Topic: KYC at end of bounty campaign - page 34. (Read 3299 times)
The requirement of the KYC from bounty-hunters is fair only when it is announced at the beginning of bounty, and not as a surprise - at the end. Serious ICO will not allow themselves to change initial conditions at the end of the bounty.
Some bounty managers will clearly state that kyc will be done at the end of bounty campaign. In that case, you're kindly advised before you jump into it. On the other hand, it will be unfair (though I've not come across such bounty) when the manager announces kyc at the end of the campaign. They should not expect all bounty hunters to have all the requirements for the kyc.
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
This is a fraud! Conducting KYC is a procedure that must be specified at the very beginning. If some party to the contract violates it already when it's done, then this is fraud!
Use of KYC isn't wrong, it for safety that nobody will deceive to have several accounts, but as the student
it is wrong, change the rules at the end of the bounty is just like they cheat all bounty participants or dont want to pay all bounty participants.
are you don't know the rules that minimum age to participate bounty is 18 years old. so if you are a student and under 18 and can not pass KYC it's your own fault.
This is not a problem, and I think it's good and fair too. If an requires a KYC there is usually a ban from certain countries to follow the campaign. of course KYC in need so that people from the country certainly not participate in the campaign.
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
Of course, this is not true. I think that this should be discussed in advance. At least it does not look good on their part and spoils the reputation. But on the other hand, these are the rules, and they write about it that they can change the rules in the middle of the company.
I aggree with you, its better that the admin clearly spell it out at the beginning of the bounty if there will be KYC...
I think it does not really matter to me, if the project is really good and we'll get good results I will not mind doing KYC
Most of the bounty lovers dislike this KYC process, because they don't know when KYC started and when finsihed? And i'm one of them! Actually i did not get three of bounties token, only because of missing KYC. The bounty manager did not send any email or mention it. It's all on me to check on their website for KYC which i did not like! I think this is the best way to cheat by did not sending tokens.
I know KYC is important now a days because of verification, but every bounty manager should mention it or mail it and also give some time, if we did not get KYC information at correct time!
I know KYC is important now a days because of verification, but every bounty manager should mention it or mail it and also give some time, if we did not get KYC information at correct time!
Use of KYC isn't wrong, it for safety that nobody will deceive to have several accounts, but as the student, we have problems with his use because some requirements for check, we actually have no which do us not to pay at the end of a campaign. We fight where to find the valid identity card, billing, business licenses and permissions. because we are dependent on our parents. KYC will be a big problem to us if each campaign demanded that
That thing is actually annoying. Sometimes, the KYC even gets rejected and all the effort you kept in that bounty becomes a waste. But sometimes it is also good to do KYC in order to track those who registered with numerous alt accounts.
The fact of KYC is not so annoying at the end of the bounty program. I'm ready for that. But when you've already worked for the campaign and find out as the fact that the hunters from your country are not eligable to get tokens , because your country is under sanctions or some other reason, it's a complete mess and fraud.
Before we enter in a bounty campaign we read all the rules and it should be said what are we going to do, so all must be there in the thread and I do not agreed if they change again the rules at the end of the campaign and asking for that KYC that has never been told before.
The most shitty thing that can happen is this. It is not clear what motivates them and why not to announce it at the very beginning that everyone would know what awaits them
I dont understand this KYC system too. It sucks. They will squeeze you to the last drop of your blood in providing the documents they want when they have not even announced it on their thread in the beginning. And if the participants refuse to give or not have enough proof to give why do they have to insist on asking. Anyway all that they ever wanted is for the security of the bounty participants but if they have nothing more to provide why insist? It is already at the expense of the bounty hunter and not in theirs.
It is not fair. No way. I lose trust to those projects which make us pass KYC procedure without any aviso. I also heard that Livestars make bountyhunters and investors pass KYC AFTER investors received tokens! This is was their fault , so they decided that hunters are obligated to pass it in order to receive reward, but in the same time investors have already received!
I prefer a bounty announcing her intentions of subjecting bounty participants to KYC before the beginning of the bounty, so that participants can be aware beforehand. So, whoever is pleased with it will participate and those who are not pleased with it will not bother to promote such project. Changing the rule at the end of the campaign is not fair enough.
i think KYCs for investor/customer to know who participated the ICO. not necesseary for bounty participant. also so annoyin bcz so many project develops decentralized platform then want to centralize their customer. its ironic for me.
in my opinion, kyc in a bounty campaign is annoying. but, on the other hand, most of bounties which requite it, are doing very good! I just started doing bounties some days ago, let's see what future holds
Im not sure if bounty hunters will join if they have announced it from the start,because hunters shouldnt be doing KYC as they are just working to get the tokens,not really part of the investment thing that is why we shouldnt be covered by the sec regulation.Our IDs might be used into something else or might be sold to the deepweb which is why it is risky to send our IDs to these people.
Jump to: