Topic: KYC at end of bounty campaign - page 35. (Read 3299 times)
I agree, it is not fair to tell the users after they have completed the work. The developers are well aware that KYC prevents a lot of users from participating so this can be a bit malicious
That is just bullshit,not all the hunters who will join such campaign has IDs or some passports to send,we all know if the campaign has announced it from the start there will be less people who will join the campaign,as most of the people are not going to risk their privacy for the sake of these tokens! which is risky as there are some incident that the ID was sold in the darkweb.
In one hand it is really irritating, but on another hand, they warned always, that they have a permission to change the rules of a company
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
before answering this question I like to make other question: "why nakamoto create BTC?" why people loved crypto? it is clear one of the main reason of people's attentions to crypto is for privacy. people do not like to share amount of their money. so, I think KYC is not reward the crypto currencies goals.
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
Kyc at the end of every campaign is really a bad call because the participants should not be involved to kyc due to that they are not investors of the ico's coin, i believe that most of the managers who ask for kyc are just trying to scam their participants.
This is the worst thing that organizers could come up with! It's not clear at all why they do it! I believe that KYC needs to pass only to large investors to prove the legitimacy of their investments !!!
It is very clear why they do it, to avoid paying people for their work.
But scams like that never last long.
I think that the KYC will not protect the company's bounty from the cartoons. this will only give more reason for the managers to speculate.
This is the worst thing that organizers could come up with! It's not clear at all why they do it! I believe that KYC needs to pass only to large investors to prove the legitimacy of their investments !!!
I don't see anything bad in doing KYC at the end of bounty campaign, though some may not request for it because we have different projects and different team.
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
If there is any KYC for bounty hunters, it should be announce at the beginning of the bounty not. At the end when everyone has finished the bounty expecting to receive token you now see KYC, that is nothing but scam to the hunters.
I think it isn't fair that ICOs ask bounty hunters to complete KYC at the end of the campaign. However, if this is made blatantly obvious at the outset, then I guess it's the ICOs prerogative to do so if they wish. Most ICOs know that this practice will severely limit the pool of potential applicants, as few people want to hand over their KYC details to potentially shady companies that might market their data, or possibly even be hacked.
KYC for bounty hunters is alegal and cause danger for people's personal information. Ask bounty manager before take part in bounty campaign.
It isn't fair to the bounty hunters community. And why all these change of terms happen is because bounty hunters don't have a common body and ground from which they respond to this projects terms. If bounty hunters can come together and speak up against all this, I believe bounty hunting will be treated more respectively.
Not just the KYC after bounty most times terms of payment change after bounty even when the project has met it's hardcap or payments never even comes at all.
Not just the KYC after bounty most times terms of payment change after bounty even when the project has met it's hardcap or payments never even comes at all.
Having kyc for bounty hunters is just really uncool and it's a way that teams empty to cut some bounty hunters away
I don't like those kind of bounty. Because it is a little bit stressful. I did one that I don't know that it require KYC. Up till now I haven't withdraw my token.. Since then I stay away from those kinds of bounties.
It all depends on the purpose for which KYC will be used. First of all, this should be used to exclude bots. But this can also be used to reduce bounty costs. Therefore, the tool itself is not bad, but the result depends on who will use it.
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
Not one normal person participating in the bounty will not like this change of conditions. But the rules of writing we do not, and the bounty Manager, and we not in forces of anything to do with it. Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
Ofc it is best to tell bounty hunters about KYC at the campaign start, and it's unfair to announce KYC at bounty end. However, the passage of KYC is not such a complicated procedure, and the ability to remove some of the bounties abusers
CBS is not a problem. Worst of all, when you are accepted in the table, you are charged with stacks, at the end of the company you will calculate the amount of tokens, but it turns out that one of the conditions does not fit ... and the tokens will not be translated to you))))
On the one hand-it helps to counteract fakes, bots, and multiaccounts. But on the other hand-it deprives people of anonymity, their data can be used for any purpose. I'm not a supporter of KYC.
Jump to: