Topic: KYC at end of bounty campaign - page 44. (Read 3299 times)
I think at the beginning of the bounty campaign the rules must include kyc at the end of the campaign not to include the rules at the end of the bounty campaign. Also I think the idea of the kyc at the end of the bounty is a good idea to check double registrations on the spreadsheet
Is this fair?
No,All rules of the campaign/ico must be announced before it begins
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
I know KYC is good especially for the participation of bounty program to avoid multi account.But the fact is you make lesser the participants and in fact this kind of participants is nicely in posting from forum activities. Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
This is nice topic and I think we should push this not to KYC for bounty hunters!Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
As of now bounty hunters are currently against in KYC because of not trusting the project just like "Cibus". Cibus is implementing the KYC to recieve the tokens and give 0.00001 eth to make the gas fee. That's cruel right. As of now. I don't know if what are they going to the users who pass the KYC some other projects are using that in fake profile for black market or in projects also.
So for KYC this is bad for community!
I do not find the credentials to get the bounty rewards of the credentials whatever it is. This is one of the most risky movements you can make. The project may come out of scam, other processes can be done using your credentials
Kyc at the end of bounty campaign is not that good I think, it should be included in the rules at once so the bounty hunters are informed already before they join the campaign. I have known few people that they cannot pass the kyc because they do not have valid documents required for kyc, if these people knew from the very beginning that the campaign does have kyc then of course they would not participate and their time and effort wouldn't get wasted. Personally I do not have problem with kyc at the end of the campaign as I have my valid and acceptable documents for it.
True, I have participated in a campaign that requires KYC before I can get my token. It had been months and until now, I cannot claim it because my documents are being rejected. If they will require KYC, they should have informed us in the beginning so we will not be disappointed in the end. Participants are paying hard work and doing their best to comply with requirements, I hope that your suggestion be implemented so people will not be having hard time thinking about KYC.
his is quite funny, first ask the the participants to make number of posts of good quality and at time of payment introducing silly requirements. Mmmebers here should run away from such projects in investment also.
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
I think this is fair, because this is to minimize the participants who have multiple accounts, and very good to do.
Kyc at the end of bounty campaign is not that good I think, it should be included in the rules at once so the bounty hunters are informed already before they join the campaign. I have known few people that they cannot pass the kyc because they do not have valid documents required for kyc, if these people knew from the very beginning that the campaign does have kyc then of course they would not participate and their time and effort wouldn't get wasted. Personally I do not have problem with kyc at the end of the campaign as I have my valid and acceptable documents for it.
I think KYC is no problem, if indeed it is done to facilitate payment orderly. the presence of KYC is also one of the bounty rules that must be met. if you don't follow the rules you will not get paid. if our data is safe yes why we don't follow the rules just to simplify the bounty payment process.
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
I'm those that support kyc for bounty campaign to reduce the number of multiple accounts but i do agree that if they want to implement kyc for bounty then they should do it at the start not after it finished because there's some people that want to remain anonymous and if they don't do the kyc their work will become useless. Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
KYC is good to identify the fake bounty hunters. But it should not be at the end of campaign. It should be at the start of campaign.
i am a bounty hunters too. i VERY AGREE using KYC (Know your Customer) as one of requirement to claim bounty rewards, as long as its state ON THE BEGINING OF CAMPAIGN. there are so many case, when someone doing their bounty tasks, works hard in 4-12 weeks straight promoting and attracting investor, but at the end, they didnt past KYC for some reason.
Appliying KYC at the end of bounty program is kinda like detering loyal participants to get their rewards.
Appliying KYC at the end of bounty program is kinda like detering loyal participants to get their rewards.
