Topic: KYC at end of bounty campaign - page 36. (Read 3299 times)
I am participating in different bounties for some time but now they are doing tricks and suddenly bringing at the end of bounty this is very bad from them if they want to these things they surely need to do at start of campaign because after this every one is doing with his own choice but suddenly at the end its setting never been accepted
KYC- Know Your Costumer
This is actually something. For those bounty hunters and investors, it is quite depressing. Why do you think these projects ask for KYCs? Some participants says, those projects implementing KYCs at the end are fraud which is what the ICO developers are also thinking the same. This is such a big problem for those participants who has a lot of accounts thinking where would they get some infos (valid IDs, passports, etc.) for the KYC of every accounts that they have. These ICO developers are just thinking that they don't wanna give away payments to those scammers. And FYI... KYC is already implemented in crypto a long time ago, its just that many ICOs are not really into it that's why most of them doesn't give too much attention.
This is actually something. For those bounty hunters and investors, it is quite depressing. Why do you think these projects ask for KYCs? Some participants says, those projects implementing KYCs at the end are fraud which is what the ICO developers are also thinking the same. This is such a big problem for those participants who has a lot of accounts thinking where would they get some infos (valid IDs, passports, etc.) for the KYC of every accounts that they have. These ICO developers are just thinking that they don't wanna give away payments to those scammers. And FYI... KYC is already implemented in crypto a long time ago, its just that many ICOs are not really into it that's why most of them doesn't give too much attention.
Hello, but still an interesting question, the process of confirming the identity is quite useful, since many bots are eliminated and the reward for the advertising company increases
I think this is pure fraud on the part of the ICO development team. If you understand, then they need to show us their data and copies of documents, not us. They pay us, but we do not pay them. Therefore, in accordance with the rules on money laundering, they should come to the KYC check, especially since there are no scammers on this forum, and among the ICO team, scammers meet, from different studies, from 31 to 81 percent.
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
If it was not stated in the original post of the bounty campaign announcement that a KYC is required, it is unfair of the project's team to add it after people have applied to and done the work. Many people don't like submitting personal documents and would avoid KYC's from the beginning.
some legal and self-regulated coins are asking for KYC at the end of campaign i still feel safe in submitting identity some are nt trusth worthy in submitting KYC
Some countries accept different laws about cryptocurrency during campaign. So at the end of a campaign it turns out that residents of some countries are not allowed to take part in icos. This is why sometimes there is a necessity to pass KYC at the end of bounty campaigns.
There are pros and cons in KYC,
We could see who is abusing the bounty,
But they cod also use our personal information.
We could see who is abusing the bounty,
But they cod also use our personal information.
There is a good effect also having a kyc in fairness because they want to determine if you have a multiple accounts, a lot of members here has a multiple accounts so to be fair with other members they implement this kyc.
I strongly agree with this opinion. the positive value of KYC can minimize multiple accounts. although a little complicated I think that's a good thingIt helps but mind you many people are using multi ids for passin KYC. I think strict KYC is too much, especially if they didn't indicate at first.
It's not fair at all. Kyc verification should have been announced before bounty begins so that bounty hunters will be aware and won't be able to say they were not told before.
I think, these days data safety is a major problem, so I don't want to participate in bounties that require KYC check at the end of bounty.
This is a very terrible situation when they begin to integrate KYC at the end of the program bounty, especially since bounty hunters do not treat customers in any way, because they do not invest, and therefore have nothing to do with the deal, hunters help spread the information about the project.
This is the most regrettable thing for bountyers like us. This shows that they do not value their marketing partners. They can either forget or not prepare and connect well with the project team or company. It is clearly an error of attachment and sometimes experience. But that really is a serious lack of responsibility. It is sometimes assumed to be false.
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
I think that you are absolutely right, and all the rules should be indicated at the beginning of the campaign! And this should not only concern KYC! I think that all the rules that were published at the beginning of the campaign should not be changeable! Now many unscrupulous administrators use the change of rules during the campaign in order to minimize payments!
In accordance with KYC stands very useful to know your customers,
However, the use of kyc for the bounty hunters in my opinion still has to be considered because kyc needs personal information from the bounty hunters and this makes the atmosphere uncomfortable for some bounty hunters
However, the use of kyc for the bounty hunters in my opinion still has to be considered because kyc needs personal information from the bounty hunters and this makes the atmosphere uncomfortable for some bounty hunters
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
I agree with you, the bounty should mention from the beginning that there will be KYC at the end of the campaign so that people who do not want to give out their information for bounty sake will not join the bounty in the first place. I don't really know the reason why KYC will be required from bounty hunters.
I consider this unfair! The same Cappa project most recently distinguished it. Because, many participants did not receive anything.
it's straight robbery, no question! if you have kyc needed for bounty you HAVE TO announce it before bounty program.
I don't trust any project that want kyc because crypto business is all about pseudonymous.
I don't trust any project that want kyc because crypto business is all about pseudonymous.
I understand that bounty managers prefer to have real hunters in their teams and not farmers or bots. They have to find ways to find out the cheaters ans KYC is one of them
BUT rules shouldn't be changed when a campaign is started and if there's no KYC at the beginning that's unfair to make it compulsory at the end of the campaign.
I agree with you, but unfortunately many projects change the conditions during the campaign, it's a pity that rarely anyone is punished for such behavior. BUT rules shouldn't be changed when a campaign is started and if there's no KYC at the beginning that's unfair to make it compulsory at the end of the campaign.
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
I think that the procedure for passing KYC is needed, namely to discourage the scammers from earning dishonest money. Now there are a lot of people in bonuses and many of them simply work with the help of bots or with several accounts, while the others study, read and are interested in projects. Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
Jump to: