Topic: KYC of bounty hunters - page 66. (Read 6981 times)
a good idea is to create a service for KYC. And already this service will give confirmation for ico, and you will not be considered a bot, but at the same time projects will not receive your data, they will receive only confirmation from the KYC project.
giving personal data in joining bounty i think its not safe. only Bounty Manager are required to send their kyc in ICO. so becareful in giving personal information. we are all here because of its anonymosity then why we need to submit kyc if were just a bounty hunter. except if you are investing on that ico ofcourse some are need kyc i order to accept paymnet.
a new rule imposed by a project and I think this will make it difficult for bounty campaign participants to join the project.
and to this very day I still do not understand clearly what the KYC rules mean.
if here anyone can explain in such detail what is the purpose of
stands for KYC and explains how to do it?
and to this very day I still do not understand clearly what the KYC rules mean.
if here anyone can explain in such detail what is the purpose of
stands for KYC and explains how to do it?
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I think that KYC is imposed as part of the cryptocurrency and investment regulation in some countries. I also think that with KYC, people who are using alternate account cannot participate in one campaign at a time because he/she will not be able to submit the requirements for the KYC.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I think there is no need KYC for bounty hunters, as they are promoting companies instead of investing real money. But, as i see more and more companies starting to create KYC forms.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
The question when it was announced. If from beginning - it's ok, I don't like it, but as least I have a choose to make decision join to or not. But when it was announced at the end, this is disgustingly.
This is great, avoiding the use of multiple accounts. There are some people using more than one account, that is a greed.
It's a real problem, because with the pretext of fighting money laundering, government tries to take control of crypto market.
In Satoshi vision, cryptocurrency is about freedom, not about control.
We'll see the evolution, but I don't like it.
In Satoshi vision, cryptocurrency is about freedom, not about control.
We'll see the evolution, but I don't like it.
KYC for bounty hunters is not needed... KYC only applies for investors because of the rules from the residing country of one investor..
I also have a very bad attitude about this KYC for bounty hunters. Because I do not see any need for this. After all, for KYC was created for investors, it is for mass verification that's why I do not understand why bounty hunters are needed there
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
That is no probelm as long as they pay all the work. I think i like this rule because we will only participate in legit project and real project. I dissapointed with ATS , Ats didn;t pay me they are suckers and now the tokens a worthless.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I think the only reason for requesting KYC is to prolong the duration of the transaction. Besides, confiscating the earnings of those who will not make KYC verification. I find it so absurd. They say they did it to prevent fraud. But those who are fraudulent may also be fraudulent for KYC.
The participants of this forum who join the signature campaign to promote a certain ICO project do not invest their money and this project, and therefore they can not be suspected of money laundering or other similar illegal actions. Therefore, it makes no sense to require from them data identifying their identity and especially copies of the relevant documents. Especially it looks strange in the sense that people are on this forum only under pseudonyms and have the right to confidentiality.
I see that members of the ICO team are using this opportunity with purely fraudulent goals. The requirement to provide additional data appears for some reason, not before joining the campaign, when each member of the forum can refuse such accession, and after the completion of the ICO, when the agreed work is already completed and the signatory campaign participants expect to pay the earned tokens. In this case, there is no choice for a signatory campaign participant who does not want to publish his data and provide copies of identity documents. They will in case of disagreement have to just abandon the earned tokens and this is what some companies are counting on. In this case, tokens are already counted and if someone does not claim them, they are simply assigned.
I see that members of the ICO team are using this opportunity with purely fraudulent goals. The requirement to provide additional data appears for some reason, not before joining the campaign, when each member of the forum can refuse such accession, and after the completion of the ICO, when the agreed work is already completed and the signatory campaign participants expect to pay the earned tokens. In this case, there is no choice for a signatory campaign participant who does not want to publish his data and provide copies of identity documents. They will in case of disagreement have to just abandon the earned tokens and this is what some companies are counting on. In this case, tokens are already counted and if someone does not claim them, they are simply assigned.
Totally agree with you! As a person can be suspected of something, if he did not invest a cent!
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
That is no probelm as long as they pay all the work. I think i like this rule because we will only participate in legit project and real project. I dissapointed with ATS , Ats didn;t pay me they are suckers and now the tokens a worthless.
For the survival of the crypto business world the KYC registration cannot be avoided by most ICOs. These requirements are necessary for the protection of the investors, that's what they say. I think the process is not optional to bounty hunters.
It's not a big problem, I think
It's not a big problem for most bounty campaigns participants but we can't deny that some participants aren't happy of exposing their identities into public because they don't want the public know their Crypto Assets as I do. As soon as possible you can keep your Assets with you and your family but not the public.
For me it's ok but companies should not expose our identities in order to protect ourselves from the bad guys.
I think that this is not the best solution. Now I already had to send my data to several companies.I do not know how dangerous it is
Well, it's your own opinion about on KYC procedure for token payout but for me I never seen any issues for this so for me each bounty campaign should ask or show first on their bounty campaign which participant's information that which are going to get because I don't think all participants are ok with that because we can't fully say that everyone is allowing their identity will be exposed on ICO companies because we are all taking care of our identities and protect our privacy and Crypto Assets to public.
It's not a big problem, I think
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I don't think I have a problem with that because I am a legal participant of every signature bounty campaigns.
Well, if they will do impose the said KYC (know your customer) will be required before payouts. And if it's part of their ICO regulation then so be it, for me I don't find any issues on this regulation process.
It's only criminals who afraid of KYC as part of ICO regulations.
I think that this is not the best solution. Now I already had to send my data to several companies.I do not know how dangerous it is
Jump to: