nz/#F!RtYS0KwY!FGxr0uBWo1nZBSqBWkFx0w

CUDA 9 built project, feel free to test. Start with intensity 18.

So weird that the one on github does not get flagged up as a virus but this one does? (false positive, I know)

It's packed, so it gets flagged.

I'm obviously not questioning your integrity but found it a bit strange. Is the one github not packed? Have you introduced a fee by any chance? Thanks for your time.

palgin

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: UrsaUrsa on October 06, 2017, 12:35:20 PM

Quote from: palgin on October 06, 2017, 10:15:50 AM

Quote from: Gaglam on October 06, 2017, 09:39:54 AM

where to find the 9.0 binary?

https://mega.nz/#F!RtYS0KwY!FGxr0uBWo1nZBSqBWkFx0w

CUDA 9 built project, feel free to test. Start with intensity 18.

So weird that the one on github does not get flagged up as a virus but this one does? (false positive, I know)

It's packed, so it gets flagged.

stzcze

jr. member

Activity: 109

Merit: 1

Good job!!! Thx

1060 tdp 70 core +150 mem -500

13,66 6x1060 6gb -i 21

latest driver, x86 cuda 9 build, w10

UrsaUrsa

member

Activity: 104

Merit: 11

Quote from: palgin on October 06, 2017, 10:15:50 AM

Quote from: Gaglam on October 06, 2017, 09:39:54 AM

where to find the 9.0 binary?

https://mega.nz/#F!RtYS0KwY!FGxr0uBWo1nZBSqBWkFx0w

CUDA 9 built project, feel free to test. Start with intensity 18.

So weird that the one on github does not get flagged up as a virus but this one does? (false positive, I know)

car1999

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 100

Quote from: palgin on October 06, 2017, 10:52:24 AM

Quote from: car1999 on October 06, 2017, 10:28:32 AM

Quote from: palgin on October 06, 2017, 10:22:16 AM

Quote from: car1999 on October 06, 2017, 10:20:10 AM

can i build it against cuda9 and copy the binary to rigs with only cuda8 installed? does it run slower than cuda9 rig?

All you need is recent Nvidia driver with CUDA9 support, you won't need any toolkits installed.

Great, thanks. Does the CPU of build machine matter? I have G1840, g3900 ,g4560, e3 1231, which one is better to build the binary and copy to other rig with different CPU?

I use ubuntu 16, nvOC.

For *nix it will be a problem (running without reboot), if you already have recent drivers installed, you can ask someone to build binary for you and just update, but if you need to update driver or want to install toolkit and build from scratch - as I know you'll need to reboot at least 1 time. If access is only remote it's quite risky, especially regarding driver module update.

CPU matters, so if you want to build it for all variety of hardware you need to remove "-march=native" flag from configure.sh file.

P.S: I'm not so experienced in *nix, it's just what I remember

I checked the document of gcc, removing arch=native can lead performance losses, so I think build against the weakest g1840 is fine.

palgin

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: car1999 on October 06, 2017, 10:28:32 AM

Quote from: palgin on October 06, 2017, 10:22:16 AM

Quote from: car1999 on October 06, 2017, 10:20:10 AM

can i build it against cuda9 and copy the binary to rigs with only cuda8 installed? does it run slower than cuda9 rig?

All you need is recent Nvidia driver with CUDA9 support, you won't need any toolkits installed.

Great, thanks. Does the CPU of build machine matter? I have G1840, g3900 ,g4560, e3 1231, which one is better to build the binary and copy to other rig with different CPU?

I use ubuntu 16, nvOC.

For *nix it will be a problem (running without reboot), if you already have recent drivers installed, you can ask someone to build binary for you and just update, but if you need to update driver or want to install toolkit and build from scratch - as I know you'll need to reboot at least 1 time. If access is only remote it's quite risky, especially regarding driver module update.

CPU matters, so if you want to build it for all variety of hardware you need to remove "-march=native" flag from configure.sh file.

P.S: I'm not so experienced in *nix, it's just what I remember

car1999

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 100

Quote from: palgin on October 06, 2017, 10:22:16 AM

Quote from: car1999 on October 06, 2017, 10:20:10 AM

can i build it against cuda9 and copy the binary to rigs with only cuda8 installed? does it run slower than cuda9 rig?

All you need is recent Nvidia driver with CUDA9 support, you won't need any toolkits installed.

Great, thanks. Does the CPU of build machine matter? I have G1840, g3900 ,g4560, e3 1231, which one is better to build the binary and copy to other rig with different CPU?

I use ubuntu 16, nvOC.

Ryuh

full member

Activity: 282

Merit: 100

Finally miner for xevan, great job guys. Thank you for the hard work!

palgin

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: car1999 on October 06, 2017, 10:20:10 AM

can i build it against cuda9 and copy the binary to rigs with only cuda8 installed? does it run slower than cuda9 rig?

All you need is recent Nvidia driver with CUDA9 support, you won't need any toolkits installed.

Ooops, you use *nix or Win?

car1999

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 100

Quote from: palgin on October 06, 2017, 08:08:36 AM

Quote from: Vivik on October 06, 2017, 07:45:19 AM

Krnlx,
Under CUDA8.0 difficult to adapt?

You can build it with 7.5, 8.0 or 9.0 without any problem. Code is friendly to CUDA version bump. 9.0 is significantly faster than 8.0, didn't measure against 7.5.

can i build it against cuda9 and copy the binary to rigs with only cuda8 installed? does it run slower than cuda9 rig?
upgrading all my rigs from cuda8 to cuda9 isn't a trivial work, a rig is dead during the upgrade, it cannot boot.

abudfv2008

full member

Activity: 728

Merit: 106

ccminer_x86 looks faster
1060 6Gb ~2500
1070 ~3500
1080 ~4350

palgin

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: Gaglam on October 06, 2017, 09:39:54 AM

where to find the 9.0 binary?

https://mega.nz/#F!RtYS0KwY!FGxr0uBWo1nZBSqBWkFx0w

CUDA 9 built project, feel free to test. Start with intensity 18.

MarcusDe

hero member

Activity: 796

Merit: 505

Good work, I was waiting for this long time :-)

12MH on 6x 1060 3GB rig.

Problem is it's far less profitable mining bitsend than using that rig on nicehash :-/

Gaglam

sr. member

Activity: 390

Merit: 250

Quote from: ZenFr on October 06, 2017, 08:42:06 AM

Mining since yesterday night and Xevan pay not so much : just a little more than Dagger-Hashimoto in dual mode ith nVidia GPUs.
I'm a little disappointed
Otherwise, good devs work : the miner was runing all the night and no problem with differents GPUs.

thats the problem, i'm also back to ZEC Cheesy

but great miner anyway

Topic: Krnlx Nvidia xevan miner - 3.3+ mh on 1070, ~6mh on 80ti FREE, OPENSOURCE - page 9. (Read 30104 times)