KYC at end of bounty campaign - page 46.

hotBriX001

jr. member

Activity: 224

Merit: 6

The revolutionary trading ecosystem

Quote from: mrcastelo on April 04, 2018, 07:52:06 AM

It is okey for me to have KYC for bounty campaigns to lessen fraud and multiple accounts registration but this is not good if it is announce almost a week before the ICO closes because its like the ICO does not want to pay its hunter. This kyc rule should be posted at the start of the campaign.

It is good to have KYC but its unfair for the bounty hunters if it is announce at the end of bounty campaign. Rules and regulations must be stated first by the ICO itself before starting, so that everybody are aware of it and not thinking FUD's until the end of the campaign.

philad220

newbie

Activity: 187

Merit: 0

Actually I've never participated in that kind of bounty, but normally all bounties I've seen requiring KYC will state it on their thread before the bounty campaign commence, then for those that change rules at the end of the bounty can be referred to as Fraudsters because it's not fair.

Vandemos

member

Activity: 280

Merit: 10

Quote from: clonedone on April 05, 2018, 07:43:24 AM

There are too many scam projects in ICO now. And what if one of these projects requires KYC from you at the beginning or at the end? Therefore I don't think that KYC is a good and necessary thing for bounty and cryptocurrency.

might be good if all bounty told to KYC,
now too many double accounts and maybe kyc will hinder it

clonedone

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 100

There are too many scam projects in ICO now. And what if one of these projects requires KYC from you at the beginning or at the end? Therefore I don't think that KYC is a good and necessary thing for bounty and cryptocurrency.

pinkpanther03

hero member

Activity: 1092

Merit: 501

Quote from: sebinator on April 04, 2018, 07:12:39 AM

What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.

Is this fair?

Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.

What do you think?

Sometimes whether we like or not for changing the rules we still do nothing about it. Besides if ever that happen I know that in every problem there is a solution. Aside from that I don't see any problem with the KYC though it is much better if there is no KYC.

jhenz20

jr. member

Activity: 321

Merit: 1

KYC is fine for me, the campaign managers have the right to change the rules anytime to ensure that the bounty hunters has no double account. KYC is a professional way to know who is the real people that has joined in the campaign. It is fair for all the bounty hunter. Before we join the bounty, we study thier project and we did not stop to support them so if the project required for KYC we should need to support it also.

ZAROBLYATOR

full member

Activity: 195

Merit: 100

I won’t trust projects and managers if they announce KYC in the end of bounty campaign. I won’t sell my ID for a thousand unknown tokens. In my opinion, managers must write about KYC in the beginning!

Also, cheaters can buy KYC data in darknet and pass all verifications. This procedure won’t stop cheaters.

demitazh

jr. member

Activity: 168

Merit: 1

BLOCKCHAIN BASED REIT

I also have difficulty if I have to verify KYC, because until now I do not have a passport. in my country make pasport very difficult. I hope for the future bounty no need KYC

loaddebitcard

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

Im fine with KYC but I also think that the developers have to provide us with the same information. We're investing huge sums of money into their business and we have to be sure they're real people

emberbekas

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1000

If for example I participate in a bounty program and in the end they require me to do KYC stuff, I will let it go. Simply put, I do not want to risk my data to strangers. Currently KYC looks like a must. So for me, I'd rather wait for tokens to hit an exchange, to buy some as an investment, if I see something promising from a project, instead of participating during the token sale.

subbotina

newbie

Activity: 25

Merit: 0

Quote from: sebinator on April 04, 2018, 07:12:39 AM

What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.

Is this fair?

Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.

What do you think?

This is not fair at all. All these conditions should be mentioned at the time of starting the campaign only. You should report such cases to moderators.

cheezcarls

hero member

Activity: 2282

Merit: 659

Looking for gigs

For me, I think KYC is a good thing. It is one way for us to verify if you are indeed a real person or not and to avoid multiple accounts as well. Like in Syncfab and Savedroid, after their bounty program, they have announced that we would undergo KYC procedure before distributing the tokens to our wallets. Just sayin’.

rosebit

jr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 1

To me i believe that one should not be afraid of KYC If you know that you dont have a multiple account there is nothing wrong with that but the ICO campaign must announce it before anything .this will save some peoples time from doing the ICO.Because not everybody want to do the KYC.

phelbaby

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 10

So campaigns have used KYC to screen out some of the participate that helped in spreading their ICO. Am not against any KYC but it will be nice it is will introduced at the beginning of the campaign before payment.

Piggy

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 1416

On the othe hand in the bounty thread they always state they can do what they want and change the rules. I mean, in the real world a contract like that would not even be legal.

Tux99

member

Activity: 238

Merit: 10

Quote from: boyshx on April 05, 2018, 01:31:49 AM

Quote from: sebinator on April 04, 2018, 07:12:39 AM

What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.

Is this fair?

Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.

What do you think?

I see it as good thing. At least this will run away people who are scammers and filling up the bounties with alts. This actually reduces the marketing and the advertising funds are distributed for nothing! Later in the time this affects the project severely and it can affect the prices of the tokens and coins. Also if they are accepting the KYC it means we do have proof of investment with us and thus these ICO projects wont be able to scam us as we can show legally that they took our KYC and we can track our transaction that way. This is what I am thinking about it I mean there could be different story behind this but these facts could be true as well and cant be ignored.

What side do you see kyc is good thing for bounty? If the reason is scammers then they can do something to hide them from the team. Its never affecting to project itself but it can impact to anonymous of our world and all people will know us.

SGToken

full member

Activity: 462

Merit: 100

Horses on a crossing do not change. ICO rules should be spelled out at the beginning and then should not change. This is my opinion. But maybe we don't know some details. Perhaps the ICO themselves are victims of government lawlessness. Coinbase was also forced to pass data about some users retroactively. People themselves to blame. A lot of people left by the user of this exchange now. Evil must always be punished.

bisdak40

hero member

Activity: 2072

Merit: 542

DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook

Quote from: sebinator on April 04, 2018, 07:12:39 AM

What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.

Is this fair?

Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.

What do you think?

This KYC thing for bounty hunters is one way of combating cheaters with apply multiple accounts in a single ICO campaign. For me i am in favor of that move if it would be announce at the start of bounty campaign because we have the option of joining or not the campaign.

Igorpap2

member

Activity: 238

Merit: 10

BAANX - https://baanx.com

I am positive about the KYC for the bounty of companies! I think this will reduce the number of multi-accounts and bots in the bounty!
But, the KYC should be at the end, when everyone is fairly sure that the project is not SCAM ... and payments will be made to the members of the bounty!

LazyBitInvestor

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 101

Your professional profile on the blockchain

Quote from: sebinator on April 04, 2018, 07:12:39 AM

What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.

Is this fair?

Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.

What do you think?

We don't have alternatives.
This requirement is especially annoying if it is said at the end of the bounty. Not everyone is ready to send photos of passports to strangers.

Topic: KYC at end of bounty campaign - page 46. (Read 3299 times)