Maybe we should just accept it because soon it will be implemented it with almost of the upcoming bounties. Yeah it's really annoying to change rules at the last moment of bounty but we can't do anything about it, I mean we're just being paid to promote them and in exchange we should follow their rules. However, it's sad that being pseudonym will loss eventually.
if it's unfair to announce a KYC checkup at the end of the campaign, but if it's announced at the beginning I think there's no problem. because actually KYC only done to avoid cheater. I agree with you if you want to request to change the rules about explain KYC checks at the beginning of bounty made.
Of course that's not fair and that totally sucks.
There is no legal precedent anywhere that would call for kyc for bounty programs.
any ico or bounty programs that asks for kyc has a TERRIBLE LEGAL TEAM.
KYC is an anti money laundering measure and has nothing to do with SEC laws or regulations (which apply only to americans and american based companies btw).
To have it required for an ico is misinformed, to require it for bounties is absurd.
Try this, anytime an ico or bounty program asks for an ico, ask them to tell you the specific jurisdiction, law, and article they are adhering to.
They won't be able to answer or will give some vague answer.
In some cases they might give a specific quote but if a company in switzerland is citing american laws then they obviously don't know what they are doing.
Great and serious companies hire great and serious legal teams.
In the case of someone suddenly telling you kyc is needed for a bounty, call them out on it.
this forum is good at calling out scam icos and coins, but lags in calling out scam bounty programs.
This allows more and more companies to mistreat and use people for free marketing.
By documenting these scams and participating in the discussions, it can set a precedent for change.
There is no legal precedent anywhere that would call for kyc for bounty programs.
any ico or bounty programs that asks for kyc has a TERRIBLE LEGAL TEAM.
KYC is an anti money laundering measure and has nothing to do with SEC laws or regulations (which apply only to americans and american based companies btw).
To have it required for an ico is misinformed, to require it for bounties is absurd.
Try this, anytime an ico or bounty program asks for an ico, ask them to tell you the specific jurisdiction, law, and article they are adhering to.
They won't be able to answer or will give some vague answer.
In some cases they might give a specific quote but if a company in switzerland is citing american laws then they obviously don't know what they are doing.
Great and serious companies hire great and serious legal teams.
In the case of someone suddenly telling you kyc is needed for a bounty, call them out on it.
this forum is good at calling out scam icos and coins, but lags in calling out scam bounty programs.
This allows more and more companies to mistreat and use people for free marketing.
By documenting these scams and participating in the discussions, it can set a precedent for change.
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
In my opinion that is not fair. Because if we know that there will be a kyc at the end of the campaign. People who cant do kyc will not join right ? like me.
What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.
Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
Sometimes whether we like or not for changing the rules we still do nothing about it. Besides if ever that happen I know that in every problem there is a solution. Aside from that I don't see any problem with the KYC though it is much better if there is no KYC. Is this fair?
Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.
What do you think?
Well, so you did kyc just because you want to get the reward of your hard work so itssame happen to me.
If we are doing it so we are disqualified and our hard work so far is nothing. I prefer not to doing kyc but if its a must then i can not do anything. So we need the rule state here in the forum to forbidden kyc for bounty hunter.
as long as the project is clear and has a good price, I have no problem with KYC, but you are right that they have to announce it from the beginning of the campaign for transparency, I am very sure 50% of the participants will choose not to use it and leave it alone.
ICO Investors are required to complete the KYC for investing, but campaign participants are not mandatory because they only run pure marketing points and are not associated with the risk of misuse of investment and money laundering.
ICO Investors are required to complete the KYC for investing, but campaign participants are not mandatory because they only run pure marketing points and are not associated with the risk of misuse of investment and money laundering.
In my opinion it is good to have KYC to prevent the citizens on the prohibited participants in one particular country. However it it will be implemented at the end of the campaign I have also an opinion.
It can be for the good of others or it is just for the good of 1 or 2 or 3 persons to get some coins of the participants that did not do KYC.
That is my opinion.
It can be for the good of others or it is just for the good of 1 or 2 or 3 persons to get some coins of the participants that did not do KYC.
That is my opinion.
Jump to: